I am trying to find the tables and columns that depends on 'table1'
sp_fkeys @pktable_name='table1'
and this takes about eight seconds, whereas if I run it for finding all
tables and columns that 'table1' depends on
sp_fkeys @fktable_name='table1'
this only takes a second.
How can I speed up the first stored procedure execution?
hi
can we call a stored procedue inside a stored procedure
i have a table where the feilds are
1.fromtable
2.fromfeild
3.fromcategory
4.totable
5.tofeild
6.tocategory.
i have write a stored proceduer for creating 2 relationship between fromfeild & tofeild from the same value in from category & in tocategory.
there r around 465 records in a table.
so anyone can comeout for solution of this.
hope soon i get a solution for this.
Every Month I have to restore Database Northwind (Using this as an example) into Database Northwindtest. I Am trying to automate this process using a Job Agent. My Code is:
RESTORE DATABASE Northwindtest
FROM DISK = 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLBACKUPGold_db_200711120300.bak'
The problem is I do a back up of this Database for day for a week. So I have:
Gold_db_200711120300.bak
Gold_db_200711130300.bak
Gold_db_200711140300.bak
Gold_db_200711150300.bak
Gold_db_200711160300.bak
Gold_db_200711170300.bak
Gold_db_200711180300.bak
How would I tell the Job agent to restore the most Current Full backup?
Thanks,
-Long
When the same code is executed in query analyzer it takes 2s instead of 20s when executing the sp. Any idea?
View 9 Replies View RelatedHi,I have a stored procedure that normalizes data from one database toanother that is included in a SQL Agent job. The job is started by atrigger so that when a table is updated, the job to normalize dataexecutes.This happens once a day in the dead of the night when nothing else ishappening and the stored procedure takes 2.5 hours to finish. Strangely,to run the same stored procedure from Query Analyzer takes only 20minutes to do the same thing. The job is executed as the same user thatlogs in to Query Analyzer.Why does running as a job take so much longer than running it manually.At the time the job is run, there is absolutely nothing else to createwaits or deadlocks. A profiler trace shows that each statement runsquickly but then it sits and twiddles its thumbs between statements.Performance monitor shows little disk activity and only 2% to 5%processor utilization.Any ideas?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen i execute a stored procedure it generally takes about half a second to run but sometimes it takes 20 to 30 seconds. I am the only one using the server so I know it is not due to other traffic. I have looked at Profiler and nothing looks out of the ordinary. Another observation is that the slow ones are always near eachother. I will have about 10 fast executions and then 3 slow ones and then back to fast ones. Has anyone seen anything like this before?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHello all.
I have a stored proc which creates a couple of temp tables, then bounces them against a production table an updates a column in the production table.
This stored proc takes about 10 minutes to run and update about 20,000 rows. If I execute each statement seperately in an ISQL window, it all runs in under 2 minutes.
Any ideas on why this is happening are GREATLY appreciated.
Dear Reader(s),
Is there anyway to write the following stored procedure without the loop so that it goes much faster? :confused:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
use MJ_ReportBase
go
if exists(select 1 from sysobjects where type='P' and name='sp_Periode')
begin
drop procedure sp_Periode
end
go
create procedure sp_Periode
@start int
, @stop int
as
declare @x int
set @x = 0
set @x=@start
delete from tbl_periode
while (@x>=@stop)
begin
-- ---
-- ---
-- Create table tbl_inout
if exists(select 1 from sysobjects where type='U' and name='tbl_inout')
begin
drop table tbl_inout
end
select datetimestamp,accname,badgeid,personname,inoutreg into tbl_inout from WinXS..x18 where convert(varchar,datetimestamp,120)+' '+ltrim(str(id))+' '+ltrim(str(badgeid)) in
(select convert(varchar,max(datetimestamp),120)+' '+ltrim(str(max(id)))+' '+ltrim(str(badgeid)) as datetimestamp from WinXS..x18 where (accname='Kelder -1' or accname='Tnk Entree') and convert(varchar,datetimestamp,105)=convert(varchar ,getdate()-abs(@x),105) group by badgeid)
and badgeid>0
order by personname
-- ---
-- ---
-- Create table tbl_result
if exists(select 1 from sysobjects where type='U' and name='tbl_result')
begin
drop table tbl_result
end
-- ---
-- ---
select
convert(varchar,datetimestamp,105) 'DATUM'
, badgeid 'PAS'
, initials 'VOORNAAM'
, personname 'NAAM'
, convert(varchar,min(datetimestamp),108) 'MIN'
, convert(varchar,max(datetimestamp),108) 'MAX'
into
tbl_result
from
WinXS..x18
where
convert(varchar,datetimestamp,105)=convert(varchar ,getdate()-abs(@x),105)
and
accname in ('Kelder -1','Tnk Entree')
and badgeid>0
group by
convert(varchar,WinXS..x18.datetimestamp,105)
, badgeid
, initials
, personname
order by
initials
, personname asc
, convert(varchar,datetimestamp,105) asc
-- ---
-- ---
-- Rapportage tabel
insert into
tbl_periode
select
tbl_result.datum as DATUM
, ltrim(ltrim(rtrim(tbl_result.naam))+' '+ltrim(rtrim(isnull(tbl_result.voornaam,' ')))) as NAAM
, tbl_result.min as MIN
, tbl_result.max as MAX
, case tbl_inout.inoutreg when 1 then 'in' when 2 then 'out' else 'err' end as [IN/OUT]
, substring('00000',1,5-len(tbl_result.pas))+ltrim(str(tbl_result.pas)) as PAS
from
tbl_inout,tbl_result
where
tbl_result.datum+' '+tbl_result.max+' '+ltrim(str(tbl_result.pas))
= convert(varchar,tbl_inout.datetimestamp,105)+' '+convert(varchar,tbl_inout.datetimestamp,108)+' '+ltrim(str(badgeid))
order by
tbl_result.naam asc
-- ---
-- ---
--
set @x=@x-1
end
go
print 'Klaar!'
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
What it does is determining the minimum entry time and the maximum exiting time per day of people going true the main entrance of a building.
Many thanks in advance.
:)
Hello,
I have a big problem with slow execution of stored procedure in SQL Server 2005 but I really don't understand the reason. I have a database with large table (about 400 million rows) and simple stored procedure to get data from that table (one select statement to select time and value columns).
Strange thing is that if I call that stored procedure from .net application (native SqlDataProvider) it takes about 6 seconds to execute but if I call the same procedure with the same parameters from within SQL Server Management Studio it takes only 25 milliseconds to execute!
I've noticed that from .net, procedure is called with binary data and in Management Studio sql script is executed so I've copied/pasted the script from Management Studio to .net code and again the same thing happens (6 seconds from .net and 25ms from Management Studio). I traced executions with SQL Profiler and everything seems to be identical for both applications except it takes much longer time for .net application.
Both SQL Server Management Studio and .net application are on the same machine and SQL Server is on another.
This is the query that when executed in Management Studio takes 25ms:
EXEC [dbo].[GetRawData] @pcu = N'DV_ZERJ_HEV1',@tag = N'MJERENO',@from = N'20070629 07:00:00',@to = N'20070629 08:00:00'
This is the same query in .net application code that takes 6 seconds to execute:
sqlCommand = new SqlCommand("EXEC [dbo].[GetRawData] @pcu = N'DV_ZERJ_HEV1',@tag = N'MJERENO',@from = N'20070629 07:00:00',@to = N'20070629 08:00:00'",sqlConnection);
sqlReader = sqlCommand.ExecuteReader();
At first I thought that Management Studio somehow caches results but if I change parameters of stored procedure it always takes less than 30ms to execute.
I really don't understand this. Please, help!
We have a stored procedure which is running fine on a SQL server 2000 from Query Analyzer. However, when we try to execute the same stored procedure from ADO.NET in an executable, the execution is hung or takes extremely long. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions about how it could happen and how to fix. thanks
View 22 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I have a webpage with a Datagrid that populates using a table adapter from a Stored procedure that exists in my SQL Database...If I run the Stored procedure in SQL Directly then it takes 20 Secs to return all records...If I run the webpage then it takes just over 20 Secs..
Great you say..But If I have the sorting option set in ASP.net and I click on a column to sort then off the page goes for another 20 secs to sort the data..
Is there a better way to do what I am doing here that will speed up the page load..
Ie..the data is returned once and then sorted...
Is it Better / Quicker for me to create a table using the stored procedure and link to this from the website..Updating the table every couple of minutes ?
Any advice please ?
Ray..
I have developed a stored procedure that filters a view that is a union of several different tables. This provides status information for items across our warehouse management system. This system seems to work very well and normally processes results very quickly (< 3 seconds). However, occasionally (every few days) we begin to see timeouts on the query after 3 minutes of processing. I can watch this process in SQL Profiler and see that the query is timing out after 180 seconds, which is the timeout we have for the query within the DAL. When I copy the line from the SQL Profiler and execute it directly in SSMS, the query executes in less than 2 seconds. I first thought that somehow this had to do with execution plans, but when I try to reload the page again, which executes the query, it still times out. I did add a OPTION(KEEPFIXED PLAN) to the sproc, and that seemed to speed things up for the time, but I am not sure if this is even the problem and what the optimal solution would be. Any thoughts spring to mind?
Thanks, Steve
I have a big table A_newHistory (more than 2 million rows) with primary key fund_id + date_price . This table has to be updated every 2 hours from XML.
Every row in XML must be inserted or updated (if current id and date already exist in the table) in the A_newHistory.
The following procedure works but very slow...
How can I optimize that?
================================================== =======
CREATE PROCEDURE spSaveFundsAdjustedClose
@XML ntext
AS
DECLARE @fund_id int
DECLARE @date_price datetime
DECLARE @adj_closed float
DECLARE @XMLDoc int
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION
EXEC sp_xml_preparedocument @XMLDoc OUTPUT, @XML
DECLARE MutualFunds_Cursor CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD READ_ONLY FOR
SELECT *
FROM OPENXML (@XMLDoc , '/xml/a', 1)
WITH ([id] INT,[date] datetime, price float)
OPEN MutualFunds_Cursor
FETCH NEXT FROM MutualFunds_Cursor
INTO @fund_id, @date_price, @adj_closed
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM A_newHistory
WHERE id_fund = @fund_id AND date_price = @date_price)
BEGIN
UPDATE A_newHistory
SET adj_close = @adj_closed
WHERE id_fund = @fund_id AND date_price = @date_price
END
ELSE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO A_newHistory
VALUES(@fund_id, @date_price, @adj_closed)
END
IF @@Error <> 0
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
SELECT -1
RETURN
END
FETCH NEXT FROM MutualFunds_Cursor
INTO @fund_id, @date_price, @adj_closed
END
EXEC sp_xml_removedocument @XMLDoc
CLOSE MutualFunds_Cursor
DEALLOCATE MutualFunds_Cursor
COMMIT TRANSACTION
SELECT 0
GO
================================================== =======
Hi,Plz, I need some info (SQL2000) :)A stored procedure is like this:"Select table1.id, table1.txt, (select table2.nr from table2 wheretable2.fk_table1=table1.id) as nr where table1.id<>10"The essence here is that "select table2.nr from table2 wheretable2.fk_table1=table1.id" returns either the integer in table2.nr, or NULLif there isnt a match. The whole sentence runs EXTREMELY slow...3-4 sec.What is wrong?"select table2.nr from table2 where table2.fk_table1=table1.id" runs quicklyoutside the stored procedure. The original sentence without the "nr" (Selecttable1.id, table1.txt where table1.id<>10) runs quickly too...But together it slows down dramatically..why? I should mention that thesub-query could return NULL if theres no match in table2...But i cant seewhy that should slow things down (remember - it runs fine outside the SP)?Thx,PipHans---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.518 / Virus Database: 316 - Release Date: 11-09-2003
View 3 Replies View Relatedwe just moved a database from a shared SQL 2000 server to SQLExpress on a VPS server. Every thing seems to work great, really no performance loss at all, except for one stored proc that is giving us problems. It's function is to update a history table, and then update the production table. On the old server, it would take less than a second to run this, now it takes anywhere from 45 seconds to 1 minute or it times out. This database is used on a classic asp web app. ANY help at all on this would be appreciated as I am pulling my hair out trying to figure out what's wrong here. here is the proc.
------------------------------------------ code ----------------------------------------------
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
SET NOCOUNT ON
go
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_UpdatePersonalization]
@p_id nvarchar(50),
@cust_num varchar(50),
--@publication varchar(25),
@full_name varchar(500),
@email varchar(200),
@web_address varchar(300),
@include_web bit,
@ReturnAddressYN varchar(1),
@include_email bit,
@job_title varchar(500),
@company_name varchar(500),
@tagline varchar(1000),
@phone1 varchar(30),
@phone2 varchar(30),
@phone3 varchar(30),
@phone4 varchar(30),
@phoneext1 varchar(10),
@phoneext2 varchar(10),
@phoneext3 varchar(10),
@phoneext4 varchar(10),
@phonedesc1 varchar(20),
@phonedesc2 varchar(20),
@phonedesc3 varchar(20),
@phonedesc4 varchar(20),
@company_mail_address varchar(500),
@masthead varchar(250),
@verbiage_page1 varchar(1400),
@verbiage_page4 varchar(2650),
@inc_bbb bit,
@inc_ehl bit,
@inc_eho bit,
@inc_rl bit,
@p_comments varchar(500),
@p_update_flag varchar(10)
--@frequency varchar(50),
--@mail varchar(50),
--@fold varchar(50),
--@contact varchar(50),
-- do not add this on the update! @date_added,
AS
declare @last_updated datetime
select @last_updated=GETDATE()
declare @set_update bit
--if @p_update_flag='False'
--select @set_update = 1
--else
--select @set_update = 0
if @p_update_flag='False'
INSERT INTO pers_main_arch
(
p_id,
cust_num,
publication,
full_name,
email,
web_address,
include_web,
include_email,
job_title,
company_name,
tagline,
phone1,
phone2,
phone3,
phone4,
phoneext1,
phoneext2,
phoneext3,
phoneext4,
phonedesc1,
phonedesc2,
phonedesc3,
phonedesc4,
company_mail_address,
masthead,
verbiage_page1,
verbiage_page4,
inc_bbb,
inc_ehl,
inc_eho,
inc_rl,
p_comments,
frequency,
mail,
fold,
contact,
date_added,
last_updated,
start_month,
ReturnAddressYN
)
SELECT
pm.p_id,
pm.cust_num,
pm.publication,
pm.full_name,
pm.email,
pm.web_address,
pm.include_web,
pm.include_email,
pm.job_title,
pm.company_name,
pm.tagline,
pm.phone1,
pm.phone2,
pm.phone3,
pm.phone4,
pm.phoneext1,
pm.phoneext2,
pm.phoneext3,
pm.phoneext4,
pm.phonedesc1,
pm.phonedesc2,
pm.phonedesc3,
pm.phonedesc4,
pm.company_mail_address,
pm.masthead,
pm.verbiage_page1,
pm.verbiage_page4,
pm.inc_bbb,
pm.inc_ehl,
pm.inc_eho,
pm.inc_rl,
pm.p_comments,
pm.frequency,
pm.mail,
pm.fold,
pm.contact,
pm.date_added,
pm.last_updated,
pm.start_month,
pm.ReturnAddressYN
FROM pers_main pm
WHERE pm.cust_num = @cust_num
if @p_update_flag='True' OR @p_update_flag='False' OR @p_update_flag IS NULL OR @p_update_flag=''
UPDATE pers_main SET
--cust_num=@cust_num,
--publication=@publication,
full_name=@full_name,
email=@email,
web_address=@web_address,
include_web=@include_web,
include_email=@include_email,
job_title=@job_title,
company_name=@company_name,
tagline=@tagline,
phone1=@phone1,
phone2=@phone2,
phone3=@phone3,
phone4=@phone4,
phoneext1=@phoneext1,
phoneext2=@phoneext2,
phoneext3=@phoneext3,
phoneext4=@phoneext4,
phonedesc1=@phonedesc1,
phonedesc2=@phonedesc2,
phonedesc3=@phonedesc3,
phonedesc4=@phonedesc4,
company_mail_address=@company_mail_address,
masthead=@masthead,
verbiage_page1=@verbiage_page1,
verbiage_page4=@verbiage_page4,
inc_bbb=@inc_bbb,
inc_ehl=@inc_ehl,
inc_eho=@inc_eho,
inc_rl=@inc_rl,
p_comments=@p_comments,
--frequency=@frequency,
--mail=@mail,
--fold=@fold,
--contact=@contact,
--date_added,
last_updated=@last_updated,
updated_flag=1,
ReturnAddressYN=@ReturnAddressYN
WHERE cust_num=@cust_num
------------------------------------------ code ----------------------------------------------
I hav the following problem. I have written an stored procedure in sql server 2000 as the following
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.pa_rellena
@pFechaInicio datetime
AS
declare @pFechaFin datetime
declare @auxcod_cen char(10)
declare @importeEfectivo decimal(17,2)
declare @importeTarjetas1 decimal(17,2)
declare @importeTarjetas2 decimal(17,2)
declare @importeVales decimal(17,2)
declare @importeTalones decimal(17,2)
declare @importeGastos decimal(17,2)
select @pFechaFin=@pFechaInicio+1
--Borramos las tablas temporales si las hemos creado con anterioridad y no se han borrado
if object_id('tmpCentros') is not null
drop table tmpCentros
if object_id('tmpCentros2') is not null
drop table tmpCentros2
if object_id('tmpMaxCajas') is not null
drop table tmpMaxCajas
if object_id('tmpCajasCentro') is not null
drop table tmpCajasCentro
if object_id('tmpVales') is not null
drop table tmpVales
if object_id('tmpDiarioEfectivo') is not null
drop table tmpDiarioEfectivo
if object_id('tmpDiarioTalones') is not null
drop table tmpDiarioTalones
if object_id('tmpDiarioTarjetas') is not null
drop table tmpDiarioTarjetas
if object_id('tmpDiarioSegundaForma') is not null
drop table tmpDiarioSegundaForma
if object_id('tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas') is not null
drop table tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas
if object_id('temp1') is not null
drop table temp1
--Seleccionamos todos los centros de Salvador Bachiller
select * into tmpCentros2
from centros
where centros.tienda=1
order by cod_cen
--Seleccionamos el maximo de cajas por cada centro
select cod_cen, max(cod_caja) as cajas into tmpMaxCajas
from cierrecaja
where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin
group by cod_cen
order by cod_cen
--Mezclamos los centros con el maximo de cajas
select c.cod_cen, c.Centro, c.Direccion, c.localidad, c.provincia, c.cpostal, c.telefono, m.cajas, operaciones, cajas_tot, tienda, franquicia into tmpCentros
from tmpCentros2 as c left outer join tmpMaxCajas as m on c.cod_cen=m.cod_cen
--Cajas por centro
select distinct cod_cen as cod_cen, cod_caja as cod_caja into tmpCajasCentro
from cierrecaja
where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin
--Los vales de cada centro
select cod_cen,sum(importe) as imp1 into tmpVales
from vales where
fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin
group by cod_cen
--Efectivo de cada centro
select cod_cen,'01' as vendedor,'EFECTIVO' as descripcion, (sum(diario.TotEuro)-Sum(Diario.Imppa2)) as importe1,0 as exp1, (sum(Diario.TotEuro)-sum(Diario.imppa2)) as importe2 into tmpDiarioEfectivo
from diario
where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and diario.cod_pago='01'
group by cod_cen
--Talones por centro
select centros.cod_cen,'02' as vendedor,'TALONES' as descripcion, sum(diario.TotEuro) as importe1,0 as exp1, sum(Diario.TotEuro) as importe2 into tmpDiarioTalones
from centros inner join diario on centros.cod_cen=diario.cod_cen
where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and diario.cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and diario.cod_pago='02'
group by centros.cod_cen
--Tarjetas por centro
select cod_cen,'03' as vendedor,'TARJETAS' as descripcion, sum(diario.TotEuro) as importe1,0 as exp1, sum(Diario.TotEuro*(FPago.Descuento/100)) as importe2, sum(Diario.TotEuro) - sum(Diario.TotEuro*(FPago.Descuento/100)) as importe3 into tmpDiarioTarjetas
from FPago left join Diario on fpago.Cod_pago=Diario.cod_pago
where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0
group by cod_cen
--Segunda Froma de Pago
select cod_cen,'03' as vendedor,'TARJETAS' as descripcion,sum(diario.imppa2) as importe1 into tmpDiarioSegundaForma
from fpago left join Diario on Fpago.cod_pago=diario.cod_pa1
where fPago.cod_pago<>'99' and fecha>=@pfechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0
group by cod_cen
--Comisiones tarjetas de pago
select cod_cen,'10' as vendedor, 'GASTOS (-)' as descripcion, sum(Diario.imppa2*(fPago.Descuento/100)) as importe2 into tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas
from Fpago left join Diario on FPago.cod_pago= Diario.cod_pa1
where fPago.cod_pago<>'99' and fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0
group by cod_cen
/*
--Venta neta por centro
declare cursortemporal cursor for select cod_cen from TmpCentros2
open cursortemporal
delete detallecaja_aux
fetch next from cursortemporal into @auxcod_cen
while @@fetch_status=0
Begin
select @importeVales=imp1 from tmpVales where cod_cen=@auxcod_Cen
select @importeEfectivo=importe2 from tmpDiarioEfectivo where cod_cen=@auxcod_Cen
select @importeTalones=importe2 from tmpDiarioTalones where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen
select @importeTarjetas1=importe3 from tmpDiarioTarjetas where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen
select @importeTarjetas2=importe1 from tmpDiarioSegundaForma where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen
select @importeGastos=importe2 from tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen
select @importeVales=isnull(@importeVales,0)
select @importeEfectivo=isnull(@importeEfectivo,0)
select @importeTalones=isnull(@importeTalones,0)
select @importeTarjetas1=isnull(@importeTarjetas1,0)
select @importeTarjetas2=isnull(@importeTarjetas2,0)
select @importeGastos=isnull(@importeGastos,0)
print @auxcod_cen
print @importeVales
print @importeEfectivo
print @importeTalones
print @importeTarjetas1
print @importeTarjetas2
print @importeGastos
insert into detallecaja_aux (cod_cen,importe1)
values(@auxcod_cen, @importeVales+@importeEfectivo+@ImporteTalones+@ImporteTarjetas1+@importeTarjetas2-@importeGastos)
fetch next from cursortemporal into @auxcod_cen
select @importeVales=0
select @importeEfectivo=0
select @importeTalones=0
select @importeTarjetas1=0
select @importeTarjetas2=0
select @importeGastos=0
end
close cursortemporal
*/
select * from detallecaja_aux
GO
When I try to run it from visual basic it slow down the sql server.
What can I do?
Hi there,
I was wondering if someone can point out the error or the thing I shouldn't be doing in a stored procedure on SQL Server 2005. I want to switch from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005 which all seems to work just fine, but one stored procedure is causing me headache.
I could pin the problem down to this query:
DECLARE @Package_ID bigint
DECLARE @Email varchar(80)
DECLARE @Customer_ID bigint
DECLARE @Payment_Type tinyint
DECLARE @Payment_Status tinyint
DECLARE @Booking_Type tinyint
SELECT @Package_ID = NULL
SELECT @Email = NULL
SELECT @Customer_ID = NULL
SELECT @Payment_Type = NULL
SELECT @Payment_Status = NULL
SELECT @Booking_Type = NULL
CREATE TABLE #TempTable(
PACKAGE_ID bigint,
PRIMARY KEY (PACKAGE_ID))
INSERT INTO
#TempTable
SELECT
PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID
FROM
PACKAGE (nolock) LEFT JOIN BOOKING ON PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID = BOOKING.PACKAGE_ID
LEFT JOIN CUSTOMER (nolock) ON PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID = CUSTOMER.CUSTOMER_ID
LEFT JOIN ADDRESS_LINK (nolock) ON ADDRESS_LINK.SOURCE_TYPE = 1 AND ADDRESS_LINK.SOURCE_ID = CUSTOMER.CUSTOMER_ID
LEFT JOIN ADDRESS (nolock) ON ADDRESS_LINK.ADDRESS_ID = ADDRESS.ADDRESS_ID
WHERE
PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID = ISNULL(@Package_ID,PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID)
AND PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID = ISNULL(@Customer_ID,PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID)
AND PACKAGE.PAYMENT_TYPE = ISNULL(@Payment_Type,PACKAGE.PAYMENT_TYPE)
AND PACKAGE.PAYMENT_STATUS = ISNULL(@Payment_Status,PACKAGE.PAYMENT_STATUS)
AND BOOKING.BOOKING_TYPE = ISNULL(@Booking_Type,BOOKING.BOOKING_TYPE)
-- If this line below is included the request will take about 90 seconds whereas it takes 1 second if it is outcommented
--AND ADDRESS.EMAIl LIKE '%' + ISNULL(@Email, ADDRESS.EMAIL) + '%'
GROUP BY
PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID
DROP TABLE #TempTable
The request is performing quite well on the SQL Server 2000 but on the SQL Server 2005 it takes much longer. I already installed the SP2 x64, I'm running the SQL Server 2005 on a x64 environment.
As I stated in the comment in the query it takes 90 seconds to finish with the line included, but if I exclude the line it takes 1 second.
I think there must be something wrong with the join's or something else which has maybe changed in SQL Server 2005. All the tables joined have a primary key.
Maybe you folks can spot the error / mistake / wrong type of doing things easily.
I would appreciate any help you can offer me to solve this problem.
On the web I saw that there is a Cumulative Update 4 for the SP2 which fixes the following:
942659 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942659/)
FIX: The query performance is slower when you run the query in SQL Server 2005 than when you run the query in SQL Server 2000
Anyhow I think the problem is something else, I haven't tried out the cumulative update yet, as I think it is something different, more general why this query takes ages to process.
Thanks again for any help
Best regards,
Pascal
I am writing a data access web page, but I find that the excution speed is too slow.
My data base is just a data table which have five columns: id, code, quantity, price and Date. The data base has about 45000 rows. When I use OSQL or Query function, speed is just fine.
Here is the main code which I think cause the speed slow:
string conn = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["connectionstring"];
SqlDataAdapter adapter_2 = new SqlDataAdapter("select * from table",conn);
DataSet ds = new DataSet();
adapter_2.Fill (ds,"table");
DataTable YahooOrders = ds.Tables["YahooOrders"];
DataRow[] product = new DataRow[20000];
.......
foreach (string s in split) // actually the split here has only one string in it
{
product = table.Select ("code like '"+s+"%' and Date >='"+minDate+"' and Date <='"+table.Select("Date = Max(Date)")[0][1].ToString()+"'");
foreach(DataRow myRow in product)
{
int count = Convert.ToInt32(myRow[2]);
itemQuantity = count + itemQuantity;
revenue = Convert.ToDouble(myRow[3]) * count + revenue;
// get product code, ignore repeated code
int myIndex=code.BinarySearch( myRow[1] );
if ( myIndex < 0 )
code.Add(myRow[1]);
}
orderQuantity = product.Length + orderQuantity;
}
The first foreach actually excutes just one time, so it won' t cause any speed problem.
The second foreach' s job is to sum each column of specified rows which is product here.
So, any ideas about this?
Thanks!
All,
Actually from the application the developers are using count(column) to know the no. of rows resulted by a statement which joins many tables but its taking lot of time.
Is there an easy way to get the count of records(result set) of the output.
I cant use sysindexes b'z i need the count of the output genereted by the SQl Statement which joins many tables and retrieves many rows.
Thanks,
Sajai
Hi fellas (and girllas),
Got a problem (duh!). My MSSQL Server lags. Now, mind, it doesn't lag all the time. And it seems to be independent of the # of users trying to access the server. And it random clears itself up. And the problem doesn't present itself in SQL MGR, just on the web app we're running on it.
Setup:
SQL Server 2k running on 2k3 w/ IIS & backup exec.
All SQL data files are on a raid5 SCSI U160.
App:
Intranet App developed by us for us. ASP.NET & VB.NET.
Symptoms:
When queried server takes a LONG time to respond. So long infact it has become counter productive. When taking a look at the server, the CPU usage hovers between 50-75% and spikes up to 90% every now and then just for kicks. The memory usage is 2.35gb out of 4gb. To fix this we have to kill and restart all the SQL services.
Any thoughts on what to look at? There're indexes on the required FKs and the heavily queried columns. We're at a loss here.
Thanks for any helpful help!
=Me!
Database has its few HUGE tables, but I experienced queries against few other very small tables to be incredible slow.
Anybody has the same or similar problem?
A vendor's application is performing slow. Vendor tested it in QA and it's slow. End-users run it in PRD and it's slow. The application calls SP1, and SP1 calls SP2. Inside SP1 has a cursor. I believe as the db gets larger. The application is going to be even slower. What can I suggest to the vendor in order to fix it? Tell them to re-write the application code? Eliminate cursor?
Thanks
Hello,
I have 4000 record in my table employee. it takes 13 sec to get data. It this normal ? What is wrong ?
Thanks
Code Snippet
CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[VrniStrukturo] (@id_sod int)
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(
WITH tree(id, parent_id, naziv, nivo) AS
(
-- Base case
SELECT
id,
parent_id,
naziv,
1 as nivo
FROM employee
WHERE id = @id_sod
UNION ALL
-- Recursive step
SELECT
e.id,
e.parent_id,
e.naziv,
eh.nivo + 1 AS nivo
FROM employee e
INNER JOIN tree eh ON
e.parent_id = eh.id
)
--SELECT *
SELECT id
FROM tree
--ORDER BY nivo, priimek, ime
);
There re certian times when I want to execute a sql request (select for example) then It gets too long before I get an answer. (that happens only some times exceptionnaly). What does that mean, is it that somebody is using heavily the DB or may be using Entreprise manager or what exactly
and how can I know who is responsible for taking all SQL server resources at that specefic time. What command or what tool can I use pls for this purpose.
Thanks for your help.
Hello,Were using the data transfermation service to copy in an Ingres II 2.5database to an SQL Server 2000 database. Small databases don't present anissue, but when pulling one across that's about 20GB its been taking between12 and 24 hours. Both systems are relitively quick boxes and neither of themare tapped out on processor, disk I/O or network resources.I do have the "Boost SQL Server priority on Windows" checked under it'sproperties and all the processors are checked to be used.Does anyone know if there's a way to tweak SQL Server or Ingres to handlethis a little quicker? Or even an idea where the bottleneck could be may behelpful.Thanks,John.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've got a performance question about a clr tvf that I have created. When I query the function it takes about 30 seconds for it to execute as apposed to < 6 seconds when I execute the same code in a console app (the 6 seconds includes outputting the returned data to the console, without writing the output to console it executes in about 1 second). Both the function and the app are iterating (>40,000) and returning ( >10,000) the same number of rows. I've noticed the following when viewing the executions in the PerfMon:
* the sqlclr tfv kicks the % Processor Time up to 30 for 30 seconds, the console app has % Processor Time at 9 for about 2 seconds
* .NET CLR Memory - Allocated Bytes/sec spikes anywhere from 1 to 3 times during the sqlclr query at about 44MB/sec. It barely registers if at all when the console app runs.
* In either case, % Time in GC is at zero.
I'm assuming that there are some configurations I'm ignorant of that can help me tune the execution. I can't imagine that it takes SqlServer that long just to iterate through the records.
I have recently decided to make the change from Microsoft access to SQL Server believing that it's a bigger faster beast with better parameterized queries and triggers and all that. BUT.I have some client data that I imported from their original paradox files.The invoice lineitem file contains over 1 milliion records.When I open this table in access and click show last record, the record is displayed in about 1 or 2 seconds.I used the upsize to SQL Server tool in Access to shift my data into SQL Server.When I use the Express Mangagement tool to open the same table and say show me the last record, it takes 17 minutes.I admit that most numeric data types have been translated to floats, so that's probably not good.But I cant alter them from floats to numeric or decimals using the table design tool.Do the conversion anomalies make up the whole reason why SQL Server seems so incredibly SLOW! ?????????
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am running the following BCP to extract a table with 156641604 rows.
bcp TestDB..data out test3.bcp -T -b1000000 -a32000
When running this i notice that the disk read bytessec counter in performance monitor on the drive that has the database devices is only reading 30mbsec. I am writing the bcp file to a different drive. Both drives are far more capable of achieving much higher IO. Is this a limitation with BCP or are there futher switches available that would speed this process up. Also the drives are both local so the bottle neck is not network. Any ideas?
Has anyone else noticed delays with SQL Express? I'm not really talking about delays on the queries but just delays in general response. For example: everything is running great, then for about 2 minutes I get connection timeouts etc can't even open stuff in the management studio without getting timeouts ... then as strangely as it started everything goes back to normal and requests are served again.
The server has nothing on except 1 website, its Win 2003 Server. 512MB Ram on a PIV. The memory usage is low and during the "lockups" the machine isn't showing any processor usage and SQL mem usage is around 40Megs.
I am not using User Instances either. Nothing in the event logs. What is odd, is its happening on 3 of my machines ..... all with different sites, the only thing in common between them is SQL.
thanks,
-c
This sounds like a pretty easy one. I have a SQL 2000 database with 2-3.4GHZ CPUs and 1GB of RAM. I have one database on it. I go in Query Analyzer on another machine and run a simple query like 'SELECT * FROM USERS' which should return 15,000 rows.
IT takes 30 (thirty) seconds to finish this query. OMG
Where do I start to decipher why on Earth this takes more than .01 seconds?
Thanks.
Hi all...
I need urgent help, about someting:
i've developed and deploy an aspnet web site (data works with sqlserver), but after a few minutes working with some users, the permormance slows and stop the site.
please help me what should i do......
Dear All,Finally I completed my project. Thanks all you helped me to do it.Now I have the biggest problem. In my application the Data grid is filled with Data from SQL server table which has large number of records. When I run my queries in SS Management Studio it runs very fast. To fill data to datagrid it takes lots of time. How can I reduce this time. How can I increase the performance of my Application.Thanks,Janaka
View 4 Replies View Related