Recovery From LOG Disk Failure

Dec 30, 2004

I am writing up a general purpose document regarding Disaster Recovery and Backup and Restore, etc. I have a question that I've been unable to find any definitive answer on, and I was hoping that someone might have an answer.





Here is the scenario and what I have so far, and my question:





Scenario - A simple database, with one MDF and one LDF, each on it's own disk, with no mirroring or filegroups etc.





Disaster - the LOG disk fails.





To simulate the disaster, I shut down SQL Server, and delete the LDF manually.





When I restart SQL Server, the database is marked as suspect. As expected :)





So, now the recovery begins..... I've read that in this case there is no data loss, but I find that hard to believe. Can anyone confirm?





Anyway, how to restore the database to usable status? Here is what I've come up with so far:





1) Do a backup of "the tail of the log." This works even though there is no log. I have no idea why really, but I can't proceed otherwise.





2) Detach the database.





3) Reattach the database. This auto-creates a new log file (albeit not in the location I want, which makes for more work after).





At this point the database appears to be fine. I have not seen any lost data or problems, but of course I'm working on a test database, not with live users hitting it constantly. If the database were under heavy use, I expect that there might indeed be data lost?





Is this the recommended way to recover from a disaster of this type? Or, would it be better to just go back to your last good backups and forget about "up to the minute" recovery in this case? Or is there yet another means?





Thanks,


Travis

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Recovery :: Disk Not Shown By Cluster

Nov 5, 2015

I am trying to cluster two sql node server on hyper-v both virtual and my situation is below : 

two hyper-v host connected to vnxe storage 
two hyper-v are mapped to 3 LUN ( SQL Data , SQL logs , Quorurm)
connectivity between hyper-v and storage direct fiber 
three LUN are mapped to the virtual SQL01 and SQL02  as VHDX and configure it on virtual machine as  IDE below is the picture 

LUNs are presented to the guest SQL01 and SQL02  and visible through disk management

When create the fail over cluster i am not getting the disk to add them to cluster 

Getting the below error when validate the storage : 

No Disks suitable for cluster disks were found, For diagnostic information about disks available run the Validate config wizard’..

Also , regarding this LUN how i can make them shared on the host side ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Unable To See Database Disk To Add As Server Name Dependencies

Nov 24, 2015

i have create sql cluster and i need to add  the Database disk as dependencies of cluster resource Server Name and i am not able to see the disk.

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Windows 2012 Clustering With Quorum Disk

Jun 20, 2015

I have a windows 2012 cluster environment  that consists of two SQL servers nodes with Quorum disk configured as witness.

Manual failover between nodes is working fine, however the sql instance virtual is  not seeing the Quorum disk.

Moreover the Quorum disk has the same number as another cluster storage disk, is that considered a problem?

When I move the SQL instance from a node to anohter, should the Quorum Disk change ownership as well to that destination node ? if it is not changing ownership what would be the problem??

View 3 Replies View Related

Recover With MDF File Only Due To Hard Disk Failure

Nov 10, 2006

catcat writes "Hi All,

Our MSSQL 2000 server crashed yesterday and one database cannot be restored. the latest backup we have is june. We can only recover the MDF file from the harddisk and according to our admin, it cannot be restored anymore because no proper shutdown was made.

Will appreciate your help here."

View 2 Replies View Related

Deadlock And Recovery Failure...

Feb 27, 2008

I wrote a stored proc that essentially did the following:
[truncate tables X, Y, Z]begin tran[lots of inserts to tables X, Y, Z]if @@error <> 0begin     rollback tran     return -1endcommit tran
 I'm not sure what happened, but the error message I received was:
Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 2.
 I was under the impression that if an error occurred, it would never make it to the 'commit tran'. However, I believe that it rolled back the transaction, and then tried to commit. Nonetheless, a deadlock occurred and the database went into recovery. We have traced the recovery process and it made it to Phase 3 of 3 2% and another deadlock occurred DURING THE RECOVERY. We have tried restarting the server (suggested by the trace), but it immediately goes into recovery again. It is VERY URGENT to resolve this TODAY. I would greatly appreciate any and all help.
 Thanks,
Matt

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery From Windows Failure

Sep 13, 2006

Hi all,

We've got a problem with our server in that Windows has totally died - a routine upgrade appears to have gone wrong and the repair function of the Windows installer keeps getting stuck in a loop so I've given up on that front. What I was wondering is:

1. If I install a fresh copy of Windows 2003 R2 over the top of the existing install will that kill MSSQL Sever 2005 and/or Windows Sharepoint Services?
2. If so, is there a simple way to get them back?
3. If I install another copy of Windows on the D: drive is there a recommended way to move the MSSQL databases & Sharepoint to the newer install or a way of pointing the new install at the old databases?

I'm not an admin person (i'm a developer normally) so I haven't got a lot of background in this stuff so any tips, pointers or ideas are welcome. If this is covered somewhere on the MS site I'm happy to read but I'm just getting lost at the moment.

And, yes, I realise that backups are a good thing but the latest backups are not new enough for some items. The backup process has been adjusted accordingly.

Thanks
Michael.

View 3 Replies View Related

Reporting Services :: Connection Failure / Timeout Or Low Disk Condition Within Database

Dec 3, 2010

I have started getting this error since a week now when I try to schedule a report or change a schedule of a report. An error occurred within the report server database. This may be due to a connection failure, timeout or low disk condition within the database. (rsReportServerDatabaseError) Get Online support For more information about this error navigate to the report server on the local server machine, or enable remote errors..

We have SQL Server 2008 installed along with SSRS running on the server. I have never seen this happening before for almost a year now but suddenly it appeared.  Along with this, report subscription is also messed up and some report are not been emailed as they have a error like..Failure sending mail: An error occurred within the report server database. This may be due to a connection failure, timeout or low disk condition within the database.Mail will not be resent. 

View 19 Replies View Related

SQL Server 6.5 Recovery Of Db After Drive Failure.

Aug 9, 2004

Good Morning guys n Gals.

New user on these forums, so basically, hey, how are yas?

I have a bit of a situation, and have done a search - although not much info has turned up relating to my situation (maybe my search was just useless).

Anyways, basically, I run SQL Server 6.5 on NT4 server.
The disks were striped - not RAIDED.

What happened was, the 4th disk died, and we replaced it with a new blank drive.

Now, I am left with two DAT files (log and data) for my database.
I cannot remember how large these were created as it was many years ago.

I have no backups.

Reseting the status hasn't worked, also I have tried creating a new DB / Devices (in size similar to those reported in windows), and "moving" the devices to point to the original ones, but no luck: and thus was wondering if anybody had any hint / tips or ideas?

Cheers,
Jamie

View 2 Replies View Related

Cluster Recovery From Node Failure

Jul 20, 2005

Cluster services gives the high availability needed - that is great.But I have never seen any discussion about what happens when a nodefails - what do you do to get everything back to the active-passivetandem.I imagine there is not much difference in terms of recovery procedurefor either active or passive node. So I'm just going to make up ascenario that we have encountered. The system hard drive (not theshared disk) on primary node fails. Cluster fails over to the passivenode. Following are the problems I have at hand:-After installing windows, I need to install driver and configure thepermission to access the SAN. There is no way I could do it since thesecondary node has exclusive access to the disks.-Imagine I got that working, is there anyway to install SQL so SQLwould know this server used to be the primary node and attach the DBand translog automatically-Finally, there is no proper way to apply SQL 2000 service pack 3a.Originally when the cluster was fully functional, the service pack wasapplied to active node and that automatically upgrades passive node.Now we have a machine without 3a and a machine with 3a alreadyinstalled. See any problem?Consider all of the above as this one big question: What is a properprocedure to restore a cluster when one of the node goes down? Whetherit's the active or passive node.

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Will AG Listener Create A Single Failure Point

Sep 16, 2015

Assuming all windows servers belonging to the WSFC are on the same subnet, will the AG listener become a single failure point in system if all Application servers connect to the AG through the listener? If the answer is yes, what are the options to resolve this issue?

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Removing A Cluster Node With Hardware Failure?

Jul 20, 2015

In case of hardware unrecoverable issue, I have two msdn articles which states different things.

First one claims you remove the node from mscs.

[URL]

Second one claims you should remove it using sql server installation and links to the first link which says you should do it from mscs:

[URL]

Then this third article invalidates the second article. "To remove a node from an existing SQL Server failover cluster, you must run SQL Server Setup on the node that is to be removed from the SQL Server failover cluster instance." 

[URL]

It is a hardware faillure where the secondary node is inaccessible.

So what is the proper way to evict a node you cannot access due to a hardware failure?

note: I don't plan on adding back the failed nodes after removing it.  i.e. I am interested in the removing part.

View 4 Replies View Related

Recovery :: FCI / AlwaysOn - Connection Remapping In Case Of Failure?

Jul 20, 2015

SQL 2012. I am working in understanding more the feature <AlwaysOn>. I have already worked with FCI (Failover Cluster Instance) and I would like to understand more about <AlwaysOn>.

Browsing internet/documentation I am getting more knowledge about <AlwaysOn> but a doubt persists:

1) Combination of FCI + AlwaysOn (2 SQL servers for FCI providing cluster instance: SQLClusterSQLReporting + 1 SQL server (at least) for <AlwaysOn>: SQLAOn/SQLReporting)

If the FCI instance is called SQLClusterSQLReporting, all the connections are mapped to this name.

But if the<AlwaysOn> feature is added to the system, in case of failure the name of <SQL Instance AlwaysOn> must be used therefore I am obliged to re-map all my connections to  SQLAOn/SQLReporting.

QUESTION: IS it correct?

If yes, I do not understand the usefulness for the <AlwaysON> feature that lead to re-map all the connection.

In my opinion it should be a <MAIN> SQL Instance covering both <FCI> + <AlwaysOn>.

View 4 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Dead Lock Will Cause Failure Of Database Differential Backup?

May 29, 2015

My Database has many Dead lock issues,Will this Dead locks  cause Differential database failure ?.

View 6 Replies View Related

Is It Possible To Move My Sql 2000 Database (in C Disk) To Another Disk (Disk) ?

Dec 28, 2006

hello,all
          I am new to Sql 2000,I installed sql 2000 database in C disk,but Now I found my C disk space is smaller than before,So I want to move my databse(include data and structure)   from C Disk to D Disk(its space is very large) .
         is it possible to do it ? 
         if its can be done ,do I need to change my asp.net program source code (exp: chaneg my crystal  report connectstring ) ?
        thanks in advanced!
 
 
 
      

View 1 Replies View Related

Calculating COUNTER Physical Disk: AVG. DISK QUEUE LENGTH

Sep 10, 2007

If I return the Average, Minimum, and Maximum values for the counter Physical Disk: Avg. Disk Queue Length, and those values are 10, 0, 87 respectively, which value do I use to compute the Avg. Disk Queue Length for a 4 disk array(RAID 10): Average, Minimum, or Maximum? The disk(lun) is on a SAN.

View 1 Replies View Related

Get Total Disk Size And Free Disk Space

Nov 13, 2007

-- Initialize Control Mechanism
DECLARE@Drive TINYINT,
@SQL VARCHAR(100)

SET@Drive = 97

-- Setup Staging Area
DECLARE@Drives TABLE
(
Drive CHAR(1),
Info VARCHAR(80)
)

WHILE @Drive <= 122
BEGIN
SET@SQL = 'EXEC XP_CMDSHELL ''fsutil volume diskfree ' + CHAR(@Drive) + ':'''

INSERT@Drives
(
Info
)
EXEC(@SQL)

UPDATE@Drives
SETDrive = CHAR(@Drive)
WHEREDrive IS NULL

SET@Drive = @Drive + 1
END

-- Show the expected output
SELECTDrive,
SUM(CASE WHEN Info LIKE 'Total # of bytes : %' THEN CAST(REPLACE(SUBSTRING(Info, 32, 48), CHAR(13), '') AS BIGINT) ELSE CAST(0 AS BIGINT) END) AS TotalBytes,
SUM(CASE WHEN Info LIKE 'Total # of free bytes : %' THEN CAST(REPLACE(SUBSTRING(Info, 32, 48), CHAR(13), '') AS BIGINT) ELSE CAST(0 AS BIGINT) END) AS FreeBytes,
SUM(CASE WHEN Info LIKE 'Total # of avail free bytes : %' THEN CAST(REPLACE(SUBSTRING(Info, 32, 48), CHAR(13), '') AS BIGINT) ELSE CAST(0 AS BIGINT) END) AS AvailFreeBytes
FROM(
SELECTDrive,
Info
FROM@Drives
WHEREInfo LIKE 'Total # of %'
) AS d
GROUP BYDrive
ORDER BYDrive

E 12°55'05.25"
N 56°04'39.16"

View 16 Replies View Related

Should The Quorum Disk Be A Physical Disk Or Majority Node Set?

Nov 15, 2006

Hello,

I am trying to setup a test cluster and am having an issue. When I try to create the resource of a physical disk it takes both the drive e: and drive q: and doesn't seperate them into two physical disks as resources. This means when I try to associate the quorum disk it links the to physcial disk resource of drive e and q. Then when I try to install SQL2k5 I get the warning about installing SQL on the quorum disk. Am I missing something? Is there a way to seperate e and q onto two physical disk resources so I can specifically associate the quorum to q and the sql to e or should I be setting the quorum disk to a majority node set? Thanks in advance.

John

View 4 Replies View Related

Disk Crash Of Disk That Contains The Paging File.

Feb 20, 2001

Hello,

this is my configuration :

1) 3 disks in RAID5 that hold the SQL data
2) 1 disk in RAID0 that holds the only paging file.

What will happen to the SQL data (DB) when the disk that holds the paging file crashes?

Kindest regards,
Luc.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server, Disk Arrays And Disk IO

May 7, 2004

Hi all,

Ok here goes,

I have a three tier system using SQL server 2000, we are currently experiencing IO bottle necks on our SCSI Raid 10 array, which holds the Data and the logs in separate partitions.

So my options as I understand it are:

Get Enterprise edition

or

Get another physical raid 10 array and separate the logs and data i.e. data on one array and logs on the other array.


I would like to try the latter but I am totally unsure how much difference this will make or whether it will make any difference at all.

Does anyone know how much performance increase I will get from using two arrays as opposed to one?


Any other advice on this scenario would be greatly appreciated.


Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Server Local High Availability Using Failover Cluster And Disaster Recovery Using AlwaysOn

Aug 17, 2015

We have a requirement to build SQL environment which will give us local high availability and disaster recovery to second site. We have two sites- Site A & Site B. We are planning to have two nodes at Site A and 2 nodes at Site B. All four nodes will be part of same Windows failover cluster. We will build two SQL Cluster, InstanceA will be clustered between the nodes at Site A Server and InstanceB will be clustered between the nodes at Site B, we will enable Always On Between the InstanceA and InstanceB and will be primary owner where data will be written on InstanceA and will be replicated to InstaceB. URL....Now we want we will have instanceC on the Site B and data will be writen from the application available on Site B, will be replicated to the instance on the Site A as replica.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Is Bulk Logged Recovery Model Support Point In Time Recovery

Dec 23, 2014

is bulk logged recovery model support point in time recovery

View 9 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Pages On A Full Recovery Model Database Corrupted

Sep 17, 2015

Pages on a full recovery model database corrupted, need to ensure data loss is minimal for restore operation am thinking about restoring the latest full backup.

View 4 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Change Db In Recovery To No-recovery And Restore Transaction Log?

May 5, 2015

in the process of migrating a big db from server 1 to server 2, we had to roll back the change. I started with taking a full db backup and restoring it on server 2 with norecovery, and then a couple logs with norecovery, and then the last log with recovery.

Is there some way to continue this chain now, I mean to change the db to norecovery, or other way to restore logs. 

I dont want to do a new full backup.

If I try to do a log restore now i get the message:

Msg 3117, Level 16, State 4, Line 1

The log or differential backup cannot be restored because no files are ready to rollforward.

Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.

View 6 Replies View Related

Recovery :: AG Databases Went Into Synchronizing / In Recovery After Upgrading To 2014

Sep 19, 2015

We have 3 replica AG setup. 2 replicas are in sync/automatic failover, the other(DR Server, different subnet) in asynchronous/manual mode…All these replicas were on sql server 2012, Recently we upgraded DR server to 2014. Since then we have a problem, the AG databases in 2014 instance went into ‘Synchronizing/ in recovery’ state…The SQL server error log has message, the recovery couldn’t start for the database ‘XYZ’…We tried to create a new database and add it to AG , it works for fine for other two 2012 replicas, but on 2014 we see the same issue

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: AG Database In Reverting / In Recovery State

Nov 1, 2015

We have an issue with a 3 node SQL 2012 Always on availability group. Normal operation is node 1 (primary replica) with node 2 and node 3 as secondary replicas.After some patching, SQL wasn't running on node 1 hence the AG flipped over to node 2. This went unnoticed for some time and the transaction log for one of the AG databases became full on node 2 and node 3. (I think this is because it couldn't commit the transactions on node 1 so couldn't truncate it's t-log?) The DB is using synchronous replication btw.So I started SQL on node 1 and flipped the AG back to node 1 (with a data loss warning but I accepted this).Now the issue is that on node 2 and 3, the DB in question is stuck in a "Reverting / In Recovery" State. I've tried various commands such as ALTER DATABASE SET ONLINE, RESTORE DATABASE WITH RECOVERY etc but these fail stating unable to obtain a lock on the DB.

The weird thing is that on node 1 the state of the DB is "synchronised".how to resolve this issue on node 2 and 3? I've left them overnight (in case they were rolling back transactions, the DB is fairly large) but nothing seems to have happened. remove the DB from the AG in node 2 and 3 and add it back in again, ie recreate the replication?

View 2 Replies View Related

Recovery :: How To Do A Full Disaster Recovery

Sep 10, 2015

If you are doing a disaster recovery of an entire SQL 2005 cluster, can you just install SQL server and restore the system database to get the configuration?

View 4 Replies View Related

Frequent Failure Of DB Conectivity Failure

Nov 17, 2007



Hi all,

I am using ODBC to connect SQL Server 2000 + SP4 server runnig on Windows 2003 standard edition Server +SP1. But, sporadically my application server connectivity to DB fails and i receive the following error messages

[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionWrite (WrapperWrite()).
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]General network error. Check your network documentation.) In D:de.cpp 702 Apr 12 2006 20:34:47
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Communication link failure) In D:de.cpp 702 Apr 12 2006 20:34:47
20071017 08:23:10 TID (00000ff0) Sev (3) Err (0) Msg (Read failure.
General SQL error.

Strange thing is that i receive this error only sporadically, Please Please advice !

Thanks ,

Jitender

View 1 Replies View Related

Move Log To Different Disk

Oct 30, 2001

We will move t-log from one disk to another one. I tried Alter Database and found it did not work for log.

Can somebody give me a method about moving log from different disks?

Thanks.

Jean

View 2 Replies View Related

Disk Space

Nov 19, 2000

Hello
I need to setup a compaq sever with 300 MB database, and will be adding around 600 records on a daily basis. Can someone help with how much disk space i should have on sqlserver, providing i have c: and d: setup.

Thank you in advance for all the help.
Paula

View 1 Replies View Related

Disk Space

Feb 19, 2001

Hi All,

I have a server and it has C: D: F: I: Drives and all the system files are on C:Drive and and all the .MDF's and .LDF's(model,temp,master) are on the F: Drive and now I am running out of space on both(C: and F: Drives)

1. Can we add space to the C: and F: drives on the fly?.
2. Can I move the System databases ( MDF's and LDF's to some other drive)and if so, how do I do it?( Moving the databases ) and this is on the production database so when I have to do this.Will there be any impact.

Thanks in Advance,
Reddy

View 2 Replies View Related

Disk Space

Feb 21, 2003

Does anyone know how to get the free disk space for all drives in many different SQL servers.

I need to populate a report (right now output in Excel) with the free disk space of all drives on all of my SQL servers.

I found xp_fixeddrives but that is specific for the server where it is executed.

Any help or pointers to a script in the archives is much appreciated.

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Disk Fragmentation && SQL

Apr 14, 2004

One of my production servers has been determined to be 92% fragmented.

What's the proper procedure for defraging a database server?

I couldn't find anything very helpful in BOL, nor Knowledge Base.

Sidney Ives
Database Administrator
Sentara Healthcare

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved