Run Both Queries In The Same Statement (was Help....with A Sql Qry)
Mar 2, 2006
Hi i'm new to this just started using SQL 2000 have created two select statements which return data fine but now i need to run them both in the same statement HELP please
statement below
select count (*) Total, displayname0 AS 'Software', (prodid0) As 'Product ID', (Publisher0) AS ' Publisher', (version0) as 'Ver'
from v_gs_add_remove_programs arp
join v_cm_res_coll_OA10006b sap on arp.resourceid=sap.resourceid
where displayname0 = 'SAP front end'
group by displayname0, prodid0, publisher0, version0
select count (*) Total , (displayname0) AS 'Software Name', prodid0 As 'Product ID', Publisher0 AS ' Publisher', version0 as 'Ver '
from v_gs_add_remove_programs arp
join v_cm_res_coll_OA100073 mac on arp.resourceid=mac.resourceid
where displayname0 = 'mcafee virusscan'
group by displayname0, prodid0, publisher0, version0
Hi, Trying to update a single value within a table, thus eliminating nulls. Another words, if the value is NULL update it with the next preceeding non-null value. In this example, 1 should be CO, 2 should be CO, 6 should be CO, 8 should be TT, and 10 should be TT.
For example,
1 NULL 2 NULL 3 CO 4 CO 5 CO 6 NULL 7 TT 8 NULL 9 TT 10 NULL
HelloWhen I use a PreparedStatement (in jdbc) with the following query:SELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = ?ORDER BY group_nameIt takes a significantly longer time to run (the time it takes forexecuteQuery() to return ) than if I useSELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = 'M'ORDER BY group_nameAfter tracing the problem down, it appears that this is not preciselya java issue, but rather has to do with the underlying cost of runningparameterized queries.When I open up MS Enterprise Manager and type the same query in - italso takes far longer for the parameterized query to run when I usethe version of the query with bind (?) parameters.This only happens when the table in question is large - I am seeingthis behaviour for a table with > 1,000,000 records. It doesn't makesense to me why a parameterized query would run SLOWER than acompletely ad-hoc query when it is supposed to be more efficient.Furthermore, if one were to say that the reason for this behaviour isthat the query is first getting compliled and then the parameters aregetting sent over - thus resulting in a longer percieved executiontime - I would respond that if this were the case then A) it shouldn'tbe any different if it were run against a large or small table B) thisperformance hit should only be experienced the first time that thequery is run C) the performance hit should only be 2x the time for thenon-parameterized query takes to run - the difference in response timeis more like 4-10 times the time it takes for the non parameterizedversion to run!!!Is this a sql-server specific problem or something that would pertainto other databases as well? I there something about the coorect use ofbind parameters that I overall don't understand?If I can provide some hints in Java then this would be great..otherwise, do I need to turn/off certain settings on the databaseitself?If nothing else works, I will have to either find or write a wrapperaround the Statement object that acts like a prepared statement but inreality sends regular Statement objects to the JDBC driver. I wouldthen put some inteligence in the database layer for deciding whetherto use this special -hack- object or a regular prepared statementdepending on the expected overhead. (Obviously this logic would onlybe written in once place.. etc.. IoC.. ) HOWEVER, I would desperatelywant to avoid doing this.Please help :)
I am currently having this problem with gridview and detailview. When I drag either onto the page and set my select statement to pick from one table and then update that data through the gridview (lets say), the update works perfectly. My problem is that the table I am pulling data from is mainly foreign keys. So in order to hide the number values of the foreign keys, I select the string value columns from the tables that contain the primary keys. I then use INNER JOIN in my SELECT so that I only get the data that pertains to the user I am looking to list and edit. I run the "test query" and everything I need shows up as I want it. I then go back to the gridview and change the fields which are foreign keys to templates. When I edit the templates I bind the field that contains the string value of the given foreign key to the template. This works great, because now the user will see string representation instead of the ID numbers that coinside with the string value. So I run my webpage and everything show up as I want it to, all the data is correct and I get no errors. I then click edit (as I have checked the "enable editing" box) and the gridview changes to edit mode. I make my changes and then select "update." When the page refreshes, and the gridview returns, the data is not updated and the original data is shown. I am sorry for so much typing, but I want to be as clear as possible with what I am doing. The only thing I can see being the issue is that when I setup my SELECT and FROM to contain fields from multiple tables, the UPDATE then does not work. When I remove all of my JOIN's and go back to foreign keys and one table the update works again. Below is what I have for my SQL statements:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SELECT:SELECT People.FirstName, People.LastName, People.FullName, People.PropertyID, People.InviteTypeID, People.RSVP, People.Wheelchair, Property.[House/Day Hab], InviteType.InviteTypeName FROM (InviteType INNER JOIN (Property INNER JOIN People ON Property.PropertyID = People.PropertyID) ON InviteType.InviteTypeID = People.InviteTypeID) WHERE (People.PersonID = ?)UPDATE:UPDATE [People] SET [FirstName] = ?, [LastName] = ?, [FullName] = ?, [PropertyID] = ?, [InviteTypeID] = ?, [RSVP] = ?, [Wheelchair] = ? WHERE [PersonID] = ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The only fields I want to update are in [People]. My WHERE is based on a control that I use to select a person from a drop down list. If I run the test query for the update while setting up my data source the query will update the record in the database. It is when I try to make the update from the gridview that the data is not changed. If anything is not clear please let me know and I will clarify as much as I can. This is my first project using ASP and working with databases so I am completely learning as I go. I took some database courses in college but I have never interacted with them with a web based front end. Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you in advance for any time, help, and/or advice you can give.Brian
Ok I have a query "SELECT ColumnNames FROM tbl1" let's say the values returned are "age,sex,race".
Now I want to be able to create an "update" statement like "UPATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race" dynamically and execute this UPDATE statement. So, if the next select statement returns "age, sex, race, gender" then the script should create "UPDATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race + gender" and execute it.
hiI need to write a stored procedure that takes input parameters,andaccording to these parameters the retrieved fields in a selectstatement are chosen.what i need to know is how to make the fields of the select statementconditional,taking in consideration that it is more than one fieldaddedfor exampleSQLStmt="select"if param1 thenSQLStmt=SQLStmt+ field1end ifif param2 thenSQLStmt=SQLStmt+ field2end if
Code Block SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02' FROM myTables WHERE Conditions are true ORDER BY Field01
The results are just as I need:
Field01 Field02
------------- ----------------------
192473 8461760
192474 22810
Because other reasons. I need to modify that query to:
Code Block SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02' INTO AuxiliaryTable FROM myTables WHERE Conditions are true ORDER BY Field01 SELECT DISTINCT [Field02] FROM AuxTable The the results are:
Field02
----------------------
22810 8461760
And what I need is (without showing any other field):
Field02
----------------------
8461760 22810
Is there any good suggestion? Thanks in advance for any help, Aldo.
I've have a need with SQL Server 2005 (so I've no MERGE statement), I have to merge 2 tables, the target table has 10 fields, the first 4 are the clustered index and primary key, the source table has the same fields and index.Since I can't use the MERGE statement (I'm in SQL 2005) I have to make a double step operation, and INSERT and an UPDATE, I can't figure how to design the WHERE condition for the insert statement.
i was tasked to created an UPDATE statement for 6 tables , i would like to update 4 columns within the 6 tables , they all contains the same column names. the table gets its information from the source table, however the data that is transferd to the 6 tables are sometimes incorrect , i need to write a UPDATE statement that will automatically correct the data. the Update statement should also contact a where clause
the columns are [No] , [Salesperson Code], [Country Code] and [Country Name]
i was thinking of doing
Update [tablename] SET [No] = CASE WHEN [No] ='AF01' THEN 'Country Code' = 'ZA7' AND 'Country Name' = 'South Africa' ELSE 'Null' END
Hello friends, I want to use select statement in a CASE inside procedure. can I do it? of yes then how can i do it ?
following part of the procedure clears my requirement.
SELECT E.EmployeeID, CASE E.EmployeeType WHEN 1 THEN select * from Tbl1 WHEN 2 THEN select * from Tbl2 WHEN 3 THEN select * from Tbl3 END FROM EMPLOYEE E
can any one help me in this? please give me a sample query.
I am using ASP.NET 2.0, and am attempting to write some code to connect to the database and query a data table. The compiler is not recognizing my SqlConnection statement. It does recognize other commands. And just to make sure, I created other sql objects such as ObjectDataSource and SqlDataSource. The compiler does not find a problem with that code. Basically the compiler is telling me that I am missing a "using" directive. The compiler is wrong though, because I am including the statement "usingSystemData" Can someone please take a look at my code below and to see if you notice what the problem might be? Note that I numbered the lines of code below. Note that I also tried putting lines 3 trhough 6 before line 2(The page directive) but that did not fix the problem The compiler still gives me the same compiler message. Compilation Error Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request.Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately. Compiler Error Message: CS0246: The type or namespace name 'SqlConnection' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)Source Error: Line 21: SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection("server=localhost;uid=sa;pwd=password;database=master;"); 1 <asp:sqldatasource runat="server"></asp:sqldatasource> 2 <%@ Page Language="C#"%> 3 using System; 4 using System.Data; 5 using System.Collections; 6 using System.Data.SqlClient; 7 8 <script runat=server> 9 10 protected void Page_Load(object o, EventArgs e) 11 { 12 ObjectDataSource dsa; // This works no problems from the compiler here 13 SqlDataSource ds; // This works no problems from the compiler 14 15 if (IsPostBack) 16 { 17 if (AuthenticateUser(txtUsername.Text,txtPassword.Text)) 18 { 19 instructions.Text = "Congratulations, your authenticated!"; 20 instructions.ForeColor = System.Drawing.Color.Red; 21 SqlConnection sqlConn = new SqlConnection("server=localhost;uid=sa;pwd=password;database=master;"); 22 String sqlStmt = "Select UserName from LogIn where UserName='" + txtUsername.Text + "' and password='" + sHashedPassword + "'"; 23 } 24 else 25 { 26 instructions.Text = "Please try again!"; 27 instructions.ForeColor = System.Drawing.Color.Red; 28 } 29 } 30 31 } 32 33 bool AuthenticateUser(string username, string password) 34 { 35 // Authentication code goes here 36 37 }
Hi All, I've looked through the forum hoping I'm not the only one with this issue but alas, I have found nothing so I'm hoping someone out there will give me some assistance. My problem is the case statement in my Insert Statement. My overall goal is to insert records from one table to another. But I need to be able to assign a specific value to the incoming data and thought the case statement would be the best way of doing it. I must be doing something wrong but I can't seem to see it.
Here is my code: Insert into myTblA (TblA_ID, mycasefield = case when mycasefield = 1 then 99861 when mycasefield = 2 then 99862 when mycasefield = 3 then 99863 when mycasefield = 4 then 99864 when mycasefield = 5 then 99865 when mycasefield = 6 then 99866 when mycasefield = 7 then 99867 when mycasefield = 8 then 99868 when mycasefield = 9 then 99855 when mycasefield = 10 then 99839 end, alt_min, alt_max, longitude, latitude ( Select MTB.LocationID MTB.model_ID MTB.elevation, --alt min null, --alt max MTB.longitude, --longitude MTB.latitude --latitude from MyTblB MTB );
The error I'm getting is: Incorrect syntax near '='.
I have tried various versions of the case statement based on examples I have found but nothing works. I would greatly appreciate any assistance with this one. I've been smacking my head against the wall for awhile trying to find a solution.
material ========= material_id project_type project_id qty 1 AB Corporate 1 3 2 Other Project 2 7
i have taken AB Corporate for AB_Corporate_project ,Other Project for Other_project
sample query i write :--
select m.material_id ,m.project_type,m.project_id,m.qty,ab.ab_crp_id, ab.custname ,op.other_proj_id,op.other_custname,op. po case if m.project_type = 'AB Corporate' then select * from AB_Corporate_project where ab.ab_crp_id = m.project_id else if m.project_type = 'Other Project' then select * from Other_project where op.other_proj_id=m.project_id end from material m,AB_Corporate_project ab,Other_project op
but this query not work,also it gives errors
i want sql query to show data as follows
material_id project_type project_id custname other_custname qty 1 AB Corporate 1 abc -- 3 2 Other Project 2 -- dsd 7
so plz help me how can i write sql query for to show the output plz send a sql query
I have 3 tables, with this relation: tblChats.WebsiteID = tblWebsite.ID tblWebsite.AccountID = tblAccount.ID
I need to delete rows within tblChats where tblChats.StartTime - GETDATE() < 180 and where they are apart of @AccountID. I have this select statement that works fine, but I am having trouble converting it to a delete statement:
SELECT * FROM tblChats c LEFT JOIN tblWebsites sites ON sites.ID = c.WebsiteID LEFT JOIN tblAccounts accounts on accounts.ID = sites.AccountID WHERE accounts.ID = 16 AND GETDATE() - c.StartTime > 180
Hello How can i say this I would like my if statement to say: if what the client types in Form1.Cust is = to the Select Statement which should be running off form1.Cust then show the Cust otherwise INVALID CUSTOMER NUMBER .here is my if statement. <% If Request.Form("Form1.Cust") = Request.QueryString("RsCustNo") Then%> <%=Request.Params("Cust") %> <% Else %> <p>INVALID CUSTOMER NUMBER</p> <% End If%> <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:RsCustNo %>" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:RsCustNo.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT [CU_CUST_NUM] FROM [CUSTOMER] WHERE ([CU_CUST_NUM] = ?)"> <SelectParameters> <asp:FormParameter FormField="Cust" Name="CU_CUST_NUM" Type="String" /> </SelectParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource>any help would be appreciated
Hi, I am using visual web developer2005 express edition and finding hard time to get my query run in this i am making my own login page as i have few more things to ask to user before they get logged in so i am not using the login control. i want to write my own query without help of sqlDataSource control from start something like sqldatasource con=new sqldatasource; con.connection String="" then what all things will come........ ??? and please give me some poitners to some articles which help one to do the requested.
I have an update query which either inserts a row or increases quantity, depending if row exists or not. It works, better than my explanation probably.After that query could be a good time to count total of all calculated sub sums.Something like this. previous queryEND goSELECT SUM(SubTotal)FROM dbo.t_Shoppings I have tried this on the tool which has a long name, but I think my way didn't work. (Microsoft sql server management studio express)Is this possible or do I have make and call another stored procedure.I can send my sp if someone wants.
2 queries together, in a single stored procedure Select top 20 * from Product where Active=1select Count( *) from product if i execute such one how can i get the 2 results in vb/c# ?
Not sure if I've got the correct place for this question. But, I'm trying to create and sql query to list the lates 10 items in a database. So far I haven't had any luck finding this.
All I have is a normal query (below). Can anyone help me please?
SELECT * FROM pages WHERE show = 'yes' ORDER BY id Desc;
Hi,I have 5 tables in sql database, naming Book, Category, Subject, UserDownload, User.In Book table, BookID, BookTitle, CategoryIDIn Category table, CategoryID, CategoryNameIn Subject table, SubjectID, SubjectName, CategoryIDIn UserDownload table, UserID, BookIDIn User table, UserID, UserNameI used Book to store information of books. Those books has many categories. In those categories, there is also some subjects.When user downloads book, I update UserDownload table.The result I want to get is, Top Ten Download Subject. How can I get? Please help me.
I just upsized my Access2K db to SQL. I am using Front Page 2000 for my website. When I had the database as Access, I was able to use one of my Access queries as my record source for my data base. I was able to choose between my queries AND my tables as the source for my records. Now that I've upsized, I am no longer given that choice. My only choices are the tables. Unfortunately, my database is designed to pull records from a query, not just a table. So my question is, in FP2000, how do I use a QUERY from my newly upsized SQL db as my record source?
I have a query that requires multiple joins and has several one-to-many relationships with other tables. The basic query I have is this:
Code:
SELECT TOP 50 eventID,eventTitle,eventAbstract,eventInsertDate,eventUpdateDate,eventAuthID_fk, eo.eventOccurrenceID,eo.eoDescription,eo.eoApprovedDate, l.LocationID,l.LocationShortName,c.categoryID,c.categoryName,a.ageID,a.ageDescription FROM enm_eventOccurrence eo INNER JOIN enm_events e ON e.eventID=eo.eoEventID_fk LEFT JOIN (enm_categories_occurrence co LEFT JOIN enm_categories c ON c.categoryID=co.co_categoryID_fk) ON eo.eventOccurrenceID=co.co_eventOccurrenceID_fk LEFT JOIN (enm_location_occurrence lo LEFT JOIN location l ON lo.lo_locationID_fk=l.LocationID) ON lo.lo_eventOccurrenceID_fk=eo.eventOccurrenceID LEFT JOIN (enm_ages_occurrence ao LEFT JOIN enm_ages a ON ao.ao_ageID_fk=a.ageID) ON ao.ao_eventOccurrenceID_fk=eo.eventOccurrenceID
This works, but it will pull out multiple rows for the same eventOccurrenceID (the PK for eventOccurrence) because of the several one-to-many relationships. For instance, there could be multiple categories, locations and ages for one event occurrence, so this will produce multiple rows. But, since I need to get only a limited of rows, the TOP will fail since there are multiple rows for each, and there's no way to tell how many rows exactly will come out (so just multiplying the TOP value is out of the question). Using DISTINCT or GROUP BY also seems to be out of the question, since I need to have the fields from the one-to-many tables in the SELECT list but cannot GROUP BY them.
My proposed solution is to run a query selecting only the eventOccurrenceID and using the WHERE information that the user is requesting, then running another query (with the full select list) with a "WHERE eventOccurrenceID IN (". But, I hate using two queries and just wonder if there's a better way around this.
I frequently need to run ad hoc queries against a database, capturing the output in a text file. In SQL Server 2000 I used Query Analyzer with no problems. In 2005 I'm trying to use the query function in Management Studio-but the output is (so far) unusable due to a Null character (hex 00) that follows every 'real' character. I assume this is due to Unicode but haven't found any way (yet) to tell it to just output in plain everyday text. (ASCII or ANSI-either will work.)
Is there some other tool I can use for SQL queries?
