I have two tables, one of which is a key table with a subaccount number and a set of attributes that define that subaccount. I am trying to join this key table with the table with all the attributes and come up with one table of subaccounts. The Subaccounts should only lookup the attributes associated with them, not all of the attributes, so I put OR [attribute] IS NULL in the WHERE clause so it only matched on the appropriate columns. This worked great in an initial test with two attributes but when I put all 9 attributes in it crashed with this message "Msg 415, Level 16, State 1
The current query would require an index on a work table to be built with 15 keys. The maximum allowable number of keys is 16"
like this
CREATE VIEW subaccounts
(Subacct_no, balance)
AS SELECT
(s.Account_No + "." + r.Subacct_Ext, S.Balance)
FROM Acct_Rcd r, Subacct_Key s
WHERE
(s.attr1 = r.attr1 OR s.attr1 IS NULL)
AND (s.attr2 = r.attr2 OR s.attr2 IS NULL)
in my table i ve the column of item code which contains '1000' ,'2000' ,'3000' series i jus wanna display the output of item codes '1000','2000'series and some of ('3000019','3000020','3000077','3000078').
i tried in my join query
these code left(itemcode,4) in ('1000','2000') or itemcode in ('3000019','3000020','3000077','3000078')
I get the following error when I try to create this stored proc. I think it may have something to do with the two joins.
Msg 8156, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_wisetopic_landing_getPaged_FeaturedAlbums, Line 16 The column 'ArtistId' was specified multiple times for 'PagedData'.
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY sortOrder DESC) AS RowNumber FROM wisetopic_artist_album A INNER JOIN wisetopic_artist_featuredAlbums B ON A.albumId = B.albumId INNER JOIN wisetopic_artist c ON A.artistid = c.artistid ) SELECT RowNumber, * FROM PagedData WHERE RowNumber between @FirstRow AND @LastRow ORDER BY RowNumber ASC;
Hello, I am in the progress of designing a new section of my database and was thinking of creating a hole new database instead of just creating tables inside the database. My question is can you JOIN multiple tables in an SQL Statement from multiple databases. Ie, In the Management program I have a database called 'Convention' and another one called 'Services', inside the two databases there are many tables. Can I link say tblRegister from Convention to tblUser in Services? Thanks
Table Name EmployeeInformation EmployeeID EmployeeFirstName EmployeeLastName   1       |John            |Baker   2       |Carl             |Lennon   3       |Marion           |Herbert
Table Name PeriodInformation PeriodID PeriodStart PeriodEnd   1     |1/1/14    |12/30/14   2     |1/1/15    |12/30/15
[code]...
I want a query to join all this tables based on EmployeeID, PeriodID and LeaveTypeIDÂ sum of LeaveEntitlement.LeaveEntitlementDaysNumber based on LeaveTypeID AS EntitleAnnaul and AS EntitleSick and sum AssignedLeave.AssignedLeaveDaysNumber based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS AssignedAnnaul and AS AssignedSick and subtract EntitleAnnaul from AssignedAnnual based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS AnnualBalance and subtract EntitleSick from AssignedSick based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS SickBalance
and the table should be shown as below after executing the query
I need to update multiple columns in a table with multiple condition.
For example, this is my Query
update Table1 set weight= d.weight, stateweight=d.stateweight, overallweight=d.overallweight from (select * from table2)d where table1.state=d.state and table1.month=d.month and table1.year=d.year
If table matches all the three column (State,month,year), it should update only weight column and if it matches(state ,year) it should update only the stateweight column and if it matches(year) it should update only the overallweight column
I can't write an update query for each condition separately because its a huge select
I have created a single FULLTEXT on col2 & col3. suppose i want to search col2='engine' and col3='toyota' i write query as
SELECT
TBL.col2,TBL.col3 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col2,'engine') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key] INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col3,'toyota') TBL2 ON
TBL.col1=TBL2.[key]
Every thing works well if database is small. But now i have 20 million records in my database. Taking an exmaple there are 5million record with col2='engine' and only 1 record with col3='toyota', it take substantial time to find 1 record.
I was thinking this i can address this issue if i merge both columns in a Single column, but i cannot figure out what format i save it in single column that i can use query to extract correct information. for e.g.; i was thinking to concatinate both fields like col4= ABengineBA + ABBToyotaBBA and in search i use SELECT
TBL.col4 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABBToyotaBBA"') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key] Result = 1 row
But it don't work in following scenario col4= ABengineBA + ABBCorola ToyotaBBA
SELECT
TBL.col4 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABB*ToyotaBBA"') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key]
Result=0 Row Any idea how i can write second query to get result?
I get a wo_ID and want to query company data. I have the following tables, work_orders (has wo_ID, wo_name and install_id), install_ids (has install_id, comp_id) and customers (comp_id, company_name). The query process goes like this: I get a wo_ID and I need to find the install_id that corresponds with that wo_ID in that same work_orders table. Then take that install_id and find out the comp_id that corresponds with that install_id from the install_ids table. Finally take that customer_id and link it to comp_id in the customers table to find out company data. I need to join it multiple times to get my final data. I have a simple one that works right now with one join and using the install_id, but I don't know how to expand it with multiple joins. Thanks.
I'm trying to eliminate all records that do not have one of two conditions. I'm using INNER JOIN on a derived "table", not a table in my database. The code below summarizes what I'm trying to do. Please note that this is an extremely simplified query.
---------------------------
SELECT * FROM jobs INNER JOIN ( SELECT contact_id FROM contacts WHERE deleted = 0 )AS ValidContacts ON (jobs.owner = ValidContacts.contact_id OR jobs.assignee = ValidContacts.contact_id)
---------------------------
This works fine when the the "SELECT contact_id FROM contacts WHERE deleted = 0" part returns a small number of records, however when that part returns a very large number of records, the query hangs and never completes. If I remove one of the conditions for the JOIN, it works fine, but I need both. Why doesn't this work?
Another possible solution is if I were to use "WHERE/IN" like this:
---------------------------
SELECT * FROM jobs WHERE owner IN (SELECT contact_id FROM contacts WHERE deleted = 0) OR assignee IN (SELECT contact_id FROM contacts WHERE deleted = 0)
---------------------------
This would work fine, but I don't want to have to run the "SELECT contact_id FROM contacts WHERE deleted = 0" part twice (since in my real code, it is much more complicated and performance is a big issue". Any help would be greatly appreceated.
select scheme.opheadm.order_no, scheme.porecpm.order_no, delivery_no, invoice_no, scheme.opheadm.customer, qty_received from scheme.opheadm join scheme.porecpm on (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.porecpm.commnt)) like (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.opheadm.order_no)) + '/%')) where effective_date between '2011-10-01 00:00:00.000' and '2011-10-08 00:00:00.000'
It gives me the 5 rows that I need to work with, one column is customer (which is giving me customer code) that I want to replace with customer name from another table
So I tried:
select scheme.opheadm.order_no, scheme.porecpm.order_no, delivery_no, invoice_no, scheme.jcmastm.name, qty_received from scheme.opheadm join scheme.porecpm on (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.porecpm.commnt)) like (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.opheadm.order_no)) + '/%')) join scheme.jcmastm on scheme.opheadm.customer = scheme.opheadm.customer here effective_date between '2011-10-01 00:00:00.000' and '2011-10-08 00:00:00.000'
this works with the same 5 rows that i need but loops them through every customer from the table scheme.jcmastm giving me a total of 960 rows not just the 5 that i want to work with. why this is looping?
The code is the name of the test and the result is just that. Not all patients will have the same set of results. What I'd now like to do is pull out a CSV file of all results from 2013 including where the result is null. The format I am looking for is along the following lines:
Sex, Age, AKIN2, AKIN7, RIFLE,
The AKIN2, AKIN7 and RIFLE are the codes in the result table. I have tried OUTER JOINS but it seems to only pull out those records that exist (example below). I need to specify the result codes I am interested in otherwise the output could be enormous but this then does not pull out null values (a NULL value is an important as an actual value).
SELECT Samples.Patient_ID AS ID, Samples.LabNo As LabNo, Patients.Sex As Sex, DATEDIFF(year, Patients.DoB, Samples.Sampled) AS Age, Samples.Source as Source,
Ok, this is what I am trying to do:, 1) I am trying to get the number of employees that has completed all their online training within 10 days of hire 2) All the employees that are has no exception(no pre-service training) and has completed their checklist within 10 days 3) all the exception(pre-service) employees that has completed their training within 70 days.
I have these tables, hipaa2006, hipaa101, hipaa201_inputs, domesticviolence, securityawareness, securityawareness2006, civilrights_input, and people_first_data. People_first_data contains all the employees we have in our database, it has empl_pfid col, but does not have last_modified col which all the other tables has.
I have this queries:
1) select distinct(count(empl_pfid)) from people_first_data left outer join tbl_domesticviolence on people_first_data.empl_pfid = tbl_domesticviolence.employee_pfid left outer join tbl_hipaa101 on people_first_data.empl_pfid=tbl_hipaa101.employee_pfid left outer join tbl_hipaa201_input on people_first_data.empl_pfid= tbl_hipaa201_input.employee_pfid left outer join tbl_hipaa2006 on people_first_data.empl_pfid=tbl_hipaa2006.employee_pfid left outer join tbl_securityawareness on people_first_data.empl_pfid=tbl_securityawareness.employee_pfid left outer join tbl_securityawareness2006 on people_first_data.empl_pfid= tbl_securityawareness2006.employee_pfid where people_first_data.empl_pfid = '639846' and tbl_domesticviolence.last_modified is not null and tbl_hipaa101.last_modified is not null and tbl_hipaa201_input.last_modified is not null and tbl_hipaa2006.last_modified is not null and tbl_securityawareness.last_modified is not null and tbl_securityawareness2006.last_modified is not null
2) ( I tried union, but i only wanted one number) select count(last_modified) as date1 from tbl_hipaa2006 union select count(last_modified) as date2 from tbl_hipaa101
hi i user this join and i have the answer like this"
select u.userid, u.user_name, u.password, c.code_description as role_code, convert(varchar, u.expiry_date,101) as expiry_date, u.created_date, u.active from [usermaster] u inner join [codeMaster] c on 'SP'=c.code where u.userid = '2'
select u.userid, u.user_name, u.password, c.code_description as role_code, convert(varchar, u.expiry_date,101) as expiry_date, u.created_date, u.active, v.user_date from [usermaster] u inner join [codeMaster] c inner join [HRUser_developerlog] v on 'SP'=c.code or u.userid=v.inserted_id and v.operation='delete' where u.userid = '2'
but i am getting error.can any onre please help me and please give me query please
I have two tables, let's say "Main" and "Dictionary".
The Main table has several fields that point to records in the same dictionary table. Because of the multiple joins I couldn't get any results if I use an expression like:
SELECT Main.ID, Dictionary.Text AS Data1, Dictionary.Text AS Data2
FROM Main, Dictionary
WHERE Main.Data1 = Dictionary.ID AND Main.Data2 = Dictionary.ID
What kind of join expression should I use? I have to generate this expression programmatically, so it's quite important to keep it as simple as possible!
An EMPLOYEE will always have at least 1 SKILL but each SKILL may or may not have any SKILLOPTIONS. I do an INNER JOIN:
EMPLOYEE->SKILL->SKILLOPTIONS but I only get a record if there is actually a SKILLOPTION. I want a record with EMPLOYEE and SKILL even if there are no SKILLOPTIONS. In Oracle it is the (+) symbol in the WHERE statement in conjunction with the JOIN. Am new to this so I'm sure the answer is simple.
This is a report I'm trying to build in SQL Reporting Services. I can do it in a hacky way adding two data sets and showing two tables, but I'm sure there is a better way.
TheTable Order# Customer Status
STATUS has valid values of PROCESSED and INPROGRESS
The query I'm trying to build is Count of Processed and INProgress orders for a given Customer.
I can get them one at a time with something like this in two different datasets and showing two tables, but how do I achieve the same in one query?
Select Customer, Count (*) As Status1 FROM TheTable Where (Status = N'Shipped') Group By Customer
I have a stored proc I am updating in an OLEDB Command from the results of a Transform Script Component. The Stored Proc has over 65 input parameters, most of them have a NULL passed in. I dont want to create output columns in the Transform Script Component for all of them to map them from the "Available Input Columns" to "Available Destination Columns".
I want to create 3 or 4 generic Output columns for their data type - say IntegerOutput (datatype Int), DateTimeOut (datatype datetime) and so on. The I want to map these generic columns in the OLEDB Command as Available Input Columns" to multiple "Available Destination Columns" - wherever the datatype matches the input column.
But the OLEDB Command Column Mappings let me map One to One only. This will create a huge and unnecessary workload for me to develop and maintain - when I tell you I have 3 such stored procedures, all of whose interfaces are exactly same and for which I can create similar Output columns in the Transform Script Component.
I have a SQL Query issue you can find in SQL Fiddle
SQL FIDDLE for Demo
My query was like this
For Insert Insert into Employee values('aa', 'T', 'qqq') Insert into Employee values('aa' , 'F' , 'qqq') Insert into Employee values('bb', 'F' , 'eee') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'T' , 'rrr') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'pp' , 'aaa') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'Zz' , 'bab') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'ZZ' , 'bac') For select select col1,MAX(col2) as Col2,Max(Col3) as Col3 from Employee group by Col1
I have a left Join problem - Appreciate any suggestions This is the error message C:InetpubwwwrootFTDecAdminFinishedAdminBeta2.aspx(47) : error BC30201: Expression expected. "tered] FROM [Colleges] "& _ ~ C:InetpubwwwrootFTDecAdminFinishedAdminBeta2.aspx(49) : error BC30035: Syntax error. " Left Join [PIDO] ON ([Colleges].[CollegeID] = ([PIDO].[CollegeID]) "& _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C:InetpubwwwrootFTDecAdminFinishedAdminBeta2.aspx(53) : error BC30451: Name 'queryString' is not declared. dbCommand.CommandText = queryString ~~~~~~~~~~~This is the Code >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FROM [Colleges] "& _ '" Left Join [PIDO] ON ([Colleges].[CollegeID] = ([PIDO].[CollegeID]) "& _ " left join [GroupPA] ON ([Colleges].[CollegeID] = [GroupPA].[CollegeID])ORDER BY "& sortBy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Can anyone give me some guidelines as to when to chose JOINS over returning multiple resultsets in a strored procedure.. For eample, I have two tables, Orders and OrderDetails, which are linked by a primary key field. There can be orders w/o a corresponding record in orderdetails. 1.) I can return all orders and their details using a stored preocedure that has: SELECT o.order_id as OrderId, o.customername, od.order_id, od.orderdate FROM orders AS o LEFT OUTER JOIN orderdetails AS od ON (o.order_id=od.order_id) 2.) I can do the same by returning two results sets in a different stored procedure: SELECT order_id, customername FROM orders SELECT order_id, orderdate FROM orderdetails I think the client processing time for the second option will be slightly less, because the resultset I need to filter will only be as big as the orederdetails table (it will not include records for orders that have no details). Regardless, I think this would only make for a small performance gain, so if Option 1 is better in Database performace, I would probably go with that. I assume the method to choose also depends on table size and # of JOINS. Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks, Al
I have a table with a large number of records that I need to delete, before attempt to perform the delete I also archived the records to another table.
So I need to delete all of these selected records stored in the archive table from the main table. I can now reference all the records that qualify for the delete in the main table by performing a join on the archive table like so:
select * from my_main_table a join my_archive_table b on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key and a.identifier=b.indentifier
So all the records check out to be the ones I'd like to perform a delete on but I just can't figure out how to perform a delete of the records with little or no change to the existing query.
Obviously something like this won't work:
delete from my_main_table a join my_archive_table b on a.distinct_id=b.distinct_id and a.surrogate_key=b.surrogate_key and a.identifier=b.indentifier
Though it would be nice if it did.:D
So my question is how would I use the existing query with some modification to delete only the records that this query returns. I've tried selection of records in the main table based on the existing records in the archive table but it can return a higher number of records than what I know is expected. I actually need the join specified to be in place to do it.
I have three tables, Users, DocType and Docs. In the DocType table there are multiple entries for allowed document types, the descriptions and other pertinent data. In the Docs table, there are all manner of documents. In the User table are the users.
The DocType and Docs tables are relational. DocType.ID = Docs.tID The Users and Docs tables are relational. Users.ID = Docs.uID
Every user is allowed to have exactly one document of each type. Therefore if there are 10 document types in the DocType table, there may be as many as 10 matching documents in the Docs table.
What I need is a single record for each user returning a boolean for each document type, whether or not there is a matching record in the Docs table.
For example, there are 5 document types defined in the DocType table (types 1 - 5), so the DocType table has 5 rows. In the Docs table, there are 23 rows, and in the User table there are 10 rows. Given that each user may have only one of each DocType, there could be a maximum of 50 rows in the Docs table, but there are 23, meaning that on the average each user is missing one document.Now the challenge is to return a table of all the users (10 rows) with a boolean value for each of the rows in DocType (as columns) based on whether there is a value in the Docs table that matches both the DocType and User.
I have 3 tables , Customer , Sales Cost Charge and Sales Price , i have join the customer table to the sales price table with a left outer join into a new table.
i now need to join the data in the new table to sales cost charge. However please note that there is data that is in the sales price table that is not in the sales cost charge table and there is data in the sales cost charge table that is not in the sales price table ,but i need to get all the data. e.g. if on our application it shows 15 records , the sales price table will maybe have 7 records and the sales cost charge table will have 8 which makes it 15 records
I am struggling to match the records , i have also tried a left outer join to the sales cost charge table however i only get the 7 records which is in the sales price table. see code below
I have two tables a and b, where I want to add columns from b to a with a criteria. The columns will be added by month criteria. There is a column in b table called stat_month which ranges from 1 (Jan) to 12 (Dec). I want to keep all the records in a, and join columns from b for each month. I do not want to loose any row from a if there is no data for that row in b.
I do not know how to have the multiple joins for 12 different months and what join I have to use. I used left join but still I am loosing not all but few rows in a, I would also like to know how in one script I can columns separately from stat_mont =’01’ to stat_month =’12’
/****** Script for SelectTopNRows command from SSMS ******/ SELECT a.[naics] ,a.[ust_code] ,a.[port] ,a.[all_qty_1_yr] ,a.[all_qty_2_yr]
[Code] ....
Output should have all columns from a and join columns from b when the months = '01' (for Jan) , '02' (for FEB), ...'12' (for Dec): Output table should be something like
* columns from a AND JAN_Cum_qty_1_mo JAN_Cum_qty_2_mo JAN_Cum_all_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_wgt_mo JAN_Cum_ves_val_mo FEB_Cum_qty_1_mo FEB_Cum_qty_2_mo FEB_Cum_all_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_wgt_mo FEB_Cum_ves_val_mo .....DEC_Cum_qty_1_mo DEC_Cum_qty_2_mo DEC_Cum_all_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_wgt_mo DEC_Cum_ves_val_mo (FROM TABLE b)
I am trying to build a report that access data from multiple cubes. Is it possible to join multiple cubes based on their shared dimensions? Or is it possible for report to display data from multiple cubes properly aligned based on the dimension.
Environment: SQL Server Analysis Services 2005 and Reporting Services 2005
Example: We have multiple cubes with “Year� as a shared dimension and each one has different Rate info. The cubes have other set of shared dimensions which I am planning to set it up as a parameter. I would like to display the report as Year Rate1 Rate2 Rate3…
I want to join 2 tables by a unique ID field, but the ID field also hasmultiple NULLS which I do not want to ignore and I fear they will causeduplication.Using TableA and TableB below i will demonstrate the problem.TableATableA.ID Field1 Field21 Paul 1Null John 12 John 1TableBTableB.ID Field3 Field41 25 1Null 32 1Null 23 12 26 1The Table I want isTableA.ID TableB.ID Field1 Field2 Field3 Field41 1 Paul 1 25 12 2 John 1 26 1Null Null John 1 Null NullNull Null Null Null 32 1Null Null Null Null 26 1I think a select distcinct statement with a full outer join may do whatI want, but I'm not certain so want to check.Regards,Ciarán
Is there a way to create one field from multiple records using sql.For exampleTable 1John 18Peter 18David 18Now I want an sql query that when executed will return a field thatlooks like thisQuery1John Peter DavidSo basically it will return one record with all the name in one field
