Remove Fields From results from Innerjoin In Sql --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi, I' ve been struggling for a few days with following problem. I have a query with 2 tables (below). They are joined by one key field checknr. I would only like to see field comm from table OTCUser.checklistcomm, but only the last result which are conform to the condition. So the fields in bold shouldn't appair.Could someone help me ?
SELECT MAX(p.Modifdatum) AS modifdatumv, OTCUser.checklistcomm.comm, p.Status, p.station, p.checkitem FROM OTCUser.checkliststat p INNER JOIN OTCUser.checklistcomm ON p.Checknr = OTCUser.checklistcomm.checknr GROUP BY p.station, p.checkitem, OTCUser.checklistcomm.comm, p.Status HAVING (p.Status = '2') AND (p.station = '00BE104740') ORDER BY p.station, p.checkitem
0 AS SalaryMin, 2088 AS SalaryMax, 2088 AS BillableHours, 'Month' AS SalaryPaidCode, 0 AS SalaryBreakdownHourly, 0 AS SalaryBreakdownDaily,
[Code] ...
While outputting to CSV.file
I got :0,2088,2088,"Month",0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"N/A","N/A","G","N/A","Exempt","Other",1
How can I remove all double quotes in the string fields? so that O can get the result as below while the output 0,2088,2088,Month,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,N/A,N/A,G,N/A,Exempt,Other,1
hi i have table i use it for update insert and the users use this table from a grid on the web and i need to prevent from white space in the fields in table so how to create TRIGGER remove white space from a fields in table scan and fix it ?
I know that when you select Multi from the parameter report properties, that it automatically makes "Select All" Available. So how would i take off the "All Value". My users dont want to see All, if Select ALL is available.
How do i exclude from "All" from my report parameter/dataset??
I have a select statement that I am using and wanted to know if there is a way to remove a parameter on the fly. What I want to do is remove the @status if the text = "". so it will only search by the date and endate is that possible to do. Here is my code.
SELECT DISTINCT S.EnrollNo ,S.Name ,ET.Descriptions AS EventName ,SA.Name AS AttendStudent ,'' AS AttendFaculty FROM StudentEvent SE INNER JOIN SStudent S ON SE.PresentatorID = S.StudentID
I have a fairly basic query I want to make but I'm struggling on figuring out how to do it. Let's say I have some fields (e.g. Value1, Value2, Value3, etc). I simply want to do a Select statement that returns the highest value among those fields for every row in my db.
At first I thought of the built in Max function until I realized that is for within a column only.
The thing about the region is that it can be defined by states only, in which case CountyID and CityId are NULL, can be defined by Counties too, in which case only CityID is NULL or it can be defined up to City level, in which case all 3 are set to something. Example, Northeast would be all cities from northeast, but Pocono would be just some counties in PA, and so on...
The issue is now selecting all cities that belong into a region... Normally I would join the Zips table with the Region_Data table and retrieve all CityIDs... The issue is that, as I said, the CountyID and CityID might be null for some records, so I am not sure how to retrieve them?
I came up with one idea in which I create 3 temporary tables and I select in them all the records that have 1) only state, 2) only state and county, 3) all 3, then I join each and I union the results...
But I am wondering if there is a way to do the select in one shot?
I have a really large table with many Proposal fields and corresponding approval fields.
Propose1 Approve1 Propose2 Approve2
Would it be good practice or even possible for me to select all proposal fields using a wildcard somehow within the select statement. If it is ok, how would I go about doing it?
I have: Dim queryString As String = "SELECT distinct [CSULOG5].[status] + [CSULOG5].[lmca_nbr] FROM [CSULOG5]" I even tried & instead of +. but it doesn't like it. Is it legit syntax for mssqlserver? This is a vb project aspnet
Could anyone tell me what governs whether a column is set as nullable or not nullable when creating a table using SELECT...INTO. It just seems to pick at random for me! I'm quite sure this is not the case. Is there a way to force a column to be non- nullable? I seem to be wasting a lot of time going through and altering the schema so I can use the columns in keys and indexes.
I have an Address column that I need to Substring. I want to remove part of the string after either, or both of the following characters i.e ',' OR '*'
Example Record 1. Elland **REQUIRES BOOKING IN*** Example Record 2. Theale, Nr Reading, Berkshire Example Record 3. Stockport
How do I achieve this in a CASE Statement?
The following two case statements return the correct results, but I some how need to combine them into a single Statement?
,LEFT(Address ,CASE WHEN CHARINDEX(',',Address) =0 THEN LEN(Address ) ELSE CHARINDEX(',' ,Address ) -1 END) AS 'Town Test'
,LEFT(Address ,CASE WHEN CHARINDEX('*',Address ) =0 THEN LEN(Address) ELSE CHARINDEX('*' ,Address ) -1 END) AS 'Town Test2'
The data I have has a 1 in for each Yes answer and a 2 for each no answer. I just want the select statement to show the word yes when there's a 1 and the word no when there's a 2. I don't need to update or change the database. Could anyone lead me in the right direction here? Thanks
In order to ask my question on a SQL query I will use a simplified version of a table I was struggling with...
¦¦¦¦SHOP¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦CARS
KILBURN MOTORS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦Mercedes KILBURN MOTORS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦BMW KILBURN MOTORS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦FIAT BRIXTON AUTOMOBILE¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦Mercedes BRIXTON AUTOMOBILE¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦BMW WEST HAMPSTEAD CARS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦Mercedes CAMDEM MOTORS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦FIAT NORTHERN LONDON CAR-STORE¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦BMW NORTHERN LONDON CAR-STORE¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦FIAT
So my question is: how can I select only SHOPs which have no CARS variety (e.g. a variety =1)?
In other words I am looking for a Query that would give me this outcome:
¦¦¦¦SHOP¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦CARS
WEST HAMPSTEAD CARS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦Mercedes CAMDEM MOTORS¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦¦FIAT
...because WEST HAMPSTEAD CARS, selling Mercedes only, has a CARS variety equal to 1 as well as Camdem Motors which sells only FIAT.
I tried with this query:
SELECT DISTINCT SHOP, CARS FROM CAR_SELLERS GROUP BY SHOP, CARS HAVING COUNT(CARS) = 1
But it doesn't work.
In addition I also would like to know for example how to create a similar query for a different desired CARS variety (e.g. 2, 3...)
How to do the tabs or attach images in the Post New Topic Message box... I wanted to attach a screen shot of the table but I was not able to and so, in order to post my question, I prepared a simplified version of the table plus I had to do the tabs/spaces manually with the symbol (¦)
Hi,Is there a way to exclude fields in a query other than just includingthe ones you want. If there are 20 fields and you want to see all but3, it would be a lot easier to exclude the 3.Thanks
I thought this was working, but apparently it was not. I was wondering how I would create a SELECT Statement for values that are blank (Equal to ""). I really could have swore that this was working, but I guess it wasn't.
// create an open the connection OleDbConnection conn = new OleDbConnection(conString); OleDbCommand command = new OleDbCommand(); command = conn.CreateCommand();
// create the DataSet DataSet ds = new DataSet();
// run the query command.CommandText = "SELECT ID AS [#], Company AS [Company], FName AS [First Name], LName AS [Last Name], Type AS [Type] FROM Table1 WHERE Tags = @P0;"; OleDbDataAdapter adapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(); adapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(command); command.Parameters.Add("@P0", OleDbType.VarChar).Value = ""; adapter.Fill(ds);
// close the connection conn.Close();
bindingSource1.DataSource = ds.Tables[0];
DataGridView.DataSource = bindingSource1;
// set the size of the dataGridView Columns this.DataGridView.Columns[0].Visible = false; this.DataGridView.Columns[1].Width = 234; this.DataGridView.Columns[2].Width = 50; this.DataGridView.Columns[3].Width = 50; this.DataGridView.Columns[4].Width = 75;
//Sort on the Title Column DataGridViewColumn sortColumn = DataGridView.Columns[1]; ListSortDirection direction; direction = ListSortDirection.Ascending; DataGridView.Sort(sortColumn, direction);
//Set the Selected Property of the First Row to False DataGridView.Rows[0].Selected = false; } catch { }
I have a table with two sets of fields, one for PRIMARY Mail Address and the other for ALTERNATE Mail Address. Both sets are five fields long. I will call them PRIMARY & ALTERNATE for this discussion. I want to select the PRIMARY fields if ALTERNATE is either null or zero, and the ALTERNATE fields if data is present.
I have used this syntax but it gives a table with both the PRIMARY & SECONDARY records.
SELECT TXPRCL, TXALTR, TXANAM FROM dbo.PCWEBF21 WHERE (TXALTR > 0) UNION SELECT TXPRCL, TXTAXP, TXTNAM FROM dbo.PCWEBF21 WHERE TXALTR = 0
Would a Select Case work? something like
Select PRIMARY when ALTERNATE = 0, and ALTERNATE when ALTERNATE > 0 or is not null.
Hi, how do i do a select statement with asp.net to return a record if a field is null. I have the following code: SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Categories WHERE ParentId = @ParentId", cn);.Parameters.Add("@ParentId", SqlDbType.Int).Value = parentId != null ? (object) parentId : DBNull.Value;cn.Open(); The variable parentId is a nullable int. However when i pass in a null value it doesn't return anything even though there are records in the database that have a null value for the ParentId field. Appreciate if someone could tell me what i am doing wrong. Thanks
Is it possible to combine fields and text in a select statement? In a dropDownList I want to show a combination of two different fields, and have the value of the selected item come from a third field. So, I thought I could maybe do something like this: SELECT DISTINCT GRP AS GroupName, "Year: " + YEAR + "Grade: " + GRD AS ShowMe FROM GE_Data WHERE (DIST = @DIST)
I hoped that would take the values in YEAR and GRD and concatenate them with the other text. Then my dropDownList could show the ShowMe value and have the GroupName as the value it passes on. However, when I test this in the VS Query Builder, it says that Year and Grade are unknown column names and changes the double-quotes to square brackets. If this is possible, or there's a better way to do it, I'd love some more info. Thanks! -Mathminded
I m writing a stored procedure to query a table Population that has the following fields - CityId, CityName, Plus0, Plus10, Plus20, Plus30, Plus40, Plus50, Plus60, Plus70, Plus80. The field Plus0 contains the number of people of age > 0 living in the city, Plus10 contains the number of people of age > 10 living in the city and so on. Given the city id and age groups like 20To40, 50To60, 40Plus, etc., I should be able to query the number of people in the city corresponding to the requested age group. Note that if the requested age group was 20To60, I need to make use of only 2 fields Plus20 and Plus60 in the table to compute this value. And if the requested age group was 40Plus, then I need only the value in the field Plus40. The problem is that a wide variety of age groups can be requested like 0Plus, 10Plus, ... , 80Plus, 0To10, 0To20, 0To30, .... 70To80.
Which is the most effecient way to handle this ?
1. Have a stored procedure that returns all the fields even though only 1 or 2 of them would be actually used ?
In this case, if I returned data for a large number of cities then there would be a lot of unnecessary information that was returned by the query. Lots of data would be passed through the network though most of it would not be used.
2. Have a stored procedure that takes in parameters @Plus0, @Plus10, @Plus20, .. @Plus80 that are bits indicating whether the field was required or not and then using a CASE statement to return values for a field only if the corresponding bit parameter was set, and returning NULL if the corresponding bit paramter was not set ?
In this case, I would be returning NULL for all those fields that were not required for a particular age group. This would save some network bandwidth, wouldn't it ?
3. Pass in the age group itself (ex: 0To20) as a parameter to the stored procedure and have lots of IF statements, one for each age group, that return only the fields that are needed for that age group.
This leads to a lot of code repitition.
4. Use a similar approach as above but use dynamic SQL queries to avoid code repitition.
But using dynamic SQL queries can affect the performance of the stored procedure as they need to be compiled each time.
I used this statement, select * from table1 where date1 = null, in SQL Query window and got a few records back. Now, I used the same statement in my VB 5 code and no record is found. How do I select all the records in table1 which do not have values in field date1? Thanks for the help.
I've been busy all night searching and reading trying to figure out how I can do the following.
I have a table that tracks user IDs in multiple fields. When I select records from this table I need a way to resolve those ID fields back into user names by referencing the users table. SQL statement thus far...
SELECT A.Username as NameA, B.Username As NameB, FROM theTable, Users As A, Users As B WHERE theTable.UserIDA ???
How do I resolve theTable.UserIDA and theTable.UserIDB back to Users.Username so that the records returned fill the fields NameA and NameB?
Dear All I am trying to populate an OledbDatareader for binding to a ASP datagrid.
For this I use select statement to display combined fields in a datagrid cell. Eg. Select (Field1+ '<br/>' + Field2 + '<br/>' + Field 3) As Address .. and so on. But the problem is if any of the three field is null the combined field 'Address' returns as Null. Please help me to overcome this problem.
INNER JOIN F1ADR_ADDRESS ON (GLF_CHART_ACCT.CHART_NAME = F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_KEY1) AND (GLF_CHART_ACCT.ACCNBRI = F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_KEY2)
GROUP BY GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR1, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR2, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR3, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_CITY, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ADDR_STATE, F1ADR_ADDRESS.POST_CODE, F1ADR_ADDRESS.PHONE_NBR, F1ADR_ADDRESS.FAX_NBR, F1ADR_ADDRESS.EMAIL_ADDR_NAME, F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_NAME, GLF_CHART_ACCT.ACCNBRI, F1ADR_ADDRESS.CONTACT_TITLE, GLF_CHART_ACCT.CHART_NAME, F1ADR_ADDRESS.ENTITY_UNIQUE_NBR, GLF_CHART_ACCT.SELN_TYPE1_CODE
HAVING CHART_NAME='ARCHART' AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1 <> '' AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.SELN_TYPE1_CODE = 'Trade' AND GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1 LIKE '%" + Search + "%' ORDER BY GLF_CHART_ACCT.DESCR1;
I get errors if not all the fields are included in the group by clause.
what i dont get is why i have to create seperate groups for this query...or am i reading it wrong??
Let's say I have a table of users. Let's imagine there's two fields: username (PK), password
Now I need to authenticate a user against this table. What is the recommended approach? Is it better / faster to (1) SELECT * FROM [User] WHERE username = 'whatever' AND password='whatever' or (2) SELECT * FROM [User] WHERE username = 'whatever' and then in my code check that the record returned matched the password?