Normal Query Or Join ?

Jul 20, 2007

hi friends the below query is actually what type of join whether inner join or normal query..?????

if not exists(select 'x'
from cobi_invoice_hdr h(nolock),
fin_quick_code_met q(nolock) ,
ci_adjustment_drdoc_vw z (nolock)
where h.tran_ou = @ctxt_ouinstance
and h.invoce_cat = @category_tmp
and d.so_no between @sonumberfrom and @sonumberto

and isnull(h.tran_amount,0) between @totalinvoiceamountfrom and @totalinvoiceamountto
and h.tran_date between convert(varchar(10),@invoicedatefrom,120)and convert(varchar(10),@fininvoicedateto,120)
and h.tran_no between @invoicenumberfrom and @invoicenumberto
and h.bill_to_cust between @billtocodefrom and @customerto
and h.fb_id = isnull(@fb,h.fb_id)
and h.tran_currency = isnull(@currency,h.tran_currency)
and h.createdby = isnull(@useridentity,h.createdby)


and EXISTS (select '*' from cobi_cust_custinfo_vw c(nolock)
where h.bill_to_cust = c.custcode
andc.ouid = @ou_tmp )

and z.status = q.parameter_text

and q.parameter_type = 'STATUS'
and q.parameter_category = 'STATUS'
and q.component_id = 'COBI'
and q.parameter_code = @status_tmp
and h.tran_no = z.documentno
and q.language_id = @ctxt_language
and z.language_id = @ctxt_language)
begin
'No matching invoices found.'
select @m_errorid = 514 -- Porselvi.J - COBIDMS412AT_000255
return
end
End

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Difference Bw SP And Normal Query

May 9, 2001

Hi all,

I've been running a long query which takes almost 39 seconds in Query Analyzer. After creating a Stored Procedure (with the same query) I expected to run it faster bcoz I heared that SP has a cache, and its a faster technique. But I didnt gain any performance improvments.

Can somebody clear my confusion, what I'm doing wrong.

Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Convert Cursor To Recursive CTE Or A Normal Query?

Sep 25, 2015

I have a stored proc I want to convert it to either a Normal Query using A while loop or a set based operation/recursive cte as I want to run it for multiple CompanyNames. I get the error message as An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested when I execute if for Multiple Companies using another Cursor

If I convert it to a Function I get the below error message

Invalid use of a side-effecting operator 'EXECUTE STRING' within a function

converting this query to a normal query or let me know if there is any change which need to done to work with multiple companynames.

CREATE PROC [dbo].[USPT] @CompanyName varchar(50),@tablename varchar(50)
AS
BEGIN
-- EXEC [USPT] 'xyz corp','Sales Header'
DECLARE @str1 VARCHAR (MAX)
set @str1 = '
DECLARE @No VARCHAR (MAX)

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Multi-table JOIN Query With More Than One JOIN Statement

Apr 14, 2015

I'm having trouble with a multi-table JOIN statement with more than one JOIN statement.

For each order, I need to return the following: CarsID, CarModelName, MakeID, OrderDate, ProductName, Total ordered the Car Category.

The carid (primary key) and carmodelname belong to the Cars table.
The makeid and orderdate belong to the OrderDetails table.
The productname and carcategory belong to the Product table.

The number of rows returned should be the same as the number of rows in OrderDetails.

View 2 Replies View Related

Why Does My Query Timeout Unless Force Join To Hash Join?

Jul 25, 2007

I'm using SQL Server 2005.



A piece of software I wrote starting timing out on a query that left outer joins a table to a view. Both the table and view have approximately the same number of rows (about 170000).



The table has 2 very similar columns, one is a varchar(1) and another is varchar(100). Neither are included in any index and beyond the size difference, the columns have the same properties. One of the employees here uses the varchar(1) column (called miscsearch) to tag large sets of rows to perform some action on. In this case, he had set 9000 rows miscsearch value to "g". The query then should join the table and view for all rows where miscsearch is set to g in the table. This query takes at least 20 minutes to run (I stopped it at this point).

If I remove the "where" clause and join all rows in the two tables, the query completes in about 20 seconds. If set the varchar(100) column (called descrip) to "g" for the same rows set via miscsearch, the query completes in about 20 seconds.



If I force the join type to a hash join, the query completes using miscsearch in about 30 seconds.



So, this works:

SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER HASH JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE miscsearch = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC



and this works:

SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE descrip = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC



But this does't:

SELECT di.File_No, prevPlacements, balance,'NOT PLACED' as status FROM Info di LEFT OUTER JOIN View_PP pp ON di.ram_file_no = pp.file_no WHERE miscsearch = 'g' ORDER BY balance DESC



What should I be looking for here to understand why this is happening?



Thanks,

john















View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Query Question - JOIN Or Not To JOIN

Jan 2, 2006

I have 2 tables, I will add sample data to them to help me explain...Table1(Fields: A, B)=====1,One2,Two3,ThreeTable2(Fields: A,B)=====2,deux9,neufI want to create a query that will only return data so long as the key(Field A) is on both tables, if not, return nothing. How can I dothis? I am thnking about using a 'JOIN' but not sure how to implementit...i.e: 2 would return data- but 9 would not...any help would be appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

Is This Normal

Nov 23, 2005

Hi. Sorry if I am asking a stupid question since I am an absolutely beginnerin SQL Server. Here is the question . . .About 13 hours ago, I got my SQL Server 2000 to index a table which has 104million records. At first the CPU usage was high. But after an hour or two,the process has seemed dead and the Enterprise Manager has had no response.The CPU usuage dropped to zero and has been jumping between 0 to 5%. Theharddisk indicator has been blinking at a rate of roughly three times pertwo seconds.Is this normal? Has anyone got any idea how long the process would take? Ihave assigned 1.8GB of RAM to the SQL service and is currently taking upabout 1GB.

View 7 Replies View Related

Just The Most Normal Connexion

Dec 7, 2003

Impossible to connect to my mssql 2000 database

web.config connexion string >>>

<add key="DataSourceSql" value="Initial Catalog=angiras;Data Source=localhost;Uid=sa;Pwd=;" />

or

<add key="DataSourceSql" value="Initial Catalog=angiras;Data Source=localhost;" />

connexion code >>>

Private ConnexionSQL As SqlConnection

Public Sub OpenConnexionSQL()
ConnexionSQL = New SqlConnection(ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings("DataSourceSql").ToString)
ConnexionSQL.Open()
End Sub

when I try >>>

OpenConnexionSQL


I get an error


any idea ?

thank you

View 1 Replies View Related

Normal Forms

Feb 1, 2008

Hi guys, I've been thinking about this problem now for some time but somehow I don't know if my "solution" for it is right. I'd like to read your opinion.

There is a Capital table with Capital_Nr, Capital_Name, Capital_Population, Country_Nr and Country_Name as attributes.

I know the table is chaotic so I brought it to 3NF :

Capital table : Capital_Nr, Capital_Name, Capital_Population, Country_Nr(foreign key)

Country table : Country_Nr and Country_Name

Ok so I guess the table should be now in 3NF, but what intrigues me is in what NF the table originally was. I tried then to use Codd's definition of 2NF : "a 1NF table is in 2NF if and only if none of its non-prime attributes are functionally dependent on a part (proper subset) of a candidate key". In my opinion the original candidate keys could only be {Capital_Nr},{Country_Nr} and {Country_Name}, each one of them single, i.e. separate from each other. So, as there is no composite candidate key, I can affirm that the original table was in 2NF. Am I right ?

Thanks !

View 3 Replies View Related

Normal Disk IO

Apr 15, 2008

I am wondering what normal disk I/O should be.
i know it verys depending on use but im looking for an average.

here is an idea of what we have

there is about 10 centers doing replication to our primary server.
we have about 80 users connecting directoy to our primary server using MS Dynamics through CITRIX.
we have a few other apps use the database as well however i am fairly certin its Dynamics generating our disk IO
Hardware wise we have a powerful blade connected to a raid 5 SAN with 15000 rpm disks.
normaly the disk IO stays fairly low but every so often it goes crazy and im thinking it shouldn't

Below is a sample of our disk IO from perfmon over 2 minutes or so. as you can see everything looks ok untill 04/15/2008 10:12:49.470 when the Disk I/O % goes above 100%

"04/15/2008 10:12:23.470","2.8300181121159178"
"04/15/2008 10:12:24.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:25.470","3.950025280161793"
"04/15/2008 10:12:26.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:27.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:28.470","5.9800382722449426"
"04/15/2008 10:12:29.470","7.7400495363170325"
"04/15/2008 10:12:30.470","3.4500220801413128"
"04/15/2008 10:12:31.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:32.470","4.180026752171214"
"04/15/2008 10:12:33.470","3.8600247041581071"
"04/15/2008 10:12:34.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:35.470","142.71091334984544"
"04/15/2008 10:12:36.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:37.470","1.1500073600471041"
"04/15/2008 10:12:38.470","0.81000518403317789"
"04/15/2008 10:12:39.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:40.470","2.1400136960876548"
"04/15/2008 10:12:41.470","10.230065472419025"
"04/15/2008 10:12:42.470","4.5800293121875981"
"04/15/2008 10:12:43.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:44.470","0"
"04/15/2008 10:12:45.470","14.500092800593926"
"04/15/2008 10:12:46.470","6.730043072275663"
"04/15/2008 10:12:47.470","1.6300104320667652"
"04/15/2008 10:12:48.470","7.3500470403010585"
"04/15/2008 10:12:49.470","264.66169383484055"
"04/15/2008 10:12:50.470","324.18207476527851"
"04/15/2008 10:12:51.470","536.17343150996169"
"04/15/2008 10:12:52.470","270.31172999507197"
"04/15/2008 10:12:53.470","331.97212462159757"
"04/15/2008 10:12:54.470","333.84213658967417"
"04/15/2008 10:12:55.470","435.57278766584108"
"04/15/2008 10:12:56.470","442.31283080211716"
"04/15/2008 10:12:57.470","685.92438991609549"
"04/15/2008 10:12:58.470","295.1618890360898"
"04/15/2008 10:12:59.470","61.470393410517829"
"04/15/2008 10:13:00.470","56.360360706308519"
"04/15/2008 10:13:01.470","45.260289665853861"
"04/15/2008 10:13:02.470","224.58143732119885"
"04/15/2008 10:13:03.470","1022.0365410338626"
"04/15/2008 10:13:04.470","1114.6271336136551"
"04/15/2008 10:13:05.470","241.52154573789269"
"04/15/2008 10:13:06.470","506.79324347675828"
"04/15/2008 10:13:07.470","374.88239924735518"
"04/15/2008 10:13:08.470","359.5723012627281"
"04/15/2008 10:13:09.485","427.62119831413077"
"04/15/2008 10:13:10.485","400.15256097639025"
"04/15/2008 10:13:11.485","1076.2868882360847"
"04/15/2008 10:13:12.485","325.94208602935055"
"04/15/2008 10:13:13.485","449.36287592240592"
"04/15/2008 10:13:14.485","344.28220340610181"
"04/15/2008 10:13:15.485","569.57364527132972"
"04/15/2008 10:13:16.485","775.02496015974498"
"04/15/2008 10:13:17.485","729.54466908588222"
"04/15/2008 10:13:18.485","778.70498371189581"
"04/15/2008 10:13:19.485","1080.1269128122422"
"04/15/2008 10:13:20.485","754.56482921490704"
"04/15/2008 10:13:21.485","999.11639434492372"
"04/15/2008 10:13:22.485","701.36448873272786"
"04/15/2008 10:13:23.485","276.26176807531567"
"04/15/2008 10:13:24.485","252.13161364232732"
"04/15/2008 10:13:25.485","533.27341294984296"
"04/15/2008 10:13:26.485","759.54486108711092"
"04/15/2008 10:13:27.485","817.11522953746908"
"04/15/2008 10:13:28.485","129.41082822930068"
"04/15/2008 10:13:29.485","158.94101722251023"
"04/15/2008 10:13:30.485","160.55102752657618"
"04/15/2008 10:13:31.485","655.87419759486454"
"04/15/2008 10:13:32.485","444.49284475420637"
"04/15/2008 10:13:33.485","272.47174381916045"
"04/15/2008 10:13:34.485","94.730606275880163"
"04/15/2008 10:13:35.485","355.28227380655238"
"04/15/2008 10:13:36.485","898.29574909279427"
"04/15/2008 10:13:37.485","1309.3783800216322"
"04/15/2008 10:13:38.485","88.200564483612695"
"04/15/2008 10:13:39.485","1.2300078720503811"
"04/15/2008 10:13:40.485","4.9400316162023437"
"04/15/2008 10:13:41.485","217.90139456892524"
"04/15/2008 10:13:42.485","373.26238887928884"
"04/15/2008 10:13:43.485","73.760472067021226"
"04/15/2008 10:13:44.485","1.4100090240577541"
"04/15/2008 10:13:45.485","34.960223745431975"
"04/15/2008 10:13:46.485","15.990102336654955"
"04/15/2008 10:13:47.485","63.580406914604247"
"04/15/2008 10:13:48.485","26.560169985087906"
"04/15/2008 10:13:49.485","11.150071360456707"
"04/15/2008 10:13:50.485","15.250097600624644"
"04/15/2008 10:13:51.485","17.010108864696736"
"04/15/2008 10:13:52.485","12.210078144500125"
"04/15/2008 10:13:53.485","95.650612163917842"
"04/15/2008 10:13:54.485","38.740247937586801"
"04/15/2008 10:13:55.485","5.6000358402293777"
"04/15/2008 10:13:56.485","1.6600106240679942"
"04/15/2008 10:13:57.485","19.590125376802412"
"04/15/2008 10:13:58.485","2.8100179841150981"
"04/15/2008 10:13:59.485","631.48404149786563"
"04/15/2008 10:14:00.485","579.14370651972172"
"04/15/2008 10:14:01.485","1.0600067840434177"
"04/15/2008 10:14:02.485","15.870101568650039"
"04/15/2008 10:14:03.485","112.28071859659903"
"04/15/2008 10:14:04.485","15.660100224641438"
"04/15/2008 10:14:05.485","4.9800318722039822"
"04/15/2008 10:14:06.485","25.44016281704203"
"04/15/2008 10:14:07.485","16.130103232660691"
"04/15/2008 10:14:08.485","5.9300379522428939"
"04/15/2008 10:14:09.485","4.8400309761982481"
"04/15/2008 10:14:10.485","2.6400168961081349"
"04/15/2008 10:14:11.485","19.430124352795858"
"04/15/2008 10:14:12.485","42.55027232174286"
"04/15/2008 10:14:13.485","37.550240321538055"
"04/15/2008 10:14:14.485","1.210007744049562"
"04/15/2008 10:14:15.485","15.930101952652498"
"04/15/2008 10:14:16.485","20.550131520841735"
"04/15/2008 10:14:17.485","4.0900261761675267"
"04/15/2008 10:14:18.485","8.0100512643280908"
"04/15/2008 10:14:19.485","1.6000102400655365"
"04/15/2008 10:14:20.485","2.3300149120954372"
"04/15/2008 10:14:21.485","1.6200103680663558"
"04/15/2008 10:14:22.485","10.730068672439504"
"04/15/2008 10:14:23.485","4.4600285441826832"
"04/15/2008 10:14:24.485","9.0300577923698704"
"04/15/2008 10:14:25.485","0"
"04/15/2008 10:14:26.485","15.550099520636932"
"04/15/2008 10:14:27.485","2.970019008121652"
"04/15/2008 10:14:28.485","64.580413314645213"
"04/15/2008 10:14:29.485","71.850459842942996"
"04/15/2008 10:14:30.485","53.220340610179903"
"04/15/2008 10:14:31.485","32.620208769336124"
"04/15/2008 10:14:32.485","1.0000064000409603"
"04/15/2008 10:14:33.485","4.8400309761982481"
"04/15/2008 10:14:34.485","8.2700529283387425"
"04/15/2008 10:14:35.485","11.160071424457115"

View 1 Replies View Related

Normal Vs Surrogate/artificial Key?

Jun 10, 2008

 Hey All, I'm trying to decide what's the 'best' to use.  I've been designing and creating database for a while and have pretty much always used a surrogate key and not a normal one.  I've finally had some free time to start studying more so in my spare time and read up and come accross a lot of guides, articles and stories that tout that normal keys should be used whenever possible as they're a better identifier and that surrogate keys should only be used when there is not a readily available normal key.  Now perhaps I'd be open to accepting that but absolutely every database I come across tends to only use surrogate keys.  For example I'm doing an authentication system from scratch and am looking at the User table.  Now of course the user name has to be unique, should that be the primary key or should I have a seperate column with a guid or an incrementing int or the like as the primary key? I can certainly see that username could be used.  I can also see how it may be easier when looking through the data tables to identify who/what a table is refering to with a surrogate key.  However it still seems sort of sloppy, for lack of a better word, to me.  Where now I could have somebody's username (or any other piece of data used for this purpose) spread accross a lot of other tables.  And while writting this I just thought of the scenario that perhaps somebody needs their username changed, with this method now the ids need to be changed on all the related rows of all the other tables whereas with a surrogate key it wouldn't matter. Anyways I'm mostly looking for opinions on which way to go (not just with the user sample, but more in general).Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Normal User Backup

Jan 12, 2000

We have a payroll database that needs to be backed up just before completing the payroll for that period. I need to create a batch file that a normal user can run that will tell the database to back up and then tell the user when it is done so they can continue working. Is there an easy way to do this without giving the users special permissions? I don't want to give them backup op status. Any help would be appreciated.

View 4 Replies View Related

Not Normal Will Stored Procs Help

Jun 19, 2000

I will be taking over a database that has almost no pk's or relations(this is not my choice, but a vendors)
Management is looking at stored procs to improve performance, but I am wondering
if the db is in this state will there really be a gain. I am pushing for normalization
first, but if anybody has any ideas or opinions I would appreciate

View 2 Replies View Related

What Is Sixth Normal Form?

Sep 19, 2006

What is the 'sixth normal form' in the normalisation of tables in database management system.

View 3 Replies View Related

MS SQL 2005: Performance – Normal CPU Vs CPU DUO/4 CORE

Mar 1, 2007

Hello,

Is performance of web application (ASP.NET + SQL Server 2005 Wrg edition + Win Server 2003 Web edition) running on server with one core duo/4 CPU generally comparable to the performance of the same application running on the same server with 2/4 physical CPU’s?

Thank you for your ideas!
Jan

View 1 Replies View Related

Changing Suspect Database To Normal

Apr 7, 2008

My sql database is in suspect mode, please help me with step by step how can i change the suspect status to normal status, please dont provid eme the links of other site and help me in your own language
 
iam getting following error:
 
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Database 'msdb' cannot be opened. It has been marked SUSPECT by recovery. See the SQL Server errorlog for more information. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 926)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.1399&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=926&LinkId=20476
------------------------------BUTTONS:
OK------------------------------Thanks in advance

View 3 Replies View Related

Make Normal Windows NT User As DBO??

Jul 4, 2002

Hi,

How do we make a normal Windows NT user as DBO in Sql server 2000?

Thanx

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Alter Normal Column To Idntitycolumn

May 28, 2008

Hi

I Created table like this
CREATE TABLE Table(sno int ,EName varchar(20))
I inserted three records like this
INSERT INTO hazarath VALUES (1,'ragav')
INSERT INTO hazarath VALUES (2,'ragavRavo')
INSERT INTO hazarath VALUES (3,'ramu')

Now i want to alter sno column to identity column
how can i alter to identity
pls help me

View 3 Replies View Related

The Fastest Normal ADO.NET Or Microsoft Best Practise EnterpriseLibrary

May 12, 2006

So I got 2 classes one I wrote to interrogate databases using normal ADO:Mine:SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(m_sConnectionString);SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand(sQuery, myConnection);myCommand.CommandTimeout = 120; // 60 Seconds TimeoutmyConnection.Open();SqlDataReader result = myCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior.CloseConnection);return result;Microsoft WaySqlDatabase dbSvc = new SqlDatabase(m_sConnectionString);DbCommand dbCommand = dbSvc.GetSqlStringCommand(sQuery);return ((SqlDataReader)dbSvc.ExecuteReader(dbCommand));What's faster?My way:SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(m_sConnectionString);SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand(sQuery, myConnection);myCommand.CommandTimeout = 120; // 60 Seconds Timeout// Use a DataTable – required for default pagingSqlDataAdapter myAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(myCommand);DataTable myTable = new DataTable();myAdapter.Fill(myTable);myConnection.Close();myConnection.Dispose();myConnection = null;return (myTable);Microsoft Way:SqlDatabase dbSvc = new SqlDatabase(m_sConnectionString);DbCommand dbCommand = dbSvc.GetSqlStringCommand(sQuery);DataTable dtData = null;DataSet dsData = dbSvc.ExecuteDataSet(dbCommand);dtData = dsData.Tables[0];return (dtData);Comments? Ideas?Al

View 4 Replies View Related

Referencing Previous Row In Normal Select Statement

Jun 14, 2002

Hi,

I was wondering if it is possible to reference a value in a previous row as a field in a normal select statement, for example:

SELECT a.user_id, a.name, b.user_id, b.name
FROM Users a
LEFT OUTER JOIN Users b
WHERE (b.user_id = a.user_id - 1)

Unfortunantly my user_id values are not in sequence so I get null entries using that code. Instead of doing something as basic as -1 is there another way to reference the previous row?

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Make AlwaysOn Over Normal Cluster

Nov 13, 2014

Can we make SQL 2012 Always ON over the normal SQL Cluster 2012.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Parsing XML That Does Not Quite Fit Normal XML Standards

Jan 21, 2015

I have an application that stores xml data in an unusal manor. Basically a SQL Key column and an XML string.The XML string is not really standard XML, but it is what it is, and I'm stuck with it. It is in the format;

<row key="Value.01" xml:space="preserve"><c1>FirstName</c1><c2>LastName</c2><c3>10 Street Address, City ST 012345-1234</c3><c4>5</c4><c5>50</c5><c6>500</c6></row>

I am able to pull values out via
SELECT
p.value('(./c1)[1]', 'VARCHAR(8000)') AS c1,
p.value('(./c2)[1]', 'VARCHAR(8000)') AS c2
FROM dbo.UserXMLTable
CROSS APPLY XMLRECORD.nodes('/row') t(p)
where p.value('(./c1)[1]', 'VARCHAR(8000)') like 'First%'

However I've been struggling with selecting row with a LIKE clause. Something like ;

SELECT *
FROM dbo.F_UserXMLTable
where XMLRECORD.value('(./c1)[1]', 'VARCHAR(8000)') like 'First%'

I have tried a number of permutations of XML syntax but so far have been stumpled.

Please note "<row key="Value.01" xml:space="preserve">" has a <SP> in the name 'row key' .

View 3 Replies View Related

SSIS &&amp; Script Transformation (debug Vs Normal)

Mar 10, 2008

I just ran across an interesting problem, that makes no sense. I
built
an SSIS package that updates a column, using an transformation
script.
Testing in Debug mode everything runs perfectly, but when I have SQL
sever agent run the package it insert null into the new column.


Any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.


r/ Anthony

View 17 Replies View Related

ADDUSERASADMIN Doesn't Work If Not In Normal User

Apr 12, 2007

As pointed out in the SQL Express blog recently http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlexpress/archive/2006/11/15/sql-express-sp2-and-windows-vista-uac.aspx (look for the section that starts "Watch out!"), the SQL Express SP2 argument ADDUSERASADMIN will not work correctly if the user is a normal user. If the user is a member of the BUILTINAdministrators group then Vista will prompt to elevate them to allow the Admin rights to be effective.



However, my reading of the blog post is that if they are normal users, Vista will prompt for the Administrator credentials. This effectively runs the install as the Administrator user. So the ADDUSERASADMIN argument works, but adds the Administrator rather than the normal user.



This is not what I need to happen. Is there any way around this? I have a ClickOnce application. Is there any way to restrict the ClickOnce install to require the user to be a member of the BUILTINAdministrator group?



Thanks.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cumulative Distributive Functions For Normal And Binomial

Jan 24, 2008

Hi,

How do we go about creating some user defined functions for cumulative distributive functions for normal and binomial distributions?

Thank you.

View 6 Replies View Related

Can Any One Tell Me The Difference Between Cross Join, Inner Join And Outer Join In Laymans Language

Apr 30, 2008

Hello

Can any one tell me the difference between Cross Join, inner join and outer join in laymans language

by just taking examples of two tables such as Customers and Customer Addresses


Thank You

View 1 Replies View Related

Server And Database Role Requests For Normal User

Jun 5, 2007

Hi,

I want to know how to assign a normal user to take backup,Restore and attach and detach the database in sqlserver2000.

Please can anyone help me to find out which server role or database role will suites my requirements.

Regards
Md S.Hassan

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: How To Change String Key To Int - Normal Methods Not Working

Apr 13, 2014

did VARCHAR(20)
SELECT top 10 CAST(did AS INT) FROM table
Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Line 3

Conversion failed when converting the varchar value 'cht6p575l7ry61k1npt' to data type int.

SELECT CONVERT(INT, did) FROM table

Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Line 5

Conversion failed when converting the varchar value 'cht6p575l7ry61k1npt' to data type int.I found a SQL Function that removes all the alphabetic characters from the string and just leaves the integers.

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Display Normal General Date Format

Jul 30, 2015

I've come accross this code and need to alter it to display a normal General Date format.

CASE WHEN p.BIRTHDTTM IS NULL THEN ''
ELSE RIGHT('0' + LTRIM(CONVERT(VARCHAR(20), BIRTHDTTM, 113)) , 20)
END AS BIRTHDTTM

The original data (which is a DOB field) looks like this

1936-08-14 00:00:00.000

And the code above is turning it into this which is good but means I cannot then format in SSRS

14 Aug 1936 00:00:00

So ideally I'd like the code above to be altered so that it gives me

14/08/1936

View 14 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Produces A Shared DB Lock With A Use DB. Normal?

Nov 20, 2007

Hi Folks,

I'm not a SQL Server expert, but need to understand something. I'm currently have SQL Server 2000 SP4 installed locally on my machine for application development.

Using sp_lock, I noticed that there are lots of shared database locks. After some study, i produced this interesting script:

use Master
go
sp_lock
go
use Experience
go
sp_lock
go

which results in:

spid dbid ObjId IndId Type Resource Mode Status
------ ------ ----------- ------ ---- ---------------- -------- ------
52 1 85575343 0 TAB IS GRANT
spid dbid ObjId IndId Type Resource Mode Status
------ ------ ----------- ------ ---- ---------------- -------- ------
52 13 0 0 DB S GRANT
52 1 85575343 0 TAB IS GRANT

My question is about the extra lock added by the "Use Experience statement". It lasts as long as the Experience DB connection is open

Question 1:
The way I read this is: the "use Experience" statement creates a shared database lock.
Am I reading this right?


Question 2:
I started looking into this because my application produces lots of locks that seem to live for 15-20 minutes. I have not noticed other adverse side effects of these locks. I have confirmed that nothing I have control over creates transactions, so I do not see why locks would be maintained.
Should I be concerned about these locks? Is this expected behavior?

Thanks Much in advance.

- D



View 3 Replies View Related

Using Log Shipping. Is It Safe To Create Normal Backups While It's Running?

May 8, 2007

Hi,



I plan to use Log Shipping on SQL 2000 to have warm standby database. I understand current procedure but have a question wether I can do full normal backups of my database server without screwing up my Log Shipping process? Also can I do transaction log backups as well (separate from the ones used for log shipping)?

View 3 Replies View Related

Processes Blocking RESOURCE MONITOR, Normal Behaviour?

Apr 12, 2007

Today I ended up in a situation where I had a process with total six "subthreads" (identified by different execution context) (seen in Activity Monitor). All of these had blocking=1. The server didn't function properly, I don't know the details of these problems, since I was not present at that time. We had to kill the processes. What is the process id 1, "RESOURCE MONITOR" in SQL Server 2005, seen in Activity Monitor? Is it fatal if some processes are blocking RESOURCE MONITOR? How can one end up in such situation, is it normal or a bug somewhere?



The server is a 64-bit Windows server having SQL Server 2005 SP1.



Yesterday I had a CLR stored procedure running on another server. The procedure uses System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection to access this server. The procedure started about 11.4.2007 22:22. The procedure created a connection to the SQL Server and created a select that should return 1,5 million rows. During fetching the rows (about after 800 000 rows) the procedure crashes to an error:"".NET Framework execution was aborted by escalation policy because of out of memory. " Naturally the procedure couldn't close the SQL Server connections, since it was forced to end.



The details if the processes as seen from Actívity Monitor (I only have screenshots so I can't copy-paste...):



The main process:

Process id: 69

status: suspended

open transactions: 1

command: SELECT

Application: .NET SqlClient Data Provider

Wait time: 578

Wait type: ASYNC_NETWORK_ID

CPU: 1375

Physical IO: 22

Memory usage: 2

Login time: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Last batch: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Blocked by: 0

Blocking: 1

Execution context: 0



Two "subthreads", there are five similar.

Process id: 69

status: suspended

open transactions: 0

command: SELECT

Application: .NET SqlClient Data Provider

Wait time: 35293046

Wait type: CXPACKET

CPU: 4875

Physical IO: 2214

Memory usage: 2

Login time: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Last batch: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Blocked by: 0

Blocking: 1

Execution context: 1



Process id: 69

status: suspended

open transactions: 0

command: SELECT

Application: .NET SqlClient Data Provider

Wait time: 35293031

Wait type: CXPACKET

CPU: 4875

Physical IO: 2210

Memory usage: 2

Login time: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Last batch: 11.4.2007 22:22:05

Blocked by: 0

Blocking: 1

Execution context: 2



The rest three subthreads differ from the above by having different wait time, CPU, physical IO and execution context.

View 12 Replies View Related

How Do I Get Bold And Normal Formatted Text In A Single Field?

Feb 27, 2007

In SSRS I am trying to get a textbox value to hold text with a mixture of formatting, along the lines of "name (country)" where the "name" part is bold and the "(country)" is normally formated.

Can anyone help?

Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved