Problem With Distributed Trans 2000 To 2005
Apr 13, 2007
I have a test environment setup consisiting of one SQL Server 2000 32 bit instance on one box and one SQL Server 2005 64 bit edtion on another box. Nearly everything works fine but have found this one snag...
Linked Server name: SQL2005
From the SQL Server 2000 instance in Query Analyzer....
-- this works fine
Delete from [SQL2005].myDB.dbo.myTbl
-- this just hangs
Begin Tran
Delete from [SQL2005].myDB.dbo.myTbl
It doesn't make any difference what provider I use on the Linked Server.
I have tried it on a SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2000 configuration and, interestingly, it would only work if I used set XACT_ABORT ON. However, in the SQL Server 2000 to 2005 configuration, this doesn't help.
We have a number of DTS packages that do deletes across the linked server that are failing due to this issue so we're being stopped from continuing with the migration to SQL Server 2005.
Any suggestions?
Cilve
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 9, 2007
I'm trying to connect to another slq server db through a linked server (and synonyms) but I get the following error.
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The current transaction cannot be committed and cannot support operations that write to the log file. Roll back the transaction. ,Unable to start a nested transaction for OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "BURT". A nested transaction was required because the XACT_ABORT option was set to OFF. , at Westfalia.TDMN.TxObjects.TxBurtOCIInterface.BurtOCIPalletChangedRecords_Get() , --- End of inner exception stack
I've set up MSDTC and executed the procedures noted in MS's article ID 873160. I am using 2005, but the Burt server is 2000. I can run the stored procedure from my server, which queries theirs. But when I execute the sp from a service, I get the error. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2007
Hi Folks,
I have been struggling with a problem for the last couple days now regarding MSTD and distributed transactions. The main issue is that 3 servers are each sitting in a different domain. Non of the domains trust each other.
As of yesterday, I could get all the SQL 2005 chatting to each other using MSDTC without a problem. However, I have a SQL 2000 box which refuses to work. A normal query across a linked server works fine. A distributed transaction will not work. This is the case from A to B and B to A.
I have tested with DTCPing and it says all is ok.
The error messages are:
SQL 2000 > SQL 2005
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "T-ServerTServer" returned message "No transaction is active.".
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Line 2
The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "T-ServerTServer" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
And the other way round:
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
If watching the DTC monitor, it shows an active transaction then goes back to 0.
All instances are on a 4 node cluster with 3 nodes turned off for the testing.
I have run out of things to try. Most of the symptoms for the above messages are to do with DTC security, the Turn RPC Security Off reg hack. All instances and OS (W2K3) are the latest updates / patches.
As for the 3rd server, SQL 2005, it is happy to talk
Anybody got a gem which I can try?
Edit: Both SQL 2005 servers are x64 while the 2000 is x86
Cheers,
Crispin
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
I am trying to write some admin only procedures which will collect information to one of my development server from other production and development servers.
I have created linked servers to access these other servers on the development server. This development server is SQL Server 2000 EE. Other servers which I want to access are 2000 and 2005 (vaious editions)
E.g I have another development server called PRODTEST which is SQL Server 2005 and on the development server I have created a linked server pointing to PRODTEST called TESTLINKSRV. I want to access new object catalog view (as I do not want to use sysobjects)
When I run the following query
SELECT * FROM [TESTLINKSRV].[DBNAME].[sys].[objects]
I get following error,
OLE DB error trace [Non-interface error: OLE DB provider does not contain the table: ProviderName=' TESTLINKSRV ', TableName='" DBNAME "."sys"."objects"'].
Msg 7314, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
OLE DB provider ' TESTLINKSRV ' does not contain table '"DBNAME"."sys"."objects"'. The table either does not exist or the current user does not have permissions on that table.
So I try this query
SELECT * FROM [TESTLINKSRV].[DBNAME].[sys.objects]
and I get following error
Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Invalid object name TESTLINKSRV.DBNAME.sys.objects'.
So bottom line is how do I access catalog views on a 2005 server from a 2000 server using linked server?
I hope someone understands what I am trying to achieve. Please let me know what is it that I am doing wrong.
Thank you
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2007
if it is possible to run a distributed query against 2000 from 2005, what would the OPENDATASOURCE parameters look like? I'd like to be able to pivot without copying my older 2000 db to 2005 or using linked servers..
For reference, here's an example of a distrib query that reads excel...
ie SELECT * INTO XLImport3 FROM OPENDATASOURCE('Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0',
'Data Source=C: estxltest.xls;Extended Properties=Excel 8.0')...[Customers$]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2001
We would like to replicate from a SQL 7 DB some data onto a SQL 2000 Server running SQL 2000. We plan to take some data off the SQL 7 DB's and create a Data Warehouse on the SQL 2000 Box.
Question: Will the data replicate successfully from the SQL 7 box onto the SQL 2000 box?
-thanks
-tom
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2001
We're running Lawson software on our SQL 2000 box. We're using Veritas
Backup Exec to back up the databases to tape. I'm also using a Maint
Plan for an extra backup (kinda redundant, but I need the practice at
all this). I just added transaction logs to the maint plan (so I
thought) but I only see a log for 1 of the 3 databases.
Also, my trans log file is 11 gig. I thought backing up the trans logs
would get the trans to delete afterwards (databases are recovery
model=full). Can anyone point a newbie in the right direction.
Fortunately it's not in production yet, and we haven't had any disasters
(yet).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2004
We just upgraded from SQL 7 to 2000 and for some reason I am unable to perform distributed transactions. I keep getting the following error:
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'MSDASQL' ITransaction Join:: JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]. Operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'MSDASQL' was unable to begin a distributed transaction
I tried a few of the fixes recommended on the microsoft website but they did not solve the problem. We are still using the same O/S (Windows 2000 Pro), so the only thing that has changed is the server.
Any help would be appreciated.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2004
Hi Chaps!!
I am in serious problem that My production sql 2000 server with winSp 4 and sqlSP 2 with slammer hotfix is not executing four part distributed query well when I combine the query with begin tran statement it enter into hang mode... else without begin tran it is fine.
request to all of u to get rid of this situation as some modules of our applicaiton is not functioning...
can sp3a installation help or going back to winSp2/3 will be helpfull. (recently we have applied winsp4 but i don't think this is concerned with it)
thanks in advance to give your time...
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2006
Just curious if anyone out there has had success running a Distributed Transaction on Windows 2000 Professional SP4 lately?
I have come to the conclusion that is is virutally impossible. I am running MSDE on a Win2k Pro machine and trying to run a distributed transaction via linked server and am getting the
"The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction."
error. Yes I have been scouring the web looking for answers and have implemented pretty much everything I have run accross... and Yes the MSDTC service is started on both machines... BTW: If I run the procedure on XP it works great!!!
I am wondering if anyone even uses Win2k Pro anymore let alone trying to run a distributed tarnsaction on the darn thing.
If anyone out there has it running let me know I would love to chat with you for a minute or two.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
Regarding backups.
The first available time to do a full backup is at 11:00pm which also applies to diff. backups.
How often does the trans. logs need a back up?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
Hello,
I've been redirected here from the Transaction Programming forum becuase I have e peculiar issue with SQL 2005 running INSERT stored procs from multiple WCF services all withing a TransactionScope.
The original post is http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2720665&SiteID=1&mode=1
The story goes, I have SRVC A with starts a TransactionScope which in turn calls SRVC B & C in sequence based on processing rules.
SRVC A is a Sequential Workflow which Starts and Completes the TransactionScope
SRVC B Creates a new Customer into the database
SRVC C Creates new Accounts for that Customer and Initialises the accounts with funds
The DB Tables underneath are Customer, Account and AccountLog
DDL
Code Block
CREATE TABLE [Member].[Customers](
[CustomerId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](32) NOT NULL,
[CreatedUtc] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Customer] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[CustomerId] ASC
)
CREATE TABLE [Bank].[Accounts](
[AccountId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[CustomerId] [int] NOT NULL,
[CurrentBalance] [money] NOT NULL,
[LastUpdateDate] [datetime] NULL,
[CreatedDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Bank_Account] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[AccountId] ASC
)
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [Bank].[Accounts] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_Account_Customer] FOREIGN KEY([CustomerId])
REFERENCES [Member].[Customers] ([CustomerId])
CREATE TABLE [Bank].[AccountLog](
[AccountLogId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[AccountId] [int] NOT NULL,
[Amount] [money] NOT NULL,
[UtcDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Bank_AccountLog] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[AccountLogId] ASC
)
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [Bank].[AccountLog] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [FK_AccountLog_Account] FOREIGN KEY([AccountId])
REFERENCES [Bank].[Accounts] ([AccountId])
NB. I've removed most fields not essential for this example.
So from SRVC A I invoke SRVC B and the Customer is created, however when I get to SRVC C and the accounts are to be created I get a lock. Only when the Transaction aborts due to timeout, do I see in SQL Profiler that the call to the SP that created the Account is executed but eventually rolls back as it is part of the distributed transaction.
Now, If I set the Isolation level in the TransactionScope to ReadUncommitted (urgh) the problem remains. When I set the IsolationLevel to Read Uncommitted in the SP that creates the account the problem remains but when I remove the FK constraint the problem disappers. The other curious thing is that with the Customer -> Account FK removed and when SRVC C calls to insert funds into the AccountLog which also updates an aggregated total in the Account from within the same transaction scope and with Account -> AccountLog FK constraints in place there is no locking even with Isolation Serializable.
I'm quite at a loss as to what could be causing these issues. If anyone has any suggestions I would greatly appreciate any help.
Thanks
Andy
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2007
Hi, I am zeronet. I decide to set up our own web system application just like Ebay. Because of the low investment, I want to select a free DB for our data storage. For high performance, we want to set up a distributed db system. As a beginner of SQL server 2005 express, we want to know: if the SQL-server-2005-express has that ability to manage large amout data and to do with this work? I am eager to hear of your advice.
Thanks.
yours
zeronet
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2007
Is it possible to use DTC (or cross database queries) with mirroring on SQL 2005 Service Pack 2?
Thnx,
GoranP
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2005
The SQL SERver 2005 Standard Edidtion install CD and the MSDN CD distributedat the SQLServer Launch in Chicago are blank. Has anyone else had thisproblem and or requested replacements? If so, how.thanks muchMo
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
I am trying to configure distributed transaction and XA support using Microsoft SQL Server 2005 JDBC Driver. I have coppied SQLJDBC_XA.dll from XA directory and placed in my sql server binn directory and trying to run the script xa_install.sql from binn directory with command as below :
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server80ToolsBinn>
osql -U sa -n -P admin -S localhost -i C:JavaLibrariesMS SQL Driversqljdbc_1.2enuxa xa_install.sql
But I am getting error saying :
[DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
[DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
when I replaced local host with the machine name it gives error :
[Shared Memory]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
[Shared Memory]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
where in I am able to test connection from Websphere using the same connection.
Please help some one ....... I am in URGENT need.... I need to enable XA suport for my application to run........
Thanks ----
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2008
We have a test db, a staging db and a live db. I have a stored procedure that runs fine on test and staging, but throws the following error on live.
The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC) has cancelled the distributed transaction.
The stored procedure uses linked servers and a transaction.
We're using the following transaction code in the stored procedure
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION
BEGIN TRY
---
procedure stuff here
---
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
DECLARE @ErrorSeverity INT, @ErrorNumber INT, @ErrorMessage NVARCHAR(4000), @ErrorState INT
SET @ErrorSeverity = ERROR_SEVERITY()
SET @ErrorNumber = ERROR_NUMBER()
SET @ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE()
SET @ErrorState = ERROR_STATE()
IF @ErrorState = 0
SET @ErrorState = 1
RAISERROR ('ERROR OCCURED:%d', @ErrorSeverity, @ErrorState, @ErrorNumber)
IF XACT_STATE() < 0
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
END CATCH
END
I found the following link which seems to be the problem we're experiencinghttp://support.microsoft.com/kb/937517
The link includes a workaround which is the following:
"To prevent the SQLNCLI provider from sending an attention signal to the server, use the SQLNCLI provider to consume fully any rowsets that the OLE DB consumer creates. "
How do I use the SQLNCLI provider to fully consume any rowsets?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2006
Hi
We would like to install Sql 2005 Enterprise Edition (including database engine, reporting service, integration service and analysis service) as a sepearte instance on a server which already has Sql 2000 with reporting services and analysis services. We do not want to disturb the existing sql 2000 setup.
If we do that then what will happen to my earlier sql 2000 reporting service? Will it be upgraded to sql 2005 reporting service? I heard that reporting services are instance unaware application. Where will be the default reporting service database available?
Please help us.
Regards,
Sankar N
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2007
I receive the following error message when I run a distributed query against a loopback linked server in SQL Server 2005:
The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC) has cancelled the distributed transaction.
To resolve this problem, I was told that running a distributed query against a loopback linked server is not supported in SQL Server 2005. And I am suggested to use a remote server definition (sp_addserver) instead of a linked server definition to resolve this problem. (Although this is only a temporary resolution, which will deprecate in Katmai)
However, I run into another problem when I use the remote server definition. I receive the following error message:
Msg 18483, Level 14, State 1, Line 1
Could not connect to server 'ServerNameSQL2005' because '' is not defined as a remote login at the server. Verify that you have specified the correct login name.
Could anyone please help me out?
(I include the reproduce steps for the first error message, followed by my resolution that generates the second error message)
======
Reproduce steps for the first error message
======
On the ComputerAInstanceA instance, run the following statement to create a database and a table:
CREATE DATABASE DatabaseA
GO
USE DatabaseA
GO
CREATE TABLE TestTable(Col1 int, Col2 varchar(50))
GO
INSERT INTO TestTable VALUES (1, 'Hello World')
GO
On the ComputerBInstanceB instance, run the following statement to create a database and a table:
CREATE DATABASE DatabaseB
GO
USE DatabaseB
GO
CREATE TABLE TestTable (Col1 int, Col2 varchar(50))
GO
On the ComputerAInstanceA instance, create a linked server that links to the ComputerBInstanceB instance. Assume the name of the linked server is LNK_ServerB.
On the ComputerBInstanceB instance, create a linked server that links to the ComputerAInstanceA instance. Assume the name of the linked server is LNK_ServerA.
On the ComputerBInstanceB instance, run the following statement:
USE DatabaseB
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertA AS
BEGIN
SELECT * from LNK_ServerA.DatabaseA.dbo.TestTable
END
GO
On the ComputerAInstanceA instance, run the following statement:
USE DatabaseA
GO
INSERT INTO TestTable
EXEC LNK_ServerB.DatabaseB.dbo.InsertA
GO
Then I receive the first error message.
=======
My resolution that generates the second error message
=======
On the ComputerBInstanceB instance, run the following statement:
sp_addserver 'ComputerAInstanceA'
GO
sp_serveroption 'ComputerAInstanceA', 'Data Access', 'TRUE'
GO
USE DatabaseB
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertA AS
BEGIN
SELECT * FROM [ComputerAInstanceA].DatabaseA.dbo.TestTable
END
GO
On the ComputerAInstanceA instance, run the following statement:
USE DatabaseA
GO
INSERT INTO TestTable
EXECUTE [ComputerBInstanceB].[DatabaseB].[dbo].[InsertA]
GO
Then I receive the second error message.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 1999
I wnat to have a log file with all the updates and inserts made to the DB.
I understand I have to do a trans-log,how?
in order to make a query a transaction do I only have to declare trans...commit ??
tanx,
eyal
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2001
I have set up a simple trans rep from a server in the office to the web. both servers are NT4sp6aSQL 7.0. Tables only.
The publication and distribution db are on the server at the office, and there is a full time connection through the firewall.
The initialization and first replication works perfectly, but after that, there is a message from the snapshot agent that "no subscriptions needed initialization", the logreader says thare are no replicated transactions and the Distribution agent says there are no replicated transactions. What am I missing?
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 26, 2000
Does anyone know how to move the transaction log(s) of a LIVE database to a new location. I must move the log of a database to a new mirrored drive without any disruption to users. I cannot take the database offline or use the sp_detach_db stored procedure. Your inputs are much appreciated!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2000
SQL7:
I have a 300MB db, and a transaction log near 1.3GB. Upon notification, I backed up the db log with truncate_only - no luck getting it smaller. Later, tried backup with no_log ( assuming the o/s was full - no diff)
I tried shinkfile (logfile,truncateonly) and no luck.
I tried dbcc opentrans to see if any pending trans. The db looks fine with dbcc checkdb. I managed to free up a mere 50MB. I checked the permissions on the db, and added backup db, and backup log in the db permissions for the user logged in (also tried this with sa)
I am unable to free up the space to the os. Can I somehow rid the log file and start off with a fresh log file? I need this space. As a patch I moved the log to a larger filesystem as a temporarily fix.
start/stop SQL- nothing? reboot -nothing? I played with waiting game. This log does not want to release space. The log grew from data loads.
Question1: Suggestions how to truncate this log? The contents are not really impt, but the space is.
Question2: Can I add another logfile, then use EMPTYFILE to transfer the contents to the newly added log file, then REMOVE The original logfile? In theory does this make sense?
Thanks,
Jason
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2001
Hello, During an intantanée arrest of replication of data base sql server 7 sp2 (nt4),
I lose keys on the subscriber, how don't have it? Thank you in advance easter
pascal
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2002
:confused:
Here's my situation (SQL2K)
We have a testing database we're using to convert large amounts of data from 1 system to another. We might process 5-6 million records, but don't care about being able to recover point-in-time.
I set recovery mode to simple, do a full backup every night. I keep getting large transaction logs. I manually run Shrink Database when I realize the logs are big
What can I do to prevent the logs from getting big in the first place ?? Can I prevent logging from happening ?
I keep reading various books and BOL, but I guess I don't quite "get it" yet ......
Any plain spoken, detailed suggestions would be very appreciated .... thanks in advance.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2002
My database backs up just fine, but the transaction logs
are not. I created a maintenance plan for the database.
Any suggestions ?
Agent Job for transaction log backup
EXECUTE master.dbo.xp_sqlmaint N'-PlanID 0A83F1BC-EEAA-
4BDF-9374-E7FF5C1215F8 -
Rpt "d:sqldataMSSQL$PRODUCTIONLOGzeon_live_commerce DB
Maintenance Plan16.txt" -DelTxtRpt 1WEEKS -VrfyBackup -
BkUpMedia DISK -BkUpLog -UseDefDir -DelBkUps 2DAYS -
CrBkSubDir -BkExt "TRN"'
The error log file for the transaction log backups is...
Microsoft (R) SQLMaint Utility (Unicode), Version Logged
on to SQL Server 'ZCHQ_SQLPRODUCTION' as 'ZCISQLSERVICE'
(trusted)
Starting maintenance plan 'zeon_live_commerce DB
Maintenance Plan1' on 6/12/2002 8:15:03 AM
Backup can not be performed on
database 'zeon_live_commerce'. This sub task is ignored.
Deleting old text reports... 1 file(s) deleted.
End of maintenance plan 'zeon_live_commerce DB Maintenance
Plan1' on 6/12/2002 8:15:03 AM
SQLMAINT.EXE Process Exit Code: 1 (Failed)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2004
If you are set up for AutoCommit why would you or should you set a explicit transaction? I have noticed that in some called stored procudures from a "container" stored procedure. (Hope I got that right) that in the called stored procedure a Begin tran is used. Can anyone help with the why and what fors? It seems to me that you want to let SQL Server handle this becuase of the danger of leaving out a Commit or Rollback? But thats me. I may be very wrong? Thanks.
Tom
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2005
Hi,
I was just wondering, if I have a DB for log shipping, and change the recovery model to bulk-insert before I do a dbreindex, does the log still grow as big as the full recovery model? as in when the DB in bulk-insert model, will dbreindex still writes to the log? What i'm trying to do is try to make the log files smaller for log ship when i'm doing the db reindexing job.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2005
I’m really scratching my head with this Transact-SQL, say you wanted to cycle through a set of rows, then perform an operation on each row, so in VB/DAO it might look like this:
Dim rsTables As Recordset, rsIndex As Recordset
Set rsTables = dbSource.OpenRecordset("SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.tables")
Do While rsTables.EOF
Set rsIndex = dbSource.OpenRecordset("Select * From SysIndexes Where Name = '" & rsTables!Table_Name & "'")
DoSomethingToIndex rsIndex!Name
rsTables.MoveNext
Loop
How can you do this cycling with Trans-SQL?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2001
Hi all,
Just wondering if the virtual filesize of the transaction log can be changed to suite us.
run dbcc loginfo(sagent_dev) display the followings:
FileId FileSize StartOffset FSeqNo Status Parity
213041664 8192 2110128
213041664 130498561960128
213041664 26091520197064
2524288039133184201064
2524288065404928204064
2524288070647808203064
25242880102105088210064
25242880107347968000
25242880112590848214264
25242880117833728213064
25242880123076608212064
Note that the virtual filesize can comprise of different configuration. In other database I can specify this logical size to whatever I like.
cheers
dave
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2000
Hi,
I am trying to disable transactional replication, but am having some problems. I used the wizard, however, it has taken 7 hours so far and is still not done. SQL Server (7.0) is showing the connection as runnable but it seems as if nothing is being removed. Am I missing something? Should I have done something else before running the wizard? I can't even kill the SPID.
Can anyone help or offer some advice?
Thanks in advance...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2005
I have a trans log backup that runs every 15 minutes on san, works fine until I do a backup after a large load. I get the below error message. Anyone had this before?
Executed as user: DPSCSDOMsqlexec. The file on device 'n:sqllogsmdentallgdmp' is not a valid Microsoft Tape Format backup set. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3242) BACKUP LOG is terminating abnormally. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3013). The step fail
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2001
No I did not write this below, this is from a vendor, I used profiler and I believe their SP is causing a blocking problem on their vendor supplied DB. It thought at the least always have a begin end or a begin trans commit trans. ANy quick opinions greatly appreciated
create procedure write_planned_service_rec
@p1 varchar(20),@p2 varchar(20),@p3 varchar(20),@p4 varchar(20),@p5 varchar(20),
@p6 varchar(20),@p7 varchar(20),@p8 varchar(20),@p9 varchar(20),
@p10 varchar(20),@p11 varchar(20),@p12 varchar(20),@p13 varchar(20),@p14
varchar(20),
@p15 varchar(20),@p16 varchar(20),@p17 varchar(20),@p18 varchar(20),@p19
varchar(20),
@p20 varchar(20)
AS
IF @p20 = 'P'
update patient set date_insurance_updated = getdate() where patient_id =
@p1 and practice_id = @p13
View 1 Replies
View Related
