I am in the process of setting up a dbcc checkdb and dbcc newalloc job for the user database in production. Do I need to include master and msdb to have checkdb and msdb run against them daily?
Any information you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Our supplyer of application we use say that dbcc checkdb or dbcc newalloc can give corrupt database (use version 6.5). I wonders about this statement. Are ther some how have explanation about this
When I try to delete a job from Enterprise Manager Console I get the following error: Erro 644: Could not find the index entry for RID '163bd10000010000' in index page (1:553), index ID 0 database 'msdb'
Oh and this is on MSDE.
Here is my complete output of DBCC CHECKDB DBCC results for 'msdb'. DBCC results for 'sysobjects'. There are 280 rows in 6 pages for object 'sysobjects'. DBCC results for 'sysindexes'. There are 143 rows in 6 pages for object 'sysindexes'. DBCC results for 'syscolumns'. There are 1567 rows in 26 pages for object 'syscolumns'. DBCC results for 'systypes'. There are 26 rows in 1 pages for object 'systypes'. DBCC results for 'syscomments'. There are 357 rows in 108 pages for object 'syscomments'. DBCC results for 'sysfiles1'. There are 2 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysfiles1'. DBCC results for 'syspermissions'. There are 116 rows in 1 pages for object 'syspermissions'. DBCC results for 'sysusers'. There are 13 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysusers'. DBCC results for 'sysproperties'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysproperties'. DBCC results for 'sysdepends'. There are 1635 rows in 8 pages for object 'sysdepends'. DBCC results for 'sysreferences'. There are 12 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysreferences'. DBCC results for 'sysfulltextcatalogs'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysfulltextcatalogs'. DBCC results for 'sysfulltextnotify'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysfulltextnotify'. DBCC results for 'sysfilegroups'. There are 1 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysfilegroups'. DBCC results for 'backupset'. There are 1045 rows in 44 pages for object 'backupset'. DBCC results for 'sysjobschedules'. There are 7 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysjobschedules'. DBCC results for 'syscategories'. There are 19 rows in 1 pages for object 'syscategories'. DBCC results for 'systargetservers'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'systargetservers'. DBCC results for 'backupfile'. There are 1451 rows in 24 pages for object 'backupfile'. DBCC results for 'systargetservergroups'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'systargetservergroups'. DBCC results for 'systargetservergroupmembers'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'systargetservergroupmembers'. DBCC results for 'restorehistory'. There are 1 rows in 1 pages for object 'restorehistory'. DBCC results for 'sysalerts'. There are 9 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysalerts'. DBCC results for 'sysoperators'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysoperators'. DBCC results for 'sysnotifications'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysnotifications'. DBCC results for 'restorefile'. There are 2 rows in 1 pages for object 'restorefile'. DBCC results for 'systaskids'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'systaskids'. DBCC results for 'syscachedcredentials'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'syscachedcredentials'. DBCC results for 'restorefilegroup'. There are 1 rows in 1 pages for object 'restorefilegroup'. DBCC results for 'logmarkhistory'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'logmarkhistory'. DBCC results for 'sysdtscategories'. There are 3 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysdtscategories'. DBCC results for 'sysdtspackages'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysdtspackages'. DBCC results for 'sysdtspackagelog'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysdtspackagelog'. DBCC results for 'sysdtssteplog'. Server: Msg 8935, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 2073058421, index ID 1. The previous link (1:343) on page (1:371) does not match the previous page (1:382) that the parent (1:300), slot 32 expects for this page. Server: Msg 8978, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 2073058421, index ID 1. Page (1:371) is missing a reference from previous page (1:343). Possible chain linkage problem. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysdtssteplog'. DBCC results for 'sysdtstasklog'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysdtstasklog'. DBCC results for 'sysdbmaintplans'. There are 4 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysdbmaintplans'. DBCC results for 'sysdbmaintplan_jobs'. There are 4 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysdbmaintplan_jobs'. DBCC results for 'sysdbmaintplan_databases'. There are 12 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysdbmaintplan_databases'. DBCC results for 'sysdbmaintplan_history'. There are 724 rows in 23 pages for object 'sysdbmaintplan_history'. DBCC results for 'log_shipping_primaries'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'log_shipping_primaries'. DBCC results for 'log_shipping_secondaries'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'log_shipping_secondaries'. DBCC results for 'mswebtasks'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'mswebtasks'. DBCC results for 'sqlagent_info'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sqlagent_info'. DBCC results for 'sysdownloadlist'. There are 0 rows in 0 pages for object 'sysdownloadlist'. DBCC results for 'backupmediaset'. There are 1045 rows in 11 pages for object 'backupmediaset'. DBCC results for 'sysjobhistory'. Server: Msg 8935, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 2073058421, index ID 1. The previous link (1:382) on page (1:564) does not match the previous page (1:371) that the parent (1:300), slot 33 expects for this page. There are 626 rows in 208 pages for object 'sysjobhistory'. CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 3 consistency errors in table 'sysjobhistory' (object ID 2073058421). DBCC results for 'sysjobs'. There are 7 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysjobs'. DBCC results for 'backupmediafamily'. There are 1045 rows in 20 pages for object 'backupmediafamily'. DBCC results for 'sysjobservers'. There are 7 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysjobservers'. DBCC results for 'sysjobsteps'. There are 9 rows in 1 pages for object 'sysjobsteps'. CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 3 consistency errors in database 'msdb'. repair_rebuild is the minimum repair level for the errors found by DBCC CHECKDB (msdb ). DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
Gurus when i run checkdb i get this error "Database 'master' consistency errors in sysobjects, sysindexes, syscolumns, or systypes prevent further CHECKDB processing." What can be the cause?Can i fix this with repair option of check db? Please advice
i've tried through this SQL script in Query Analyser but. the Result is not storing in the Text file, and getting output this
--------------------------------------- Password: NULL Do you want to save this format information in a file? [Y/n] Starting copy... SQLState = S1000, NativeError = 0 Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]BCP host-files must contain at least one column NULL BCP copy out failed NULL ---------------------------------------- Please help me, Successful Query. Thanks <b>Nosepicker</b> u r solutions is right... Which u gave the Query... Exec Master..xp_cmdshell 'osql -Uuserid -Ppassword -Sservername -ddatabase -Q"DBCC CHECKDB" > "c:Test.txt"'
i've Executed, It's work's fine in the VB6,VB.Net,ASP.Net... I've done project, i've facility to take Backup and Restore the Database...
We're just in the process of moving to 7.0, although SQL 7 has the autogrow feature we'd prefer to size MASTER and MSDB properly in the first place to avoid disk fragmentation. Does anyone have an experience/suggestions as to appropriate sizes, particulary for MASTER?
I am working on a third party client product which shrinks all the databases in MS SqlServer based on the rule or parameter that is set. This product will be used in production server which has MS SqlServer 7.0.
My question is: Is it advisable to shrink Master,Model and Msdb databases in an production environment? Please give the reasons.
I have a server attached to a SAN, all user db's are on the SAN, master, tempdb, and msdb are on the local machine. We will be replacing the machine (not the SAN) to a newer sql server. Our plan was to create the new server with same name, deattach current user db's,backup master and msdb, then connect new server with same name an IP to SAN. I then wanted to restore the master and msdb db's to the new machine, and attach the user db's. We are running log shipping to a stand-by server in this configuration. I was thinking I could let last tran log backup and copy occur, and then let the last restore happen on the standby. I would then shut down the agent. Should I not be able to restore the MSDB and master to the new server (as long as all file folder locations are the same) and be ready to go? Or are there issues when restoring the Master and MSDB to a new server from a different server.
When SQLserver2K was installed it placed master, model, msdb, tempdb data files in the installation location (i.e. C:Program Files....). This puts pressure on the C: drive, which also holds the page/swapfile. I want to move at least the tempdb location to the new 'Default data directory' and log directory we set after installation (i.e. E:MSSQLData).
How do I get tempdb to relocate to E: given that it gets recreated each time SQLserver starts?
Since,You cannot mirror the master, msdb, tempdb, or model databases.What will happen if i create new login,change existing security profile and new jobs,change of existing job on princicpal db. how these will be mirrored to other server and in case failover, how it will treat.
Hi, I'm new to SQL 6.5 and am having trouble with a scheduled backup. The job runs three dbccs: checkdb, checkcatalog and newalloc before running the backup (if clean). However the newalloc gives errors and thus my backup does not run - how do I fix this or can I ignore it?
The error reads: Processed 85 entries in the Sysindexes for dbid 7. Found 18 bad entries in the Sysindexes. DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, see your System Administrator.
Step 1. First I am filtering the Sales Order information and inserting it in my Sales Orders table. Step 2.Then I am filtering the details from the sales Order and inserting them in the respective table.
My Problem is that the Sales Order File does not contain the Sales Order key (ID), this is generated by the SQL Server. How can get it in order to use it in the second step? I need it because it is a foreign key in the details table.
I'm new to SQL and need help with a query. Not sure if this is the right place.
I have 2 tables, one MASTER and one DETAIL.
The MASTER table has a masterID, name and the DETAIL table has a detailID, masterID, and value columns.
I want to return a populated MASTER table with entries based on the DETAIL.value.
SELECT MASTER.* FROM MASTER WHERE DETAIL.value > 3
This is a simplified version of my problem. I can't figure out how to set the relationship between MASTER.masterID and DETAIL.masterID. If I do an INNER JOIN, the number of results are based on the number of DETAIL entries. I only want one entry per MASTER entry.
I have a few extremely large databases in SQL Server 6.5 sp3 (soon to be 5a - but we won't talk about that!!) NT 4.0 sp4 (about 10 GIG each). I don't have a big window of down-time in order to do any maintenance. Does anyone know of a way to be able to run dbcc checkdb or other dbcc's that I can run to verify the database yet complete within a reasonable amount of time? The last time dbcc checkdb was run, it was started Friday night and still not complete Sunday night. Over a weekend, I may have up to a 24 hour maintenance window.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks! Toni
Hai , When I ran DBCC CHECK DB of userdatabase, its reporting along with usual messages as Descriptor for system table '8' in database '8' not found in the descriptor hash table. I could'nt understand being familiar error encounterd . Any one will appreciate for the help
I recently took over a SQL server with 300 MB of data. I am relatively new to SQL 6.5 and have been reading that DBCC checkdb and checkalloc should be run at least once per week. Apparently the person before me never ran any of those checks. Is not running the database consistency checks for so long going to present a problem? has anyone run into problems when running those checks? Any advise is greatly appreciated.
I ran "dbcc checkdb(MCMSdb) with no_infomsgs" and I get the following: Server: Msg 8946, Level 16, State 12, Line 2 Table error: Allocation page (1:274992) has invalid PFS_PAGE page header values. Type is 0. Check type, object ID and page ID on the page.
What cane be done to correct this problem? Can this error prevent a user from connecting to the database?
I ran checkdb and found 4 error message on the db.. it seen like same object.. can anyone tell me what it is.. and how can i fix it? thanks !!!!
1. Server: Msg 8976, Level 16, State 1, Line 35 Table error: Object ID 2094630505, index ID 1. Page (1:809859) was not seen in the scan although its parent (1:77885) and previous (1:809767) refer to it. Check any previous errors. 2. Server: Msg 8978, Level 16, State 1, Line 35 Table error: Object ID 2094630505, index ID 1. Page (1:809860) is missing a reference from previous page (1:809859). Possible chain linkage problem. 3. Server: Msg 8976, Level 16, State 1, Line 35 Table error: Object ID 2094630505, index ID 1. Page (1:1453795) was not seen in the scan although its parent (1:1453347) and previous (1:1453796) refer to it. Check any previous errors. 4. Server: Msg 8978, Level 16, State 1, Line 35 Table error: Object ID 2094630505, index ID 1. Page (1:1453801) is missing a reference from previous page (1:1453795). Possible chain linkage problem.
Does anybody know if the results of DBCC CHECKDB are stored anywhere? If yes, where? Also, if you don't select "attempt to repair minor problems" option when you set up the maintenance plan, will SQL Server let you know about any errors Integrity check encounters? If yes, where the erros can be found?
in the SQL 6.5 documentation it says when running the DBCC CHECKDB, you should make the database read Only or DBO use only. Do you guys know if SQL 6.5 locks rows while this runs? In SQL 7.0/2000 it only locks the schema.
I am using windows nt40 and sql server 6.5 on a DEC ALPHA and accidentlly started a dbcc checkdb. Is it possible to stop the process with out damaging the database?
When running dbcc checkdb from my workstation(nt) I recieve some of the output and then I get "Connection Broken" this is on a 6.5 machine with the service pack 5, what could be causing my ODBC connection to drop during the proccess of running checkdb?
How can I make the dbcc checkdb fail so I can get the errors displayed in the report log? DBCC Checkdb is the step in the integrity job that I run once a month. What I am trying to do is when the dbcc checkdb fails for any reason, I want to get notified so I can correct the problem. I don't want to use repair fast or any other repair parameters that you can select when you run dbcc checkdb function because most of my dbs are 24x7.
I have a job set up that runs the dbcc checkdb and puts the results into a table. Then I run a query against this table to check the results of dbcc checkdb. If there are errors, I get a page that lets me know that there are some problems. When I ran this job on my production server, the job failed stating that there are problems with data integrity. So I copied this db to a dev server and recreated the job just like I have in prod. The job completed successfully withou any errors. Can anybody tell me what to look at to figure out why it failed on the prod server?
Madhur writes "Last week DBCC CHECKDB <database name> took 2 Hrs to complete on a database. Today again i have started but with the following command: dbcc checkdb (<database name>, REPAIR_FAST ).
It is now running for more than 2.5 Hrs now.
Does the execution time increases even when the DB is consistent?
Can we cancel the execution in the middle? What consequences it may have on the db?
I have a db that is about 50Gigs. Last night it went into a suspect mode and I have not been able to get any of my tables to display. I am running the dbcc checkdb. I have been running it for over 7 hrs. Do you have any suggestions as to what I should do or do you have any ideas as to how long this process might take?
Ricardo writes "We are consistently getting this error. We have check the hardware and nothing appears in the checkdk, can you help.
Thanks
Ricardo
dbcc checkdb (virtualrequest) DBCC results for 'tblVRAnswers'. Server: Msg 8928, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Object ID 370256524, index ID 3: Page (1:243518) could not be processed. See other errors for details. Server: Msg 8939, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Object ID 370256524, index ID 3, page (1:243518). Test (IS_ON (BUF_IOERR, bp->bstat) &&bp->berrcode) failed. Values are 2057 and -1. There are 9608 rows in 106 pages for object 'tblVRAnswers'.
CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 2 consistency errors in database 'VirtualRequest'.
dbcc checkdb (virtualrequest) DBCC results for 'tblvrquestions'. Server: Msg 8952, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Database 'VirtualRequest', index 'tblVRRequestedItems.IX_NC_tblVRRequestedItems_CurrentStatusID' (ID 784825958) (index ID 2). Extra or invalid key for the keys: Server: Msg 8956, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Index row (1:214293:372) with values (CurrentStatusID = 3 and RequestedItemID = 413260) points to the data row identified by (). There are 6614 rows in 103 pages for object 'tblvrquestions'.
CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in database 'VirtualRequest'
dbcc checkdb (virtualrequest) DBCC results for 'tblvrquestions'. Server: Msg 8952, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Table error: Database 'VirtualRequest', index 'tblVRRequestedItems.IX_NC_tblVRRequestedItems_CurrentStatusID' (ID 784825958) (index ID 2). Extra or invalid key for the keys: Server: Msg 8956, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 Index row (1:214293:372) with values (CurrentStatusID = 3 and RequestedItemID = 413260) points to the data row identified by (). There are 6614 rows in 103 pages for object 'tblvrquestions'.
CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 1 consistency errors in database 'VirtualRequest'."