Searching A List Of Tables, Derived From Another Table
Sep 21, 2005
Relative SQL newbie here......this is probably easy, but....
Lets say I have a table (MainTable) that stores a list of input table names,
a primary key (PKey), and a field called "Configured" for each one. Each of
these input tables also contain a field called "Configured", which is set to
true or false in another process based on an OrderNumber. (So an order's
inputs are stored in several input tables, and the MainTable is a summary
table that shows which input tables have been configured for any given
OrderNumber).
What I need to do is open each input table, and look for a record containing
a specific OrderNumber and where Configured=true. If a record is found, I
need to update the Configured field for that table in the MainTable, and
then move on to the next sub-table.
The way I'm doing it now is with simple SQL and loops. Here is the basic
code (ASP):
*****************************************
OrderNumber = "562613" ' the current order that is being processed
' reset all configured flags
sql = "UPDATE MainTable SET Configured = 0"
conn.execute sql, , &H00000080
' get list of all tablenames
sql = "SELECT InputTableName, PKey FROM MainTable WHERE InputTableName <>
'---'"
set rsTableNames = conn.execute(sql)
while not rsTableNames.eof
' test each input table for configured flag
sql = "SELECT Configured FROM " & rsTableNames("InputTableName")
& _
" WHERE Configured = 1 AND OrderNumber = '" & OrderNumber &
"'"
set rs = conn.execute(sql)
If Not rs.EOF Then
' update the main table
sql = "UPDATE MainTable SET Configured = 1 WHERE PKey='" &
rsTableNames("PrimaryKey") & "'"
conn.execute sql, , &H00000080
end if
set rs = nothing
rsTableNames.movenext
wend
*****************************************
There has to be a faster way.. I think.... maybe something that could be
written as a stored procedure? I use a similar technique in a couple of
other places and it's a bit of a performance hit, especially as the number
of input tables grows.
I need to build a search function for my site. So there is a single text box for the users to type in their search string. I have been asked that I need to break the user's search string into separate words. So if the user enters: "This is my search query", I need to break it into: "This" "is" "my" "search" "query" and then search for all these words.- Can I break a string into separet words using SQL?- How do I remove funny / dangerous characters from the search string?- If I have to break the search string using a programming language, I would have to run the search query for each word. If I run the search query for each word, How do I combine the search result for the user. For instance, if I search for "my" and find some result, then search for "search" and find some results, how do I display a SINGLE search result to the user.thanks
I have 3 different companies that share the same ticket_types(CRMS System). I need to display the Ticket Types and the 3 company's Ticket Count:
Ticket Type | Company A Count | Company B Count | Company C Count
I can get the information individually for each company, but if a company doesn't have a ticket in one of the ticket_types, then it isn't displayed in a row. So, I tried to write the following, which isn't pulling back any data.
DECLARE @startdate date = '20150306' DECLARE @enddate date = '20151031' DECLARE @AcctGrp varchar(20) = '111' ;WITH TType AS ( SELECT ctp.description as TicketType
[Code] .....
If I run each SELECT individually from above (excluding the last SELECT), it works and I get the following:
TicketType AR Request Credit Availability/Rush Cancel Order Credit Card Payment Expedite Order Freight Quote
[Code] ...
How to get the query results? Am I even close to getting it right?
Just wanted to run this idea past u all before I have a go at it.
I have two tables A & B that are similar to the below
Table A Name1 Name2 Name3 Tom Bill John Gary Harry Eric
TableB Name1 Name2 Name3 John Bill Tom Tom Eric john Leslie Philip Colin
What I wanted to do is see if the the records from tableA row 1 exist in tableB
As you can see they can appear in any order, partially or not at all.
What I propose to do is take tableA Name1 and see if it matches tableb row1 name 1 OR name 2 OR name 3 and if I find a match use a variable to assign the the value 1 (so I can then see if the match is full (score three) partial socre 1 and two or not at all (0)
Then I will need do the same for tableA row 2
Then goto row 2 of table a and start again.
Does this make sense? Are there beter ways of doing this.
What I need to do is identify records from Table 2 that do not have an Activity in the Act_Listing field contained in Table 1. So for Part_ID=1927, code 33 exists in Table 1, but code 14 doesn't, so that record should be selected.
Hi. We have to create an export from our system to be imported into another system. To get the data out we need to create some SQl but we're struggling a bit.
Hi there,i am having some problem related to SQL server........ Actually i am having a table called ZipCodes that have around 80,000 rows... and the size of the table is around 100 MB...... and my table is now on web Server,. now my problem is that when i fire some query that needs to go through whole of the table then it estimated time to execute the query comes to be 13 seconds and the corsor threshold is set to 7 seconds (and i can't change that)....... so the SQL server cancels the query to be fired........Now i need some Methodology/Technique through which i can search Large Tables with minimum calculations in minimum Time............(Any Ideas)....
i have multiple tables that vary very little in name. what i mean by this is they are named tbleffort1, tbleffort2 etc. i need to search all the tables together. there is a large constantly changing number of tables, so i would prefer not to have to write them out one by one! any suggestions would be most appreciated!
This is kind of what I'm trying to do in my MS SQL 2000 query. ShouldI be able to reference s1.col1 inside the 2nd derived table?I'm getting 'Invalid column name col1' and it's coming from the 2ndderived table (I've commented out other refs to just it to check).Maybe I need to use a temp table instead.SELECT s1.col1,(SELECT * FROM(SELECT COUNT(zzz) AS SomeTotalFROM tab1WHERE s1.col1 = zzz)) AS RowCount) /* error here */FROM(SELECT col1 FROM table) AS s1Thank you!
Hi, In the SQL92 Specifications i read the foloowingf statement... "All base tables are updatable. Derived tables are either updatable or read-only. The operations of insert, update, and delete are permitted for updatable tables, subject to constraining Access Rules. The operations of insert, update, and delete are not allowed for read-only tables." But i am concentrating on the below line from the above written lines, "Derived tables are either updatable or read-only." I want to ask that is derived tables are updatable or not??? if yes then how,???i tried the following querry but its not working...
Basically, I want to be able to have a stored procedure that will search through all the stored procedures looking for a given string and returning the names of all the stored procs that contain that string value.
I know I can script it off and then do a text search in Notepad or whatever, but I figured there must be a more elegant way to do it. More than likely dealing with the DB sys tables.
Is there already a tool in SQL Server that does this? Or has anybody had a chance to roll their own?
Hi!I want to return a derived table along with 4 simple tables in a storedprocedure as follows:Input parameter: @FtNum (==Order Number, selects one Order and allassociated data)Table 1: OrdersTable 2: ItemsTable 3: InstancesTable 4: StockDetailsDerived Table: for each Item that requires stock items, 1st columnshould receive the ItemNo (from Items), subsequent columns should receive thedetails from StockDetails via the common key field 'StockCode'.I have so far used a 'Fetch' cursor to find all occurrences of a StockCodewithin the Items table, but have been unable to figure out how to first addthe ItemNo into the temporary table.Code is as follows:... build #tmp_StockDECLARE stock_cursor CURSOR FORSELECT StockCode, ItemNoFROM ItemsWHERE FtNum = @FtNumORDER BY ItemNoOPEN stock_cursorFETCH NEXT FROM stock_cursorINTO @StockCode, @ItemNoWHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0BEGININSERT INTO #tmp_Stock-- wish to insert ItemNo = @ItemNo here --SELECT *FROM ControlledStockWHERE StockCode = @StockCodeFETCH NEXT FROM stock_cursorINTO @Stockcode, @ItemNoENDOf course there may be a much simpler way to do this!Your help would be greatly appreciated either way.--Message posted via SQLMonster.comhttp://www.sqlmonster.com/Uwe/Forum...eneral/200510/1
Hello.So the scenario is a little complicated.I am joining two tables.Table 1 is derived; it has one row; it has a column based from newid()Table 2 joins to table 1 and reuses the newid() value from table 1 in table 2's rowsBecause there is only one row in Table 1, the value of newid() REPEATS in Table 2The bug is that the NewId() value from Table1 is REGENERATED with every Table 2 record.I created a blog about this because it takes a code sample to demonstrate:http://jerrytech.blogspot.com/2008/04/sql-2005-tsql-bug-with-newid-in-derived.html
they all seem same to me. Is there any big difference among them.
Also, if I do have the tables avaiable, so now I don't think I have to create any of the temerory tables, since I can use the
WITh mystatement ( ) Select * from mystatmment
I think if I have to use any of the temperory tables , only time when I have to just create some tables to test some values on in it rather then using the real table in the database.
2) And not only that I use the CTE for that but for any sub query whereever apply, i would like to forget about the IN, Exit or = in the correlated queries but would use whereever I can use the "Joins"
create multiple INNER JOIN on derived tables as I have written below or use a #temp table for all derived tables and use them into JOIN. This below query is also very hard to understand what is going on .
I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
I did use query plans to find out more. ( Please see the thread BELOW)I have a question on this, if someone can help me with that it will begreat.In my SQL query that selects data from table, I have a where clausewhich states :where PermitID like @WorkTypeorder by WorkStart DESC@WorkType is a input parameter to the Stored proc and its value is'01%'When I use the above where clause, all the Sorts in the ESTIMATED QueryExecution plan show me a COST of 28%.However if I change the query manually to say:where PermitID like '01%'order by WorkStart DESCThe COST of the Sort (in ESTIMATED Query Execution plan) reduces to 2%and at the beginning of the PLAN, there is a Bookmark Lookup whichincludes the above where clause.Whereas with the FIRST example , the BookMark Lookup in the beginningdoesn't show that where condition.Can anyone help me better understand this anomaly?TIA=====================================I am using derived tables to Page data on the SQL Server side.I used this link as my mentor for doing paging on the SQLServerhttp://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms979197.aspxI wanted to use USER PAGING, thus I used the following code:CREATE PROCEDURE UserPaging(@currentPage int = 1, @pageSize int =1000)ASDECLARE @Out int, @rowsToRetrieve int, @SQLSTRING nvarchar(1000)SET @rowsToRetrieve = (@pageSize * @currentPage)SET NOCOUNT ONSET @SQLSTRING = N'selectCustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP '+ CAST(@pageSize as varchar(10)) +'CustomerId,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle from( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM( SELECT TOP ' + CAST(@rowsToRetrieve as varchar(10)) +'CustomerID,CompanyName,ContactName,ContactTitle FROM Customers as T1ORDER BY contactname) AS T2 ORDER BY contactname DESC ) AS T3)As T4 ORDER BY contactname ASC'EXEC(@SQLSTRING)RETURNGOWhen I use this. Assume that the Total records returned by the SQLquery is 1198.Thus when I am on Page1 the above Stored Proc (SP) willreturn the first 1000 records.This works absolutely fine.Now I am on Page2, now I need to retrieve only the remaining 198records.But if I use the above SP, it will return the last 1000records.So to tweak this I used the following logic to set the@pagesize variable:Declare @PageCount intselect @PageCount = @TotalRows/@PageSizeif @currentPage @PageCount SET @PageSize = @TotalRows%@PageSizeSince I am on Page2 the above logic will set the PageSize to 198 andnot 1000.But when I use this logic, it takes forever for the SP toreturn the 198 records in a resultset.However if the TotalRows were = 1800, and thus the PageSize=800 orgreater, this SP returns the resultset quickly enough.Thus to get over this problem I had to use the other logic i.e. usingApplication Paging (i.e. first storing the entire result set into aTemp table, then retrieving only the required records for the PAGE)Can anyone suggest what is wrong with my user paging logic?????TIA...
The data I am pulling is correct I just cant figure out how to order by the last 8 numbers that is my NUMBER column. I tried adding FOR XML AUTO to my last line in my query: From AP_DETAIL_REG where AP_BATCH_ID = 1212 and NUMBER is not null order by NUMBER FOR XML AUTO) as Temp(DATA) where DATA is not null
but no change same error. Output: 1234567890000043321092513 00050020
Select DATA from( select '12345678'+ left( '0', 10-len(cast ( CONVERT(int,( INV_AMT *100)) as varchar))) + cast (CONVERT(int,(INV_AMT*100)) as varchar) + left('0',2-len(CAST (MONTH(DATE) as varchar(2))))+ CAST (MONTH(DATE) as varchar(2)) + left('0',2-len(CAST (day(CHECK_DATE) as varchar(2)))) + CAST (day(DATE) as varchar(2))+right(cast (year(DATE)
Hi, I wanna know is there any advantage of perf gain when using Derived Tables over Temp Tables, advice me which one is better to use. Can I create Indexes and Insert/Update records into Derived Tables.
Hi, I have built a database for a university project, but am having trouble with the SQL syntax for inserting derived data from a calculation into a table. At present my SQL is; INSERT INTO MemberPayment (TotalCharge) VALUES ( [Total] ) SELECT ((MileageHistory.MileageUrban * Vehicle.EmissionsPerGramUrban) * 0.05) + ((MileageHistory.MileageCountry * Vehicle.EmissionsPerGramUrban) * 0.05) AS 'Total' FROM [NeuCar].[dbo].[MileageHistory] JOIN [NeuCar].[dbo].[Vehicle] ON MileageHistory.Registration = Vehicle.Registration JOIN [NeuCar].[dbo].[Member] ON Vehicle.UserName = Member.UserName WHERE Member.UserName = 'wenger1' AND (MileageHistory.[Date] >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 30); Would anybody be able to point out where I am going wrong? I would very much appreciate any advice, Kind regards, Chima
I got an error as follows: Derived table 'A' is not updatable because a column of the derived table is derived or constant. when I tried to run this query: update A set MonthsUnbilled =99999888 FROM (select MonthsUnbilled from dbo.vw_MasterView WHERE (RecordID =8377396)) A This is a simplified query in order to pinpoint the culprit. I know I don't need to use a derived table if the real query is this simple.
Below is my sql, i am getting error msg "Incorrect sytax near 'Votes'." Can anyone tell me what im doin wrong?
UPDATE #TblExposure SET E.Unity = ( SELECT -- DealId ,DocketId, CASE Participant2 WHEN nullTHEN 'NA' ELSE CASE WHEN Participant2-Vote2 =0 THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No' END END AS Unanimous1 FROM #tblVoting ) Votes FROM #tblExposure E INNER JOIN Votes ONVotes.Dealid = E.Dealid AND Votes.DocketId =E.DocketId
OBJECTIVE:THE QUERY SHOULD GIVE ME THE FIELDS I MENTIONED IN THE FIRST QUERY WITH THE CONDITIONS BELOW. CONDITION 1: RateReview field should have yesterday's date CONDITION 2: Email will be send to customer only once so Customer_GUID is UniqueIdentifier CONDITION 3: Customer shouldnt' have opted to get out from receiving any email so Termination field should be NULL ONe Customer can have many transwactions Is there any way i write the code specifying that no email should be sent more than once evereven if customer buys 10 tickets. Only one email sent so i need to specify that if this email has gone to particulare CUSTOMER_GUID then Ignore that record and do not send any email. This would be done by some tool known as StrongMail. SELECT CAST(a.Transaction_GUID AS varchar(36)) as Transaction_GUID, CAST(a.Customer_GUID AS varchar(36)) as Customer_GUID, Film_id as MovieId, First_nm as FirstName, Last_nm as LastName, Email_nm as EmailAddress FROm Table1 where RateReview_dm >= dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, getdate()), -1) -- Greater or same as Yesterday day and RateReview_dm < dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, getdate()), 0) -- Less than today's date and and Terminate_dm is null (I don;t know what condition to give that same customer good should not be send email again if send once) i don't know whether i need to create a derive table or it can work without drive table
I've created this:SELECTc.ProjectID,Count(c.ID) as 'Registrants',Count(dt.Hits) as 'Submissions'FROMCME_TBL cJOIN(SELECT ProjectID, Count(*) as Hits FROM CME_TBLWHERE evalDate Is Not NULL OR testDate Is Not NULLGROUP BY ProjectID) dtON c.ProjectID = dt.ProjectIDGROUP BYc.ProjectIDORDER BYc.ProjectIDand I get this:ProjectID Registrants Submissions--------- ----------- -----------adv_104699 99adv_1047185 185adv_110566 66boh_107134 34Instead, I want this:ProjectID Registrants Submissions--------- ----------- -----------adv_104699 14adv_1047185 82adv_110566 17boh_107134 12The "ProjectID" and "Submissions" columns are produced when I run thederived table (dt, above) as a standalone query. By the same token,the "Project ID" and "Registrants" columns are produced when I run the"outer" query, above.Am I on the right track here?TIA,-- Bill
Hi all,I have a table in this formatcolname1 colname2 colname3col1data1 col2data1 col3data1col1data2 col2data2 col3data2col1data3 col2data3 col3data3col1data4 col2data4 col3data4I want to display it in this formatcolname1 col1data1 col1data2 col1data3 col1data4colname2 col2data1 col2data2 col2data3 col2data4colname3 col3data1 col3data2 col3data3 col3data4Basically rotate it through 90 degrees clockwise and flip it over :)I'm pretty sure this is done by using a crosstab query and or aderived table or temp table. The problem is I use a crosstab query toget the original data into the first format. I've been strugglingtrying to get the ouptput into the second format for over a day nowand just can't seem to get it to work. Can anyone give me any pointerson the general solution to this?I hope this makes sense. Thanks for the help.
I have an application that has two different database backends, one is SQL Server Compact Edition and the other is SQL Server. The reason is because the application may run at home on one of our sales agent's computers or here in the office.
I have a query that uses a derived table and works just fine in SQL Server, however when I run it in the compact edtion (having the exact same table structures) it will not run. My question is...does the Compact Edtion or the Mobile Edition allow derived tables. If not is there a way to work around this? I will happily give an example if it will help.
I have some questions on derived table. Below is my situation.
Table order, there are 40 columns and it has indexes for productID and addressID Table product, there are 15 columns and it has index for productID Table address, there are 20 columns and it has index for addressID
Query A ------- select C.address, C.area, B.productname, B.category, A.qty, A.price from order A join product B on A.productID = B.productID join address C on A.addressID = C.addressID
Query B ------- select C.address, C.area, B.productname, B.category, A.qty, A.price from (select qty, price, productID, addressID from order) A join (select productID, productname, category from product) B on A.productID = B.productID join (select addressID, address, area from address) C on A.addressID = C.addressID
Will I loss the indexing when using derived table? Why query B performance is much better than query A?
I have a table tblFriends:UserCodeOwner FriendCode5 545 1235 4785 49054 5123 5478 5478 500490 5490 500500 478500 490500 600600 500As you can see I store each relation twice, i've done that because now I can create a clustered index on UserCodeOwner for faster searching.What I want is the following:I want to count how many steps it takes to get from one user to another via their relations and also via which usercode it goes.so: from 5 to 123 is one step.5-123from 5 to 500 is 2 steps via either 478 or 490I want to get a result like this:5-478-500and5-490-500from 5 to 600 is 3 steps:5-478-500-6005-490-500-600Does anyone have a good start for me on how im able to return such results and how I can search through the table most effecively?