hello,
I could need some help with a little query.
table "acme"
name1 varchar(128)
name2 varchar(128)
idate datetime
content
A,H,1/1/2005
A,H,2/1/2005
A,I,2/1/2005
A,J,3/1/2005
B,K,4/1/2005
B,L,5/1/2005
I want the following result (for 'A'):
1/1/2005,1
2/1/2005,3
3/1/2005,4
I want to filter for Column "Name1" and cumulative count the entries grouped by date.
what's the simplest solution?
best regards, thilo.
Hi! I am rather new to SQL, and could use some help. I have a table with lots of records, with fields like this:
TableA.Batch
TableA.Wafer
TableA.DieID
TableA.Param
TableA.Value
For each batch, there are ~25 wafers. For each wafer, there are thousands of dies. For each die there are several parameters, and for each die and parameter there is a value.
I want to calculate the median and robust sigma (inter-quartile range/1.35) per wafer, for a parameter. The following code works perfectly for me:
DECLARE @Q1 FLOAT, @MEDIAN FLOAT, @Q3 FLOAT, @SIGMA FLOAT, @x INT, @y INT, @z INT
SET @Q1 = SELECT TOP 1 value FROM (
SELECT TOP 25 PERCENT value
FROM TableA
WHERE batch=@x
AND wafer=@y
AND param=@z
ORDER BY value) Quartile1
ORDER BY value DESC
SET @MEDIAN = SELECT TOP 1 value FROM (
SELECT TOP 50 PERCENT value
FROM TableA
WHERE batch=@x
AND wafer=@y
AND param=@z
ORDER BY value) Median
ORDER BY value
SET @Q3 = SELECT TOP 1 value FROM (
SELECT TOP 25 PERCENT value
FROM TableA
WHERE batch=@x
AND wafer=@y
AND param=@z
ORDER BY value DESC) Quartile3
ORDER BY value
SET @SIGMA = (@Q3-@Q1)/1.35
SELECT @MEDIAN, @SIGMA
Ok, if you are still there: I need to do this for hundreds of wafers, and hopefully without having to manually set the batch and wafer numbers. I'm using MS SQL server by the way. As far as I've understood, there is no for-loop in SQL, and I can't see how I can do this by using GROUP BY.
Any help is very appreciated.
Hey i have a query i need help with.
I have a table where i have 4 columns in it which i need to group together and then sum up a cost column also. I want to sum up the columns where i have a parent and and child and then i want to sum up the other column where i have only a child.
Example of the data is below. I think i need to do this in a sub query
ID Ind Parent Child Cost
P110041012705921.8000
W11004101270595.4500
A110041012705921.8000
B110041012705916.3500
R110041012705916.3500
B0100420043.3000
P0100420043.3000
W0100420021.6500
I have a table that stores billing rates for our employees by client.Each employee can have a different billing rate for each client for aspecified period. Here are the columns in the table.eid - Employee ID#cid - Client ID#startdt - start date of billing rateenddt - end date of billing ratebrate - billing rateI need to create a script that will verify that for a given eid, and cidthat either the startdt or enddt for one billing rate, the periods donot overlap.For example, I need to be able to detect overlaps such as this:eid cid startdt enddt brate001 001 1/1/2003 12/31/2003 $50001 001 11/01/2003 04/01/2004 $75*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 2 Replies View Relatedsuppose I have the following table:CREATE TABLE (int level, color varchar, length int, width int, heightint)It has the following rows1, "RED", 8, 10, 122, NULL, NULL, NULL, 203, NULL, 9, 82, 254, "BLUE", NULL, 67, NULL5, "GRAY", NULL NULL, NULLI want to write a query that will return me a view collapsed from"bottom-to-top" in order of level (level 1 is top, level 5 is bottom)So I want a query that will returnGRAY, 9, 67, 25The principle is that looking from the bottom level up in each columnwe first see GRAY for color, 9 for length, 67 for width, 25 forheight. In other words, any non-NULL row in a lower level overridesthe value set at a higher level.Is this possible in SQL without using stored procedures?Thanks!- Robert
View 22 Replies View RelatedHi.
I am developing for a system that receives an input from an external modem.
The Transaction is split into 2 sections,
Section 1 = grants the transaction ID,
Section 2 = deliver the transaction Data.
I have 2 corresponding tables,
One called tblremoteunitrequestID (Where the transaction ID is granted)
The other called tblremoteunitrequests (Where the transaction is completed, about 1 second later)
I am writing a diagnostic report that determines if the first part of the transaction completes but the second part fails.
I am having difficulties designing the SQL for this.
Here is some sample data for tblremoteunitrequestID: (The first stage of the transaction)
RecordDate | Serial
13/11/2006 14:00:36 0000-0000-0000-0006
13/11/2006 14:00:30 0000-0000-0000-0004
13/11/2006 13:59:04 0000-0000-0000-0092 (This didtn transaction didnt complete)
13/11/2006 12:15:22 0000-0000-0000-0092 (nor did this one)
13/11/2006 10:31:54 0000-0000-0000-0092
13/11/2006 10:00:29 0000-0000-0000-0006
Here is some sample data for tblremoteunitrequests: (The second stage of transaction, 1st stage has to be completed beforehand)
DateReceived | Serial
13/11/2006 14:00:37 0000-0000-0000-0006
13/11/2006 14:00:31 0000-0000-0000-0004
13/11/2006 10:31:56 0000-0000-0000-0092
13/11/2006 10:00:31 0000-0000-0000-0006
13/11/2006 10:00:25 0000-0000-0000-0004
13/11/2006 07:19:13 0000-0000-0000-0020
From this data I can see that serial number 0000-0000-0000-0006 Successfully completed part 1 and part 2 of the transaction, as did serial number 0000-0000-0000-0004.
Serial number 0000-0000-0000-0092 had trouble, it connected at 13:59:04 (tblremoteunitrequestID) but part 2 didnt complete, so it wasent saved in tblremoteunitrequests. The same happened at 12:15:22 but at 10:31:54 it was successful so it was saved.
I Only want to display the transactions that didnt complete, sounds easy huh?
This is what I hope to get in my Results table:
DateReceived | Serial
13/11/2006 13:59:04 0000-0000-0000-0092
13/11/2006 12:15:22 0000-0000-0000-0092
I was experimenting with T-SQL today, this is what I have done so far:
SELECT DISTINCT
TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.Serial, TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.RecordDate,
CASE WHEN TBLRemoteUnitRequests.DateReceived BETWEEN DATEADD(SECOND,-1,TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.RecordDate) AND DATEADD(SECOND,10,TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.RecordDate)
THEN ' Ok'
ELSE ' Not ok'
END AS PROBLEM
FROM TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID LEFT OUTER JOIN
TBLRemoteUnitRequests ON TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.Serial = TBLRemoteUnitRequests.Serial
WHERE TBLRemoteFeildUnitRequestID.RecordDate BETWEEN DATEADD(WEEK, - 2, GetDate()) AND GetDate()
ORDER BY RecordDate DESC
This kinda worked, but it caused records that satisfied the between condition to be displayed twice, once as "Ok" and once as "Not ok".
Heres a sample of the result I got:
Serial | RecordDate (1st part of transaction) | Status
0000-0000-0000-0006 2006-11-13 14:00:36.000 Ok (Duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0006 2006-11-13 14:00:36.000 Not ok
0000-0000-0000-0004 2006-11-13 14:00:30.000 Not ok (Duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0004 2006-11-13 14:00:30.000 Ok
0000-0000-0000-0092 2006-11-13 13:59:04.000 Not ok (Correct) (Not duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0092 2006-11-13 12:15:22.000 Not ok (Correct) (Not Duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0092 2006-11-13 10:31:54.000 Not ok (Duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0092 2006-11-13 10:31:54.000 Ok
0000-0000-0000-0006 2006-11-13 10:00:29.000 Ok (Duplicated)
0000-0000-0000-0006 2006-11-13 10:00:29.000 Not ok
I have just about had enough, I have wasted an entire day on this
Someone please Help
Dan
I'm writing a workflow management application for my work, and its somewhat complicated, here's a general idea of how it works:
- Anything that a company does is defined by a workflow.
- A workflow consists of tasks.
- Some tasks in a workflow can't be started until other tasks have been completed. If task A can't be started until tasks B and C are finished, then task A depends on B and C.
You might imagine that a bank has a workflow for handling a house loan. Before a bank could sign a contract with an applicant, they'd need proof of house ownership, but before they could get proof of house ownership they need an applicant's proof of identity like a driver's license or military ID.
Here's an oversimplified visual:
Each arrow points to its dependency. Each task can have multiple dependencies.
The setup above is represented in the database by a Tasks and a Dependencies table. Tasks has an ID field, and Dependencies has a TaskID and DependencyID field which are both foreign keys to Tasks.ID.
Code:
[Tasks]
ID Status Name
-- ------ ----
1 Done Start Processing Loan Application
2 Done Photocopy applicant's driver's license
3 NotDone Photocopy proof of house ownership
4 NotDone Get a copy of applicant's W-2 forms
5 NotDone Perform credit check on applicant
6 NotDone Sign loan contract
[Dependencies]
TaskID DependencyID
------ ------------
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 2
5 2
5 3
6 4
6 5
Tasks has a many-to-many relationship with itself.
Here's the hard part:
- A task can't be started until all of its dependencies have been completed.
- after a task is completed (meanings its status is marked "done"), I need to return a list of all the new tasks that are ready to be started.
When TaskID 2 is marked "Done", then TaskID 4 is ready to begin; however, TaskID 5 is not ready to begin since it depends on 2 and 3, and 3 hasn't been completed yet.
The requirements of the query are very simple, but the implementation is difficult.
I'll post a prelimenary solution in the next post:
Hello,Here is a brief summary:Table 1 = All Accounts- with fields such as Customer ID and Account #Table 2 = Deposit Balance Table- with fields such as Account #, BalanceTable 3 = Loan Balance Table- with fields such as Account #, BalanceAll accounts are either deposit accounts or loan accounts. What I needto do is to gather information about total balances in both depositsand loans for each customer. I haven't been able to hit the right queryfor doing this. I can easily get information about one or the other,such as the following:SELECT All_Accounts.Customer_ID, COUNT (DISTINCT(Deposit_Balance_Table.Account_Number)), Sum(Deposit_Balance_Table.Balance)FROM Product_Table, Deposit_BalanceWHERE (Product_Table.Account_Number=Deposit_Balance.Acco unt_Number)GROUP BY Product_Table.Customer_ID ORDER BY 1Which will give me one row for each user, and show me the total numberof deposit accounts each customer has and a sum of the balances in eachof those accounts. I can make a similar query involving Loan Accounts.As soon as I try to draw both, however, I wind up below my depth.Something to do with the handedness of my joins, I believe. Often Iwill get one column of information (either deposits or loans), or thequery will fail because the join I'm attempting is invalid, etc. I needto take every row in the All_Accounts table, match each one to itsbalance in either the Deposit or Loan table, and then group them all bythe Customer ID and sum them, so that I can find out the totalrelationship balance per customer. Any help would be appreciated.
View 5 Replies View Related GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Product]
(
[ProductId] [smallint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT PkProduct_ProductId PRIMARY KEY,
[Name] [varchar](52) NOT NULL,
[Type] [smallint] NOT NULL,
)
For this table
I have to write the querywhich willget the TOP 1 Row of each Type.
I know the alternate way of doing this by union.
But this is not professional.
Can anyone resolve this issue?
Hi,I have a table as followingaa Text1 aa, Join Bytes!, 15267aa Text1 aa, Join Bytes!, 16598aa Text1 aa, Join Bytes!, 17568aa Text2 aa, Join Bytes!, 25698aa Text3 aa, Join Bytes!, 12258I have to write a query as follows ...SELECT DISTINCT TOP 500 fldText, fldContact, fldItemidFROM tableWHERE fldCat = 10 AND CONTAINS (fldText, 'Text1')In the example you can see the table has rows in which text and contact ordouble but with different itemid's. Now my employer wants me to show only 1row when text and contact or the same. He doesn't mind which itemid I show.... but I have to show one.I've an idea of how to do this using a cursor and a temporary table but Iguess that will be fatal for the performance because then I have to loopthrough all selected rows, check each row with all other rows and store theprimary key in the temporary table if dedected it isn't double. AfterwardsI can execute ... SELECT ... FROM TABLE where primary key in (selecttemp_primarykey from #temptable).I hoped I could do everything in 1 "easy" SELECT but I should not know how?Any ideas are much appreciated.Thanks a lot.Perre Van Wilrijk.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIf you know the answer please explain what you're doing if possible, that'll help me :)I have the following tables:CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblUserData]( [UserCode] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [UserName] [nvarchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL, [DisplayName] [nvarchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL,) ON [PRIMARY]CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblFriends]( [UserCodeOwner] [int] NOT NULL, [UserCodeFriend] [int] NOT NULL, [createdate] [datetime] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_tblFriends_createdate] DEFAULT (getdate())) ON [PRIMARY]in tblFriends relations are stored twice, so for a relation between user 5 and 6, there will be 2 rows: 5-6 and 6-5Now, I want to get the columns (UsercodeOwner,UsercodeFriend,createdate,username,displayname) for relations that were created in tblFriends in the last 10 days for the FRIENDS of a person with usercode 5.Example:tblUserdata5 peter Petertje6 john Johnny11 simon SimonSays15 monique MontjetblFriends5 6 'createdate 30 days ago'5 11 'createdate 5 days ago'6 5 'createdate 30 days ago'6 11 'createdate 3 days ago'6 15 'createdate 7 days ago'11 5 'createdate 5 days ago'11 6 'createdate 3 days ago'15 6 'createdate 7 days ago'The resultset for a query on usercode 5 would now be (usercode1, username1, displayname1,usercode2, username2, displayname2,createdate):6 john Johnny 11 simon SimonSays 'createdate 3 days ago'6 john Johnny 15 monique Montje 'createdate 7 days ago'As you can see each relation is only returned twice even though there are always two entriesWhat would be the SQL statement, if possible without temp table..Thanks!
View 21 Replies View RelatedHi All,I have what seems to me to be a difficult query request for a databaseI've inherited.I have a table that has a varchar(2000) column that is used to storesystem and user messages from an on-line ordering system.For some reason (I have no idea why), when the original database wasbeing designed no thought was given to putting these messages inanother table, one row per message, and I've now been asked to providesome stats on the contents of this field across the recordset.A pseudo example of the table would be:custrep, orderid, orderdate, comments1, 10001, 2004-04-12, :Comment 1:Comment 2:Comment 3:Customer askedfor a brown model2, 10002, 2004-04-12, :Comment 3:Comment 4:1, 10003, 2004-04-12, :Comment 2:Comment 8:2, 10004, 2004-04-12, :Comment 4:Comment 6:Comment 7:2, 10005, 2004-04-12, :Comment 1:Comment 6:Customer cancelled orderSo, what I've been asked to provide is something like this:orderdate, custrep, syscomment, countofsyscomments2004-04-12, 1, Comment 1, 12004-04-12, 1, Comment 2, 22004-04-12, 1, Comment 3, 12004-04-12, 1, Comment 8, 12004-04-12, 2, Comment 1, 12004-04-12, 2, Comment 3, 12004-04-12, 2, Comment 4, 22004-04-12, 2, Comment 6, 22004-04-12, 2, Comment 7, 1I have a table in which each of the system comments are defined.Anything else appearing in the column is treated as a user comment.Does anyone have any thoughts on how this could be achieved? The endresult will end up in an SQL Server 2000 stored procedure which willbe called from an ASP page to provide order taking stats.Any help will be humbly and immensely appreciated!Much warmth,Murray
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have the following table:tblFriendsOwnerCode FriendCode7 107 1410 710 1210 1312 1013 1013 1814 718 13
I need a SP which return the following (im unsure about the best return datatype and the sql statement):
I want return all friendcodes of user nr 7 (10 and 14)and I want to return all friendcodes of user 10 and 14 (7,12,13,7) WITHOUT user 7
(if possible WITHOUT the use of a temptable!)
I have roles set up for different companies. The role names are structured companyname_department, ex.,
CallawayContracting_SalesDepartment
CallawayContracting_Administration
FredsAutobody_PaintSales
How would I search the roles and return only departments that belong to a certian company and also users that belong to a certian company. I appear to have gotten myself into quite a bind. Any help would be much appreciated! I will be certian to click best answer.
I'm pretty new to this so I'll explain as best I can.
I am building a small DB which will track attendance for employees based on a point system. I believe I'm almost there (with this piece) but am stuck.
The basic concept:
1. Collect all records from the attendance table for the previous 14 day period
2. sum the points column in the attendance table and group by UID, storing in a new table called TOTAL_POINTS ONLY for those UID's which have a value > 0
3. Perform a basic insert into statement on the attendance table for each UID matching those found in the previous TOTAL_POINTS table
Number 3 is where I'm failing and could really use some help.
My code thus far...
-------------------------------
/*Declare local variables for current date and start date.*/
--
DECLARE @DateNow DATETIME
DECLARE @StartDate DATETIME
SET @DateNow=getdate()
SET @StartDate = DATEADD(Day, -14, @DateNow)
--
/*Create table to hold totals for future calculations*/
CREATE TABLE POINT_TOTALS
(UID int, TOTAL float)
/*select ALL records from the table within the above defined date range
and group them by UID tallying the score column*/
--
INSERT INTO POINT_TOTALS
SELECT UID, SUM (POINTS) AS TOTAL_POINTS
FROM attendance
WHERE date >= @StartDate
GROUP BY UID
--
/*If the TOTAL_POINTS > 0 for the 14 day period, insert a record in to the
attendance table which deducts .5 points for the UID in question*/
*** This is where I'm failing ***
--This was just to make sure I was returning the correct results to the POINTS_TOTAL table.
SELECT UID FROM POINT_TOTALS
WHERE TOTAL > 0
/*All I want to do now is for each of the UID's in the POINT_TOTALS table,
I want to perform a basic insert on the ATTENDANCE table where the UID's in both
match. I would think this to be fairly simple but I can't seem to figure it out.
*/
DROP TABLE POINT_TOTALS
--This is works
SELECT *
from vwClientsByAge
WHERE age like '18'
--This gives me an error
SELECT clientId, firstName, age
from vwClientsByAge
WHERE age < CONVERT(int, '18')
Error: The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range datetime value.
Whats wrong with the conversion?
However, this works:
SELECT age
from vwClientsByAge
WHERE age < CONVERT(int, '18')
What is wrong?
Hello !This is my table:Ordernr Date ArticleO1 1.1.05 22O2 2.2.05 33O3 5.5.05 22O4 2.2.05 33O7 8.8.05 55I need one result-row for each article with the newest Order(max(date)):article lastDate lastOrdernumber22 5.5.05 O333 2.2.05 O455 8.8.05 O7How can I get this ?I tried this:SELECT distinct article, max(date), max(ordernr)FROM tableGROUP BY articlearticle and max(date) is ok, but I am not sure that max(ordernr) andmax(date) comes from the same row.I think, I will need complex subqueries.Many thanksaaapaul
View 8 Replies View RelatedHello !I habe 2 TablesTable1: OrdersFields: Ordernr, OpiecesTable2: CalloffsOrdernr, CpiecesIn Table1 ordernr is primary key.In Table2 the same ordernr can exist oftenMy problemIf the sum(Cpieces) < Opieces:I have to create a new virtual calloffwith Cpieces = opieces - sum(cpieces)Its too high for me.Please helpBest regardsaaapaul
View 8 Replies View RelatedHiI am trying to produce an update trigger. I understand the concept ofdelete and insert triggers without a problem. Unfortuantely, theupdate triggers do not have particularly simple documentation in BoL.So, can someone please explain to me, quite simply how I would producea trigger on the following:I have table 1 which we'll call simon. In here are various columns androws. I also have table 2, called simon_a, my audit table.Whenever anything is updated or deleted in simon, I want it sent tothe simon_a table. Delete, as above, is fine since it's conceptual buthelp me out on the update one. I cannot seem to figure out how to getthe information from the table before it's updated.As ever, champagne and beer for the successful answer.With thanksSimon
View 5 Replies View Related
I Installed CE 3.1 months ago to play around with it to see how easy or difficult it would be to move from SQL Express to CE. Got it all to work with SQL Managment and VS 2005. Now, months later I am back to really upgrading my product to use CE. Oops, now we are on version 3.5. Decided to stay with 3.1 until I realized transact-sql command "TOP" is not supported in 3.1. So, onto the hours of research to do a simple upgrade. Here's where I stand:
1. Uninstalled CE 3.1. Installed CE 3.5. Oh, if only it were that easy. Visual Studio 2005 is still using the dll from 3.1 and still can only see reference to 3.1 in the GAC.
2. SQL Management Studio now cannot open the .sdf database.
3. There is no mention of using CE 3.5 with VS 2005, only VS 2008. Is VS 2008 a requirement to be able to work with .sdf file in VS? I remember I had to install "Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition Tools for Visual Studio 2005" when I went through the first installation of CE. Is this now obsolete if I want to use 3.5? I don't even remember what its purpose was other than I needed it.
It seems there is and upgrade.exe file that need to be run command line to updgrade my .sdf file. Are you kidding?
Has anyone upgraded while still using VS 2005? Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Why have you made connecting to a sql server express database so difficult?
I have it working locally, but going to production has been nothing but a nightmare.
I can't even connect locally on the production box.
I am on a dedicated server and my login is an Admin on the box. I have just installed SQL Express + the fancy management interface.
I have made a copy of my database that I was connecting to dynamically (which was failing remotely) and I have attached it to the server. I have made myself a user of the database and granted my self evey permission available.
I have turned on impersonation in my web.config. The database knows it's me trying to connect and STILL denies me when I'm actually ON the production server. It is not even a remote connection problem.
How can I sit there an look at myself as a user of the database in the admin interface, yet I cannot connect via a web app. With SQL server 2000 and MSDE it was soooo simple....
Here is a snippet from my web.config
<connectionStrings>
<remove name="LocalSqlServer"/>
<add name="LocalSqlServer" connectionString="Data Source=localhost;Integrated Security=True;Initial Catalog=TEST" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>
...
</connectionStrings>
Here is the error:
Cannot open database requested in login 'TEST'. Login fails.
Login failed for user 'DEDICATEDquick'.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot open database requested in login 'TEST'. Login fails.
Login failed for user 'DEDICATEDquick'.
I have a screen shot of the admin interface to prove I am a user.
This should be a 5 minute task that has eaten up days.
So frustrated...
Bernie Quick
I am trying to make a single display page for an author's books.the books page only displays books of a type "type" (novels, non-fiction, etc)I would like to make it so that it can also show all books if "type" isn't selected. I THOUGHT the string would look like this: <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDSBooks" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:csK2Reader %>"
SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Books] ( If @Type <> "" then WHERE ([Type] = @Type)) ORDER BY [SortDate] DESC"> But it doesn't seem to want to work. I get a "server tag is not well formed" error.
I have a table called "member" that has two fields (amongst others) called "firstname" and "city"I want to return a list that sorts people who live in the same city, but does not return people who do not have a city in common.For example if this is my data:Karen - ParisMike - RomeTim - Dallas
Jim - ParisChris - DallasJohn - ManhattanSarah - OrlandoDavid - DallasThe query would return this:Dallas - ChrisDallas - DavidDallas - TimParis - JimParis - KarenI have this SQL so far: Select city, firstname From member Order By city, firstnamebut it includes all the cities including those that only have 1 resident.Can someone tell me how to do this?Thanks a lot,Chris
hi,i have three fields in the database tablep1 p2 rank10% 20% 3 21% 40% 2now i am passing the input as 15%...this 15% is related to 3rd rank.. so i need the o/p rank as 3..if the p1 and p2 datatypes are varchar..then how we can we write the query for that one tgo get the rank as 3.Ramesh
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi All
Can anyone tell me what this simple SQL query would be:
Find all the words "black", "dvd" and "player" from any of the fields "Product", "Brand" or "Description".
Many thanks
accelerator
I am trying to select players from a database based on the userid not having any user's name in it with an order by ASC. I basically want all the players that haven't been taken. Here is what I came up with and it gives me empty.
strSQLA="SELECT UserID, playerName from Allplayers WHERE UserID = '' ORDER BY playername ASC"
I hope it's considered appropriate to post a SQL query question here; it's not I'll gladly post this question elsewhere. That having been said, I've run into a simple but quite tricky SQL query and was wondering if the community might be able to help. Here's what's going on:
I have a "Documents" table. Let's call it DI have a "Benefits" table. Let's call it B.There is a many-to-many relationship between D and B so I have a third table to store the relationships. Let's call that table BD.
When I create a document it creates a row in D. Let's call that D1, D2...DN. When I create a benefit it creates a row in B. Let's call that B1, B2...BN
When I associate a document to a paritcular benefit, let's say that if D1 and B2 are associated, that I created row B2-D1 in my BD table. Now here's what my challenge is. Suppose I have these entries in my tables:
D: D1, D2, D3B: B1, B2, B3
Table BD:B1-D1B2-D1B2-D2
When the user goes to add documents to benefit B1, I want to show the user only documents that are not yet added to B1. In this case, I want to show the user D2 and D3 but not D1 since that one's already added. How do I write a SQL query to do this?
Here's what I've been using, but it shows too many results (e.g. included D1, D2, D3)
SELECT D.*, BD.*FROM Documents AS d LEFT JOIN rel_BenefitsDocuments AS bd ON d.doc_id = bd.doc_idWHERE (benefit_id <> @benefit_id OR benefit_id IS NULL)
Any thoughts?
Hi,
I want to write a sql query for an asp page which will display only unique rows from the specified column along with the number of count for each unique row.
Example:
Table that I want to query
Last Name || First Name
Gates || Bill
Boyce || Mike
Gates || Bill
Gates || Phil
Results I want:
Last Name || First Name || Count
Gates || Bill || 2
Boyce || Mike || 1
Gates || Phil || 1
Thanks a lot,
Heta
Hi,
I have a very simple question:
declare @treshold int
set @treshold = 10
SELECT
dbo.fn_Calc(t.column1) as calc,
t.column2
FROM
mytable t
WHERE
dbo.fn_Calc(t.column1) > @treshold
I can't think of a way to get rid of the function call in the WHERE clause.
Is this actualy a problem ?
I mean does realy the function fn_Calc execute 2 times in this statement and isn't this a performance issue then?
thanks
Hi,
I am new to SQL and this question may be most easiest to many of you. Here is what I need.
I have two identical tables (exactly the same in structure) having a compound primary key with a combination of 3 columns. Can someone give me the most efficient query that fetches all the rows from table1 that are not in table2.
Thanks in advance for your help
Kevin
This is my query...I am attempting to only return the records for each
sales_contact with the greatest issue_id
select
sc.sales_contact_id
, idd.issue_id
, sr.code
from
sales_contact sc
, invoice i
, invoice_line_item il
, sales_region_special_section srss
, sales_region sr
, issue_date idd
where
sc.sales_contact_id = i.sales_contact
and i.invoice_id = il.invoice
and srss.sales_region = sr.sales_region_id
and il.issue_date = idd.issue_date_id
and srss.invoice_line_item = il.invoice_line_item_id
order by
sc.sales_contact_id
================
heres some of the result set I want only the records with the greatest id
for each unique sales contact...
AF85F32E-8E34-4C40-9468-00148A34E903, 41, N
AF85F32E-8E34-4C40-9468-00148A34E903, 42, N
5D26328A-192B-4E4E-9B34-010C4E077CF8, 77, N
5D26328A-192B-4E4E-9B34-010C4E077CF8, 70, N
5D26328A-192B-4E4E-9B34-010C4E077CF8, 34, BC
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 25, NW
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 26, NW
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 24, NW
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 28, HC
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45 , 28, NW
this would be an ideal result set using the data above...note there are
situtations where there are n* for a greatest issue id.
AF85F32E-8E34-4C40-9468-00148A34E903, 42, N
5D26328A-192B-4E4E-9B34-010C4E077CF8, 77, N
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 28, HC
B44C914E-6001-40CE-8AB6-0126BD572D45, 28, NW
thanks in advance for your help.
This should be easy, I'm just having a brainfart at the moment, can't remember how to do this:
Say I have a bunch of records in a table, with an ID field as Key. I want to return the count of times each ID shows up, so for the following example data:
Code:
-----
| ID |
-----
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 4 |
------
Would return something like:
Code:
----------------
| ID | Count |
----------------
| 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 |
-----------------
This should be obvious but for some reason I can't see it.
When this is done I'm going to join in another table to get a name based on the ID with the highest count. I believe it's faster to do a TOP 1 here rather than after the join, but I want to verify that while I'm at it also.
OLD_TABLE
CustomerPost_ClosestStore1_ClosestStore2_ClosestStore3
00501_____9339_____9193_____9445
02151_____9161_____9838_____9185
02917_____9788_____9105_____9626
06443_____9644_____9102_____9286
43434_____9258_____9496_____0
NEW_TABLE
CustomerPost_ClosestStore1_ClosestStore2_ClosestStore3
00501_____9339_____9193_____9445
02151_____9161_____9838_____9185
02917_____9788_____9105_____9626
06443_____9644_____9102_____9286
43434_____9258_____9496_____1111
(end result)
FINAL_TABLE
43434_____9258_____9496_____1111
I have two tables ... I am trying to get only the rows that are different.