Hi, i have installed sql 7.0 sp1 on a server that frecuently report the error: 1024
"SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users, or ask the system administrator to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS.."
I reconfiguered the locks twice, but the error persist.
What do you recomend to do to avoid this error??
thanks.
Hi,
I have just upgraded my sql 65 to sql 7. The problem I am running into is running out of locks all the time with 50000 locks. The sql box has 4 pentium pro 200 processors and 1 Gig of ram. Here is the error message:
DESCRIPTION:Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users, or ask the system administrator to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS.
COMMENT:Fatal Error Occured in Resource
Help!!!
Jim
I've got an INSERT that's selecting data from a linked server and attempting to push 10 million rows into the blank table. More or less, it looks like this:
insert into ReceivingTable (
Field1, Field2, Field3, Field4
, Field5, Field6, Field7, Field8
, Field9, Field10, Field11, Field12
, Field13, Field14, Field15
[code]...
The instance of the SQL Server Database Engine cannot obtain a LOCK resource at this time. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users. Ask the database administrator to check the lock and memory configuration for this instance, or to check for long-running transactions. There are no other active users. I ran it again and monitored the following DMO to watch the growth of locks for that spid:
SELECT request_session_id, COUNT (*) num_locks
-- select *
FROM sys.dm_tran_locks
--where request_session_id = 77
GROUP BY request_session_id
ORDER BY count (*) DESC
The number of locks started small and held for a while around 4-7 locks, but at about 5 minutes in the number of locks held by that spid grew dramatically to more than 8 million before finally erroring again with the same message. Researching, I can't figure out why it's not escalating from row locks to table locks at the appropriate threshold. The threshold in was set to 0 at first (Server Properties > Advanced > Parallelism > Locks). I set it to 5000, and it still didn't seem to work. Rewriting the INSERT to include a WITH (TABLOCK) allows it to finish successfully in testing. My problem is that it's coming out of an ETL with source code that I can't edit. I need to figure out how to force it to escalate to locking the entire table via table or server level settings.
A colleague suggested that installing service packs may take care of it (the client is running SQL Server 2008 R2 (RTM)), but I haven't found anything online to support that theory.
Hi,
I had application that access the database 'test'. Now i created a ETL package, in this Souce database is 'test' and destination database is 'mytest'. I have scheduled the job for every hour.
Now, i want to know that whether any locks will create on source database 'test' while ETL package is running.
Thanks
Dinesh
Hi all ,
When i Run the report in reporting services, it locks the tables.
so is there any option to Unlock the tables. I m using just select query to run the report but when i run the report it locks the tables.
I used with(nolock) option in select query but it didnt work...still showing me lock on the tables.
Pls help...its urgent
Thanking You,
Rupali Rane.
Hi,
First of all, my apology. I'm not sure if this is the right SQL server forum. Moreover, this didn't even happen on SQL Server but Sybase 11.9. But I'm thinking that the same situation might happen on SQL Server and I can't find any Sybase forum to run this by some experts.
I got the following error on a dev server:
Error: Number (1204) Severity (17). SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Re-run your command when there are fewer active users, or contact a user with System Administrator (SA) role to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS
The number of locks was set to 10,000.
I set it to 15,000 and ran the same code: Same error.
I set it to 20,000 and ran the same code: No error.
I set it back to 15,000 and ran the same code: No error.
I set it to 10,000 and ran the same code: No error.
I set it to 5,000 and ran the same code: No error.
It seems strange that it used not to work at 10,000 locks (repeatedlly) but once I set the number of locks to 20,000 once, then it worked with the number of locks as low as 5,000. Does anybody have any idea why this would happen?
Another question is that when the number of locks is set to 10,000, I run sp_lock while the code is running and the number of rows returned was often over 10,000. Still, I didn't get the error. Anybody knows why?
Did anybody ever run into a similar situation?
Appreciate your help.
We are migrating our database(s) from ORACLE to SQL. In Oracle we were able to issue a SELECT statement and see all of the locks (Blocking and Non-Blocking) currently in the system. The query also included the Process ID of the process we needed to kill in order to get rid of the lock.
We now need to create the same type of query for Microsoft SQL Server 2012. I have seen postings on different sites saying that this info can be obtained using SP_WHO2 or using the SQL Server Management Studio Activity Monitor's PROCESSES tab, but we are looking for a SELECT statement that will give us similar information.
Everytime I try to open the design-mode of a table from enterprise mgr, I get this error 1204.---
SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users, or ask the system administrator to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS.
There no other users but me. Locks have been configured to their max (over 200000000). Don't understand whats wrong. Please help..
We've experienced persistent hang up on our application. I tried opening the enterprise manager->management->Current Activity->Locks/Object and I've seen ridiculous entries like master.dbo.spt_values, SIS.dbo.feesclass,tempdb.dbo$##lockinfo205. I don't what this mean? does it tell us that something wrong with the application that does not release locks? please help me.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a simple web application using ASP.NET/C#/SQL Server 2000/Windows 2000
I'm having problems with the server "hanging" for ~15 minutes. Disk/CPU are idle so this isn't a resource issue. In Enterprise Manager, under "Current Activity" I see several processes waiting on:
LCK_M_X
LCK_M_S
LCK_M_S
NETWORKIO
How do I investigate this? My application is so simple, I have trouble imagining how a lock-related problem could ocurr? There is absolutely no concurrent processing done on this server. There is only one user running this app and there are no separate threads spawned.
Although this problem is sporadic, this happens the most while doing the following:
- Open connection1 (for SELECT)
- Open connection2 (for UPDATE)
- Open SqlDataReader through connection1 with SELECT statement
- Iterate through
- For certain records issue UPDATE statement via connection2.
Here are some sample code snippets. Default ADO.NET options and everything should be cleaned up through C# "using" blocks without relying on garbage collection.
using (SqlConnection selectConnection = LeadsDatabase.OpenConnection()) {
using (SqlConnection updateConnection = LeadsDatabase.OpenConnection()) {
using (SqlCommand dbCommand = new SqlCommand(sql, selectConnection)) {
using (SqlDataReader reader = dbCommand.ExecuteReader()) {
while (reader.Read()) {
using (SqlCommand updateCommand = new SqlCommand(sql, updateConnection)) {
updateCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();
Situation:
When I ran a query and bumped into a message that is "SQL server has run out of LOCKS. Re-run your command when there are fewer active ussers. or ask your system administratroe to reconfigyre SQL Server with more LOCKS." Then, I tried to reconfigure/increase the locks. It could not let me do it. So, I tried to relog on the server, then I kept getting the same message as above.
Questions:
Is there a way to log on the server and reconfigure the locks? Do I have reinstall the SQL server?
I appreciate it ahead of time.
Hi,
I am getting the following message from the SQL Server 7.0.
I have increased the locks but still it is getting messages on few days.
Coould you please advise me what is the main reason for ran out of locks and how can solve this problem otherthan increase the locks.If needs to be increased what is the calculation method to arrive at the number of locks.
Thanks
>RAvi
"
SQL Server Alert System: 'Demo: Sev. 19 Errors' occurred on CSQWBDB1
DESCRIPTION:Error: 1204, Severity: 19, State: 1
SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users, or ask the system administrator to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS. "
The present configuration:
name minimum maximum config_value run_value
locks 5000 2147483647 225000 225000
Hey all,
I've been experiencing an issue related to linked server. Here is the scene:
- Application A queries View V located in SQL Server S1
- View V accesses Table T located in SQL Server S2 using a linked server
The problem is:
- Application A start the transaction and it simply gets locked. It throws no errors nor exceptions.
Important:
- S1 and S2 are in different machines
- When S1 = S2, then the application successfully access View V.
Any suggestions?
I have to find locks which have been caused by some particular users before the scheduled jobs kick off and kill the locked processes so that the scheduled job executes without failing. How to do this in SQL server? please help
Thanks in Advance
Hi All,
I am frequently getting an error of Unable to acquire a LOCK at this time. Something about too many users logged in. What is the limit of LOCKS in MS SQL 2005 ? When I switch the cluster nodes, the LOCK issue goes away. The issue only occurs when someone tries a DDL command. Advice.
Is anyone have already encountered such a problem :
When a table is locked by several locks (key, pag), either a SELECT request which does not need to lock any row cannot succeed.
In SQL Server Enterprise Manager, I see that my request is waiting for a lock "LCK_M_S" !!!
How I can avoid this kind of situation which seems to me completely abnormal.
I have never been faced with this kind of problem in Oracle.
Thanks for anyone who will help me to resolve this "bug".
hello,
I have an application wrote in Power Builder 11 and use OLEDB connection for SQL SERVER 2005 DB.
it works excellent till multiple users access the application. 2 seconds passes and locks appears and blocks all the DB!
I realy don't know what is the reason. In past I used SQL Native driver and it works well with the same application!!! (other reasons caused me to change the connection. not this).
Does someone can help me????????
I have a co-worker whose sql server 2005 is exhibiting strange behavior. We have already re-installed sql server 2005 and service packed it to SP2 to try and see if the behavior stops but it has not.
Every so often during the day sql server 2005 will start to slow down to the point that my co-worker's queries begin to time out. He turned on profiler to look at what was going on behind the scenes.
We see where sa is releasing and acquring locks to the tune of 180,000 rows in a fifteen minute span when this behavior starts so does his time outs. He has reporting options and analysis services installed but not configured. His only connection is to his local database. Occasionally, you see a number like - (03000d8f0ecc) appear in the Text Data column in profiler for sa. I read something about reporting options using sa for clean up but I don't think that is what is happening here.
Does someone have a clue as to what is happening and a way we can prevent the behavior? It is affecting his ability to work on his application.
Thx
I have a sql snippet from a 3rd party application that will not complete its transaction. The SELECT statement executes but does not finish. Instead the statement just sits in AWAITING COMMAND for 1000 seconds then dies, thus killing the UPDATE statement that is supposed to follow.
The CROSS JOIN and CROSS APPLY seem suspect.
(
@p0 DATETIME,
@p1 INT,
@p2 INT,
@p3 NVARCHAR(4000),
@p4 INT,
[code]....
I just ran into an issue with cascading locks due to a SPID on one of my production servers. When researching the lock, I noticed that there was no sql text. SP_Who 2, nor the following query captured anything,
SELECT sqltext.TEXT
, sqlplan.query_plan
, req.session_id
, req.status
, req.command
[Code] ....
I spoke to the user causing the lock and he ran into a visual basic error when this occurred and didn't close out that window. So my guess is that it's due to an uncommitted transaction. However, shouldn't I still see something if that was the case?
Hello Reporting Services 2005 users or Reporting Services Team,
I have done everything to get pass this error but no luck.
My setup is :- WIndows 2003 Standared Edition SP1
Sql Server :-
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 (Intel X86) Oct 14 2005 00:33:37 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
Reporting Services starting SKU: Standard.
From the Reporting Services Configuration Manager:
I can see all other things configured except Encryption Keys(blue sign)
Initialization(Grey sign) and Execution Acct(Yellow sign)
My windows Service Identity is using :
NT AuthorityNetworkService
Builtin Acct :NetworkService
Web Service Identity :-
ASP.NET Service Acct :- NT AuthorityNetworkService
DataBase Setup :- Credentials Type :- Service Credentials
I have also done everything from here thanks to Göran
http://stevenharman.net/blog/archive/2007/03/21/Avoiding-the-401-Unauthorized-Error-when-Using-the-ReportViewer-in.aspx
and
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;896861
and
http://forum.k2workflow.com/viewtopic.php?t=619&
If you guys any solution for this please let me know.
I was wondering could this be a scale-out deployment issue ?
I also get the error when setting up the DataBase Setup :
Although saving the database connection info succeeded the The report server cannot access internal info about this deployment to determine whetherthe current con fig is valid for this editionThis could be a scale-out deployment and that the feature is not supported by this editionTo continue use a diff report server database or remove the encription keys
My Error log file is below:-
w3wp!webserver!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Reporting Web Server started
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing ConnectionType to '0' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing IsSchedulingService to 'True' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing IsNotificationService to 'True' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing IsEventService to 'True' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing PollingInterval to '10' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing WindowsServiceUseFileShareStorage to 'False' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MemoryLimit to '60' percent as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing RecycleTime to '720' minute(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MaximumMemoryLimit to '80' percent as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MaxAppDomainUnloadTime to '30' minute(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MaxQueueThreads to '0' thread(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing IsWebServiceEnabled to 'True' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MaxActiveReqForOneUser to '20' requests(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing MaxScheduleWait to '5' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing DatabaseQueryTimeout to '120' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing ProcessRecycleOptions to '0' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing RunningRequestsScavengerCycle to '60' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing RunningRequestsDbCycle to '60' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing RunningRequestsAge to '30' second(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing CleanupCycleMinutes to '10' minute(s) as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing DailyCleanupMinuteOfDay to default value of '120' minutes since midnight because it was not specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing WatsonFlags to '1064' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing WatsonDumpOnExceptions to 'Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.InternalCatalogException,Microsoft.ReportingServices.Modeling.InternalModelingException' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing WatsonDumpExcludeIfContainsExceptions to 'System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException,System.Threading.ThreadAbortException' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing SecureConnectionLevel to '0' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing DisplayErrorLink to 'True' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!library!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Initializing WebServiceUseFileShareStorage to 'False' as specified in Configuration file.
w3wp!resourceutilities!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Reporting Services starting SKU: Standard
w3wp!resourceutilities!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Evaluation copy: 0 days left
w3wp!resourceutilities!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Running on 1 physical processors, 2 logical processors
w3wp!runningjobs!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Database Cleanup (Web Service) timer enabled: Next Event: 600 seconds. Cycle: 600 seconds
w3wp!runningjobs!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Running Requests Scavenger timer enabled: Next Event: 60 seconds. Cycle: 60 seconds
w3wp!runningjobs!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Running Requests DB timer enabled: Next Event: 60 seconds. Cycle: 60 seconds
w3wp!runningjobs!5!16/05/2007-14:52:46:: i INFO: Memory stats update timer enabled: Next Event: 60 seconds. Cycle: 60 seconds
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:48:: i INFO: Call to GetPermissions:/
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:48:: i INFO: Catalog SQL Server Edition = Standard
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:48:: e ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server., ;
Info: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server.
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:48:: e ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server., ;
Info: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server.
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:49:: e ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server., ;
Info: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server.
w3wp!library!5!05/16/2007-14:52:49:: e ERROR: Throwing Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server., ;
Info: Microsoft.ReportingServices.Diagnostics.Utilities.ReportServerServiceUnavailableException: The Report Server Windows service 'ReportServer' is not running. The service must be running to use Report Server.
I have read that even during read procedures (sql select statements), sql server uses row locking. I know that you can use the NOLOCK keyword, but if you don't everytime that a user makes a selects statement on a table, does sql server really lock those rows, and if so are they then unavailable to another user who wants to make a select statement at the same time on that same table? That does not seem like it would be the case otherwise it would not scale well. Thanks for any clarification on this.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am using SQL Server7.0. I opened a table through the Enterprise Manager and left it open. In the Query Analyzer when I try to update a field on that table(more than 2000 rows), it goes on running. When I watched the Current Activity, it shows that the update process is being blocked by the select query. But if I try to update the same column for less than 1500 rows, there is no blocking issue and the update occurs immediately. Can anybody let me know why this is happening and what should I do to prevent it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using Sql Server 7.0
To I got the following error message. Can some one tell how to solve this issue.
Server: Msg 1204, Level 19, State 1, Procedure OPEN_OBJECTS, Line 2
SQL Server has run out of LOCKS. Rerun your statement when there are fewer active users, or ask the system administrator to reconfigure SQL Server with more LOCKS.
ranga.
what the best way to control locks, if inserting couple thousands records from one table to another.
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi
I have a big query which updates around 14000 rows at a time if i place a lock on the table and others try to update the same table is it possible to let them know that table is locked by someone else.
2 quick questions :
1) How do I keep multiple users from editing the same record without locking the entire table? What would be a 'standard' way of handling this?
2) How do I keep 2 people from posting the same record?
Please help me understand locking, THANKS!!!
I have a stored proc which will be entering/updating a record into a table. The table's key is an integer field which I may have to increment by one. I know I can use
declare @nextid int
set @netxid = max(id) from table
insert @nextid into table
Is some kind of lock the best way to approach this?
Hello,
I have a problem in SQLSERVER 2000, when I execute a Query, the table get locked for insert or any other transaction, even for other queries.
Does SQL Server have a kind of lock mode different of Oracle ?
How do I solve this problem ??
Hello There !!
I have a very big problem, with SQL SERVER 2000. I want to know about the locks with select.
When I execute a Select (so big), and I try to update or Insert into one of the tables that I invoke in the select, I get locked.
Is there in SQL Server, something like a Select for update, that could be causing the problem ???
Is there any way to select rows from a table without locking it ?
I really have a big problem with this, and I don't know so much about sql server !
Thank you so much !!!
Some of my tables Were locked IN IS Mode.What does it mean?
Thanks.
I Have 359 locks on MY Database ,They are always there on my DB.The DB is a development database and lots of summary Stored procedures will be running on this DB.
Does it effect the performance.How can I remove those locks.
Thanks.
Hi All,
Sql server 7
pls provide me sql statement that shows all the locks. the goal is to produce the output on an HTML page.
pls help me in solving this
TIA
Adil