Memory Limits Sql 2000 Entp On Win2003 Entp

Apr 27, 2006

AM I correct that with a quad box running sql server 2000 enterprise edition running on windows 2003 enterprise edition, I can put 32 gig of memory which sql server can use. Need response ASAP, Thanks

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2000 On Windows 2003 Memory Limits

Mar 11, 2004

Can anyone confirm that SQL 2000 Standard Edition is still limited to 2GB of memory utilization on Windows 2003 Server?

In addition, anyone have suggestions for deploying SQL 2000 on Windows 2003?

TIA

View 1 Replies View Related

Win2003 / Sql2000 Memory Usage

Jun 20, 2007

I have googled by heart out trying to find answers to this and am onlymore confused.DB Server:Windows Server 2003 Enterprise4 GB memorySQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition, SP4 8.00.2039The SQL server process appears to be using a steady 1.7 gb of memory.There are no other memory intensive applications running on thisserver as reported by Task Manager.I have read all about the 2gb/process limit and the /3gb boot switchand all but most of that seems to apply to windows 2000, not 2003. I'dlike SQLServer to use more of the memory if it can (assuming it wouldbe advantageous for performance).Can anyone sum this up for me?Thanks,Michael

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Express Memory Limits

Jun 26, 2007

Hi everybody,

I know that SQL2005 Express has 1 GB memory limitation.



Well, if my server has 2 GB RAM and I have other applications (without memory constraints) how does this relate to the SQL constraints ?



Can I still run SQL2005 Express if other applications exaust only 1 GigaByte of memory ?



Thank you in advance.



Pierluigi

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Server Does Not Start In A Win2003 Cluster

Nov 5, 2007

We have a sql2000 clustered server running on a windows 2003 cluster, today we noticed that the
SQL resources where in a Online Pending state and do not came up anymore.

I have searched the net and found some info about the sqlstate = 08001 Native error 11 , witch indicated that the SQL Network name could have been renamed , however this is not the case here , .
i also found that there might be Resolve issue but The Cluster Name and the SQL Network name can be resolved by both Cluster nodes ..

does anyone here got experience with this kind of problem ? Pls Help

Here is a part of the cluster.log with the errors :

ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 2; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 2; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
INFO [CP] CppRegNotifyThread checkpointing key SOFTWAREMicrosoftMicrosoft SQL ServerDBHSBMSSQLSERVER to id 4 due to timer
INFO [Qfs] QfsGetTempFileName C:DOCUME~1SRVCCL~1LOCALS~1Temp, CLS, 13 => C:DOCUME~1SRVCCL~1LOCALS~1TempCLSD.tmp, status 0

According to the SQL server log the server is started and all databases are brought on-line then a stop request from Service Control Manager terminates SQL Server see log below:

2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86)
May 3 2005 23:18:38
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: )

2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Copyright (C) 1988-2002 Microsoft Corporation.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server All rights reserved.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Server Process ID is 3264.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Logging SQL Server messages in file 'P:mssqlMSSQL$DBHSBlogERRORLOG'.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server SQL Server is starting at priority class 'high'(2 CPUs detected).
2007-11-05 14:04:03.61 server initdata: Warning: Could not set working set size to 823168 KB.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.66 server SQL Server configured for thread mode processing.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.72 server Using dynamic lock allocation. [2500] Lock Blocks, [5000] Lock Owner Blocks.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.77 server Attempting to initialize Distributed Transaction Coordinator.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.32 spid2 Starting up database 'master'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid2 Server name is 'HSBSQL01DBHSB'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid5 Starting up database 'msdb'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid6 Starting up database 'model'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid8 Starting up database 'dbHSB'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 server Using 'SSNETLIB.DLL' version '8.0.2039'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.56 server SQL server listening on 10.122.131.103: 1433.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.62 spid8 Analysis of database 'dbHSB' (7) is 100% complete (approximately 0 more seconds)
2007-11-05 14:04:06.63 server SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.63 server SQL Server is ready for client connections
2007-11-05 14:04:06.66 spid6 Clearing tempdb database.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.10 spid6 Starting up database 'tempdb'.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.20 spid2 Recovery complete.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.20 spid2 SQL global counter collection task is created.
2007-11-05 14:04:16.41 spid1 Warning: unable to allocate 'min server memory' of 1658MB.
2007-11-05 14:10:45.18 spid2 SQL Server is terminating due to 'stop' request from Service Control Manager.

View 2 Replies View Related

Limits In SQL 2000

Jul 12, 2006

I have a database with 10,000 records and I want to just see record1000 - 1025 is there an easy way to do this with a query. I have foundinfo for my SQL using limits but it does not work with SQL Server 2000.Please help.Thanks in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Limits

May 15, 2001

Im curious about how much data SQL Server 2000 can handle. Where does SQL Server stand today comparing to Oracle? It would be interesting to hear views and experiences from people here on swynk on SQL Server 2000. How big are the biggest tables, how many rows and speed etc. When is it time to consider using Oracle, if ever, instead of SQL Server 2000?

Regards,

S

View 2 Replies View Related

Concatenation Limits In SQL Server 2000?

Dec 6, 2005

Is there a limit to how much text you can concatenate (other than datatype limits, of course)? For example, if you write:SELECT 'This is some text from: ' + Convert(char(15), SomeFieldName01)+ 'some more text' + Convert(char(25), SomeFieldName02) + 'yet moretext.' As BigNoteFROM TableIs there a limit on how much you can concatenate into that big notefield, meaning is there a limit other than the size of the data type?

View 4 Replies View Related

Has Sql Server 2000 Personal Edition Any User Limits?

Jan 7, 2008


I have installed Sql Server 2000 Personal Edition (Version: 8.00.2039 SP4 Personal Edition), it runs over Windows XP.
Has Sql Server 2000 Personal Edition any user limits?
Thanks for reply
Ariel

View 6 Replies View Related

Sql Server 2000 Using Less Memory After More Memory Added

Aug 22, 2007

sql server 2000 is running on windows server 2003 ... 4gb of memory on server .... 2003 was allocated 2.3gb nd sql server was allocated (and using all of it) 1.6gb for total of approx 4gb based on idera monitor software ... all memory allocated betweeen the OS and sql server .... then 4 more gb of memory added for total now of 8g ... now idera monitor shows 1.7gb for OS and 1.0 gb for sql server ..... 'system' info shows 8gb memory with PAE ... so I assume that the full 8gb can now be addressed .... why are less resources being used now with more total memory .... especially sql server ..... i thought about specifying a minimum memmry for sql server but i amnot convinced that would even work since it seems that this 1gb limit is artificial .... it it used 1.6 gb before why would it not use at least that much now ??

thank you

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Memory Adjust

Oct 3, 2007

Does anyone know how or where to adjust Ram Memory usage for SQL 2000.
      I've just added Changed the 512 MB Ram that came with the Server and Exchanged it with 4 GIG Ram . Is it a good Idea to allow only 2GiG for SQL . I 've heard that SQL will take/use all Ram that you install if you let. If this is true
Can anyone advise on how/where to make adjustments. Thank You...

View 2 Replies View Related

Configuration Of Memory For SQL 2000

Apr 16, 2003

I am looking for recommandations regarding the memory distribution for SQL 2000 server. In the memory tab of the server properties you can define use a fixed memory size or dynamically configure SQL server or even reserve physical memory for SQL server.
Are there any hints available or must it be handled according trial and error?

Thanks for any info

mipo

View 2 Replies View Related

Memory In Sqlserver 2000

Aug 16, 2004

Running sqlserver 2000 on a w2k server with 1gb of memory. After a reboot the memory usage is around 500m but quickly climbs. At 1 point it was up to 1.5gb so it must have been swapping. Are there any good docs about this or any recommendations on how to limit sqlserver from using all the memory. It is the only application on the server so it isn't affecting anything else so maybe it isn't a problem. I just wanted to get people's inpit on this.

View 2 Replies View Related

Memory Upgrade And SQL 2000

May 3, 2004

We have a SQL server that has a failover cluster on our network. We are looking to updrade the memory by adding a couple gigs of ram.

We don't need to upgrade the failover cluster to have the exact amount of memory as the primary do we?

DotNetJunkie

View 3 Replies View Related

Memory Allocation In SQL 2000

Sep 13, 2007

I would like to ask regarding the memory allocation fo SQL Server 2000. For example if my Data Server have 8GB physical memory installed how much memory can SQL Server 2000 utilize? Based on my research and understing SQL 2000 Server can only utilize 3GB memory? But using the AWE you can set the memory to a maximum server memory?

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 SP4 EE 32 Bit - SQL Is Not Using All Of The Memory Allocated To It.

May 17, 2007

I recently changed the max. memory option in SQL from 24 GB to 30GB but the perfmon counters still only show 24 GB. Any ideas on why it is not recognizing the change? The server has Win 2003 EE and 32 GB of RAM.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Std Memory

Feb 12, 2007

I have SQL Server 2000 STD installed on a Windows Server 2003 STD machine. It's essentially the only app on this box. I have 4GB of RAM installed. SQL is configured to dynamically allocate memory. I run a batch file daily to restart the SQL services as SQL does not seem to release memory once it's got it. I don't think this is a problem because, like I said, it's basically the only app. But I want to make sure my OS memory settings and SQL's memory settings are optimized. Will adding the /3gb switch to the boot.ini file make a difference? Also, can someone educate me a little on PAE and AWE?
Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Memory Issues

Aug 23, 2007

Every day or two I have to restart my SQL Server because users are receiving timeouts and very slow page loads.  My mem usage in Task Manager show that SQL Server is at 1,200,000k compared to 400,000k when I restart it.  Performance Monitor also shows that Buffer Manager/Target Pages and Total pages are maxed out.  Any advice?  Thanks!
 
 

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 And Memory Consumption

Sep 14, 2005

Hello!


We have a SQL Server 2000 that has been working nice
without any issues. Lately we noticed the fact that the amount of memory that
it is using has increased and once it took down the web server as the total
amount of memory used was 2G. Due to this fact I have set Memory Max to 500MB.
Now as I look in Task Manager the Memory usage is at 530396k which is 518MB.
Any reason why would it exceed the 500MB?

What we did before was to stop the SQL Server and restart it, and it takes about
2 days until it gets back to +500MB.

What can I do to stop this behavior?

Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Memory Issues

Jun 13, 2006

Dear All,

We have a Windows 2003 Enterprise server with SQL Server 2000 Enterprise on it. This has the AWE settings for 'max memory setting' to 5120MB. This server has 6GB of memory, or rather about 5.8GB due to PAE. From yesterday morning the server has become almost unresponsive when the SQL service is running, and pretty much all the memory, ie < 1MB on average is listed as being free.

The database has been growing constantly and is now 46GB, with database file size of 67GB.

We moved the database onto a new box which was being prepared for another service, and this has 8GB or ram and no AWE settings. It is running fantastic.

We are going to rebuild the original box and the SAN structure, but I want to do some fiddling before we do. I was going to set awe-enabled to 0 to see if that setting was allowing the OS to have no memory, but from reading http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2000/maintain/failclus.mspx it says If AWE is enabled and is taking too much memory, SQL Server must be shut down to reconfigure it, causing downtime (which makes a high availability option such as failover clustering less available). Because the memory pages used by the instance of SQL Server are taken from the nonpageable pool of Windows memory, none of the memory can be exchanged. This means that if the physical memory is filled up, SQL Server cannot use the page file set up on a physical disk to account for the surplus in memory usage. How do you reconfigure AWE settings if the SQL service is shutdown?

Also, how can I figure out whether the server is deficient in physical RAM, or it is just a 'max memory' setting we need to tweak, or is it just trial and error?

Incase it might help, we have ~3 meaningful DB's on the server apart from 'master'. One is an archive DB ~80GB, one is ~5MB and the live DB which is the size mentioned above. Unfortunately I don't know table sizes.

Pax

View 3 Replies View Related

MSSQL 2000 SP4 Memory Leak

Oct 5, 2005

Greetings all!

On one of our intranet SQL servers running under Windows 2000 SP 3,
MSsql 2000 SP4 seems to gradually "eat" away all available memory (with no obvious reason for it) until a certain limit is reached, forcing the server to slow down substantially since the OS has to SWAP continuously.

I would appreciate any suggestions at this point on how to tackle this problem :)

Thank you!
VincentJS

View 2 Replies View Related

MSSQL 2000 Memory Leaks

May 16, 2006

Hi,
I have one application in two different companies with MSSQL2000 running on Windows2000 Server and Windows2003 Server.
It seems that memory needed for MSSQL2000 as displayed in task manager is increased every day.
Does anybody knows anything regarding memory leaks in MSSQL2000?

How can I find what version of service pack have I installed in a MSSQL2000 server machine?

Regards,
Manolis

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Not Using All Memory Allocated To It.

Aug 1, 2007

One of our servers has 20GB of memory and SQL server has been allocated 18.5 GB out of it, however SQL Server only uses about 9GB or so.

OS: Windows 2003 Server
MS SQL Server 2000 SP4
awe enabled
min & max server memory (run values) are: 18432
/PAE switch in boot.ini

any help why SQL server is not using 18.5 GB allocated to it, would be greatly appreciated?

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Cluster Memory Settings

Jan 31, 2008

I have an Active/Active/Passive cluster with 64GB RAM on each node running SQL 2000 EE, AWE is enabled as well as the PAE switch, all is dandy with that.

Question:
Should I configure each SQL Instance to have only a max mem usage of 32GB in the event both failover to the same node ? or will the memory allocation be handled without any issue if each node is configured to use 64GB ?

Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Memory Usage For SQL SERVER 2000

Mar 23, 2006

Good day to all of you
I am faced SQL SERVER 2000 Memory usage problem. I am using Windows 2000 Server SP4 and SQL SERVER 2000 SP4. When User running some in-house application software, the memory for sqlservr.exe was increased . But, when user logout from the software. The sqlservr.exe did not decrease the memory. I have around 100 Users in my company. SQL Memory will countinues increase till max memory usage in CPU.

May i know how to order SQL SERVER need to purge memory when USER was log off from the Program? Or my SQL SERVER was corrupted /missing file?

Please advice

Many thanks!
Melvin

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 2GB Memory Limit?

Jul 23, 2005

SQL Server 2000 SP3 on a Dell dual 2.4GHz Xeon box 3GB RAM Windows 2KSP4. Two aplication dbs, each less than 2GB in size.Had a problem where we would run Solomon queries and what not againstthe box. It had 2GB RAM, and sqlserv.exe would take up to 1.85GB ofRAM, exhausting the physical RAM on the box. SQL would choke and theSolomon users would have problems, and I would have to restart the SQLservice.I added another GB of RAM, bringing the box to 3GB, and increased thepaging file. The OS sees it, and SQL sees it. I check EnterpriseManager, and tell SQL to dynamically configure memory, and it offers anupper limit of 3071MB, so it "sees" the 3GB.I can stress the box with queries to the point that sqlserv.exe takes1.99GB of memory (as viewed through Task Manager) and then SQL serverchokes. It never goes past 2GB, and the OS and box continue runningfine.Does SQL server 2000 have some upper limit, or do I just need to changesome setting through EM?Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Memory Allocation In MS-SQL 2000 Instances

Mar 17, 2006

Hi,From a previous sys-admin I inherited a a MS-SQL (2000) machine with 3instances. It is a nice machine with 4 Gb of memory but the memory allocationis very weird:Instance A: 1400MbInstance B: 1000MbInstance C: 80Mb (!)Instance C is performing badly under a bit of pressure which seems not strangeconsidering these allocations.With that in mind, is there a way to check and re-allocate memory? I'd like tosee if the instances really need these amounts of memory and if not, to movesome over to other instances.Thanks!Dries Bessels

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Memory Reclaim

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,I guess SQL server does not release claimed memory even if it is notused. Is there anyway to free the unused memory?Thanks,John Jayaseelan*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 X32 OnWin2003 X64 Memory Config

Apr 1, 2008



We have a new server (4 dual-core CPUs and 8GB ram) with Windows 2003 x64 installed. We need to put SQL 2000 on the system and want to maximize it for sql performance (will be dedicate to SQL). Do we enable awe in SQL? Are there any 3GB switches we need to put in the boot.ini for the 32-bit subsystem? Should we use the 32bit version of Windows and just use awe and pae?

Thanks
Steve

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 - MSDN - AWE Memory

Aug 16, 2007

We use MSDN SQL 2000 , the enterprise edition for our development servers,
which have always had 2GB RAM.
Now they are bringing in a Win 2003 Enterprise with > 12GB RAM .
They want SQL SERVER 2000 to use AWE memory up to 12GB . Is there any limitation
on MSDN Ent. Edition using more memory.?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 -- Taking Over My Memory

Feb 3, 2006



I am running SQL Server 2000 on a desktop PC. Just recently upgraded my PC to 2gig of ram from 1 gig, in part, to try and fix the problem below. Didn't work. Have SP3 installed but not SP4 at this point.

When I open up query analyzer and edit some code, regardless of whether I actually execute the code, SQL server eventually sucks up available and cached memory to the point that my system comes to an effective halt --takes forever to do anything either in SQL server or other applications. In the task manager PF Usage climbs to just over the 2gig memory limit.

I conceptually understand the dynamic memory operation of SQL server ... but why is it sucking up most available memory when nothing is executing?

Is there a way I can release/clear the memory? Ideally, code that coould be run under a stored procedure would best meet my needs. Right now, I am "fixing" by shutting down and then restarting SQL server.



Thanks,

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Not Listening On Shared Memory. Why Not?

Apr 18, 2007

One of my production SQL Server 2000 systems is listening on TCP and Named Pipes, but not on Shared Memory.



This server has a lot of scheduled jobs that are internal to this box. I assume these jobs would benefit from using shared memory instead of TCP/IP, but I can't figure out why it doesn't use shared memory already and how to correct that.



Thanks in advance for all assistance.

View 12 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Memory Problem

May 10, 2007

Hi to alll,


I use sql server 2000 ver 8.00.2039
I would like to know if is possible to free some ram memory without restart the service .

I have about 1.7 Gb of memory used

I have just tried to use these commands


DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE
dbcc free


but seems that nothing happens

Any idea?

thank you in advance

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved