CREATE PROCEDURE proc
@id varchar(50),@pswd varchar(20),@no_go int OUTPUT
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
SELECT user_id FROM profile
WHERE user_id=@id AND pswd=@pswd
IF @@ROWCOUNT = 0
BEGIN
SET @no_go = 1
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT date,date_mod FROM ans
WHERE user_id=@id
SET @no_go = 0
END
Using the PERL odbc_more_results function I can retrieve the data in
the second select statement whether the rowcount is 0 or not. Any
suggestions how to stop this
I have a purchased product that has a DB with several thousand tables in dbo. I can't change anything with the default dbo schema other than security. I have a table called dbo.ACCOUNT. It has information from multiple sites on it. I have a reporting team that need only access the information for SITE 1 on the ACCOUNT table and anything in the other 1000+ tables in the dbo schema.
I created a role (Analytics) and granted select access to dbo. I created a schema (Analytics) and assigned it the role. I created a view in the new schema called Analytics.ACCOUNT with a WHERE SITE = 1 clause on it. If they use the view, they see only the things they should. My problem is they can still do a select * from dbo.ACCOUNT and see everything they shouldn't see. How can I close that hole? I am not seeing a solution. If there is no way to fix this with roles/schemas/views, what else can I do?
Some of my pain points. I have this issue with about 30 tables. Creating custom table(s) to isolate data for each site will cost me another 2T of storage. Loading those custom tables every day would be cumbersome. Keeping the DDL in sync with the source table would be cumbersome. With the way I have it set up now, if I deny access to the source tables the view breaks because it needs access to the source tables to dynamically build the view. Here is the code I ran to create everything.
USE[DB] --create test user login CREATE LOGIN [Analytics_ETL] WITH PASSWORD=N'XXXXXXXXXXX' GO --create user in test database CREATE USER [Analytics_ETL] FOR LOGIN [Analytics_ETL] WITH DEFAULT_SCHEMA=[Analytics]
Is it a safe way to use a paramter (which fetch values from querystring) in the "where-part" of my stored procedure? Or is it an securityrisk because I dont know what the user is writing in the url-field? I got the following sqldatasource which grab the value (from querystring) into the my parameter. <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SQLDataSource" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString %>" runat="server" SelectCommand="My_StoredProcedure" SelectCommandType="StoredProcedure"> <SelectParameters> <asp:QueryStringParameter QueryStringField="Myparameter" Name="City" Type="string" /> </SelectParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource>
this should be a easy question, but I can't really seem to find anything on it...
Here's the scenerio:
n-tier web app, with asp/iis/sql... All database calls are done via stored procedures with the same user (lets call the user: webuser)
webuser has NO access to the db in question, but it is granted EXEC on all stored procedures.
My question is, when a user tells the web app to say delete a record, the application server (iis) makes a call to the database with the webuser security cred's... It says execute the delete stored proc.
webuser has the ability to do this, so it happens. However, in what context (this may not be the right word) does the stored procedure execute?
ie: which user does the stored proc exeucte as. It can't be webuser can it? Because webuser does not have access to the base tables.
Does the stored proc execute as the user that created it?
I have a Stored Procedure in one database that grabs data from another database. I don't want the user to be able to read data from the tables that the stored procedure Selects from but I would like the user to be able to run the stored procedure. Pretty standard request I think.
What I have done is to give the user in question a login then assigned them the Execute Permissions on the stored procedure. Unfortunately they are still unable to run the stored procedure from my web app. I have "allow anonymous access" turned on but I am still getting an error when the user tries to execute the stored procedure.
Am I missing something here or could there be a bigger issue?
I have a role called 'creator'. I want that no one else other than creator should be able to execute this procedure through an asp.net application or directly.If anyone attempts, it should be logged.
HOw do I do this. Please explain the answer. I am new to this.
Does anyone know how you can distribute Stored Procedures that work with a third party application but keep the contents / code of those Stored Procedures from being viewed and edited by the end users who have purchased the application as well as own and operate the SQL Server??
I have an ASP page which is supposed to populate a dropdown based on values returned from a stored procedure. This ASP page is working on our old server. I recently moved all the pages, code, ect over to our new server including migrated to SQL Server 2005 (from 2000 I think), as you can tell, somthing broke...
I assume this is security related however, all the relevant security is set correctly as far as I can tell. I am granting "Execute" access for the stored procedure and "Select" access for all the referenced tables. Am I missing something? Is there another security setting which needs to be set?
Dear GroupI'm having two stored procedures, sp_a and sp_bContent of stored procedure A:CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_aSELECT * FROM aGOContent of stored procedure B:CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_bSELECT * FROM bGOI have created a user that has execute permissions for both procedures.When I run procedure A, all works fine but when running procedure B I'mgetting an error saying that the user must have SELECT permissions on tableB.Both tables are owned by dbo, and the security role for the user doesn't hasany SELECT permission on table a and b.I'd be grateful if anyone could point me in a direction why this error mightcome up for procedure B but not for A,with a possible solution without giving the user SELECT permissions.Thanks very much for your help!Martin
Hi,I have a .NET application that connects to a SQL 2000 database usingtrusted security. It eventually calls a stored procedure that receives3 parameters - nothing special.If I simply change the connection string to use a valid Userid andPassword it still connects to the DB w/o problems but when it executesthe SP I get the following:System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Invalid length parameter passed tothe substring function.I change nothing but the login. Same store procedure, same parameters.Any ideas?
Dear GroupI have found that table A had SELECT permissions for 'Public' but not tableB.Giving 'Public' SELECT permissions on table B did the trick.HOWEVER, I don't want anyone to be able to do a direct SELECT on table A orB but only give them access to the data by using the stored procedures. Isthere any way this can be set up?Thanks for your efforts!Have a nice day!Martin"Martin Feuersteiner" <theintrepidfox@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:...[color=blue]> Dear Group>> I'm having two stored procedures, sp_a and sp_b>> Content of stored procedure A:> CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_a> SELECT * FROM a> GO>> Content of stored procedure B:> CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_b> SELECT * FROM b> GO>> I have created a user that has execute permissions for both procedures.> When I run procedure A, all works fine but when running procedure B I'm> getting an error saying that the user must have SELECT permissions on> table B.>> Both tables are owned by dbo, and the security role for the user doesn't> has any SELECT permission on table a and b.> I'd be grateful if anyone could point me in a direction why this error> might come up for procedure B but not for A,> with a possible solution without giving the user SELECT permissions.>> Thanks very much for your help!>> Martin>[/color]
Hi all . I am going to consult you about a security concept . In my database I have a set of tables (eg. City , Country , ...) and I have a corresponding View for each Table (eg. V_City , V_Country , ...) and There are a set of Add/Delete/Update/List stored procedures for each object , the user which logs on to database has only EXECUTE Privilege on defined stored procedures and does not have any kind of access to any other object in database , In your opinion , Can Inserting into/Updating Views instead of Inserting into/Updating Tables cause any problem?and Is this model help improve security? Not that I access SQL Server Database from a .Net App.
I have implemented an SSAS stored procedure for dynamic security and I call this stored procedure to obtain the allowed set filter. To my supprise, the stored procedure is being called repeatedly many times (more than 10) upon establishing the user session. Why is this happening?
"Could not impersonate the client during assembly file operation."
The CLR function is invoked from Service Broker internal activation stored procedure.
"SELECT user_name()" returns dbo just before CREATE ASSEMBLY execution.
SqlContext.WindowsIdentity.Name is "NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM" as the Data Engine runs with the LocalSystem account.
How do I create a the necessary security context for "CREATE ASSEMBLY" to succeed ?
Service Broker Queue activation with EXECUTE AS = "SELF", "OWNER", domain account or dbo, all result in the above error. The Service Broker assembly having the internal activation stored procedure is registered "unsafe".
Hi all!I need your help to realize algorithm for stored proc or trigger.tool: MS SQL server 2000, T-SQLTABLE:[unique_id] [mynumber] [week][unique_id] - bigint,primary key, identity auto-increnment[week] - int, 1-53, week number[mynumber] - int, 1 - 7, for every week, daily record one per day, upto 7 per weekso, for every week we have a mynumber from 1 to 7or nothing (if no records for that day),we can insert or delete mynubers in any order, at willEXAMPLE:week 1, mynumber 1,2,3 - so if we insert a new record, mynumber value= 4week 2, mynumber 1,2,3,5,7 - so next mynumber = 4QUESTION:How to use _only_ T-SQL find a missed numbers for particular week whenI'm insert a records?Thanks.Chapai
Whats the best type to hold a phone number in this format with a column in my sql table...should i use varchar???? or something else....any help would be great!!
Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created' returns an int value as 1 (performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created') but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie: exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1' which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID) I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc): SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID) This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example). My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert). Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
I executed them and got the following results in SSMSE: TopSixAnalytes Unit AnalyteName 1 222.10 ug/Kg Acetone 2 220.30 ug/Kg Acetone 3 211.90 ug/Kg Acetone 4 140.30 ug/L Acetone 5 120.70 ug/L Acetone 6 90.70 ug/L Acetone ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Now, I try to use this Stored Procedure in my ADO.NET-VB 2005 Express programming: //////////////////--spTopSixAnalytes.vb--///////////
Public Class Form1
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim sqlConnection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection("Data Source = .SQLEXPRESS; Integrated Security = SSPI; Initial Catalog = ssmsExpressDB;")
Dim sqlDataAdapter As SqlDataAdapter = New SqlDataAdaptor("[spTopSixAnalytes]", sqlConnection)
'Pass the name of the DataSet through the overloaded contructor
'of the DataSet class.
Dim dataSet As DataSet ("ssmsExpressDB")
sqlConnection.Open()
sqlDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet)
sqlConnection.Close()
End Sub
End Class ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I executed the above code and I got the following 4 errors: Error #1: Type 'SqlConnection' is not defined (in Form1.vb) Error #2: Type 'SqlDataAdapter' is not defined (in Form1.vb) Error #3: Array bounds cannot appear in type specifiers (in Form1.vb) Error #4: 'DataSet' is not a type and cannot be used as an expression (in Form1)
Please help and advise.
Thanks in advance, Scott Chang
More Information for you to know: I have the "ssmsExpressDB" database in the Database Expolorer of VB 2005 Express. But I do not know how to get the SqlConnection and the SqlDataAdapter into the Form1. I do not know how to get the Fill Method implemented properly. I try to learn "Working with SELECT Statement in a Stored Procedure" for printing the 6 rows that are selected - they are not parameterized.
Table A, Table B. need to update table A balance field from table b sum of amount
UPDATE CUSTOMERS SET BALANCE=(SELECT SUM(AMOUNT) FROM PAYMENT,CUSTOMERS
WHERE CUSTOMERS.ID=PAYMENT.ID GROUP BY PAYMENT.ID)
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 25
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
I have some code that I need to run every quarter. I have many that are similar to this one so I wanted to input two parameters rather than searching and replacing the values. I have another stored procedure that's executed from this one that I will also parameter-ize. The problem I'm having is in embedding a parameter in the name of the called procedure (exec statement at the end of the code). I tried it as I'm showing and it errored. I tried googling but I couldn't find anything related to this. Maybe I just don't have the right keywords. what is the syntax?
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[runDMQ3_2014LDLComplete] @QQ_YYYY char(7), @YYYYQQ char(8) AS begin SET NOCOUNT ON; select [provider group],provider, NPI, [01-Total Patients with DM], [02-Total DM Patients with LDL],
I have a sub that passes values from my form to my stored procedure. The stored procedure passes back an @@IDENTITY but I'm not sure how to grab that in my asp page and then pass that to my next called procedure from my aspx page. Here's where I'm stuck: Public Sub InsertOrder() Conn.Open() cmd = New SqlCommand("Add_NewOrder", Conn) cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure ' pass customer info to stored proc cmd.Parameters.Add("@FirstName", txtFName.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@LastName", txtLName.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@AddressLine1", txtStreet.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@CityID", dropdown_city.SelectedValue) cmd.Parameters.Add("@Zip", intZip.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@EmailPrefix", txtEmailPre.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@EmailSuffix", txtEmailSuf.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhoneAreaCode", txtPhoneArea.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhonePrefix", txtPhonePre.Text) cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhoneSuffix", txtPhoneSuf.Text) ' pass order info to stored proc cmd.Parameters.Add("@NumberOfPeopleID", dropdown_people.SelectedValue) cmd.Parameters.Add("@BeanOptionID", dropdown_beans.SelectedValue) cmd.Parameters.Add("@TortillaOptionID", dropdown_tortilla.SelectedValue) 'Session.Add("FirstName", txtFName.Text) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() cmd = New SqlCommand("Add_EntreeItems", Conn) cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure cmd.Parameters.Add("@CateringOrderID", get identity from previous stored proc) <------------------------- Dim li As ListItem Dim p As SqlParameter = cmd.Parameters.Add("@EntreeID", Data.SqlDbType.VarChar) For Each li In chbxl_entrees.Items If li.Selected Then p.Value = li.Value cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() End If Next Conn.Close()I want to somehow grab the @CateringOrderID that was created as an end product of my first called stored procedure (Add_NewOrder) and pass that to my second stored procedure (Add_EntreeItems)
I have a stored procedure and in that I will be calling a stored procedure. Now, based on the parameter value I will get stored procedure name to be executed. how to execute dynamic sp in a stored rocedure
at present it is like EXECUTE usp_print_list_full @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
I want to do like EXECUTE @SpName @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
I have a stored procedure that calls a msdb stored procedure internally. I granted the login execute rights on the outer sproc but it still vomits when it tries to execute the inner. Says I don't have the privileges, which makes sense.
How can I grant permissions to a login to execute msdb.dbo.sp_update_schedule()? Or is there a way I can impersonate the sysadmin user for the call by using Execute As sysadmin some how?
Has anyone encountered cases in which a proc executed by DTS has the following behavior: 1) underperforms the same proc when executed in DTS as opposed to SQL Server Managemet Studio 2) underperforms an ad-hoc version of the same query (UPDATE) executed in SQL Server Managemet Studio
What could explain this?
Obviously,
All three scenarios are executed against the same database and hit the exact same tables and indices.
Query plans show that one step, a Clustered Index Seek, consumes most of the resources (57%) and for that the estimated rows = 1 and actual rows is 10 of 1000's time higher. (~ 23000).
The DTS execution effectively never finishes even after many hours (10+) The Stored procedure execution will finish in 6 minutes (executed after the update ad-hoc query) The Update ad-hoc query will finish in 2 minutes
I am trying to debug stored procedure using visual studio. I right click on connection and checked 'Allow SQL/CLR debugging' .. the store procedure is not local and is on sql server.
Whenever I tried to right click stored procedure and select step into store procedure> i get following error
"User 'Unknown user' could not execute stored procedure 'master.dbo.sp_enable_sql_debug' on SQL server XXXXX. Click Help for more information"
I am not sure what needs to be done on sql server side
We tried to search for sp_enable_sql_debug but I could not find this stored procedure under master.
Some web page I came accross says that "I must have an administratorial rights to debug" but I am not sure what does that mean?
I have a stored procedure that creates an xml file. It executes a SELECTstatement with the FOR XML clause and then writes the xml file using bcp andxp_cmdshell. I am calling this procedure by passing it a parameter via ADO.I have configured the SQL Server Agent with a proxy account so non-SysAdmincan execute xp_cmdshell.I'm concerned about giving non-SysAdmins execute on xp_cmdshell. I'm alsoconcerned about having to maintain the password on my proxy account whenthat users' password changes.Is there a better, more secure way to generate this xml file.Thanks
I have a stored procedure 'ChangeUser' in which there is a call to another stored procedure 'LogChange'. The transaction is started in 'ChangeUser'. and the last statement in the transaction is 'EXEC LogChange @p1, @p2'. My questions is if it would be correct to check in 'LogChange' the following about this transaction: 'IF @@trancount >0 BEGIN Rollback tran' END Else BEGIN Commit END. Any help on this would be appreciated.
I want to "deny" create, update,and delete access on the dbo stored procs that are in the database, but do not want take away dbo owner access. is this possible?
can i create a role and deny access on a particular table in msdb? or a system table in the user table. Thus preventing the developers on the box access to update any of the dbo owned sp's and have them create their own user-owned stored procs?
