Random Timeouts Related To Multi Processor Usage
Apr 30, 2007
Hello all,
Has anyone else experienced random SQL timeouts and checked the processor usage and found that processors 0 and 1's usage patterns are mirrored (when one goes up the other goes down)? We're running into this all of a sudden.
SQL 2000
fairly small db and very low usage at this time < 100 connections/hour.
only web services, SQL 2000 running on the machine, SQL 2005 is installed but currently stopped.
1GB memory
Windows Server 2003 SP 1.
2 processors (dual core) in use.
SQL Usage of the processors according to performance monitor becomes an exact mirror where proc 0 goes high proc 1 goes low, if proc 1 is 25% then proc 0 is 75%.
Thanks
Bob
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 24, 2007
Application folks experiencing recurrence of problem previously reported. This is causing delays with multiple projects. Errors below are occuring when attempting to run a DTS package that will refresh data from prod to pilot.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor could not produce a query plan. For more information, contact Customer Support Services.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Another example reads:
Step Error Source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package
Step Error Description:The task reported failure on execution. (Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server (80004005): Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor could not produce a query plan. For more information, contact Customer Support Services.)
Step Error code: 8004043B
Step Error Help Fileqldts80.hlp
Step Error Help Context ID:1100
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2001
I know this won't be a lot to go on but, we has a quad processor box that is doing a lot of sql crunching. When we turn off three of the processors it runs the SQL queries faster. The requests are comming from COM objects. CPU, Memory, page faults, all that stuff is fine. Also SQL dosen't appear to be using all the processors as only 1 has any amount of usage?. Any suggestions of where to start would be most appreaciated.
Mike
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi, Ive been told this, but I hope it is NOT true. I have an sqlserver2000 installation running on a server that has four processors.It is on a active network but is not the domain controller soessentially it is fully dedicated to servicing the needs of sqlserver, (a bit of browsing, a bit of ms Office, but almost whollydedicated to sqlserver. Now, the big question, why, when the serverproperties have been set to utilize all four processors, can any onejob never get more than 25% of cpu time? I can launch multipleinstance of QA and run the same job on each one and that will utilisemore and more cpu time, but if you launch multile QA windows fromwithin one insance of QA, you can NEVER get more than 25% CPUutilisation. Now i have to run a job (FTS is a good example,re-indexing lots of db's another, or even a huge query with multipleufd's on computed cols which I hoped would grab lots of CPU time thatthey need, but no. So do I have to live with this or can I tell eitherwindows or sql server to grab more cpu when it want to ie use my spareCPU capacity more efficiently or am i working on a misguided premiseand 25% per job is your lot?DMAC
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2006
SQL2K
SP4
Howdy all. I have a query with bizarre results in Query Analyzer.
Box1; 4 x 3.0 processors, 4 gigs of RAM. Results never come back.
Box2; 8 x 3.0 processors, 16 gigs of RAM. Results never come back.
Both of the above boxes are extremely under utilized. The absolute max amount of CPU being used is 25%. Box1 had 1 gig free RAM and Box2 had 7 gigs free RAM.
Box3; 1 x 3.0 processor, 1 gig of RAM. Results in 15 seconds.
Box4, all the same as box 3.
I took a backup of the DB and restored it from box to box to box, so I know everything is identical.
I once had a deadlock issue where I had to use the maxDop hint and tried that here, but it didn't help.
All ideas are appreciated.
TIA, cfr
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2007
Hello
I have a windows application that connects to a SQLExpress database hosted on a shared server. The client machines will run an interface software and interact with the info within SQL The SQL database isn't huge (50 megs) and all of the info is text. The interface application isn't too complex either, it was designed using VB.net05. I have a few setup questions:
1 - Is it best to use Windows or SQL authentiaction? Currently I am using Windows authentication and I have a user group setup on the DNS that is setup as a user for the SQL database. That has worked so far, but I've only had a few users logged in at one time so far. My plan was to add all DNS accounts that will use the software to the DNS user group, thus giving them access to the SQL database.
2 - I know this gets asked a TON, but I am interested in knowing how many users I should be able to support using the current setup. I have the one user acount setup for the DNS user group. The SQL table is not huge and it is all reading and writing text. The server is running Windows Server 03 and is a couple years old (not sure of exact specs).
Thanks for any help, I am still learning my way around SQL and it's great to have such a vast amount of support for the product.
Happy New Year!
Paul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi,I need to extract randomly 5 records from the table "Questions". Now I useSELECT TOP 5 FROM Questions ORDERBY NEWID()And it works. The problem is that I need an additional thing: if SQLextracts record with ID=4, then it should not extract record with ID=9,because they are similar. I mean, I'd like something to tell SQL that if itextracts some questions, then it SHOULD NOT extract other ones.How can I do it?Thanks!Luke
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
I am running a query on a SQL Server 2005 database and encounter the following error message
"Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor encountered an unexpected error during execution."
There is a join between a table on the 2005 database and another on a 2000 database. I have run DBCC CHECKTABLE and found no errors on the two tables.
Anybody with ideas?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2004
I'm using ASP and SQL Serv 2000. What I need to get from 2 tables (company & customers) is random 10 customers from random 20 comp.
Anyone got an idea how to do this??? I've spent 2 days trying to get stored proc. or T-SQL to work, but nothing good came out of it. I can get 1 comp and 10 cust, but not a grouped list of 20 comp. w/ 10 cust. each.
Help is greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2007
I have a client program that writes to sql server database 10 records per second . i want to compute the CPU usage and the memory usage for the whole program or CPU usage,memory usage for the insert statement in the program .
Can anybody help me with this?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2007
Hello, When I am seeing SQL Server 2005 Management studio Server Dashboard> I am seeing my(USERS) databases and msdb database usage is very small % of in CPU Usage(%), Logical IO Performed (%) Usage pie chart.
90% of Total cpu usage is showing for Adhoc Queries. what excatly this means in Dashboard? if application uses more than it would have shown in Database level or not?
sicerely this dashboard is good, if any one is watching daily, please advice their experiences here.
Thanks in advance. Hail SQL Server!
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2007
SQL Server 2005 9.0.3161 on Win 2k3 R2
I receive the following error:
"Error: 8624, Severity: 16, State: 1 Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor could not produce a query plan. For more information, contact Customer Support Services."
I have traced this to an insert statement that executes as part of a stored procedure.
INSERT INTO ledger (journal__id, account__id,account_recv_info__id,amount)
VALUES (@journal_id, @acct_id, @acct_recv_id, @amount)
There is also an auto-increment column called id. There are FK contraints on all of the columns ending in "__id". I have found that if I remove the contraint on account__id the procedure will execute without error. None of the other constraints seem to make a difference. Of course I don't want to remove this key because it is important to the database integrity and should not be causing problems, but apparently it confuses the optimizer.
Also, the strange thing is that I can get the procedure to execute without error when I run it directly through management studio, but I receive the error when executing from .NET code or anything using ODBC (Access).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2001
Hello,
Has anyone experienced timeouts on SQL Server 2000 that happen at regular intervals?
Regards,
Brent.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2004
Anyone else expirencing some heavy duty timeouts?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2008
of query timeouts in SQL Server Management Studio?
I have increased the timeout setting in many places and still receive a timeout message within 40 seconds for certain update queries that involve large tables and many records. The only workaround is to break up the job into smaller queries but this makes management, unmanageable.
Is there a solid alternative to SQL Server Management Studio?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
hi!I am having some timeout issues.I am running sql 2k with 3gig available ram.I did a 600,000 record delete on a table that gets written to by theactive/production application and my application timed out when it wasdoing the delete.why did stored procedures that ran fine before I started the largedelete slow down?Some of the procedures which slowed down were accessing the same tablewhere i was doing the delete.Thanking you in advance!!parez
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2007
I am getting Timeout Errors quite often and cannot figure out why. I am using Enterprise Library 2.0 when accessing the database. It is not from any particular function or page either and when I check the database there may only be 2 or 3 connection from my app. Any ideas of what could be causing this? Below is my error and stack.
Error: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.
Stack:
at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.OpenConnection() at Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.ExecuteReader(DbCommand command) at HM.Security.SecurityData.GetAllUsers(Int32 filter) at HM.Admin.Security.SecuritySearch.SetUpAutoFill() in f:InetpubWwwroothomemiSectionsactSearch.aspx.cs:line 74 at HM.Admin.Security.SecuritySearch.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in f:InetpubWwwroothomemiSectionsactSearch.aspx.cs:line 26 at System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) at System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 1999
Hello all,
I am managaing an NT infrastructure that supports a web application. The web server is configured to use an ODBC System DSN to access data on an SQL server over a 100MB private segment. When users run a particular query through the web page, they get an ODBC "Timeout Expired" message.
Does anyone know a fix for this. I could not find anything that explicitly identified this problem in MS Support. The query runs fine from an Eneteprise Manager T-SQL window both on the server and remotely.
Thanks in advance,
Ed Molinari
Technical Architect
Eamerald Solutions
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2001
A timeout issue is occurring resulting in following error.
This issue is sporadic and may be related to network.
This error occurs on the client: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server error `80040e14`
OLE/DB provider returned message: Timeout expired
"conn_info".asp, line 444
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Subject: SQL server job timeouts?We have a job that uses WinHTTP inside a stored procedure. We haveanother SP wrapper that runs this for a couple hundred records.When we add this as a job using SQLAgent it times out half way. Runningit from SQL Query analyser and it completes to the end.Anyway to set the timeouts for jobs?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I've had my SQL server database running for two years now without aproblem.However, just today one of the main tables started returning an error.The table is contained within a database called engineering. I backit up once a week and the file size is up to about 40 MB.The error returned when trying to return data from one table(DbLucent) is:"[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Timeout expired"I can open/query any of the other tables in the database. I can opendesign table for this table. But it won't return any query.I'm debating whether to restore the database from the last backup.Any suggestions would be appreciated. Being located reomotely, Irather not fly back to the city where the server is and work on itthere either.-David
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2003
I'm having major problems with SqlClient Data provider connections in my application. I'm using Win 2003 Server with SQL Server 2000 (both on the same machine), and my application is developed in VB.NET.
I'm using the following db connection string:
Data Source=(local);Initial Catalog=database;Uid=user;Pwd=password;max pool size=100;
As you can see max pool size is set to 100. The SQL Database has it's MAX_CONNECTIONS property set to >32000.
The symptoms are that at seemingly random times, not nessecarily during peak hours, the application becomes extremely slow and stops responding. The error message that is beeing generated is "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding."
After monitoring and debugging, I've found two things.
1) At random times, zero-three times a day, the number of database connections (according to performance monitor) rises from normally 2-8 up to 20-25. After a while, usually 10-60 minutes, it drops back to normal. This is directly related to when the timeout errors occur. It doesn't seem to happen more often during peak load, for some reason. I suspect there is connection leakage in the application, but I've done extensive debugging, and I just can't find any. Also, since the peaks occur randomly and I can't reproduce the error in my development environment, I have no solution to this problem. A few weeks ago, the application ran during heavy load without this problem for 7 days. Before and after that, there have been errors at least every second day. That confuses me even more.
2) The number of connections (monitored in perf mon) never reach above 25. Why? I'm using SQL Server enterprise edition, it's connection limit is over 32000. ADO pool size is 100, and I can't find anything else that would limit the amount of concurrent connections. I'm totally confused. Why does number of connections never rise above 25? Is there a setting hidden somewhere that I just can't find? Also, according to Performance Monitor, I don't get any failed connects, I just get failed commands. Maybe that's a clue? Could the problem some kind of deadlocks in the database that causes timeout?
I realize this entire post is rather confusing. It reflects the state of my mind, I guess, after working around the clock on this issue for a month :)
Any help is deeply appreciated!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2004
I have a basic UPDATE that's something along the lines of:
UPDATE LocalTable SET LocalColumn = RemoteColumn
FROM LocalTable INNER JOIN server.catalog.dbo.RemoteTable ON (...)
After running in Query Analyzer for ten minutes, I get:
Server: Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' reported an error. Execution terminated by the provider because a resource limit was reached.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: Timeout expired]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ICommandText::Execute returned 0x80040e31: Execution terminated by the provider because a resource limit was reached.].
I checked the linked server settings in EnterpriseManager and both timeout settings are at 0 (no timeout). Any idea how I can remove whatever timeout is causing this?
Anyone know how remote join performance compares to moving remote data over via DTS, running an UPDATE, and dropping the data?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2008
I'm having a problem with SQL Server 2005 not being able to send all of my messages. Occasionally when we batch a large number of messages together, we run into problems because the SMTP server can't process them fast enough, and the message doesn't send due to a timeout. I know I have increase the number of retries, but I'd rather just increase the timeout setting. Does anyone know where I might be able to do this at? The mail admins are also looking at modifying the rules in SMTP so that messages from these servers don't go through the vigor of SPAM and phishing detection. Hopefully that will speed it up, but I'd like to give it a little extra leniency on the SQL side as well. Any suggestions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I have two problems I need some help with.First, I've just inherited a system and am delving into a few timeoutproblems that are causing problems for the users.Now, if I do a simple select * from the table (which looks to be thecause of the problem at this stage) in QA, I get the results back inless than a second. If I open the table in EM it takes about 10. Isthere a difference in viewing the data this way ? I'm used to EM beingvirtually the same speed. There is only one row. Minor questionreally, just something I'd like to understand if there is adifference.CREATE TABLE [QUERY] ([QUERY_ID] [numeric](18, 0) IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[CAT_ID] [numeric](18, 0) NOT NULL ,[QUERY_DESCR] [varchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL ,[USER_NAME] [varchar] (40) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL ,[USER_ID] [int] NOT NULL ,[IND_EURO] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULLCONSTRAINT [DF_QUERY_IND_EURO] DEFAULT ('N'),[IND_DGCOLUMNS] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL CONSTRAINT [DF_QUERY_IND_DGCOLUMNS] DEFAULT ('N'),[NO_GROUPS] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_QUERY_NO_GROUPS] DEFAULT(0),[NO_FIELDS] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_QUERY_NO_FIELDS] DEFAULT(0),[NO_LINES] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_QUERY_NO_LINES] DEFAULT (0),CONSTRAINT [PK_QUERY] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([QUERY_ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY] ,CONSTRAINT [FK_QUERY_QUERY_CATEGORY] FOREIGN KEY([CAT_ID]) REFERENCES [QUERY_CATEGORY] ([CAT_ID]) ON DELETE CASCADE ON UPDATE CASCADE) ON [PRIMARY]GOI don't think any re-indexing has been done on this (or the othertables in the db). I was wondering if constant adding/deleting rowscould cause the index to be massive and in need of a good clear out.Any pointers would be appreciated. From what I can tell, there wassome problems trying to get replication to work. I need to dig deeperto see if this is now correct.-------------------------Secondly, there is a another table in the same database.CREATE TABLE [FIELD_DATA] ([ID] [numeric](18, 0) IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[DATA_ID] [numeric](18, 0) NOT NULL ,[FIELD_ID] [numeric](18, 0) NULL ,[FIELD_CODE] [varchar] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOTNULL ,[FIELD_VALUE] [numeric](15, 5) NULL ,CONSTRAINT [PK_FIELDDATA] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([ID]) WITH FILLFACTOR = 90 ON [PRIMARY]) ON [PRIMARY]GOIt holds approx 4 million rows. The rest of the tables have minimaldata and about the same amount (consider them the same if you will).Now, another 'copy' of this database is held elsewhere (differentclient data) and this holds 40 million rows. The difference is thatthe first DB is 4.5GB and the second 6.5GB (approx). Does this provemy theory that re-indexing would be a good idea ?ThanksRyan
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
HiGot a strange problem.For some reason our web client box times out occasionally. Maybe afew times a day.Nothing appears in the logs.What I do know is that the disk queue ramps up to <high>(think top ofthe graph), processor queue jumps up and the tps drops to 0 (naturallyenough!) along with reduced pagefile usage. Usually at this time thetps is between 20 and 300. Running a pair of mirrored 18gb scsi disksfor the whole server (yeah yeah) and a whopping 640mb memory. Oh anda single piii 1 gig. Sql2k standard vanilla, server2k.What server trace events is it worth my catching to try and get abetter Idea of what may be causing this? No major jobs (backups etcseem to be occuring at these times).Cheers
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Dear Group,I am tring to use a command that calls the server to fill an adapter, itnever seems to get to the adapter, command and the server either times outor does not respond. The timeout is set at 10 hours. I am using VisualStudio to acces MS SQL - Server.I think I have all the rights and permissions set correctly. Also, I haveused this command to fill other adapters and tables.Does anyone have a suggestion.Jeff Magouirk
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
im testing some database cleanup scripts that dont seem to be working. im calling stored procedures through a VBScript file to clean out a table in the database at night. there are a couple of tables to clean out (around 12 tables) and i have a sleep in between each call to the stored procedure.
the sqlcmd im using is in this format:
cmd /C osql -E -S computernameSQLEXPRESS -d database -Q ""{CALL SP_MY_PROC}" -l 20 -o debug.txt
so this is called a few times, once for each table, and sleeps for ~10 seconds before the next call to give some lead time.
the output i see is below
[SQL Native Client]SQL Network Interfaces: Error Locating
Server/Instance Specified [xFFFFFFFF].
[SQL Native Client]Login timeout expired
[SQL Native Client]An error has occurred while establishing a
connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this
failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL
Server does not allow remote connections.
now when i run these SPs manually in SSMSE, it executes fine with no problems. is there some timeout valuee im doing wrong? or am i using the wrong syntax for the osql?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2006
Getting an issue with SQL Server 2005 in my production environment and
wanted to see if anyone else has seen similar behavior. First the
environment:
SQL Server 2005 on the backend, main site is running on ColdFusion 5
and there are various internal applications written in VB6 and .NET.
Upgraded to SQL Server 2005 about three weeks ago and since then about
once a week the server throws a fit and causes all sorts of timeouts.
Event Viewer is showing a bunch of same event:
Event ID: 8628
Description: A time out occurred while waiting to optimize the query.
Rerun the query.
The events occur a rate of about 10/minute and basically lock up the
server. Last time this happened I was not able to open a connection to
the SQL Server to even analyze the issue. All connections timed out...
Had to shutdown and restart the server to recover.
The first time this happened I saw a lot of waittypes
RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE_QUERY_COMPILE in the processes table and thought
that this might be related to the known bug with 2005 that has to do
with implicit conversions between Ascii and Unicode. This might be the
case since I know we have a lot of NVARCHAR columns and most searches
are using ASCII text so the result looks something like this:
SELECT cols FROM table WHERE nvarchar_column = 'Something'
There is a published article regarding this issue here:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=919636
Any thoughts?
Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2007
I'm having an issue with what appears to be SQL Server 2005 deciding to randomly ignore new connections.
I currently have two virtual servers - one running just SQL Server 2005, the other running Reporting Services, Windows Sharepoint Services and Team Foundation Server.
For 3 weeks, it was all working perfectly, then on Wednesday night the server (and both Virtual Servers) was rebooted after installing the latest updates for Windows. Since then, I've had this issue.
It will work fine for a while, then it'll start throwing loads of Errors and Warnings into the Event Log, all along the lines of unable to connect to the database. The Reporting Services Configuration utility throws up the same problem. Then randomly, it'll start working again.
If anyone has any ideas, they would be much appreciated as this is driving me crazy!
Thanks!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2007
We get the following errors at the same times every night (between about 3AM and 4AM) on our distributor (ss2000). The publisher and subscribers do not log anything unusual during this time period but are busy. The distribution agents time-out with:
Timeout expired (Source: ODBC SQL Server Driver (ODBC); Error number: S1T00)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
exec sp_MSadd_repl_commands27hp 2, N'pacefs', 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
exec sp_MSadd_distribution_history 7, 3, N'The process is running and is waiting for a response from one of the backend connections.', 0x0000000000000000000000000000, 0, 0, 0.00, 0x00, 1, 0x0000000000000000000000000000, 0, 0x01, 0x01
This is driving me crazy as there appears to be little to go on and I don't know what to do next.
Any useful suggestions?
Thanks,
Michael
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2014
providing a query for fetching the data for CPU Usage, Memory usage, blocking and all details ...
I want to create a job which will run on a Node every 15 min and store data in a table for each instance...
DMV is not giving more stuff and xtended events not sure if i can store that data into a table?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2006
I was given a list of user comments from an old application and told to match it up with our current system. After all the easy methods I was still left with 95% of the records unmatched. The only way I had left was to try and match up the names. Given that people could have the same name I added a count to make sure it only found one record. This query has been running for over an hour now. How do I tell if it's actually running, or if it locked up?
Also here is the query I'm using, does anyone have any feedback on it? Is this poorly written, is my logic wrong? Did I put the server in a loop?
UPDATE user_table_1SET id = s.idFROM user_table_2 AS sWHERE RTRIM(s.first_name) = RTRIM(user_table_1.first_name) AND RTRIM(s.last_name) = RTRIM(user_table_1.last_name) AND (SELECT COUNT (*) FROM user_table_2 AS cs WHERE RTRIM(user_table_1.first_name) = RTRIM(cs.first_name) AND RTRIM(user_table_1.last_name) = RTRIM(cs.last_name)) = 1
View 2 Replies
View Related
