Problem With Sliding Window Scenario On Partitioned Table...

Nov 7, 2007

I have a partition function as follows:
CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [TimeTicksRangePFN](bigint) AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (633294720000000000, 633320640000000000, 633347424000000000, 633374208000000000, 633399264000000000)

These numbers happen to correspond to the dates 11/1/7, 12/1/7, 1/1/8, 2/1/8 and 3/1/8 in ticks respectively.

I have a partition scheme as follows:
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [TimeTicksRangePScheme] AS PARTITION [TimeTicksRangePFN] TO ([FG_xxx_EventArchive00001], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00002], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00003], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00004], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00005], [PRIMARY])

After running my €œsliding window script€? , which I wanted to switch out the lowest partition with, and add a new partition with a new tick boundary that equates to 3/5/8, I get an error saying that 1 of my switch out table€™s indexes is in filegroup 1 but partition 5€™s index of the same name is in PRIMARY. At this point the partition function looks like€¦

CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [TimeTicksRangePFN](bigint) AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (633320640000000000, 633347424000000000, 633374208000000000, 633399264000000000, 633402720000000000) which looks like what I had intended cuz the last boundary is tick representation of 3/5/8 and the oldest has rolled off

and the scheme looks like€¦

CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [TimeTicksRangePScheme] AS PARTITION [TimeTicksRangePFN] TO ([FG_xxx_EventArchive00001], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00003], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00004], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00005], [PRIMARY], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00001]) which looks nothing like what I intended, I thought I€™d end up with €¦00002,€¦00003,€¦00004,€¦00005,€¦00001,PRIMARY

the relevant script steps are...

5) creates table [dbo].Switch on the switch out filegroup with columns, PK and indexes matching those of [dbo].EventArchive (allows default location for indexes)
6) switches partition 1 of [dbo].EventArchive to [dbo].Switch
7) ALTER PARTITION FUNCTION TimeTicksRangePFN() MERGE RANGE (633294720000000000)
8) truncates [dbo].Switch
9) drops all indexes on [dbo].Switch except a clustered index (IX_TimeTicks), leaves PK constraint alone
10) ships the new data whose values range from 3/1/8 to less than 3/5/8 to [dbo].Switch and deletes them from their source
11) recreates all non clustered indexes on [dbo].Switch
12)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Switch] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT RangeCK CHECK ([TimeTicks] < the number of ticks represented by 3/5/8)
13)ALTER PARTITION SCHEME TimeTicksRangePScheme NEXT USED [FG_xxx_EventArchive00001]
14)ALTER PARTITION FUNCTION TimeTicksRangePFN() SPLIT RANGE (the number of ticks represented by 3/5/8)
15)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Switch] SWITCH TO [dbo].[EventArchive] PARTITION 5

step 15 is the one that fails with message "ALTER TABLE SWITCH statement failed. index 'xxx.dbo.Switch.IX_TimeTicks' is in filegroup 'FG_xxx_EventArchive00001' and partition 5 of index 'xxx.dbo.EventArchive.IX_TimeTicks' is in filegroup 'PRIMARY'.

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Sliding Window Scenario On Partitioned Table

Nov 13, 2007

I began with a partition function as follows:

CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [TimeTicksRangePFN](bigint) AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (633294720000000000, 633320640000000000, 633347424000000000, 633374208000000000, 633399264000000000)

These numbers happen to correspond to the dates 11/1/7, 12/1/7, 1/1/8, 2/1/8 and 3/1/8 in ticks respectively.

I began with a partition scheme as follows:

CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [TimeTicksRangePScheme] AS PARTITION [TimeTicksRangePFN] TO ([FG_xxx_EventArchive00001], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00002], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00003], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00004], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00005], [PRIMARY])

While running my “sliding window script� , which I hoped would 1) roll off the oldest partition of my EventArchive table and 2) add a new partition with a tick boundary that equates to 3/5/8, I get an error related to my switch out table's index, the same table's Filegroup and Primary.

After getting the error, I scripted the partition function as a create in mgt studio and got…

CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [TimeTicksRangePFN](bigint) AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES (633320640000000000, 633347424000000000, 633374208000000000, 633399264000000000, 633402720000000000)

...which looks like what I had intended cuz the last boundary is the tick representation of 3/5/8 and the oldest has rolled off

scripting the scheme produced...

CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [TimeTicksRangePScheme] AS PARTITION [TimeTicksRangePFN] TO ([FG_xxx_EventArchive00001], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00003], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00004], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00005], [PRIMARY], [FG_xxx_EventArchive00001])

which looks nothing like what I intended, I thought I’d end up with …00002,…00003,…00004,…00005,…00001,PRIMARY

the script steps that seem most relevant start at the 5th step as follows...

5) creates table [dbo].Switch on the switch out filegroup with columns, PK and indexes matching exactly those of [dbo].EventArchive

6) switches partition 1 of [dbo].EventArchive to [dbo].Switch

7) ALTER PARTITION FUNCTION TimeTicksRangePFN() MERGE RANGE (633294720000000000) --this was the oldest date corresponding to 11/1/7

8) truncates [dbo].Switch

9) drops all indexes on [dbo].Switch except a clustered index (IX_TimeTicks), leaves PK constraint alone

10) ships the new data whose values range from 3/1/8 to less than 3/5/8 to [dbo].Switch and deletes them from their source

11) recreates all non clustered indexes on [dbo].Switch

12)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Switch] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT RangeCK CHECK ([TimeTicks] < the number of ticks represented by 3/5/8)

13)ALTER PARTITION SCHEME TimeTicksRangePScheme NEXT USED [FG_xxx_EventArchive00001] --fg isnt really hardcoded

14)ALTER PARTITION FUNCTION TimeTicksRangePFN() SPLIT RANGE (the number of ticks represented by 3/5/8)

15)ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Switch] SWITCH TO [dbo].[EventArchive] PARTITION 5

step 15 is the one that fails with message "ALTER TABLE SWITCH statement failed. index 'xxx.dbo.Switch.IX_TimeTicks' is in filegroup 'FG_xxx_EventArchive00001' and partition 5 of index 'xxx.dbo.EventArchive.IX_TimeTicks' is in filegroup 'PRIMARY'.

View 1 Replies View Related

Sliding Window Scenario For Shifting Partitions...do All Indexes Need To Be Built On The Staging Tables?

Oct 31, 2007

Kimberly Tripp describes a recipe for switching partitions in and out, thru the use of staging tables, when it comes time to "slide the window" on a partitioned table. She says that the clustered index (on staging) must be the same as that chosen for the partitioned table itself but she doesnt discuss whether or not all of the non clustered indexes need to be the same too once the
ALTER TABLE Orders
SWITCH PARTITION 1
TO OrdersOctober2002
and
ALTER TABLE OrdersOctober2004
SWITCH TO Orders PARTITION 24
run. For the data being switched out, I wouldnt want to do anything extra. For the data being switched in, I'd like to understand if she is implying that all other indexes would be built automatically as a result of the 2nd ALTER statement?

Kimberly's article is at http://www.sqlskills.com/resources/Whitepapers/Partitioning%20in%20SQL%20Server%202005%20Beta%20II.htm#_Toc79339965

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Partition Sliding Window Causing Loads Of Blocks

Oct 29, 2015

We have a massive database with an almost massive amount of traffic to and from it.

I've been requested to implement a sliding window partitioning with 2 partitions an active and passive 1,I managed to test this on a very small testbed last month.

I currently moved 97k table on to the partition function leaving me another 26 k to go

I'm using the following stored procedure to implement the sliding window

CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[ManageFactSlidingWindow](@pFunction nvarchar(max),@pSchema nvarchar(max),@FG nvarchar(max),@moveDays int)
/*****************************************************************************
PROCEDURE NAME: [ManageFactSlidingWindow]
AUTHOR: Arshad Ali
CREATED: 02/24/2013
DESCRIPTION: This stored procedure manages sliding window for the partitioned table

VERSION HISTORY:
DATE EMAIL Company DESCRIPTION

[Code] .....

When I try to move the partition even a single day I get loads of locks.

View 0 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Aggregation Table On Sliding Dates

Sep 18, 2014

currently need to re-create an aggregate table in a proc every night to aggregate purchases broken down by person/store in groups of 3, 6 12 etc months.finding the performance of it is very slow as it covers 500,000 million rows.The query looks like

SELECTCusID(int)
, StoreID(int)
, SUM(L3M) as Last3Months
, SUM(L6M) as Last6Months
, SUM(L9M) as Last9Months

[code]...

I need to make changes to this because it is using a BETWEEN on a datetime column. I was wondering though, if anyone else has made agg tables like this before an found a better way of doing them?

View 0 Replies View Related

Query Server To Find All Partitioned Tables, Partition Name, Column Used, Partitioned By

Dec 17, 2007

I want to find a way to get partition info for all the tables in all the databases for a server. Showing database name, table name, schema name, partition by (maybe; year, month, day, number, alpha), column used in partition, current active partition, last partition (for date partitions I want to know if the partition goes untill 2007, so I can add 2008)

all I've come up with so far is:






Code Block

SELECT distinct o.name From sys.partitions p
inner join sys.objects o on (o.object_id = p.object_id)
where o.type_desc = 'USER_TABLE'
and p.partition_number > 1

View 3 Replies View Related

Table Upate/insert Scenario

Oct 24, 2007

Hi,i am using sql 2005 and this is what i am trying to do..i  have multiple table say tbl1,tbl2,tbl3 etc and each one of have columns say col1,col2,col3,col4,col5 etc... and table_total.Each of these table contain  same forignKey,say col2,  and gets populated different time.In table_total i need to store the sum of particular column/columns(like sum of col3 from  tbl1  and sum of col3 and also sum of col4 from tbl2 )values in a given row,for a given foriegn key under the respective column in table_total. Something like table_total has columns sum_col3tbl1, sum_col4tbl2, sum_col4tbl3, sum_col5tbl2 likewise..table_toal should get updated at the same time,whenever tbl1,tbl2,tbl3 etc..are getting updated,so that it always has most updated value.Can someone suggest me how to achive this? thanks...

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Create Partitioned Table?

Jul 16, 2001

I'm running sqlserver 2000 enterprise edition on windows 2000 and I need
to know, how to create partition table. Please give me a small partition table example.

Thanks,
Ranjan

View 1 Replies View Related

Insertion Into Partitioned Table

Apr 8, 2008

hello
i want to ask if the insertion of a record into a partion is slower than insertion it into a non partitioned table or not?
cuz sql has to decide to wich partion the record has to insert according to the partitioning key and is this decesion process is making insertion slower ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Inserting In A Partitioned Table

Sep 14, 2007

Hello;


I have inserted 200m rows into a partitioned table using SSIS, the table has a [RecID] column which is an identity(1,1) primary key.
When I open the table, I see that RecId doesn't start from 1(its not ordered), it starts from 889823. But, when I query the table for RecID = 1, I can see that row.


Is it a typical behavior of a partitioned table? Or am I doing something wrong?


This is the query I used to create the partitioned table.



create partition function pf_LoadDate(Datetime)

as range right for

values ('01/01/1997','01/01/1999','01/01/2001','01/01/2002','01/01/2003',
'01/01/2004','01/01/2005','01/01/2006','01/01/2007')

--------------



create partition Scheme ps_RecBuyLoadDateScheme

as partition pf_LoadDate

to (FG1,FG1,FG1,FG1,FG2,FG2,FG2,FG3,FG3,FG3)


I'll appreciate any help.

Prok

View 15 Replies View Related

Replication And One Row Updates On Partitioned Table

Jul 27, 1998

Hi,

Has anyone had any problems on one row updates on a table where you have defined horizontal and vertical partitioning of the data to be replicated?
When I execute an update clause that modifies just one row the log reader misses the modification and it does not get replicated to the other databases.

If I do the same update clause but on several rows then all the modifications are read by the log reader and the replication task goes ok.

What might be wrong?

-janne

View 1 Replies View Related

Truncate A Partition In Partitioned Table

Nov 14, 2007

Hi all,

We have a table with 15 Partitions in SQL Server.Can i write a stored procedure or an SQL statement just to truncate a particular partition by passing the partition name.

Any Suggestions??????????

Thanks
Chow.

View 11 Replies View Related

256 Table Limit For Partitioned Views

Aug 8, 2005

I have a partitioned view sitting over several tables and I'm slowlyapproaching the 256 number. Can anybody confirm if there is such alimit for the maximum number of tables that a partitioned view canhold?If this is true, does anybody have any suggestions or ideas to workaround this max limit?TIA!

View 4 Replies View Related

Interesting Scenario - Multiple Files Updating One Table

Sep 6, 2007

Hi,

i have a scenario where I have to read 2 files that update the same table (a temp staging table)...this comes from the source system's limitation on the amount of columns that it can export. What we have done as a workaround is we split the data into 2 files where the 2nd file would contain the first file's primary key so we can know on which record to do an update...

Here is my problem...

The table that needs to be updated contains 9 columns. File one contains 5 of them and file2 contains 4 of them.

File 1 inserts 100 rows and leaves the other 4 columns as nulls and ready for file 2 to do an update into them.
File 2 inserts 10 rows but fails on 90 rows due to incorrect data.
Thus only 10 rows are successfully updated and ready to be processed but 90 are incorrect. I want to still do processing on the existing 10 but cant affort to try and do processing on the broken ones...

The easy solution would be to remove the incorrect rows from the temp table when ever an error occurs on the 2nd file's package by running a sql query on the table using the primary keys that exist in both files but when the error occurs on the Flat File source, I can't get the primary key.

What would be the best suggestion? Should i rather fail the whole package if 1 row bombs out? I cant put any logic in the following package that does the master file update/insert from the temp table because of the nature of the date. I

Regards
Mike

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Filestream On Partitioned Table

Jun 12, 2015

I'm having a problem creating a partitioned table with a filestream column. I'm getting error: Cannot create table 'MyTable' since a partition scheme is not specified for FILESTREAM data

CREATE TABLE MyTable
(
IndexID BIGINT IDENTITY(1,1),
PartitionID SMALLINT,
IndexGUID UNIQUEIDENTIFIER NOT NULL ROWGUIDCOL

[code]...

I actually managed to get the table created. The table below gets created. I had to specifically indicate that the unique constraint is on [PRIMARY] (non-partitioned) and create a partition scheme in the filestram filegroup. However my problem now is with partition switching. I successfully created a non-partitioned staging table identical to the partitioned table, but the switching operation doesn't work.

CREATE TABLE MyTable
(
IndexID BIGINT IDENTITY(1,1),
PartitionID SMALLINT,
IndexGUID UNIQUEIDENTIFIER NOT NULL ROWGUIDCOL
CONSTRAINT DF_MyTable_IndexGUID DEFAULT (NEWID())

[code]...

I get error:

'ALTER TABLE SWITCH' statement failed. The table 'MyTable' is partitioned while index 'UQNP_MyTable_IndexGUID' is not partitioned.

However, I can't drop the non-partitioned unique index on MyTable as it violates the filestream, and would make the table unusable.

View 0 Replies View Related

DB Design :: Cannot Delete Data From A Partitioned Table

Sep 30, 2015

I have a very large table that I am trying to partition and use to reduce maintenance overhead as well as improve performance. The table contains about 12 years worth of data but only the most recent years is inserted/updated/deleted from thru the app. I created partitions on a computed(persisted) column which holds the "year" value derived from a date column. I have created the partitions with all the default set options, and the stored procedure which performs the delete against this table also was created with no special set options(basically database/session default). Yet, every time I try to run the proc to delete data thru the app, I get this error:

Msg 1934, Level 16, State 1, Procedure xxxx, Line 118
DELETE failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ANSI_WARNINGS'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or filtered indexes and/or query notifications and/or XML data type methods and/or spatial index operations.

I've tried setting ANSI_WARNINGS on and off when creating the proc, inside the proc etc.., its always the same error whatever I set the option to.

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Find If A Table Is Partitioned By Month Or Day

Nov 6, 2015

Is there a way to figure out if a table is partitioned by month/day in SQL. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Truncate A Partition Of Partitioned Table In SQL Server

Nov 13, 2007

Hi All,

I am new to SQL Server. I have a table which is paritioned by Value (String). Can I write a stored procedure or an SQL Statment to truncate a particular partition in SQL Server. Please suggest me on this.

Thanks
Chow

View 2 Replies View Related

Can The Match Index Of A Fz Lookup Table Be Partitioned?

Oct 8, 2007


Hello,

The illustration below is for a customer dedupification project.
The Source file, containing customer name and address records, is conditionally split based on 7 ranges of substring(city,1,2) to distribute the load across 7 different threads for parallelization. Each customer record in the source file
is looked up against a reference table named Location_Stage for its existence using the Fuzzy Lookup
transformation.

The reference table Location_Stage has around 10 miilion+ records. The source file would normally have around 1 million
records.

I am wondering :

- if it would be possible to partition the Match Index of the reference table (NOT the reference table) into
7 partitions based on 7 ranges of substring(city,1,2) and maintain these partitions on different drives?
- if it is possible to specify a particular partition to be used by a FzLkup transformation?
- if the partitioning approach will improve the performance of the Fuzzy Lookups?



Source File Feed
|
Split data into 7 groups based on substring(city,1,2)
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | | | | | |
UnionAll UnionAll UnionAll UnionAll UnionAll UnionAll UnionAll
| | | | | | |
FzLkup FzLkup FzLkup FzLkup FzLkup FzLkup FzLkup
| | | | | | |
Split Split Split Split Split Split Split
| | | | | | |
------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
<- - - - - - - Write the Canonicals and Dupes from each of these splits into database - - - - - - - - ->


Please advice.
Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Partitioned View Broken After Moving Table To New Filegroup

Jul 20, 2005

I am using SQL Server 2000, SP3.I created an updatable partitioned view awhile ago and it has beenrunning smoothly for some time. The partition is on a DATETIME columnand it is partitioned by month. Each month a stored procedure isscheduled that creates the new month's table, and alters the view toinclude it. Again... working like a charm for quite some time.This past weekend I moved some of the first tables onto a new filegroup. I did this through Enterprise Manager, by going into designmode for the table, then going into the properties for the table andchanging the file group there as well as in all of the indexes. Nowthe partitioned view is no longer updatable. It gives the errormessage: "UNION ALL view '<view name>' is not updatable because apartitioning column was not found."I have extracted the DDL for all of the partition tables and comparedthem and they all look the same. I checked and then double-checked theCHECK constraints to make sure that they were all valid and they are.If I remove the tables that I moved to the new file group from theview, then it is once again updatable, but when I put them back in itfails again.Any ideas? If you would like samples of the code then I can send italong, but it's rather large, so I have not included it here.Thanks!Thomas R. Hummel

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Partitioned Views Table Elimination Not Working

Jul 7, 2015

I have some Partitioned Views and on all queries using a table for the in clause, table elimination isn't happening.

Check Constraint is on the oid column

This works as expected, only goes to 2 tables;
SELECT *
FROM view_oap_all
WHERE oid IN ( '05231416529481', '06201479586431' )

This works as expected, only goes to 2 tables;
SELECT *
FROM view_oap_all
WHERE oid IN ( SELECT oid
FROM owners
WHERE oid IN ( '05231416529481', '06201479586431' ) )

This is checking all tables (headingnames are unique), ive tried this for the last 3 hours on many different tables containing the oid column.

Unless I write the oid as in the above queries it just doesn't work.
SELECT *
FROM view_oap_all
WHERE oid IN ( SELECT oid
FROM owners
WHERE headingname = 'TestSystem' )

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Left Join With A Large Partitioned Table?

Aug 3, 2015

I have a query that has a left join with a large partitioned table. The partitioned table has 10s of millions of records, and each partition has about 100,000 records.

The left join is part of an insert that gets a column from the partitioned table, if the column exists. The query contains the partition ID and all other joined columns are part of a non-clustered index.

Through the profiler, I found that there were millions of reads and the execution plan was giving me a table scan on the partitioned table.

I changed the query to do the insert followed by an update with inner join. That did the trick, but it worries me that SQL Server 2014 behaves differently from 2012 or 2008R2, which can make upgrading very time consuming.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Using Partitioned Views In Order To Manage Table Sizes

Oct 13, 2015

I have a few databases that are using Partitioned Views in order to manage the table sizes and they all work well for our purposes. Recently I noticed a table that had grown to 400+ million rows and want to partition it as well, so I went about creating new base tables based on the initial table's structure, just adding a column to both table and primary key to be able to build a Partitioned View on them.The first time around, on a test system, everything worked flawlessly but when I put the same structure in place on the production system I get the dreaded "UNION ALL view 'DBName.dbo.RptReportData' is not updatable because the primary key of table '[DBName].[dbo].[RptReportData_201405]' is not included in the union result. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 4444)" error.

I have searched high and low and everything I see points to a few directives in order for a UNION ALL view to be updatable:

- Need a partitioning column that is part of the primary key
- Need a CHECK constraint that make the base tables exclusive, i.e. data cannot belong to more than one table
- Cannot have IDENTITY or calculated columns in the base tables
- The INSERT statement needs to specify all columns with actual values, i.e. not DEFAULT

Well, according to me, my structure fulfills these conditions but the INSERT fails anyway. CREATE scripts below scripted from SQL Server. I only modified them to be on a single row - it is easier to verify that they are identical in a text editor that way.

SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO

[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Replicating Merge Range And File Drops For Partitioned Table?

Jul 28, 2015

I have few tables, which are replicated and partitioned. They also have archival process. I want to avoid having to run that same process on the subscriber.

Replication of partition switching is easy. However I am not sure how to replicate merge range and empty filegroup/file drops.

There the following article options:

Copy file group associations
Copy table partitioning schemes
Copy index partitioning schemes

I am not sure if these are enough to implement the replication of merge range and empty filegroup/file drops.

I could not find and option to copy partition functions.

View 0 Replies View Related

How To Connect To Sql Server As Other's Window Login Rather Than User's Window Login Thorugh ASP.NET.

Dec 14, 2006

Dear members,

In MSDN, it says that it is recommended to use windows authentication to connect to SQL Server rather than use mixed authentication.

I create user deltasqluser on windows OS, and I specify in my webform ASP.NET script below :

protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label Label1;
private string _connString = @"data source=deltasql2000;initial catalog=northwind;integrated security=false;user id=deltasqluser";
/*
comment : I login to my windows as deltakoronx, and I want to every user (including me), connected to sql server through IIS, will be identified as deltasqluser not as user's login (impersonate)
*/
private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(_connString);
SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();
cmd.Connection = conn;
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
cmd.CommandText = "select suser_sname()";

conn.Open();


string userName = cmd.ExecuteScalar() as string;
conn.Close();
conn.Close();
Label1.Text = userName;
}


at web.config, I add :
<identity impersonate="false" userName="deltasqluser" password="" />


at IIS webApplication1's properties, tab "Directory Security", at "Authentication and access control" section, I checked "enable anonymous access" with user : DELTAIUSR_DELTA and checked "Integrated Windows Authentication",


at query analyzer, I login as "sa" and execute script below :
exec sp_grantdbaccess 'deltasqluser','northwind'


when I run the ASP.NET script, error at conn.Open(); with error message :
Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE'.


What should I do so that IIS login to SQL Server as user deltasqluser not as "NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE" ?

Regards,

Koronx

View 1 Replies View Related

Open Report In New Window: Window.open Method Gives Error

Jun 26, 2006



Hi,

I am using SSRS Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Designers
Version 9.00.1399.00. I want to open linked report in new window.

I tried whats mentioned in http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=240172&SiteID=1 but i get an error on Window.Open method.

How do I solve the problem?

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Unable To Open New Query Window Or Open Any Table

Nov 3, 2014

Post installation of SQL Server 2014 Express edition, I am able to connect to the Database Instance.

But while opening a new query window in SSMS or opening a table getting the error:

Package 'RadLangSvc.Package, RadLangSvc, Version 12.0.0.0, Culture=Neutral, Public Token=89845dcd8080cc91' failed to load

Object reference not set to an instance of an object. (mscorlib)..Have already tried installing the componentsDACProjectSystemSetup_enu.msi, TSql LanguageService_enu.msi, DACFramework_enu.msi from path VS 2010 WCU DAC.

View 5 Replies View Related

Scenario

Apr 23, 2004

Consider the following scenario:

I got 2 webservers (2003) using NLB.
I want some kind of common data store (SQL Server).
I need this data store to be fault tolerant.
I don't have any more machines.
I don't have an enterprise licence for windows.

How do I solve this???

View 3 Replies View Related

Is This Scenario Possible?

May 4, 2007

I have a company with 5 offices connected with a dedicated line (500+ employees).

They have five databases, one in each office.

Now they want a new application which will replace the old (VB6 on MySQL will now be VB.NET 2.0 with MS SQL Server 2005).

The want all the data availiable in all the offices. We will still have 5 databases in 5 offices, but all with the same data.

Sometimes the dedicated line is lost.

Now I have a few questions:

Will the database be still running while a line is down?
Will the database be still running if replication is of type Merge (instead of continuesly).
Is it good practice to use unique identifiers versus Numeric keys?
Is it good practice when the application uses the "master" database to save global things like "Suppliers" and the local database to add and change Orders?
Do you have some recommended reads?

Thx for your time!




Henri
~~~~
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

View 3 Replies View Related

DR Scenario

Aug 13, 2007

For High Protection mode (2servers, no witness, FULL safety), in the event of a catastrophic failure of the principal, can a remote (but well connected) mirror be forced to assume the principal role? The MS manual "Database Mirroring in SQL Server 2005" on p2 says the failover type for HP mode is manual only (as opposed to forced). Elsewhere it seems to seems suggest otherwise but there is no clear and unambiguous discussion describing the exact procedure.

Can anyone clarify this matter? Thanks,


Bud

View 3 Replies View Related

SSB Scenario, Can It Be Done?

Oct 29, 2006

I currently have a workflow "like" application which uses msmq to pass messages to each step transactionally. I'd like to take advantage to something like SSB to make the app scale. Here's how it works today:

Start Workflow WebService puts message on queue.
Windows Service has threaded listeners on each queue for the workflow.
The listeners do a transactional Receive off the queue. By doing this is in a transaction, we can enforce that only one listener will pick up and process the message. Once they have a message they call a .Net Assembly to perform some work. Once the work is performed succesfully, the listeners put the work context on the next queue using the same transaction as the receive and commit the transaction effectively removing the message from the receive queue permanently. If a fatal error occured during processing, the work context is moved to an error queue transactionaly. If the process blew up due to other reasons, the transaction is rolled back and the message reappears on the original queue so that another instance of the service can pick it up. Currently all this is running on one instance of the Windows service and cannot span more than one host machine since MSMQ did not support transactional reads off public queues without using DTC.

I saw the external activator sample and it looks great but I have a few questions. First, I'd have to modify it to call assemblies instead of external processes. No biggie there. One other requirement that one and only one receiver should process the message and that when the next message is sent to the next queue, it's done within the same transaction as the receive. I hope that this can be done without any deadlocks. I also saw mentioned somewhere that this messaging could advantage of the local SQLExpress instances so that even if the main SQL Server instance is down, the messages can go out. Last requirement is that our message is a blob (serialized .Net object) so how do we define that kind of message?

Thanks

Costas

View 6 Replies View Related

Newbie Scenario

Dec 9, 2005

Table1: WriterID, WriterName, WriterSurname
Table2: BookID, WriterID, BookName, Category
Table3: CategoryID, CategoryName
There will be one form. Which way i should use to enter data from one form to multiple tables with same WriterID.
1.) Should i use SqlCommand class and a Stored Procedure?
( Like that: http://www.aspnet101.com/aspnet101/tutorials.aspx?id=13 )
2.) Is there another way without a stored procedure? I can't imagine how to insert same form to multiple tables. In real scenario there are lots of table and all contains a column that holds same value such as WriterID.

View 1 Replies View Related

My Synchronization Scenario

Sep 22, 2005

Hi, I want to know the a solution for my Synchronization Scenario

I have a several client databses which are SQL Server 2005 Express and i have a master database which is SQL Server 2000 containing all the individual Client databases. All the individual client databases are kept seperately at the master location. I need to Synchronization the client database with its copy at the master database (something like Merge replication). Both the Client Copy as well as Master Copy could be Publishers & Subscribers.

Now the problem is Because of security & firewall issues, only the Client should have the ability to schedule & initiate the synchronization process with the master copy. Unfortunately SQL Server 2005 Express has only subscriber agent and not a publisher agent.

Any help on how to achieve this would be appreciated . Thank You

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved