I need to be able to search article in several tables in a MSSQL DB. What is the best way to do a word search? Are there and freebies out there or code examples?
Can anyone tell me how to search an SQL database for a given key word in a textbox? I basically have a database that has a qualifications column and this column needs to be searched for the data given in the textbox. Which is the best method to search for the data? Is it a simple SQL query or an XML based search engine type? Can anyone give any suggestions regarding this? If XML is efficient then how do I use it to query my database, as I'm pretty new in XML based searching.Thanks
Hi ,I would like to whether its possible or not.I have stored word document(Resume) in SQL server. Now i want to search for particular key word.for example . I want to list down all details of candidate which have ASP.Net mentioned in their resume. So please provide me any link / or article .
Hi I was wondering if anyone can help me out here. I want to search a word in the database which has more than 80 tables is it possible to search all the tables at once for that word.
I am trying to search a multi words with “like� function using the following statement in a S.P.: @ITEM_desc nvarchar(10), @QUOTFIL nvarchar (200), @mfil nvarchar (500) = ''
SET @mfil = QUOTENAME('%' + @ITEM_desc + '%','''') exec ('select * from ims.item where adesc like' + @mfil + @QUOTFIL) Nrormaly one word can be send to SP for searching, is there any way to send multi word for the like function to search Like follows:
I am having a colume as image datatype, in which candidates resume is stored in binary format. I have to search for particular words for eg. "ASP.Net, 2 Years" into that column I have converted that column as varchar and then searching above two words(after spliting them by comma) into that string using CHARINDEX
DECLARE @i int, @j int SET @i = select MIN(ResumeId) from table_name SET @j = select MAX(ResumeId) from table_name
WHILE (@i <= @j) BEGIN DECLARE @Resume varchar(max) SET @Resume = CAST((select Resume from table_name where ResumeId=100) as varbinary(max))
--code to search the particular word from @Resume
END
It is working fine, but it is very slow, taking 2+ minutes to scan 15000 records How can I make it faster or is there any other way to search?
I'm designing a Job Recruitment Website, in which the admin person searches for the right candidate for the job using certain keywords . Each jobseeker will be uploading his CV (ms word doc) during registration .How can i search for keywords in the word documents. I just want the candidate reference once i found keyword match in the word docs.I heard about the indexing and blobs in sql server? But dont know much about it Are these the only solutions ?Is there any better approach for this ?Any help will be greatly appreciated
I am trying to set up a query that will allow the user to input a string, and the search will match ANY word in that string. Currently, I have it configured so that the search will only match the exact string that the user inputs. I have google searched for the answer, but no luck yet. Any ideas?
Session1 Session2 Session3 Session4----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SQL Server-Part1 SQL Server-Part2 ASP.Net CSS C# SQL Server-Part3 ASP.Net Javascript I have set the Full-Text to all the columns. For searching i wrote the below query SELECT * FROM <TABLE NAME> WHERE CONTAINS(*,'"SQL Server-Part1"') My Result expectation is: The First Record should come. But the result of the query bring the two records. It see the "SQL Server" string also. I need to find the exact word. How to do it? Please answer me as soon as possible. Ganesh.
select updatedb.callref, updatedb.updatetxt, updatedb.udsource, opencall.suppgroup from updatedb left join opencall on updatedb.callref=opencall.callref
where udindex = '0' and suppgroup = 'SUPPORT' and (updatetxt like '%' + @Word + '%')
And opencall.status <> '17'This means that when they search for items and they separate each word it is "and" between each one.
They would like it to be more fuzzy with "and" and "or". How can I adapt this?
I am using VS2005 to construct a website. I have a sql database with 3 datasets. One of the table adapters is called Proudcts and has the following fields. ProductItem, Description, Price, ProductID, PackSizeI want to be able to see a summary of the products (there are thousands of them) using one or more words (or partial words) in one text box to search in only 3 fields (ProductItem, Description, ProductID, ). This needs to show only records which contain the search criteria in a gridview?This is such a basic requirement for a website, and can be found on many sites, but I haven't found how to do it.Thanks, Bri
Anyone please suggest me that How to search specific word present multiple times from a paragraph stored in sqlserver database using asp.net 2.0 With Regards Tapan
We compulsorily use NOLOCK in our scripts on reporting DB and development generally forget putting NOLOCKS or schema names with tables.
Creating a script to search for a missing word or a phrase in SQL Server script.
Our format is <schema>.<table> <alias here> WITH NOLOCK <or alias here> or <schema>.<table> <alias here> NOLOCK <or alias here> or <schema>.<table> <alias here> (NOLOCK) <or alias here>
but generally developers write only <table> <alias>
What I really need is to find the entries that have the word LVAD but on either side there should be a space chartacters.In other words I don't want to see the following coming from the query "SILVADENE ([PHI] SULFADIAZINE)"How can we write this query to search only for any entry that has the word " LVAD " ?
Select top 100 * FROM tbl_abc where AIMS_Value like '%LVAD%'
Is the word "Name" a reserved word in SQL? look at line 10 of my stored procedure. When I use the word "Name"it is highlited in blue by SQL Server? Note I only list part of the stored proc 1 CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetXMLPeopleNames] 23 (4 @Status nvarchar(3)5)6 AS7 SELECT8 PersonId,9 PersonDescription,10 Name,11 UpdateDate,12 UpdateAppUser13 FROM14 Customer WHERE Customer.PersonDescription=@Status15 ORDER BY
I work for a financial company where we send out lots of correspondence to clients on a daily and monthly basis. This would typically be something like a financial report, account statements, etc. We've decided to use PDF as the format which these documents must be in when our clients receive them.
Our marketing and sales departments designs the templates of these documents using Microsoft Word. They can save these MS Word documents in the Word XML format (either 2003 or 2007). We want it in XML format, because it is text based, and we can therefore string replace the content to update the template with a client€™s information. In the same token RTF would also do, but the file size when converted to RTF is a problem.
What I am looking for is a way to convert this XML into PDF using something like XSL-FO - i.e. we do not want to use the Word Interopt on our Production Server, firstly it is a little slow and secondly the production server is unmanned and we cannot allow a WinWord.EXE process to not close successfully for some or other reason.
I've tried a number of companies' evaluation software to try and achieve this (converting the WordML to PDF via XSL-FO), but so far no luck.
Does anybody know of a stylesheet out there with which I will be able to achieve this? Or an alternative method of converting MS Word files into PDF without using Word to do it?
I have Sql Server 2000 and Word from Office Xp. Since a few weeks, I cannotimport Data from my database towards a Word document. I follow theprocedure, but at the end, it tells me Word cannot find the data source. IfI use Excel, well it works perfectly. What is the gig?thanks
Can anyone find what is wrong with this? I think I am using the keyword "Like" correctly. I am trying to enforce some rules by doing this this way. No obvious typos or syntax errors are jumping out at me.
Hi there, i need to know how to cut a string to the nearest word. For example, i've got an article and i need to extract just a part of the beginning, i could use LEFT([content], 250) but there is little chance this will cut on a word. Therefore i need to know if there is a function that will cut to the nearest word in T-SQL or i will simply put a summary field in the database. (I prefer to generate the summary on the fly if possible)
I took a search through the archives for related topics (and got Des in trouble along the way :( ) but couldn't find a directly related thread. If I missed one, feel free to tell me where to go (hey...watch that...only if I MISSED one!)
I wrote what is, essentially, a data verification stored proc that goes out to each of FOUR servers we have - each one running a mirror database. In a nutshell, there is one table that contains a row with a column in it that, if everything has gone well in the daily processing in all 4 databases, will match identically between all 4 DBs.
So, that said, here is the output: Job 'Index - Verify PortfolioIndex Across Servers' : Step 1, 'PortfolioIndex Check across all servers and portfolios' : Began Executing 2004-11-09 15:30:00
------------------- BEGINNING PortfolioIndex VERIFICATION -------------------- [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 2 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 3 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 11 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 67 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 72 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 84 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 90 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 92 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 100 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 105 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 110 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 115 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 120 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 125 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 130 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 135 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 140 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 145 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 150 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] WHOO-HOO!!! EVERYTHING MATCHES for porfolio number 155 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 160 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 110.582 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 110.582 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1000 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 189.623 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 189.623 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1001 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 164.058 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 164.058 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1002 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 255.978 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 255.978 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1003 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 159.009 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 159.009 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1004 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 318.981 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 318.981 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1005 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 145.921 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 145.921 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1006 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 141.035 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 141.035 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1007 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] UH-OH - TROUBLE!!! CloseIndex mismatch for porfolio number 1008 on 11/09/2004! [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TA1 shows an index of 123.179 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server TRADEANALYSIS shows an index of 123.179 [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE1 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] --> Server RECEIVE2 shows an index of NULL [SQLSTATE 01000] ------------------- COMPLETE -------------------- [SQLSTATE 01000]
This was cut-n-pasted here from a log file created by the actual SQL SERVER 2000 job created to run the afore-mentioned stored procedure.
After all that...my quandry is this:
What is the best way to send this info out in an email format to interested parties? Currently I have the job send out an email notification on completion, but that still requires my lazy buttocks to go look at the log file in the job (or, more accurately, on the server in the logfile directory).
I want to get the actual DATA as shown above into the email.
As I see it, my options are: (1) write the data out to a flat file during the run (or, as is done now, into a log file by the SQL Server scheduled job) and then attach that FILE to the email - this still requires my lazy buttocks to OPEN the attachment that comes with the email. ro (2) write the message out a line at a time to a table with an IDENTITY column (used to order them on the select) and a VARCHAR(128) column that each line in the log would be written to. This option allows me to just do a SELECT in the call to xp_sendmail to get the data into the actual email...but I just really hate the idea of creating a permanent table for this cheesy solution.
I tried it with a temp table within my stored proc, but of course, when I made the call to xp_Sendmail, it can't see my temp table in order to select from (mind you, it's not that I mind USING a cheesy table, just that I don't want it to have a lifespan longer than the time I need to use it and toss it aside)
I know the common denominator here is "My Lazy Buttocks", but I really can't understate the laziness of my buttocks, so this is a valid concern ;)
Any thoughts? How do people get status messages like this into an email without using an attachment or a cheesy middleman table?
Sorry, as always, about the miniseries...just trying to set the mood before popping the question ;)
