Dear All,
i've made repliaction stup using the information guide below. all the things are done axactly. now i've inserted a row in the publisher. but i'm not getting the record at the subscriber database. please let me know where i'm missing
http://blog.csdn.net/longrujun/archive/2006/06/09/783357.aspx
Arnav
Even you learn 1%, Learn it with 100% confidence.
Hello!I have an MS SQL-server with an database, that runs replication. In thisdatabase there is an table with an columni want to extend; varchar(50)->varchar(60).But I get this error (using design window of Enterprise Manager): Cannotdrop the table 'MytableName' because it is being used for replication.Thanks for helpBjoern
View 1 Replies View RelatedA customer wants to implement table partitioning on a replicated table.
They want to hold 13 months of data in the table and roll off the earliest/oldest month to an identical archive table. The table has a date field and partitioning by month makes sense all around.
So SWITCH PARTITION is the obvious solution to this, except for the fact that the table is replicated (transactional w/no subscriber updates).
What are his architectural or practical solutions to using table partitioning and replication?
thx
Hope to be my last question.
I used Transacational with update sub method. When adding new column to replicated table. Do I need to generate new snapshot again? Just want to know how can I apply the new schema to subsciber DB without doing all regenerate snapshot, recreate all tables and bulk copy.. Please help
How can i change my Table Structure that is replicated?
I need to add a new field.
How can I do an alter table in some table that replicated database ?
I got the error message when I try !
I have a strange problem. I have a computed column in a replicated table, the Formula is as follows:
(isnull(hashbytes('SHA2_256',CONVERT([varchar](256),[AccrualReference],(0))),(0))) the column is also Persisted.
This gets around a case sensitivity issue and is used as the Primary Key column, which works well.The problem is that this table is then replicated to another server. On the subscriber the value of this computed field is being returned as 0x00000000 for every row, so this must be the ISNULL function doing its job. But why? The AccrualReference is the true PrimaryKey and is never NULL.
If I remove the computed specification and set the field up as varbinary(64) the value then gets replicated. This then means maintaining a different table schema for in excess of 500 tables.
I need to rename a replicated table columns.will this affect my current replication (Transactional replication)? Do i have to create a new snapshot and restart the subscriber?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to remove a table, it complains because it's part of apublication. I could script the publication and subscriptions suchthat they can be deleted, the table removed, and then added again.But, I not sure if this is the 'best' approach.Anyone faced this challenge before?Regards,gary
View 1 Replies View RelatedI created a trigger on a replicated table in a publishing database on SQL Server 2000. When I attempt to ALTER TABLE ... DISABLE TRIGGER ..., I get a message that I cannot alter the table since it is part of a publication. Does anyone know if I would be able to issue a DROP TRIGGER or ALTER TRIGGER on a replicated table?
Thanks,
Gerald
Hi
We have a merge publication - I want to change the primary key for one of the tables (add another column to the primary key)
How do I do it ?
Currently there is no data in the table - which I guess might help..
thanks
Bruce
How can I change a field size that is set to numerical 9,2 to 9,3? I need to allow 3 decimal places.
Thank you,
Kameron
I have transaction replication setup on two SQL7 boxes and a nightly job runs a procedure that need to alter a table and disable a trigger. Since replication has been set up the disable doesn't work. Any way around this.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to have a replicated table that you can open from and input data manually?
That is, I've got a table that I am replicating data to and I want to add some manual data to this table, every now and then.
Will this break replication?
www.beyonder422.com
Hi,
I'm merge replicating a SQL Server 2005 database (publisher) to SQL Compact databases (subscribers) on mobile devices. I understood that I could add a "not null" column to a replicated table on the server as long as I specified a default value, but it seems this is not possible. I ran the following script on the server database:
ALTER TABLE Activity ADD ActivityRequiresProject bit not null default(0)
which executed OK. When I went to synchronize the db on the mobile device I got the following error:
Alter table only allows columns to be added which can contain null values. The column cannot be added to the table because it does not allow null values.
The SQL statement failed to execute. If this occurred while using merge replication, this is an internal error. If this occurred while using RDA, then the SQL statement is invalid either on the PULL statement or on the SubmitSQL statement. [ SQL statement = alter table "Activity" add "ActivityRequiresProject" bit not NULL constraint "DF__Activity__Activi__4A47DDAE" default ( ( 0 ) ) ]
Does anyone know if this is a valid error? Is is possible to add a not null column with default, and if not how do I update the schema on a replicated database?
Regards,
Greg
For SQL 2005 transactional replication I have 1400 articles (tables, views, functions, sp) that are all replicated.
Will SQL 2005 allow me to drop a table from from the publication and drop it from the publication database that is referenced by exising views or sps that are replicated or does it somehow check that?
Linda
Can I increase the length of a varchar column of table involved in transactional replication without dropping and recreating publication/subscription?
Any help/short-cuts/undocumented features greatly appreciated.
Regards
Opal
I tried to run this(below) the table is replicated(transactional).
EXECUTE
sp_rename N'dbo.Tablename.Columnname, N'New_Columnname', 'COLUMN'But getting this error message:
Msg 15051, Level 11, State 1, Procedure sp_rename, Line 227
Cannot rename the table because it is published for replication.
I'm new to replication and am trying to determine the best approach to add a column (NOT NULL with no DEFAULT) to a replicated table. The only success I have had is if I do the following:
Delete entire Subscription
Delete entire Publication
Add column to table
Create new Publication
Create new Subscription
Run SnapShot
The problem with this approach is that each step affects the entire database and not just the modified table. I think it is inefficient to redo replication for a simple object change. What am I missing? Is there a way to only replicate the changes made to the one table without having to run a SnapShot for the entire publication?
Keep in mind the column must be defined as NOT NULL and cannot have a Default.
Thanks, Dave
We are using merge replication and it is working fine. We are looking for increase in on numeric column 10,5 instead of 7,2. How I can do it?
Any suggession highly appreciated by us.
Thanks
On sqlserver 2000 transactional replication:
How would I best go about changing a published table's column from smallint to int? I could not find anything about it in BOL or MS.com. I do not think EM/Replication Properties allows the change. I suspect I have to run "Alter Table/Column" on the Publisher and each Subscriber the old-fashioned way. Is that true?
Thanks!
If the id1 will change in table1 it should also change the corresponding id1 field in table2 it does not do anything.
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[IDCHANGE]
ON [dbo].[table1]
AFTER UPDATE
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
[Code] .....
I have a scenario where I need to add a blank column to a table that is a publisher. This table contains over 100 million records. What is the best way to add the column? In the past where I had to make an update, it breaks replication because the update would take forever as jobs are continuously updating the table so replication can't catch up.
If I alter a table and add a column, would this column automatically get picked up in replication?
I'm trying to replicate a table(s) in access 2000 to MS SQL server 2000/2005 programatically on a timed instance and then have these tables merged in SQL to create one table.
Any guidance appreciated.
Thank you,
Hi All,
Is there a way by which we can modify the width of a column of a table which is being replicated without touching the ongoing transactional replication? This is for MSSQL2000 Transactional Replication.
I know (and successfully tried) that we can add a column to a table and that gets propaged to the replicate database and indeed the added column gets reflected there. How to add a column? sp_repaddcolumn or Right Click on the Publication-Properties and it shows a button to Add a Column.
This is what I have tried for modifying the width of a column of a table participating in Transactional Replication from varchar(10) to varchar(100)
MH (source) -> MH1 (Replicate)
The column €œcol1€? had width of varchar(10) and this was altered to varchar(100).
insert into MH..test_mh values(4,'abcdeabcdefff')
select * from MH1..test_mh
exec sp_dropsubscription @publication = N'MH', @article = N'test_mh', @subscriber = N'UKPBDRMTST2', @destination_db = N'MH1'
go
exec sp_droparticle @publication = N'MH', @article = N'test_mh'
go
alter table test_mh alter column col2 varchar(100) null OR
MH1..sp_help test_mh
exec sp_addarticle @publication = N'MH', @article = N'test_mh', @source_table = N'test_mh'
go
exec sp_addsubscription @publication = N'MH', @article = N'test_mh', @subscriber = N'UKPBDRMTST2' , @destination_db = N'MH1'
go
Needless to say, help would be apreciated -
~Mihir
is there a such thing as a "UPDATED table".. as in a trigger's INSERTED table or DELETED table ....
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow can I determine who and when a table in a db was updated, I dont need this per record, I only need to know the last time an update was made to a table. Thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table written in to sql by the program Wincc flex wich is currently constantly saving data in to it. I want to reed this data back in to Labview and update it’s content on Labview constantly to plot a graph that keeps updating over time.
I have achieved this after some research but my problem is that I need a way of just reading the last row (meaning most recent row, not last row as the bottom one) inserted in to the table written by wincc and saved in sql WITHOUT having to read all the data and selecting for example the higest value of a timestamp column (which is added by wincc) because this would cause too much lag since the table has a lot of elements and I need to constantly read it. One of the main problems is that the data written by wincc is written in a circular buffer, which does delete 20% of the data when it fill’s up and start writing new data in to the free space, so that the temporal order of the data does nothing to do (at least nothing simple) with the index order in the table. Is there anything like a method to save the index of the last row modified in the table so that labview could read it and directly access the most recent recordset in the table just by index specification on a query?
I am writing a generic trigger in VS 2005 that selects records from the inserted table, and updates an audit table. I am, however, unable to retrieve the name of the table that the insert occurred on. I am using the following code to select the records, and obtain the name.. Can anyone offer any alternatives to accomplishing this task? Thanks in advnace for any help you can provide.
Craig
SqlDataAdapter tableLoader = new SqlDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM inserted", connection);
DataTable insertedTable = new DataTable();
tableLoader.Fill(insertedTable);
string insertedTableName = insertedTable.TableName;
is there any way to know when was the table last touch (updated) in all scenarios (insert, delete, update, etc..)?
View 4 Replies View Relatedhello all..
i want to update my table information with the value which is currently inserted/updated in another table dynamically..how to get the value of a currently inserted single cell in that table..?
table1 contains Refno,.....Refno is primarykey,identity
table 2 contains uploadID,....uploadID is primary key,identity
table3 contains RefNo,UploadID(both r foriegn keys corresponding to table1 & table2)
how to fill table3 with values(not manually) when i am inserting records into table1 n table2 ..( refno and uploadId are identity columns )..Any Idea..?
thanks in Advance
Anne
Hi all,
i have a table1 with 3,25,000 records in US database.i want to upadate this table information in to table2 in SG database based on some condition (if prodid and skuno match in both tables, then update ordertransferind column in table2 from table1) what is happening is after 10,000 records query is not executing. in status bar it is displaying 'done'. but only 10,000 records are updating not the remaining ones. for this 10,000 records also it is taking more than 1 hour time. i tried by incresing the commandTimeout to max value(99999)...but still it is same...any advise...please suggest...
i am using sql2005,visualstudio 2005....
thanks for the help..
Anne
I want to setup a method to get emailed whenever someone adds an item to a particular table.
I'm looking at SP's, and DTS's.. but i'm just not sure what the best path is.
http://www.sqldev.net/dts/SMTPTask.htm will create a great Custom DTS Email Task.. but then i don't know what to do next... I don't know how to say.. "If a new row is added, then run this DTS"... or if i should schedule the DTS to run every 30 minutes and then somehow query for new "Created" dates.
Please Help!