Stored Procedure Not Optimized

Feb 1, 2005

Hi ,


I created a page that list the total of hours, lunch time and expenses for the employees of the company.


I am trying to optimize this stored procedure , but it still takes more than 40 seconds for 50 employees.


select @StartDate As DateLigne, TPerson.Name, TPerson.idperson,


(select sum(coalesce(hours,0) - coalesce(lunch,0)) FROM Thereport


WHERE etridperson=TPerson.idperson AND etridproject=TUserProject.etridproject AND DateDIFF(day, @StartDate, datereport) >= 0 AND DateDIFF(day, datereport, @endDate) >= 0 ) As hours,


(select sum(coalesce(nonbillable,0)) FROM Thereport


WHERE etridperson=TPerson.idperson AND etridproject=TUserProject.etridproject AND DateDIFF(day, @StartDate, datereport) >= 0 AND DateDIFF(day, datereport, @endDate) >= 0 ) As nonbillable,


(select sum((coalesce(miles,0)*@mil)+ coalesce(perdiem,0)+coalesce(supplies,0)+coalesce(airfare,0)+ coalesce( gas,0) + coalesce(autorental,0)+ coalesce(other,0) ) FROM ThereportWHERE etridperson=TPerson.idperson AND etridproject=TUserProject.etridproject AND DateDIFF(day, @StartDate, datereport) >= 0 AND DateDIFF(day, datereport, @endDate) >= 0 ) As Expenses


FROM TUserProject, TPerson


WHERE TUserProject.etridperson=TPerson.idperson AND etridproject =89





Do you have any idea of how I could optimize this stored procedure?





Thanks

View 8 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2012 :: Memory Optimized Tables And Updatable Column Stored Index

Aug 26, 2014

We are planning to upgrade. We are using Sql 2008R2 now. Which is the better option migrating to SQL 2012 or migrating to 2014?I am thinking 2014 has memory optimized tables and updatable column stored index. So it is better option.

View 2 Replies View Related

Calling A Stored Procedure Inside Another Stored Procedure (or Nested Stored Procedures)

Nov 1, 2007

Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly.  For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created') 
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert). 
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
 

View 1 Replies View Related

Calling A Stored Procedure From ADO.NET 2.0-VB 2005 Express: Working With SELECT Statements In The Stored Procedure-4 Errors?

Mar 3, 2008

Hi all,

I have 2 sets of sql code in my SQL Server Management Stidio Express (SSMSE):

(1) /////--spTopSixAnalytes.sql--///

USE ssmsExpressDB

GO

CREATE Procedure [dbo].[spTopSixAnalytes]

AS

SET ROWCOUNT 6

SELECT Labtests.Result AS TopSixAnalytes, LabTests.Unit, LabTests.AnalyteName

FROM LabTests

ORDER BY LabTests.Result DESC

GO


(2) /////--spTopSixAnalytesEXEC.sql--//////////////


USE ssmsExpressDB

GO
EXEC spTopSixAnalytes
GO

I executed them and got the following results in SSMSE:
TopSixAnalytes Unit AnalyteName
1 222.10 ug/Kg Acetone
2 220.30 ug/Kg Acetone
3 211.90 ug/Kg Acetone
4 140.30 ug/L Acetone
5 120.70 ug/L Acetone
6 90.70 ug/L Acetone
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Now, I try to use this Stored Procedure in my ADO.NET-VB 2005 Express programming:
//////////////////--spTopSixAnalytes.vb--///////////

Public Class Form1

Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click

Dim sqlConnection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection("Data Source = .SQLEXPRESS; Integrated Security = SSPI; Initial Catalog = ssmsExpressDB;")

Dim sqlDataAdapter As SqlDataAdapter = New SqlDataAdaptor("[spTopSixAnalytes]", sqlConnection)

sqlDataAdapter.SelectCommand.Command.Type = CommandType.StoredProcedure

'Pass the name of the DataSet through the overloaded contructor

'of the DataSet class.

Dim dataSet As DataSet ("ssmsExpressDB")

sqlConnection.Open()

sqlDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet)

sqlConnection.Close()

End Sub

End Class
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I executed the above code and I got the following 4 errors:
Error #1: Type 'SqlConnection' is not defined (in Form1.vb)
Error #2: Type 'SqlDataAdapter' is not defined (in Form1.vb)
Error #3: Array bounds cannot appear in type specifiers (in Form1.vb)
Error #4: 'DataSet' is not a type and cannot be used as an expression (in Form1)

Please help and advise.

Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang

More Information for you to know:
I have the "ssmsExpressDB" database in the Database Expolorer of VB 2005 Express. But I do not know how to get the SqlConnection and the SqlDataAdapter into the Form1. I do not know how to get the Fill Method implemented properly.
I try to learn "Working with SELECT Statement in a Stored Procedure" for printing the 6 rows that are selected - they are not parameterized.




View 11 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: One Stored Procedure Return Data (select Statement) Into Another Stored Procedure

Nov 14, 2014

I am new to work on Sql server,

I have One Stored procedure Sp_Process1, it's returns no of columns dynamically.

Now the Question is i wanted to get the "Sp_Process1" procedure return data into Temporary table in another procedure or some thing.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Embed Parameter In Name Of Stored Procedure Called From Within Another Stored Procedure?

Jan 29, 2015

I have some code that I need to run every quarter. I have many that are similar to this one so I wanted to input two parameters rather than searching and replacing the values. I have another stored procedure that's executed from this one that I will also parameter-ize. The problem I'm having is in embedding a parameter in the name of the called procedure (exec statement at the end of the code). I tried it as I'm showing and it errored. I tried googling but I couldn't find anything related to this. Maybe I just don't have the right keywords. what is the syntax?

CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[runDMQ3_2014LDLComplete]
@QQ_YYYY char(7),
@YYYYQQ char(8)
AS
begin
SET NOCOUNT ON;
select [provider group],provider, NPI, [01-Total Patients with DM], [02-Total DM Patients with LDL],

[Code] ....

View 9 Replies View Related

Connect To Oracle Stored Procedure From SQL Server Stored Procedure...and Vice Versa.

Sep 19, 2006

I have a requirement to execute an Oracle procedure from within an SQL Server procedure and vice versa.

How do I do that? Articles, code samples, etc???

View 1 Replies View Related

Grab IDENTITY From Called Stored Procedure For Use In Second Stored Procedure In ASP.NET Page

Dec 28, 2005

I have a sub that passes values from my form to my stored procedure.  The stored procedure passes back an @@IDENTITY but I'm not sure how to grab that in my asp page and then pass that to my next called procedure from my aspx page.  Here's where I'm stuck:    Public Sub InsertOrder()        Conn.Open()        cmd = New SqlCommand("Add_NewOrder", Conn)        cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure        ' pass customer info to stored proc        cmd.Parameters.Add("@FirstName", txtFName.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@LastName", txtLName.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@AddressLine1", txtStreet.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@CityID", dropdown_city.SelectedValue)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@Zip", intZip.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@EmailPrefix", txtEmailPre.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@EmailSuffix", txtEmailSuf.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhoneAreaCode", txtPhoneArea.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhonePrefix", txtPhonePre.Text)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@PhoneSuffix", txtPhoneSuf.Text)        ' pass order info to stored proc        cmd.Parameters.Add("@NumberOfPeopleID", dropdown_people.SelectedValue)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@BeanOptionID", dropdown_beans.SelectedValue)        cmd.Parameters.Add("@TortillaOptionID", dropdown_tortilla.SelectedValue)        'Session.Add("FirstName", txtFName.Text)        cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()        cmd = New SqlCommand("Add_EntreeItems", Conn)        cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure        cmd.Parameters.Add("@CateringOrderID", get identity from previous stored proc)   <-------------------------        Dim li As ListItem        Dim p As SqlParameter = cmd.Parameters.Add("@EntreeID", Data.SqlDbType.VarChar)        For Each li In chbxl_entrees.Items            If li.Selected Then                p.Value = li.Value                cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()            End If        Next        Conn.Close()I want to somehow grab the @CateringOrderID that was created as an end product of my first called stored procedure (Add_NewOrder)  and pass that to my second stored procedure (Add_EntreeItems)

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2012 :: Executing Dynamic Stored Procedure From A Stored Procedure?

Sep 26, 2014

I have a stored procedure and in that I will be calling a stored procedure. Now, based on the parameter value I will get stored procedure name to be executed. how to execute dynamic sp in a stored rocedure

at present it is like EXECUTE usp_print_list_full @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT

I want to do like EXECUTE @SpName @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT

View 3 Replies View Related

Optimized Sp

Jul 21, 2005

Is it some how The following sp can be optimized?
IF @groupID='812846'
BEGIN
IF (SELECT count(*) from Employee where SSN= @SSN and groupID=@groupID) > 0
BEGIN
UPDATE Employee
SET NameLast=@LastName,
NameFirst=@FirstName,
NameMiddle=@MI,

WHERE SSN= @SSN and GroupId=@GroupId
select @EmpId=EmpId from Employee where SSN= @SSN and groupID=@groupID
END
ElSE
BEGIN
insert into Employee (GroupId, NameLast, NameFirst, NameMiddle,SSN)
values (@GroupId, @LastName, @FirstName, @MI, @SSN)
select @EmpId = @@IDENTITY
END

END

else
BEGIN
insert into Employee (GroupId, NameLast, NameFirst, NameMiddle, SSN)
values
(@GroupId, @LastName, @FirstName, @MI, @SSN)
select @EmpId = @@IDENTITY
END

View 8 Replies View Related

Optimized A 'LIKE' Query

Jan 14, 2007

let said, i have a table which contains a column with value such as:

,1,2,3,4,5,6,
,3,4,5,
,1,2,4,

and then i use the query:
select col1, col2 from table (nolock) where (col3 like ',1,' or col3 like ',3,')

is there any function which can be used to speed up the query or which more optimized one? Maybe something similar to IN(xxxx,xxxx,xxxx)

View 8 Replies View Related

Is This Query Optimized?

Jun 13, 2008

I started with this query:

SELECT procs.name as ProcName,
params.name as ParameterName,
types.name as ParamType,
params.max_length,
params.precision,
params.scale,
params.is_output,
params.has_default_value
FROM sys.procedures procs
LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.all_parameters params
ON procs.object_id = params.object_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.types types
ON params.system_type_id = types.system_type_id
AND params.user_type_id = types.user_type_id
WHERE procs.is_ms_shipped = 0
AND params.name = '@DISPOSAL_AREA_NAME'
AND procs.name = 'webservices_BENEFICIAL_USES_DM_SELECT'
ORDER BY procname,
params.parameter_id

Now, all I need from it is the column params.is_output.

I have modified it down to what I need, but I'm wondering if I can remove some of the joins or anything else for better performance without losing the proper results:

SELECT params.is_output
FROM sys.procedures procs
LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.all_parameters params
ON procs.object_id = params.object_id
LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.types types
ON params.system_type_id = types.system_type_id
AND params.user_type_id = types.user_type_id
WHERE procs.is_ms_shipped = 0
AND params.name = '@DISPOSAL_AREA_NAME'
AND procs.name = 'webservices_BENEFICIAL_USES_DM_SELECT'

View 2 Replies View Related

Looking For A More Optimized Code

Feb 21, 2007

is there a better code for this..?

SELECT phase, stat, subject, CASE WHEN phase = 'Initial/Data Collection' THEN '1'
WHEN phase = 'Screening' THEN '2'
WHEN phase = 'Assessment and Selection' THEN '3'
WHEN phase = 'Placement' THEN 4 END AS PhaseSort

FROM (SELECT subject, stat, CASE WHEN stat = 'Application Received' THEN 'Initial/Data Collection'
WHEN stat = 'Shortlisted' OR
stat = 'For Screening' THEN 'Screening'
WHEN stat = 'For Assessment' OR
stat = 'Passed Initial Evaluation' OR
stat = 'Passed Profiles Exam' OR
stat = 'Passed Technical Exam' THEN 'Assessment and Selection'
WHEN stat = 'For Placement' THEN 'Placement' END AS phase

FROM (SELECT subject, CASE WHEN subject = 'Process Application' OR
subject = 'Application Received' THEN 'Application Received'
WHEN subject = 'Screen Application' THEN 'For Screening'
WHEN subject = 'Phone interview' THEN 'Shortlisted'
WHEN subject = 'Initial Interview' THEN 'For Assessment'
WHEN subject = 'Profiles assessment'THEN 'Passed Initial Evaluation'
WHEN subject = 'Technical Exam and Interview' THEN 'Passed Profiles exam'
WHEN subject = 'background and reference check' THEN 'Passed Technical Exam'
WHEN subject = 'Job Offer' OR
subject = 'Contract Signing' THEN 'For Placement' END AS stat

FROM dbo.filteredtask
WHERE (subject = 'application received') OR
(subject = 'process application') OR
(subject = 'screen application') OR
(subject = 'initial interview') OR
(subject = 'profiles assessment') OR
(subject = 'technical exam and interview') OR
subject = 'background and reference check' OR
subject = 'phone interview' OR
subject = 'shortlisted' OR
subject = 'For Placement' OR
subject = 'job offer' OR
subject = 'contract signing') Phases) stats
ORDER BY phasesort

__________________________________________________
Your future is made by the things you are presently doing.

Andrew

View 6 Replies View Related

UPDATE Optimized

Feb 13, 2008

Any idea how I could do this efficiently?

For example, the SiteName & SLAClass field using select statements each time may bog down the system.

Also, I’d like to feed the CustID and Subject fields from another table call Profile instead of typing the CustID field each time.

The result of this statement is to search for customers in the subject line and if customer is found then add the customer information into the Detail table. The Profile table contains all customer information.



UPDATE [TEST3].[dbo].[Detail]
SET [CustID] = 'Book Fairs' /*fill in with field from the Profile table automatically*/
,[SiteName] = (SELECT distinct([Profile].[SiteName] )
FROM [TEST3].[dbo].[Profile], [TEST3].[dbo].[Detail]
WHERE [Profile].[CustID] = [Detail].[CustID])
,[SLAClass] = (SELECT distinct([Profile].[SLAClass])
FROM [TEST3].[dbo].[Profile], [TEST3].[dbo].[Detail]
WHERE [Profile].[CustID] = [Detail].[CustID])
WHERE [Detail].[CallID] IN
(SELECT [CallLog].[CallID] FROM [TEST3].[dbo].[CallLog], [TEST3].[dbo].[Subset], [TEST3].[dbo].[Asgnmnt]
WHERE [CallLog].[CallType] = 'DREAM' AND
[CallLog].[Subject] LIKE '%Book Fairs%' ) /*fill in with field from the Profile table automatically*/

View 6 Replies View Related

Table Not Optimized Or What ?

Jul 20, 2005

I have two tables in SQL 6.5 database with identical fields and indexes. Onecontains the data of August 2003 and other July 2003. Now the august tableis larger ( about 40000 more rows ) than the july table but i've noticedthat the same queries perform much faster on the august table than the julytable. Ive tried this with many different queries so i'm wondering whats thereason behind this. Is there a way to optimize a table? Remember , I'm usingSQL 6.5thx

View 4 Replies View Related

Can This Query Be Optimized?

Nov 28, 2007

Hello All,

I have this query that is taking more than 5 minutes to run, granted it involves 7 tables, 4 of which have over 100000+ rows, but there must be a quicker way of executing this.






Code Block

SELECT
ACP.COMPANY_NAME,
WOD.WO ,
WOH.SCHEDULED_DATE ,
WOH.JOB_ADDRESS_1,
WOH.JOB_ADDRESS_2,
WOH.CUSTOMER_CODE,
ARC.CUSTOMER_NAME,
ARC.BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_CODE,
APS.SUPPLIER_NAME,
APC.INVOICE_NUMBER as AP_INVOICE_NUMBER,
APC.INVOICE_DATE as AP_INVOICE_DATE,
APC.DATE_OF_RECORD as AP_DATE_OF_RECORD,
WOD.AMOUNT,
APC.CHEQUE_NUMBER,
WOH.INVOICE_NUMBER as AR_INVOICE_NUMBER,
ARI.DATE_OF_RECORD as AR_DATE_OF_RECORD
FROM
WO_WODDescription_tbl AS WOD
LEFT OUTER JOIN WO_Headers_tbl AS WOH ON WOD.COMPANY_CODE = WOH.COMPANY_CODE AND WOD.WO = WOH.WORK_ORDER_NUMBER
LEFT OUTER JOIN AP_CurrentDetails_tbl as APC ON WOD.COMPANY_CODE = APC.COMPANY_CODE AND WOD.DRILL_DOWN_NUMBER = APC.DRILL_DOWN AND WOD.AUDIT_NUMBER = APC.AUDIT_NUMBER
LEFT OUTER JOIN AR_CustomerMaster_tbl as ARC ON WOD.COMPANY_CODE = ARC.COMPANY_CODE AND WOH.CUSTOMER_CODE = ARC.CUSTOMER_CODE
LEFT OUTER JOIN AP_Suppliers_tbl as APS ON APC.COMPANY_CODE = APS.COMPANY AND APC.SUPPLIER_CODE = APS.SUPPLIER_CODE
LEFT OUTER JOIN ADM_CompanyProfile_tbl as ACP ON WOD.COMPANY_CODE = ACP.COMPANY_CODE
LEFT OUTER JOIN AR_InvoiceDetailCurrent_tbl as ARI ON WOD.COMPANY_CODE = ARI.COMPANY_CODE AND WOH.INVOICE_NUMBER = ARI.INVOICE_NUMBER
WHERE
(WOD.COMPANY_CODE = '01' OR WOD.COMPANY_CODE = '03')
AND APC.CHEQUE_NUMBER <> 'X%'
AND (APC.DATE_OF_RECORD < '20061101' AND ARI.DATE_OF_RECORD > '20061031')
ORDER BY WOD.COMPANY_CODE, WOD.WO

Can anyone give me any suggestions of how I could speed this up?
Also, I have noticed that sqlservr.exe is using more than 1.5GB of the 2GB in the machine while doing conversions from flat files to the database while the CPU is under 3% load, is this action typical of MSSQL2005?

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Get Optimized Join

Sep 30, 2006

Hi Experts,




I have following doubts on join condition

Table 1 primary key (id,sub)



Name id sub marks



xxx 61 maths 45



xxx 61 science 50







another table primary key ( id,language)



id language write



61 english yes



61 Hindi no



Output:



Xxx 61 maths 45 english yes



Xxx 61 maths 45 Hindi no



Xxx 61 science 50 english yes



Xxx 61 science 50 hindi no



how to join these tables to get



every information in 2 rows will it possible



xxx 61 maths 45 English yes



xxx 61 science 50 hindi no



please suggest me to right path

thanking u



please mail to me:nallisalmon@yahoo.co.in










View 1 Replies View Related

System Stored Procedure Call From Within My Database Stored Procedure

Mar 28, 2007

I have a stored procedure that calls a msdb stored procedure internally. I granted the login execute rights on the outer sproc but it still vomits when it tries to execute the inner. Says I don't have the privileges, which makes sense.

How can I grant permissions to a login to execute msdb.dbo.sp_update_schedule()? Or is there a way I can impersonate the sysadmin user for the call by using Execute As sysadmin some how?

Thanks in advance

View 9 Replies View Related

Ad Hoc Query Vs Stored Procedure Performance Vs DTS Execution Of Stored Procedure

Jan 23, 2008



Has anyone encountered cases in which a proc executed by DTS has the following behavior:
1) underperforms the same proc when executed in DTS as opposed to SQL Server Managemet Studio
2) underperforms an ad-hoc version of the same query (UPDATE) executed in SQL Server Managemet Studio

What could explain this?

Obviously,

All three scenarios are executed against the same database and hit the exact same tables and indices.

Query plans show that one step, a Clustered Index Seek, consumes most of the resources (57%) and for that the estimated rows = 1 and actual rows is 10 of 1000's time higher. (~ 23000).

The DTS execution effectively never finishes even after many hours (10+)
The Stored procedure execution will finish in 6 minutes (executed after the update ad-hoc query)
The Update ad-hoc query will finish in 2 minutes

View 1 Replies View Related

Optimized Way To Store Hashed Values?

Jul 12, 2007

What is the most optimized way to store Hashed values (obtained by Object.GetHashCode() method) in SQL Server?

Thanks.

View 4 Replies View Related

Optimized Qeries Without Using Sub-Correlated Queries

Aug 16, 2007

Hi, 
I am used to writing Sub-Correlated queries within my main queries. Although they work fine but i have read alot that they have performance hits. Also, as with time our data has increased, a simple SELECT statement with a few Sub-Queries tends to run slower which may be between 10-15 seconds. Following will be a simple example of what i mostly do:  
SELECT          DISTINCT C.CusID, C.Name, C.Age, 
                        (
                                    SELECT          SUM  (Price)
                                    FROM             CusotmerOrder
                                    WHERE           CusID_fk = CO.CusID_fk
                        )           Total_Order_Price, 
                        (
                                    SELECT          SUM (Concession)
                                    FROM             CusotmerOrder
                                    WHERE           CusID_fk = CO.CusID_fk
                        )           Total_Order_Concession,          
                        (
                                    SELECT          SUM  (Price) - SUM  (Concession)
                                    FROM             CusotmerOrder
                                    WHERE           CusID_fk = CO.CusID_fk                              
                        )           Total_Difference  
FROM             Customer C
INNER JOIN  CustomerOrder CO
ON                  C.CusID = CO.CusID_fk
                        ...... 
WHERE                       (conditions...)  
My question is what would be a better way to handle the above query?  How can i write a better yet simple query with optimized performance. I would also mention that in some of my asp.net applications, i use inline queries assigned to SqlCommand Object. The reason i mention it that since these queries are written in some class files, how would we still accomplish what i have mentioned above. Kindly could any Query Guru guide me writing better queries. I shall be obliged...
 

View 9 Replies View Related

Will This Query Be Optimized For A Partitioned View?

Jul 20, 2005

Hello :-)My question is: If I query a partitioned view, but don't know the valuesin the "where x in(<expression>)" clause, i.e.: select * from viewAwhere intVal in(select intVal from tbl1) . Compared to: select * fromviewA where intVal in(5,6).Of course "intVal" is partitioning column.Will this result in an optimized query that searches only the relevanttables?*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 1 Replies View Related

Optimized SQL Server Disk Configuration

Jan 18, 2008

I have a question concerning where to put certain database files for the followinig RAID configurations. The server has 2 RAID configs: 2 hds in a RAID 1 and 4 hds in a RAID 10. The server will host 4 database instances: A replicated db, a Reporting Services db (which technically constitutes 2 db instances) and an application db.
In order to get the best performance, should I put the OS, SQL binary and log files on the RAID 1 config with the data and tempdb on the RAID 10? If not, please explain the best solution. Thank you!

View 3 Replies View Related

User 'Unknown User' Could Not Execute Stored Procedure - Debugging Stored Procedure Using Visual Studio .net

Sep 13, 2007

Hi all,



I am trying to debug stored procedure using visual studio. I right click on connection and checked 'Allow SQL/CLR debugging' .. the store procedure is not local and is on sql server.



Whenever I tried to right click stored procedure and select step into store procedure> i get following error



"User 'Unknown user' could not execute stored procedure 'master.dbo.sp_enable_sql_debug' on SQL server XXXXX. Click Help for more information"



I am not sure what needs to be done on sql server side



We tried to search for sp_enable_sql_debug but I could not find this stored procedure under master.

Some web page I came accross says that "I must have an administratorial rights to debug" but I am not sure what does that mean?



Please advise..

Thank You

View 3 Replies View Related

Query Against Partitioned View Is Not Optimized Due To CONVERT_IMPLICIT

Nov 2, 2007

We have a situation where queries against a partitioned view ignore a suitable index and perform a table scan (against 200+MB of data), where the same query on the underlying table(s) results in a 4 page index seek. I can€™t find any mention of the situation, so I€™m trying a post here.


We€™re running SQL Server 2005 Enterprise edition sp2 on Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition sp1 on a two node cluster, and it also occurs on a stand-alone development box with Developer edition. We have four tables, named Options#0, Options#1, Options#2, and Options#3. All are almost identical (script generated by SSMS and edited down a bit):


SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Options#0](
[ControlID] [tinyint] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Options#0__ControlID] DEFAULT ((0)),
[ModelCode] [char](8) NOT NULL,
[EquipmentID] [int] NOT NULL,
[AdjustmentContextID] [int] NOT NULL,
[EquipmentCode] [char](2) NOT NULL,
[EquipmentTypeCode] [char](1) NOT NULL,
[Description] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[DisplayOrder] [smallint] NOT NULL,
[IsStandard] [bit] NOT NULL,
[Priority] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[Status] [bit] NOT NULL,
[Adjustment] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Options#0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ModelCode] ASC,
[EquipmentID] ASC,
[AdjustmentContextID] ASC,
[ControlID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Options#0] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Options#0__ControlID] CHECK (([ControlID]=(0)))


ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Options#0] CHECK CONSTRAINT [CK_Options#0__ControlID]


The only differences between the tables are in the names and in the value defaulted to and CHECKed, which matches the table name (to support the partitioned view, of course).


We receive and load data ever week and every two month, and use an unlikely algorithm to load and manage its availability by running an ATLER on the view (to maintain the access rights defined for the hosting environment). Scripted out via SSMS, the view looks like:


SET ANSI_NULLS ON
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[Options] AS select * from Options#1 union all select * from Options#3


The problem is that when we issue a query like


SELECT count(*)
from Options
where ControlID = 1
and ModelCode = '2004NIC9'


The resulting query (as checked via the query plan and SET STATISTICS IO on) will get €œpartitioned€?, running against the proper table, but it will ignore the query, perform a table scan, and churn through 200+MB of data. A Similar query run against the underlying table


SELECT count(*)
from Options#1
where ControlID = 1
and ModelCode = '2004NIC9'


(with or without the ControlID = 1 clause) will perform a Clustered Index Seek and read maybe 4 pages.


Analyzing the execution plan shows that the table query work like you€™d think, but for the query against the view we get a Clustered Index Scan, with predicate:


[DBName].[dbo].[Options#1].[ControlID]=(1) AND CONVERT_IMPLICIT(char(8),[ DBName].[dbo].[Options#1].[ModelCode],0)=€™2004NIC9€™


I get the same results when explicitly listing all columns in the view. The code page on the view and tables is the same (as determined by checking properties via SSMS).


Why is the table data column being implicitly converted to the data type that it already is? Why does this occur when working with the partitioned view but not with the actual table? Can this behavior be controlled or modified without losing the (incredibly useful) data loading management benefits of the partitioned view? I€™m guessing (and hoping) it€™s some subtle quirk or mis-setting, please set me on the right path!


Philip Kelley

View 7 Replies View Related

Is The Transaction Context Available Within A 'called' Stored Procedure For A Transaction That Was Started In Parent Stored Procedure?

Mar 31, 2008

I have  a stored procedure 'ChangeUser' in which there is a call to another stored procedure 'LogChange'. The transaction is started in 'ChangeUser'. and the last statement in the transaction is 'EXEC LogChange @p1, @p2'. My questions is if it would be correct to check in 'LogChange' the following about this transaction: 'IF @@trancount >0 BEGIN Rollback tran' END Else BEGIN Commit END.
 Any help on this would be appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Memory Optimized Tables And Indexes

Feb 18, 2015

I'm just beginning to experiment with memory optimised tables.

I have two sets of near identical tables - one set normal, the other set memory optimised with DURABILITY=SCHEMA_ONLY - and am running test queries against these. When I say that the two sets are "near identical", I mean that they are the same except for the primary keys: for the normal tables these are defined as PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED whereas for the memory-optimed ones they are defined as PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED HASH WITH (BUCKET_COUNT=nnnn) as per the requirements for such tables.

I then run a pair of test queries, again identical but one referencing the normal tables and the other referencing the memory optimised ones.

(The query uses an inner join on three tables with row counts of approx 3m rows, 100000 rows and 5000 rows.)

The query against the normal tables runs noticeably faster than that against the memory optimised ones. To try to find out why, I examined the execution plans. the plan for the memory optimised query suggests that I have a missing index: but of course I can't create this againsty a memory optimised table. Is this a bug or am I missing something? Why the performance between the two should be so different?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Remove Memory Optimized Filegroup

Apr 28, 2015

I read this: [URL] ....

Which says you must drop the database to remove the filegroup.

I deleted all the objects and then backed up the DB and restored it and the filegroup is still there.

I was skeptical but some of the comments made me think this might work.

Do I really have to restore from a pre-memory optimized state?

View 3 Replies View Related

Calling Stored Procedure Fromanother Stored Procedure

Oct 10, 2006

Hi,I am getting error when I try to call a stored procedure from another. I would appreciate if someone could give some example.My first Stored Procedure has the following input output parameters:ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.FixedCharges @InvoiceNo int,@InvoiceDate smalldatetime,@TotalOut decimal(8,2) outputAS .... I have tried using the following statement to call it from another stored procedure within the same SQLExpress database. It is giving me error near CALL.CALL FixedCharges (@InvoiceNo,@InvoiceDate,@TotalOut )Many thanks in advanceJames

View 16 Replies View Related

Use Resultset Returned From A Stored Procedure In Another Stored Procedure

Nov 15, 2006

I have a store procedure (e.g. sp_FetchOpenItems) in which I would like to call an existing stored procedure (e.g. sp_FetchAnalysts). The stored proc, sp_FetchAnalysts returns a resultset of all analysts in the system.
I would like to call sp_FetchAnalysts from within sp_FetchOpenItems and insert the resultset from sp_FetchAnalysts into a local temporary table. Is this possible?
 Thanks,
Kevin

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Stored Procedure Issue - Search Stored Procedure

May 18, 2007

This is the Stored Procedure below -> 
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GOSET ANSI_NULLS ON GO
/****** Object:  Stored Procedure dbo.BPI_SearchArchivedBatches    Script Date: 5/18/2007 11:28:41 AM ******/if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[BPI_SearchArchivedBatches]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsProcedure') = 1)drop procedure [dbo].[BPI_SearchArchivedBatches]GO
/****** Object:  Stored Procedure dbo.BPI_SearchArchivedBatches    Script Date: 4/3/2007 4:50:23 PM ******/
/****** Object:  Stored Procedure dbo.BPI_SearchArchivedBatches    Script Date: 4/2/2007 4:52:19 PM ******/
 
CREATE  PROCEDURE BPI_SearchArchivedBatches( @V_BatchStatus Varchar(30)= NULL, @V_BatchType VARCHAR(50) = NULL, @V_BatchID NUMERIC(9) = NULL, @V_UserID CHAR(8) = NULL, @V_FromDateTime DATETIME = '01/01/1900', @V_ToDateTime DATETIME = '01/01/3000', @SSS varchar(500) = null, @i_WildCardFlag INT)
AS
DECLARE @SQLString NVARCHAR(4000)DECLARE @ParmDefinition NVARCHAR (4000)
 
IF (@i_WildCardFlag=0)BEGIN
 SET @SQLString='SELECT       Batch.BatchID, Batch.Created_By, Batch.RequestSuccessfulRecord_Count, Batch.ResponseFailedRecord_Count,   Batch.RequestTotalRecord_Count, Batch.Request_Filename, Batch.Response_Filename, Batch.LastUpdated_By,   Batch.LastUpdated, Batch.Submitted_By, Batch.Submitted_On, Batch.CheckedOut_By, Batch.Checked_Out_Status,   Batch.Batch_Description, Batch.Status_Code, Batch.Created_On, Batch.Source, Batch.Archived_Status,  Batch.Archived_By, Batch.Archived_On, Batch.Processing_Mode, Batch.Batch_TemplateID, Batch.WindowID,Batch.WindowDetails,   BatchTemplate.Batch_Type, BatchTemplate.Batch_SubType  FROM           Batch  INNER JOIN   BatchTemplate ON Batch.Batch_TemplateID = BatchTemplate.Batch_TemplateID WHERE  ((@V_BatchID IS NULL) OR (Batch.BatchID = @V_BatchID )) AND  ((@V_UserID IS NULL) OR (Batch.Created_By = @V_UserID )) AND  ((Batch.Created_On >= @V_FromDateTime ) AND (Batch.Created_On <=  @V_ToDateTime )) AND  Batch.Archived_Status = 1 '
 if (@V_BatchStatus IS not null) begin  set @SQLString=@SQLString + ' AND   (Batch.Status_Code in ('+@V_BatchStatus+'))' end
 if (@V_BatchType IS not null) begin  set @SQLString=@SQLString + ' AND   (BatchTemplate.Batch_Type  in ('+@V_BatchType+'))' end END
ELSEBEGIN SET @SQLString='SELECT       Batch.BatchID, Batch.Created_By, Batch.RequestSuccessfulRecord_Count, Batch.ResponseFailedRecord_Count,   Batch.RequestTotalRecord_Count, Batch.Request_Filename, Batch.Response_Filename, Batch.LastUpdated_By,   Batch.LastUpdated, Batch.Submitted_By, Batch.Submitted_On, Batch.CheckedOut_By, Batch.Checked_Out_Status,   Batch.Batch_Description, Batch.Status_Code, Batch.Created_On, Batch.Source, Batch.Archived_Status,  Batch.Archived_By, Batch.Archived_On, Batch.Processing_Mode, Batch.Batch_TemplateID, Batch.WindowID,Batch.WindowDetails,   BatchTemplate.Batch_Type, BatchTemplate.Batch_SubType  FROM           Batch  INNER JOIN  BatchTemplate ON Batch.Batch_TemplateID = BatchTemplate.Batch_TemplateID WHERE  ((@V_BatchID IS NULL) OR (isnull (Batch.BatchID, '''') LIKE @SSS )) AND  ((@V_UserID IS NULL) OR (isnull (Batch.Created_By , '''') LIKE @V_UserID )) AND  ((Batch.Created_On >= @V_FromDateTime ) AND (Batch.Created_On <=  @V_ToDateTime )) AND  Batch.Archived_Status = 1 '
 if (@V_BatchStatus IS not null) begin  set @SQLString=@SQLString + ' AND   (Batch.Status_Code in ('+@V_BatchStatus+'))' end
 if (@V_BatchType IS not null) begin  set @SQLString=@SQLString + ' AND   (BatchTemplate.Batch_Type  in ('+@V_BatchType+'))' end
END
PRINT @SQLString
SET @ParmDefinition = N' @V_BatchStatus Varchar(30), @V_BatchType VARCHAR(50), @V_BatchID NUMERIC(9), @V_UserID CHAR(8), @V_FromDateTime DATETIME , @V_ToDateTime DATETIME, @SSS varchar(500)'
EXECUTE sp_executesql @SQLString, @ParmDefinition, @V_BatchStatus , @V_BatchType , @V_BatchID, @V_UserID , @V_FromDateTime , @V_ToDateTime , @SSS
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER OFF GOSET ANSI_NULLS ON GO
 
 
The above stored procedure is related to a search screen where in User is able to search from a variety of fields that include userID (corresponding column Batch.Created_By) and batchID (corresponding column Batch.BatchID). The column UserID is a varchar whereas batchID is a numeric.
REQUIREMENT:
The stored procedure should cater to a typical search where any of the fields can be entered. meanwhile it also should be able to do a partial search on BatchID and UserID.
 
Please help me regarding the same.
 
Thanks in advance.
 
Sandeep Kumar
 

View 2 Replies View Related

Sql Count Using Stored Procedure Withing Stored Procedure

Apr 29, 2008

I have a stored procedure that among other things needs to get a total of hours worked. These hours are totaled by another stored procedure already. I would like to call the totaling stored procedure once for each user which required a loop sort of thing
for each user name in a temporary table (already done)
total = result from execute totaling stored procedure
Can you help with this
Thanks

View 10 Replies View Related

Exec Twp Stored Procedure In A Main Stored Procedure

Apr 29, 2004

Hi there

i have a stored procedure like this:

CREATE PROCEDURE SP_Main

AS
SET NOCOUNT ON

BEGIN TRANSACTION

exec SP_Sub_One output

exec SP_Sub_Two output


IF @@ERROR = 0
BEGIN
-- Success. Commit the transaction.
Commit Tran
END
ELSE
Rollback Tran

return
GO


now the problem is, when i execute the stored procedure's inside the main stored procedure, and these sub sp's has an error on it, the main stored procedure doesnt rollback the transation.

now i can put the "begin transation" in the two sub stored procedure's. The problem is

what if the first "SP_Sub_One" executed successfully, and there was error in "SP_Sub_Two"

now the "SP_Sub_One" has been executed and i cant rollback it... the error occured in the
"SP_Sub_Two" stored procedure ... so it wont run ... so there will be error in the data

how can i make a mian "BEGIN TRANSACTION" , that even it include the execution of stored procedure in it.

Thanks in advance

Mahmoud Manasrah

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved