Manage Transaction To Avoid Locks

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,
I am quite puzzled how SQLServer manages transactions.
Whatever the isolation level I set when performing an insertion, other
connections do not have access to the table in select mode.

Example in SQL Analyzer:
create table foo (
id numeric(10),
data varchar(100)
)

On Connection 1
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
GO
BEGIN TRANSACTION
insert into foo(id,data) values (1,'data');

On Connection 2
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
select * from foo
-> QUERY HANGS

On Connection 1
COMMIT

On Connection 2
Get the result

Using READ COMMITTED level, I was expecting not to lock the table when
performing the select.

Thanks in advance for your help,
Cedric

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

How To Avoid Deadlocks Using Locks On Transactions

Sep 21, 2015

I'm a web developer. our system uses sql server 2012 since it was put in an environment production, what happened one year ago, but only now we are facing a disturbing problem. what happens it's that, when 30 users try to do the same operation in the database, we are getting deadlock status from the db in a few time. we did put this system in production one year ago and now we are facing this kind of problem.

We know that in other dbms using an optimistic lock solves the problem, but it's not our case, 'cause the users are not doing the same operation in a row.

We develop our system in java ee and our db is sql server 2012. These operations might be done on our api.

View 3 Replies View Related

Linked Server Transaction Locks...

Mar 9, 2007

Hey all,

I've been experiencing an issue related to linked server. Here is the scene:

- Application A queries View V located in SQL Server S1
- View V accesses Table T located in SQL Server S2 using a linked server

The problem is:
- Application A start the transaction and it simply gets locked. It throws no errors nor exceptions.

Important:
- S1 and S2 are in different machines
- When S1 = S2, then the application successfully access View V.

Any suggestions?

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Manage Stored Procedure Transaction Involving Update In Several Tables

Jul 22, 2004

I am running a vba procedure ( adp file ) that executes successively 5 stored procedures . however it happens that the execution breaks at the middle of the code thus giving a situation where only 2 tables among 5 are updated.

Is it any solution to rollback transactions update already done before
the code breaks due to error ?

I was thinking about combining all stored proc on a big one and use
Begin transaction - commit transaction and rollback transaction ... however i am not sure wheter updates involving several tables can be handled on one transaction.

Any advise highly appreciated !

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Manage Sql Server Transaction In Desktop Networking Application Vb.net2005?

Jun 10, 2006

hi





i want to know that how to manage the sql server transaction in a

big desktop networking application?





for example





there are 200 tables in

database. many of that tables have relatationship. i have a form in

frontend which holds nere ablut 50 tables deffrent calculated amount. i

want to ADD, EDIT and DELETE, SAVE(commit), CANCEL(roll back) them and

same time another use will do the same work from another pc. if there

are 100 user does the same work (add, edit, delete, save, cancel) how

could i magage my sql server data???





i also want to know that





1 kind of

proffessionsl way to use sql server and vb.net?

2 what kind of septs to

develop a desktop networking application with sql server?

3 how i could

manage the transaction in sql server when there are many-many user

working in the same database(add, edit, delete, save-commit,

cancel-rollback).<img src="images/emoticons/smile_baringteeth.gif">

View 1 Replies View Related

Question About Transaction Locks And Isolation Levels

Oct 27, 2005

Have the need for going to a table to get an identity value. This is for updating an existing database, blah blah blah. Here is the schema of the table we are using:CREATE TABLE [TableIdentityValue] ( [TableName] [varchar] (50) , [NextNegativeIdentity] [int] NOT NULL , [NextPositiveIdentity] [int] NOT NULL , CONSTRAINT [PK_TableIdentityValue] PRIMARY KEY  CLUSTERED  (  [TableName] )  ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY]GO
Now, depending on the type of data we are inserting into a table, we need to get either a negative or positive number for the PK. There are two sprocs that control the obtaining of those values:CREATE PROCEDURE GetNegativeIdentity @tableName varchar(50)AS DECLARE @nextNegativeIdentityValue int
 BEGIN TRANSACTION SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
 SET @nextNegativeIdentityValue =  (  SELECT NextNegativeIdentity  FROM TableIdentityValue WITH (ROWLOCK)  WHERE TableName = @tableName )
 UPDATE TableIdentityValue SET NextNegativeIdentity = @nextNegativeIdentityValue - 1 WHERE TableName = @tableName
 COMMIT TRANSACTION RETURN @nextNegativeIdentityValueGOCREATE PROCEDURE GetPositiveIdentity @tableName varchar(50)AS DECLARE @nextPositiveIdentityValue int
 BEGIN TRANSACTION SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
 SET @nextPositiveIdentityValue =  (  SELECT NextPositiveIdentity  FROM TableIdentityValue  WHERE TableName = @tableName )
 UPDATE TableIdentityValue SET NextPositiveIdentity = @nextPositiveIdentityValue + 1 WHERE TableName = @tableName
 COMMIT TRANSACTION RETURN @nextPositiveIdentityValueGOSo, the thing is, we need the read and update of the value from the specific TableIdentityValue row to be atomic - we don't want anyone else reading or modifying that data. The problem is knowing which level of isolation to use and/or locking, and how to implement that. I have tried a few different things that seemed to make sense, like placing a ROWLOCK on the SELECT statement, but is that lock going to hold for the entire length of the transaction? Also, I read that using some of the lock hints can be accomplished in the sense that some isolation levels are the same as some lock hints (e.g. setting isolation level to SERIALIZABLE "has the same effect as setting HOLDLOCK on all tables in all SELECT statements in a transaction" according to SQL Books Online.Any help is appreciated!

View 5 Replies View Related

How To Avoid A Growing Transaction Log

Mar 12, 2003

I have to admit, I'm usually using the MySql database, but in this particular case I have to use MSSQL 2000.

Over to my problem.

I'm building a web-based system (who isn't these days) in which the user types arbitrary information that is published when the user pushes the save button. Nothing new about that.

Here comes the tricky part, when the user wants to edit an existing item I copy all information in the database and sets the id of the 'edit-copy' to the negative value ( id 45 becomes id -45 for the edit-copy). This is also done on all items in other tables that is connected to the main item.

This way I get a copy that the user may edit without messing up the published information. When the user is done I either delete all the negative items (cancel) or delete the positive items and update the negative to become positive (save).

So far so good, allmost... my problem is that the transaction log grows tremendously.

Is there any other way to accomplish a safe edit that doesn't affect the transaction log as much as my current solution?

Could I be doing something wrong when updateing or deleteing my items?

View 1 Replies View Related

Long Transaction With Locks Is Blocking All Other Activity To Table

Oct 1, 2007

We have a web-based third-party application that has both background processes and user activity requests running in the same database (SQL Server 2005 SP2). The problem is that a background process will start a long-running transaction and hold an exclusive lock on a few rows in a given table (a small table, <100 rows). The web clients need to scan this same table, but when their "select *" statements get to those locked row(s), the web client queries stall waiting for that exclusive lock to be released. This effectively brings the entire web front end to a halt because all clients must hit this table for each user action. I realize that this is the classic lock condition that multiversioning databases like Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server Compact Edition, and other databases do not suffer because they don't use shared read locks like SQL Server. But since we're on SQL Server for this app, what is the way to get around this problem? Modifying the clients to use WITH (NOLOCK) is not an option... there will be major consistency issues unless the clients run in Read Committed or higher. Any ideas? We could tweak this app if needed. Does SQL Server 2008 introduce multiversioning or at least some mechanism to get around this problem? I did not see it mentioned on the Microsoft site, but maybe I missed it. Thanks in advance.


Austin

View 6 Replies View Related

Exclusives Locks With Transaction Isolation Level Readuncommitted

Mar 12, 2008

Hello,

I have some locks issues on production database (win 2k3 SP1, sql server 2k5).
In fact, I have an asynchronous process that makes SELECT TOP 1 in a table and UPDATE the selected row. The transaction isolation level for doing this action is READUNCOMMITTED.
The isolation level readuncommitted is ignored for the update if I'm not wrong.
On the other hand, I have some transactional activities with the isolation level read uncommitted too.

But when I control the database activity, I find very often locks between the asynchronous part and the transactional part. This is the transactional activity that is locking the asynchronous activity.
The transactional activity is a simple SELECT and this type of query, in spite of the isolation level readuncommitted, makes exclusives locks when the asynchronous makes LCK_M_U.

I tried to modify the strored procedure for the SELECT/UPDATE of the asynchronous process with a "UPDATE my_table ... FROM my_table" query in order to reduce the transaction time. But the problem is always present.

Can someone help me to understand how a select query with the isolation level readuncommtted can make exclusives locks ?

Thanks in advance.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Row Locks Not Escalating To Table Locks After 5000

Jul 16, 2015

I've got an INSERT that's selecting data from a linked server and attempting to push 10 million rows into the blank table. More or less, it looks like this:

insert into ReceivingTable (
Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4
, Field5, Field6, Field7, Field8
, Field9, Field10, Field11, Field12
, Field13, Field14, Field15

[code]...

The instance of the SQL Server Database Engine cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users. Ask the database administrator to check the lock and memory configuration for this instance, or to check for long-running transactions. There are no other active users. I ran it again and monitored the following DMO to watch the growth of locks for that spid:

SELECT request_session_id, COUNT (*) num_locks
-- select *
FROM sys.dm_tran_locks
--where request_session_id = 77
GROUP BY request_session_id
ORDER BY count (*) DESC

The number of locks started small and held for a while around 4-7 locks, but at about 5 minutes in the number of locks held by that spid grew dramatically to more than 8 million before finally erroring again with the same message. Researching, I can't figure out why it's not escalating from row locks to table locks at the appropriate threshold. The threshold in was set to 0 at first (Server Properties > Advanced > Parallelism > Locks). I set it to 5000, and it still didn't seem to work. Rewriting the INSERT to include a WITH (TABLOCK) allows it to finish successfully in testing. My problem is that it's coming out of an ETL with source code that I can't edit. I need to figure out how to force it to escalate to locking the entire table via table or server level settings.

A colleague suggested that installing service packs may take care of it (the client is running SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM)), but I haven't found anything online to support that theory.

View 9 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: How To List All Locks (including NON-BLOCKING Locks)

Aug 5, 2015

We are migrating our database(s) from ORACLE to SQL. In Oracle we were able to issue a SELECT statement and see all of the locks (Blocking and Non-Blocking) currently in the system.  The query also included the Process ID of the process we needed to kill in order to get rid of the lock.

We now need to create the same type of query for Microsoft SQL Server 2012. I have seen postings on different sites saying that this info can be obtained using SP_WHO2 or using the SQL Server Management Studio Activity Monitor's PROCESSES tab, but we are looking for a SELECT statement that will give us similar information.

View 7 Replies View Related

Error 8525: Distributed Transaction Completed. Either Enlist This Session In A New Transaction Or The NULL Transaction.

May 31, 2008

Hi All

I'm getting this when executing the code below. Going from W2K/SQL2k SP4 to XP/SQL2k SP4 over a dial-up link.

If I take away the begin tran and commit it works, but of course, if one statement fails I want a rollback. I'm executing this from a Delphi app, but I get the same from Qry Analyser.

I've tried both with and without the Set XACT . . ., and also tried with Set Implicit_Transactions off.

set XACT_ABORT ON
Begin distributed Tran
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.TRANSACTIONMAIN
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1 and DONE = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.WBENTRY
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.WBENTRY
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.FIXED
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.FIXED
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.ALTCHARGE
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=10.10.10.171;User ID=*****;Password=****').TRANSFERSTN.TSADMIN.TSAUDIT
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
update TSADMIN.TSAUDIT
set REPFLAG = 0 where REPFLAG = 1
COMMIT TRAN


It's got me stumped, so any ideas gratefully received.Thx

View 1 Replies View Related

SSIS, Distributed Transaction Completed. Either Enlist This Session In A New Transaction Or The NULL Transaction.

Feb 22, 2007

I have a design a SSIS Package for ETL Process. In my package i have to read the data from the tables and then insert into the another table of same structure.

for reading the data i have write the Dynamic TSQL based on some condition and based on that it is using 25 different function to populate the data into different 25 column. Tsql returning correct data and is working fine in Enterprise manager. But in my SSIS package it show me time out ERROR.

I have increase and decrease the time to catch the error but it is still there i have tried to set 0 for commandout Properties.

if i'm using the 0 for commandtime out then i'm getting the Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.

and

Failed to open a fastload rowset for "[dbo].[P@@#$%$%%%]". Check that the object exists in the database.

Please help me it's very urgent.

View 3 Replies View Related

Distributed Transaction Completed. Either Enlist This Session In A New Transaction Or The NULL Transaction.

Feb 6, 2007

I am getting this error  :Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new
transaction or the NULL transaction. Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web
request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and
where it originated in the code. Exception Details:
System.Data.OleDb.OleDbException: Distributed transaction completed. Either
enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.have anybody idea?!

View 1 Replies View Related

Distributed Transaction Completed. Either Enlist This Session In A New Transaction Or The NULL Transaction.

Dec 22, 2006

i have a sequence container in my my sequence container i have a script task for drop the existing tables. This seq. container connected to another seq. container. all these are in for each loop container when i run the package it's work fine for 1st looop but it gives me error for second execution.

Message is like this:

Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.

View 8 Replies View Related

Distributed Transaction Completed. Either Enlist This Session In A New Transaction Or The NULL Transaction. (HELP)

Jan 8, 2008

Hi,

i am getting this error "Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.".

my transations have been done using LINKED SERVER. when i manually call the store procedure from Server 1 it works but when i call it through Service broker it dosen't work and gives me this error.



Thanks in advance.


View 2 Replies View Related

Manage SQL Express Over Lan

Oct 27, 2006

Hey EveryoneI have a desktop machine and a laptop machine.  Both have XP Pro.  I prefer to code on my laptop, but I want to use my desktop machine as a home server/development environment because its always on.  I have IIS (HTTP and FTP), .NET 2.0, my mp3 server, etc up and running just fine on my desktop.When I'm working on an application, I access the site with VWD through a network share.  It's worked great so far.  What I haven't been able to do, however, is connect to the database with VWD or Management Studio Express.  I don't even really know where to begin with this one.  What I don't want to do is open this up to the internet.  I'd like to just keep it accessible from the LAN (the database, not the website)I'm new to database stuff, and I don't really know where to look to figure out how to do this.  Basically, I want to have the same functionality with VWD or Management Studio that I would have if I was physically on the machine with the SQL Express server.If anyone can provide some advice, I'd really appreciate it.Thanks!Brandon 

View 6 Replies View Related

Manage Data

Apr 14, 2008

Hello,I am working on an ASP.NET web site using an SQL database. Is there a way to Insert/Delete and Update data in the database without creating all the forms in ASP.NET?Since I am the only person to work with the database it would be easier for me than creating all ASP.NET forms.Thanks,Miguel

View 1 Replies View Related

How Do You Manage Your Remote MS SQL?

May 28, 2007

How do you manage your remote MS SQL?

I have worked with mysql for sometimes now and everywhere there was a mysql there was phpmyadmin for managing it but now on my new windows hosting with plesk I don't see such program. The only thing I see is a pothetic program called ASP.NET enterprise manager that doesn't allow uploading data.

.

View 3 Replies View Related

Remote Manage

Jun 11, 2004

Before I just manage the SQL serve in LAN.

Right now i have a SQL server on internet I want to Remote manage

Can I still use QA and Enterprise Manager ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Manage Data

Apr 14, 2008

Hello,

I am working on an ASP.NET web site using an SQL database.

Is there a way to Insert/Delete and Update data in the database without creating all the forms in ASP.NET?

Since I am the only person to work with the database it would be easier for me than creating all ASP.NET forms.

Thanks,
Miguel

View 2 Replies View Related

How Do I Manage 100.000 Actions A Day ?

Mar 27, 2008

In a previous application i stored about 100.000 actions ( coming from an external system )in an access database for each day. Therefore i created everyday a new accessdatabase to have enough performance. Each month i copied automatically all databases in a new 'month' map as a backup.

The goal of the application is the view all actions of one day of week in one grid. This is a kind of history of the external system.

I'm afraid the application will become to slow if i save all actions in one database. ( after 1 month i will have 3.000.000 actions.

How this is done in an sql server ?
Do i have to use a different kind of method ?

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Manage 16 Bit Number

Jul 3, 2006



is there any datatye that can accept 16 digit number

View 4 Replies View Related

How Do I Manage This Mess? Thanks!

May 24, 2007

Say for example I have the following 2 database tables, the first one contains the old employee data, and has the fields shown below:
oldEmployeeID
FirstName
LastName
DateOfBirth
HiringDate
TerminationDate
and another one containing the new employee data with similar fields but instead of oldEmployeeID, it is showing the newEmployeeID.
During the conversion process, something were messed up and instead of putting in the original hiring date of the workers into the new employee database, the conversion date was put in, which, depending on the mood of HR ladies, could be any date, and at the same time, of course, new employee join the company, and we assume their hiring dates were entered correctly. On top of that, there are some employee who were terminated before the conversion took place but we still need to keep a record of that.
And I created a third table, say, emplyeeAll with similar fields to the employee data tables.
So here is what I need to do: if the firstName, lastName and DateOfBirth in the old employee data table and the new employee data table matches, I would assume they are the same employee, hence I would put the information for the employee obtained from the new employee data table to the employeeAll table, with the Hiring Date changed to the Hiring Date of the old employee data table (and do not copy the record from the old employee table to prevent duplicates), otherwise, I would simply copy and paste the data in new and old employee table to my employeeAll table.
I know this is really confusing, but...well...hope you know what I am saying...
Is it possible to have a SQL statement for all these? If so, how should the statement looks like?

Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Anyi

View 6 Replies View Related

Manage Ssce 3.5

Aug 5, 2007

I have been having "fun" trying to get all the bits (SSCE 3.5, Orcas Beta 2, SQL Managment Studio) in Vista 64 and Xp 32.

So far I have found at the SQLMetal does work with SSCE 3.5 but not in Vista64

BUT I cannot get any tool (tried SQL and SLQ express) to manage my SSCE db - ie make relationshipos so that SQLMatal can do its stuff


Any advice as to which tool to use to manage SSCE 3.5


Thanks

Mike

View 5 Replies View Related

Manage Sql Table

Mar 18, 2008

create

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Manage A DTS Package Usin Asp.net

May 18, 2007

Hi
How i can manage a DTS Package usin Asp.net

View 1 Replies View Related

Manage Indexes In Sql 2005

Jun 5, 2007

Hi,
I'm currently migrating to Sql 2005 from 2000 and have a quick question about indexes.
In 2000 i used to click on Table > All Tasks > Manage Indexes... to view and create all my table indexes. There doesn't seem to be anything similar in 2005 Management Studio. I thought it was under Table > Modify but there's nothing there for indexes. I've had to create all my indexes manually through t-sql but this doesn't help when needing to view and manage current indexes.
Can anyone help me on this?

View 2 Replies View Related

Manage A SqlDataSource In Code Behind (VB.Net)

Dec 30, 2007

Hi All
 It´s my DropDownList data source from my page1.aspx:
<asp:DropDownList ID="ddlChampionships" runat="server" DataSourceID="sdsSearchChampionships" DataTextField="name" DataValueField="id_championship">     </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="sdsSearchChampionships" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:LocalSqlServer %>"
ProviderName="System.Data.SqlClient" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Tupi_Campeonatos]"></asp:SqlDataSource>
When I put a new championship name in a TextBox and click on the button "ADD", this button event click is called:
 Protected Sub btAddChampionship_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btAddChampionship.Click
     insertNewChampionshipIntoDataBase()
End Sub
The Page then reloads but my DropDownList is not updated. The way I found to do it is to put the DDList update code after the calling of the insertNewChampionshipIntoDataBase() method, but how???
thnx

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Manage Sql Server 2005

Jul 25, 2005

What admin tool do I use to create databases, stored procedures, etc in the Sql Server 2005 CTP?

View 9 Replies View Related

Manage Permissions Script

Jan 4, 2006

How can I create a script that will set all the permissions for a specific user for some objects in a database?
Thx in advance.

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Manage Multilingual Data

Apr 12, 2008

Hi Fellas,

I have a problem and it is described as follows:

1. The user may browse any website on the internet that may be in any language and enter the data into my application.
2. The data entered can be in English or any other language.
3. That’s were the problem arises; the data that enters the database other than English is displayed in wrong format like small boxes.
4. The user who had previously entered the data in the database can also alter that data. So when I display the data (other than English) to him it is not in the format in which the user had entered.

So can anybody help me out how to manage multilingual data?

View 2 Replies View Related

What Permissions Do I Need To Manage Users?

May 23, 2006

I have a user that I have granted the server role "securityadministrator" and a database role "db_securityadmin". When logged inas this user I can create new logins but not run sp_adduser to add thenew login to as this says I don't have permission to do this. I canhowever run sp_revokedbaccess to get rid of a user from the database.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved