hi,
there is any way to a bd notify the user by creat a file or send a e-mail or even connect to a ip and send a message when any record is changed ( update/insert/delete)
i have seen a event called triger but i don´t know if is that what i want and i think this event can´t do what i need.
any one can help me?
thanks a lot
If I have a table with 1 or more Nullable fields and I want to make sure that when an INSERT or UPDATE occurs and one or more of these fields are left to NULL either explicitly or implicitly is there I can set these to non-null values without interfering with the INSERT or UPDATE in as far as the other fields in the table?
EXAMPLE:
CREATE TABLE dbo.MYTABLE( ID NUMERIC(18,0) IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, FirstName VARCHAR(50) NULL, LastName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
[Code] ....
If an INSERT looks like any of the following what can I do to change the NULL being assigned to DateAdded to a real date, preferable the value of GetDate() at the time of the insert? I've heard of INSTEAD of Triggers but I'm not trying tto over rise the entire INSERT or update just the on (maybe 2) fields that are being left as null or explicitly set to null. The same would apply for any UPDATE where DateModified is not specified or explicitly set to NULL. I would want to change it so that DateModified is not null on any UPDATE.
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded) VALUES('John','Smith',NULL)
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName) VALUES('John','Smith')
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded) SELECT FirstName, LastName, NULL FROM MYOTHERTABLE
I have a web form with a text field that needs to take in as much as the user decides to type and insert it into an nvarchar(max) field in the database behind. I've tried using the new .write() method in my update statement, but it cuts off the text after a while. Is there a way to insert/update in SQL 2005 this without resorting to Bulk Insert? It bloats the transaction log and turning the logging off requires a call to sp_dboptions (or a straight-up ALTER DATABASE), which I'd like to avoid if I can.
I'm working on inserting data into a table in a database. The table has two separate triggers, one for insert and one for update (I don't like it this way, but that's how it's been for years). When there is a normal insert, done via a program, it looks like the triggers work fine. When I run an insert manually via a script, the first insert trigger will run, but the update trigger will fail. I narrowed down the issue to a root cause.
This root issue is due to both triggers using the same temporary table name. When the second trigger runs, there's an error stating that a few columns don't exist. I went to my test server and test db and changed the update trigger so that the temporary table is different than the insert trigger temporary table, the triggers work fine. The weird thing is that if the temporary table already exists, when the second trigger tries to create the temporary table, I would expect it to fail and say that it already exists.I'm probably just going to update the trigger tonight and change the temporary table name.
I have a problem with the notification. I have enabled Database mail and i have created an Operator.
Under SQL Server AgentJobs and then in the job properties i have enabled notification but i don`t receive a mail. Test e-mail works fine but "real" e-mail not.
I have also tried with the Database Maintenance Wizard but even then it just not work.
I have noticed that others have experienced the same problem but i have seen no solution yet.
Could you please help me? What can cause this problem? What`s the best i can do to start searching for the solution? Thanks!
Hello,I am writing a stored procedure that will take data from severaldifferent tables and will combine the data into a single table for ourdata warehouse. It is mostly pretty straightforward stuff, but there isone issue that I am not sure how to handle.The resulting table has a column that is an ugly concatenation fromseveral columns in the source. I didn't design this and I can't huntdown and kill the person who did, so that option is out. Here is asimplified version of what I'm trying to do:CREATE TABLE Source (grp_id INT NOT NULL,mbr_id DECIMAL(18, 0) NOT NULL,birth_date DATETIME NULL,gender_code CHAR(1) NOT NULL,ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL )GOALTER TABLE SourceADD CONSTRAINT PK_SourcePRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (grp_id, mbr_id)GOCREATE TABLE Destination (grp_id INT NOT NULL,mbr_id DECIMAL(18, 0) NOT NULL,birth_date DATETIME NULL,gender_code CHAR(1) NOT NULL,member_ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL,subscriber_ssn CHAR(9) NOT NULL )GOALTER TABLE DestinationADD CONSTRAINT PK_DestinationPRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (grp_id, mbr_id)GOThe member_ssn is the ssn for the row being imported. Each member alsohas a subscriber (think of it as a parent-child kind of relationship)where the first 9 characters of the mbr_id (as a zero-padded string)match and the last two are "00". For example, given the followingmbr_id values:1234567890012345678901123456789021111111110022222222200They would have the following subscribers:mbr_id subscriber mbr_id12345678900 1234567890012345678901 1234567890012345678902 1234567890011111111100 1111111110022222222200 22222222200So, for the subscriber_ssn I need to find the subscriber using theabove rule and fill in that ssn.I have a couple of ideas on how I might do this, but I'm wondering ifanyone has tackled a similar situation and how you solved it.The current system does an insert with an additional column for thesubscriber mbr_id then it updates the table using that column to joinback to the source. I could also join the source to itself in the firstplace to fill it in without the extra update, but I'm not sure if theextra complexity of the insert statement would offset any gains fromputting it all into one statement. I plan to test that on Monday.Thanks for any ideas that you might have.-Tom.
Currently, I have set up a SQL 7.0 database backup job and have one person notified if the job succeeds, but HOW do I choose an option to notify a different person if the job fails ?
In the server agent properties I use the Test button and I receive the response. "Successfully started(and stopped) a mail session with this profile." Indicating that mail should work.
If I send a email notification from a scheduled job it gives me the error: NOTE: Failed to notify 'operations' via email
In the SQL Server Agent Error log I get. "[264] An attempt was made to send an email when no email session has been established"
I have a requirement to create a sorted list of objects, stored withinan assembly, and I would like to use a After Insert/Update trigger tonotify that assembly that something has changed, rather than pollingthe database for changes all the time.My initial problem is that I need to create a static list so that itcan be dynamically looked at by other assemblies, but SQL Server won'tallow me to attach a dll which contains a static method.Has anyone done something like this? Are there any decent examplesavailable anywhere?any help will be appreciated.simo
Hi, I am developing desktop application with SQL Server 2005 in C#. I need your help. My Question is "How to notify a Database trigger is executed thru C# application?". Now I am going to explain clearly. I have a table "Employee" and I created one trigger (it may be INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE) for that table. Then I created a C# application to show a msg box when that table is modified. Now my question is If that table is modified a message box will be shown. I know about trigger (If trigger assigned table is modified that trigger will automatically executed.) But how do i know that trigger is executed thru a C# application. Please send your suggestion or links.
I have a VB.NET 2005 application that needs to monitor constantly each change of a field on a SQL server 2005. Is there a way of setting a trigger up in the SQL Server that notifies the VB.NET application to avoid having the VB.NET apllication querying the SQL table all day for changes?
The table in SQL stores a temperature value. I need the VB.NET application to receive this value everytime there's a change. I could do a timer on the VB.NET application to check for changes in the table every 1 second but I don't think this is efficient. The temperature value may change once every two or three seconds.
The VB.NET application will process the temperature value.
Is there a way of notifying the VB.NET application (which runs from a different server) from within SQL Server? If so, how? If not, what would you go about implementing this?
1.In SSIS is there a way to unzip the text files I have set an automated process in sql server agent I receive ziped text files.I want to unzip the files before loading the data
2.Is there a way to notify when an error occurs in the package in sql server agent.
Can I roll back certain query(insert/update) execution in one page if query (insert/update) in other page execution fails in asp.net.( I am using sqlserver 2000 as back end) scenario In a webpage1, I have insert query into master table and Page2 I have insert query to store data in sub table. I need to rollback the insert command execution for sub table ,if insert command to master table in web page1 is failed. (Query in webpage2 executes first, then only the query in webpage1) Can I use System. Transaction to solve this? Thanks in advance
I'm running sqlserver 2000 EE on windows nt 4.0 server. We are using Microsoft outlook express. I would like to setup our sqlserver to notify me via e-mail when a job finishes.
1) What value should I have for mail profile. Under sql server age properties.
I have job in SQL Server 2000 that is setup to notify an email operator upon successful completion.
When I test the notification to the set email operator it sends the email just fine.
When the job is run manually it emails the operator just fine.
When the job is run on a schedule it does not email the operator upon completion. It gives the details in view job history "NOTE: Failed to notify '<operator>' via email.
I have other jobs on the same server that run and notify via email to other operators upon successful completion just fine.
I have parsed MS Technet and the web and did not find anything.
When my SQL Agent job completes successfully, I'd like to send a notification to QlikView. The idea is to stop QlikView having to constantly check if the job has been run, and just get notified when it needs to update its data.
I don't know how to start. Can the job notifications push a success message to QlikView? I don't think I want to send an email, but something that indicates to QlikView to update the tables.
I have two servers S1 and S2. Inmediately after new data on S1 is available I want to perform some actions on S2.
I can use a trigger on S1, but if S2 is down the transaction on S1 will be lost. I could use database replication but I only need one single table in S1 to report changes to S2
I am havig trouble getting database mail to work. I setup IIS on the same box as sql. I setup SMTP with the relay to 127.0.0.0. In sql server, I setup database mail to point to localhost, with no authentication. After the setup, when I test the email (RMB Send test message) it works fine.
I created a job that will fail every time. I setup myself as the notify party on the job. When I run the job, it fails. I get no email. The job log has the following error:
Message The job failed. The Job was invoked by User xxxxAdministrator. The last step to run was step 1 (test 1). NOTE: Failed to notify 'Dan Jones' via email.
I have spent lots of hours trying to make this simple thing work. What is wrong?
I've been working with Database Mail for some time but I haven't seen this one before. I have a maintenance plan that does the following:
1. Check database integrity On Success: 2. Perform backups On Success: 3. Perform a maintenance cleanup On Success: 4. Notify operator of success
Steps 1 - 3 are also linked (via On Failure arrows) to a singular Notify Operator of Failure task.
The maintenance plan does exactly what I want it to, and if everything goes correctly, it successfully sends an email to an operator.
If steps 1 - 3 fail, the job ends in an error state, but does not trigger the Notify Operator of Failure task.
I was able to recreate the problem by creating another maintenance plan on the same instance with the same steps. Its "Notify Operator" on failure task also doesn't work.
It occurs to me that maybe I'm missing something, so here's some of the details of my SQL server:
SQL 2008 + SP1 (10.0.2531) x64 on Windows 2008 R2 DB Mail profile is public and default
I do have a slightly unusual profile, in that it uses two accounts:
1. A connection to a SharePoint SMTP service (where it catches emails directed at document libraries)
2. A connection to a UNIX-based smtp server (which routes mail to regular mailboxes and my SQL DBA mailing list)
The Profile will attempt to send to the SharePoint server first. The SharePoint server does not relay. If the document library email address doesn't exist, SQL will raise a warning (in the Database Mail log) and the profile will use the second account on the list, which is a real mail server and can relay the message to any mailbox.
It works really well, actually. When the maintenance plan completes successfully, the message is sent to the drop folder on the SharePoint server, and SharePoint routes the email to the correct library, and we have a central archive of all DB Mail notifications.
But if the job fails (for example, if the backup disk is out of space), none of this happens. According to the log, the job doesn't even try to send a notification. Looking at the DBMail log, the Mail service does not start. No email is delivered to the drop folder of the receiving SMTP server. So I don't think my Database Mail configuration is the problem here. It is apparently something to do with the way the job itself handles errors.
I have configured an alert like below to track all blocked events in SQL Server across all databases and then kick start a sql job when a blocking happens which inserts data to a table, when there is a blocking in SQL server , i get an email  --which is working fine and i am able to track all queries.
but, HOW to get notifications ONLY if BLOCKING IS HAPPENING FOR MORE THAN 30 SECONDS OR 1 MINUTE with out using sp_configure?
---ALERT USE [msdb] GO EXEC msdb.dbo.sp_update_alert @name=N'Blocking Process', @message_id=0, @severity=0, @enabled=1,Â
Hi, Can anyone explain what the difference is and the advantages or disadvantages of using the below statements in my SQL paramaters please. Is there a performance hit if I use the second option? If myCustomer.Phone2 IsNot Nothing Then versus If myCustomer.Phone2.Length > 0 Then
Is there an easy way with DTS to pump data from one table to another so that it will update the row if it exists (the source and destination have the same value for the ID colum) or insert it if it doesn't. I know this can be done with stored procedures/sql by doing IF EXISTS UPDATE ELSE INSERT but there are many tables and columns and this will be very tiime consuming.
I have a page where the user can update stock records. it has 5 x 5 text boxes. If the user has already entered stock before that stock will show up and they can change it and clicking the button it will update, however if they have just entered new data i would assume they would need to insert it, so how do i go about doing this? do i need to use both insert and update in the same sql string?
I am developing an application for the marketing dept at my company. Basically users can build the content of an email to be sent to our subscriber database.
I am wanting the application to initailly save the content into a database, the update the most recently inserted row.
The save button uses the following SQL command: Dim SqlMethod As String = "INSERT INTO CZC_email (Offer, SendDate, Destinations, Copy, BannerURL) VALUES ('" & txtCampaignName.Text & "','" & calCampaignDate.SelectedDate.ToString("yy/dd/MM") & "','" & DestinationsSelected & "','" & FreeTextBox2.Text & "', '" & txtBannerPath.Text & "')SELECT @@IDENTITY AS 'CZ_ID'"
And my update button has this SQL command:
Dim SqlMethod As String = "UPDATE CZC_email SET SendDate = '" & calCampaignDate.SelectedDate.ToString("yy/dd/MM") & "', Offer = '" & txtCampaignName.Text & "',Destinations = '" & DestinationsSelected & "', BannerURL = '" & txtBannerPath.Text & "' WHERE CZ_ID = @@IDENTITY "
but it doesnt seem to be updating. anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
I have a GridView on a page, It contains data from 2 joined tables and a command column to Edit/Update. I want to update the data in only one of the tables. If the data exists in the table to be updated there seems to be no problem (obviously). But I get an error when trying to update a record that does not exist (I should think so). Is there a way of Inserting the record before the update is fired? I have tried to do an insert contained in a 'Try' in the GridView1_RowUpdating, but this does not seem to work. as I still get the same error. Object cannot be cast from DBNull to other types. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidCastException: Object cannot be cast from DBNull to other types. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [InvalidCastException: Object cannot be cast from DBNull to other types.] System.DBNull.System.IConvertible.ToInt32(IFormatProvider provider) +54 System.Convert.ChangeType(Object value, TypeCode typeCode, IFormatProvider provider) +293 System.Web.UI.WebControls.SqlDataSourceView.AddParameters(DbCommand command, ParameterCollection reference, IDictionary parameters, IDictionary exclusionList, String oldValuesParameterFormatString) +577 System.Web.UI.WebControls.SqlDataSourceView.ExecuteUpdate(IDictionary keys, IDictionary values, IDictionary oldValues) +400 System.Web.UI.DataSourceView.Update(IDictionary keys, IDictionary values, IDictionary oldValues, DataSourceViewOperationCallback callback) +78 System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridView.HandleUpdate(GridViewRow row, Int32 rowIndex, Boolean causesValidation) +1173 System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridView.HandleEvent(EventArgs e, Boolean causesValidation, String validationGroup) +1084 System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridView.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs e) +88 System.Web.UI.Control.RaiseBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +35 System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridViewRow.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs e) +117 System.Web.UI.Control.RaiseBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +35 System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.OnCommand(CommandEventArgs e) +83 System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +136 System.Web.UI.WebControls.LinkButton.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +7 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +11 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +172 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +4839
Protected Sub GridView1_RowUpdating(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.GridViewUpdateEventArgs) Handles GridView1.RowUpdating Try Dim eventid As Integer = CInt(GridView1.Rows(GridView1.EditIndex).Cells(7).ToString) Dim userid As Integer = CInt(hfID.Value) Dim guests As Integer = CInt(GridView1.Rows(GridView1.EditIndex).Cells(4).ToString) Dim attending As Boolean = CBool(GridView1.Rows(GridView1.EditIndex).Cells(5).ToString) Dim extra As String = Server.HtmlEncode(GridView1.Rows(GridView1.EditIndex).Cells(6).ToString) InsertRecord(eventid, userid, guests, attending, extra) Catch ex As Exception End Try End Sub
Function InsertRecord(ByVal eventID As Integer, ByVal userID As Integer, ByVal guests As Integer, ByVal attending As Boolean, ByVal extra As String) As Integer Dim connectionString As String = "server='localhost'; trusted_connection=true; Database='AFRA'" Dim sqlConnection As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(connectionString) Dim queryString As String = "INSERT INTO [AFRAAttendance] ([EventID], [UserID], [Guests], [Attending], [Extra]) VALUES (@EventID, @UserID, @Guests, @Attending, @Extra)" Dim sqlCommand As System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand(queryString, sqlConnection) sqlCommand.Parameters.Add("@EventID", System.Data.SqlDbType.Int).Value = eventID sqlCommand.Parameters.Add("@UserID", System.Data.SqlDbType.Int).Value = userID sqlCommand.Parameters.Add("@Guests", System.Data.SqlDbType.Int).Value = guests sqlCommand.Parameters.Add("@Attending", System.Data.SqlDbType.Bit).Value = attending sqlCommand.Parameters.Add("@Extra", System.Data.SqlDbType.VarChar).Value = extra Dim rowsAffected As Integer = 0 sqlConnection.Open() Try rowsAffected = sqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery Finally sqlConnection.Close() End Try Return rowsAffected End FunctionThank you
Is it possible to run a DTS package so that it just updates existing rows rather than a full on insert?
I have an HR db as a source and a health and safety db as destination. records of peoples H+S acheivments and assessments are maintained in the H+S db but i need to keep this topped up with the newly recruited staff details and the existing staff change of details. The DTS need to know to insert where its a new record and to update where its just a change of name or work location etc.
I have a form that pulls existing information from a database and allows users to edit it. Every field can be left blank if the user wishes. I am having an issue with determining which SQL statement to run. There has to be an easier way to do this then what I am doing. For each filed I process the data this way:
SQL2="select * from 1985ClassList where MailingListID =" & Session("EID") set aData = oConn.execute(SQL2)
SQL = "Update 1985ClassList SET "
if aData.Fields("FirstName") > " " and Request.QueryString("FirstName") > " " then SQL = SQL & "'FirstName' = '" & Request.QueryString("FirstName") & "', " end if
if aData.Fields("FirstName") = " " and Request.QueryString("FirstName") > " " then strFSQL = strFSQL & "FirstName, " strVSQL = strVSQL & Request.QueryString("FirstName") & ", " end if