Successive Records With Self Join
Sep 22, 2014
We are using a presence checker to register when our employees show up at work, when they leave and whenever they change their working section.
The raw data has this format:
TABLE
-----
TIMESTAMP USERID SECTION INCIDENCE
------------------------------------------------------
2014-06-27 14:52:40.000 77675669 7 0
2014-06-27 15:08:33.000 77675669 6 8
2014-06-27 15:30:58.000 77675669 7 12
2014-06-27 18:52:00.000 77675669 11 15
2014-06-27 19:47:38.000 77675669 7 12
2014-06-27 23:30:18.000 77675669 7 0
In order to determine the exact time people had been working in the sections I have to match every record with the record of the successive timestamp I do:
SELECT TIMESTAMP as START, USERID, SECTION, INCIDENCE, MIN(TIME_END) as STOP
FROM (
SELECT *, TABLE2.TIMESTAMP as TIME_END
FROM TABLE
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE as TABLE2 on TABLE.USERID = TABLE2.USERID and
TABLE2.TIMESTAMP > Table.TIMESTAMP and
[Code] ....
How do I get the incidence of the successive timestamp in my query?
The key trick is that I first do a self join which increases the amount of records, including senseless matches from the first timestamp with the last one of that day. Afterwards I group by all columns of TABLE in order to get only the successive timestamp.
But once I include TABLE2.INCIDENCE in the GROUP BY clause, of course the query stops working correctly.
I can't use the TIMESTAMP isself as it is not singular (there are several terminals in the plant); and I prefer not to use Timestamp in combination with Userid, as the userid is actually not stored directly and has to be retrieved through a couple of joined tables. Any smarter way to include a second column once the successive timestamp has been determined.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 19, 2007
I am experiencing an issue with service broker timeouts. I have a c# app which sends successive message with the second message needing to be in the same conversation as the initial message. As part of a .net 2.0 transaction, I send a request to the following stored procedure:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[POST_AuditMessage]
@MessagePackage xml,
@dh uniqueidentifier out
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Begin a dialog and send the audit conversation.
BEGIN TRANSACTION
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @dh
FROM SERVICE AuditInfoDeliveryService
TO SERVICE N'AuditInfoRecipientService'
ON CONTRACT AuditInformationContract
WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF ;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @dh
MESSAGE TYPE AuditInformation
(@MessagePackage);
COMMIT
END
I then use the @dh uniqueidentifier returned from the first stored proc passed to the next stored proc:
[dbo].[POST_AuditCompletion]
@dh uniqueidentifier ,
@MessagePackage xml
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @dialog_handle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Begin a dialog and send the audit conversation.
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @dialog_handle
FROM SERVICE AuditInfoDeliveryService
TO SERVICE N'AuditInfoRecipientService'
ON CONTRACT AuditInformationContract
WITH RELATED_CONVERSATION = @dh , ENCRYPTION = OFF ;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @dialog_handle
MESSAGE TYPE AuditTimingInformation
(@MessagePackage);
COMMIT;
END
My understanding was that queues would accept messages on the same conversation without blocking. However, the only way to get the process to complete is to use an entirely new conversationID. I'm obviously misunderstanding what's going on. Anyone have an idea of what I am doing wrong?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2006
Hello
Im searching for a solution to set all matrix row or cell the same height.
it schoud looks like this example:
This is a simple matrix
test a
text b
text c
text d
text e
text f
text g
This is a matrix with all the same row-height.
test a
text b
.
text c
.
.
text d
text e
text f
text g
.
.
Thx you a lot
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2007
Hi ,
I've got two tables.. the first table carried a ProductID, and amongst other things a TradePrice
The other tbl carries a ProductID, a IndivPrice and a CustomerID
The second tbl lists prices for products for indiv Customers.
My Query needs to bring back ALL the products from the first tbl...
It also needs to show the TradePrice for that product.
I need to join my query to the second tbl...
And finally, if the second tbl has a price for that product AND the customerID is the same as one I pass into the query.. show that price also..
So here's my first query:
SELECT dbo.Products.ProductID, ProductName, ProductTradePrice, IndivPrice, dbo.Trade_PriceLists.CustomerID AS PLCustomerID FROM dbo.Products LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Trade_PriceLists ON dbo.Products.ProductID = dbo.Trade_PriceLists.ProductID WHERE (ProductType = 'Trade' OR ProductType = 'Both') AND (Replace(Lower(ProductBrand),' ','') = 'brandname') AND (CustomerID IS NULL OR CustomerID = 'teste' OR CustomerID = '') ORDER BY TradeOrder
I thought that would work, but what happens is that, if that particular customer has no indiv prices set.. then it only shows the ones that have no records at all in that second tbl..
So unless there is a record for a particular product in that second tbl and it doesn't have a CustomerID assigned to (which would never happen as that tbl is only every for indiv customer prices) then it doesn't show.
Examples:
First Tbl
ProductID Name TradePrice
1 Jumper £1.00
2 Jeans £3.00
3 Shoes £5.00
4 Hat £2.00
Second Tbl
ProductID CustomerID IndivPrice
1 teste £0.50
2 othercustomer £2.50
3 teste £4.50
What I want in the results is:
ProductID ProductName TradePrice IndivPrice CustomerID (PLCustomerID)
1 Jumper £1.00 £0.50 teste
2 Jeans £3.00
3 Shoes £5.00 £4.50 teste
4 Hat £2.00
See? - The 2nd product should not get an indiv price as although it's in that second tbl, the customerID assigned to it is different. The 4th product should not get an indiv price as it's not in that second tbl at all.
however, with my query above I'd only get Products 1and 3... and if I did a query on a customer with no indiv prices I'd only get product 4 as it's not in the indiv at all...
HELP!!!!!
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2006
I have some data that looks like this
Col1 Col2 SumCol
XXX,YYY, 5
XXX,ZZZ,6
ZZZ,XXX,7
YYY,XXX,2
I want to do a inner join on that data so I get this
XXX,YYY, 7
XXX,ZZZ,13
Right now I'm using a CTE set to do that, is there a better way??
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2015
I have 2 tables:
create table #InsuredLoc (
PolGK int,
InsuredLocGK varchar(20),
InsuredLocEffDt datetime,
InsuredLocType varchar(20),
InsuredLocStatus varchar(20),
InsuredLocAddress varchar(50),
PolEdrGk varchar(20),
[Code] ...
I will need to join the #InsuredLoc table to the #PolicyEndorsement table using PolGk and PolEdrGk and get the min(BkgDt) and min(PolEdrRowUpdateDt) for the distinct list of InsuredLocType, InsuredLocStatus, and InsuredLocAddress fields from the #InsuredLoc table above.
 I will also need the min(InsuredLocEffDt) and the max(InsuredLocUpdateDt) from the #InsuredLoc table for those records. So after the first run, i should get the following:
I tried to use CTE's with ranking, but some records are dropping off and I'm not sure why. Â
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2008
I am having problem with Inner joining of tables
my query is..
Select j.jobSubject,e.eOrganization ,jv.JobClick,j.jobID from dbo.tbl_Jobs jinner join dbo.tbl_Employer e on e.mId=j.jobCreatedByIDinner join dbo.tbl_JobView jv on jv.JobID=j.jobID
order by jv.JobClick desc This query returns 1 to many records
But I need the query should return 0 to many record . .yes I have already know inner join does not handle my problem so plz suggest me which type of join would solve my problem
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2004
If there is 13 million records in one table and 40 thousand records in another table then what is the fastest way of joining these two tables????
This was a question to me from somebody to which i cudn't answer back properly. Cud anybody tell the answer with properreasons behind the answer??????
Thanx.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2006
I have my SQL call:
SELECT CallLog.CallID, Journal.HEATSeqFROM CallLog INNER JOIN Journal ON CallLog.CallID = Journal.CallID
There are multiple enteries in the Journal table for every entry in the CallLog table, so I receive multiple records:
CallID HEATSeq00000164 983290904 00000164 983291548 00000164 983295209 00000231 984818271 00000231 985194317 00000231 985280248
I only want to return the LAST record in the Journal table, so the output will be:
CallID HEATSeq00000164 983295209 00000231 985280248
Can this be done directly in the SQL call?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2008
Hi All,
I need a bit of help with a join. I have 2 tables :
TradeSummary
has fields : SymbolID, CurrentPrice, TotalValue
Trades
has fields : SymbolID, TradeID, ExecutionTime, TradeValue
TradeSummary has one entry for each SymbolID, while Trades contains one or more entries per SymbolID
and what I want to retreive is :
For every item in TradeSummary get CurrentPrice, TotalValue from TradeSummary
and also get TradeValue from Trades for the record for max(ExecutionTime)
tables are joined on TradeSummary.SymbolID = Trades.SymbolID
Every attempt of mine so far returns multiple rows for each SymbolID - I want only one row per SymbolID
thanks in advance
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2014
[URL]
I had a problem before of not been able to find the rows with 0 values. I've now managed this although it's brought up duplicate rows due to the discounts been different on the same Mfr_part_number. I tried using the max function on the isnull (Exhibit_Discount.Discount, 0.00) AS Discount instead but to no success. i think i maybe something to do with PK keys not been used in the set-up of the database.
Use Sales_Builder
Go
SELECT DISTINCT
GBPriceList.[Mfr_Part_Num],
[Code]....
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
Is there a way to create one field from multiple records using sql.For exampleTable 1John 18Peter 18David 18Now I want an sql query that when executed will return a field thatlooks like thisQuery1John Peter DavidSo basically it will return one record with all the name in one field
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2006
Hi,
I have the folowing 3 (SS2005) tables:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblSubscription](
[SubscriptionID] [int] IDENTITY(1000000,1) NOT NULL,
[SubscriberID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Status] [int] NOT NULL,
[JournalID] [int] NOT NULL,
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblTransaction](
[TransactionID] [bigint] IDENTITY(100000000,1) NOT NULL,
[TransactionTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[SubscriptionID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblMailing](
[MialingID] [bigint] IDENTITY(1000000000,1) NOT NULL,
[SubscriptionID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MailTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MailDate] [datetime] NOT NULL
So for each subscription there can be 1 or more transactions and 0 or
more mailings, and the mailings are not necassarily related to the
transactions. What I am having difficulty doing is this:
I wish to select tblMailing.MailingID, tblMailing.MailDate,
tblMailing.SubscriptionID (or tblSubscription.SubscriptionID),
tblSubscription.SubscriberID, tblSubscription.Status,
tblTransaction.TransactionID, tblTransaction.Created, but I only wish
to retrieve rows from the transaction table where
tblTransaction.Created is the latest dated transaction for that
subscription.
I.E. (maybe this makes more sense..:) I wish to select all rows from
tblMailing along with each mailing's relevent subscription details,
including details of the LATEST TRANSACTION for each of those
subscriptions.
I am currently working along the lines of MAX(tblTransaction.Created)
and possibly GROUP BY in a subquery, but cannot quite figure out the
logic.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks, KoG
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2008
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me which of the following is the most efficient query if i have huge tables.
SELECT *FROM Tab1 Inner join Tab2 ON Tab1.Col1 = Tabl2.Col1 AND Tab1.Col1 = 5
OR
SELECT *FROM Tab1 Inner join Tab2 ON Tab1.Col1 = Tabl2.Col1WHERE Tab1.Col1 = 5
As long as i explored this, Sql Server Query Execution Plan shows the similar cost for both cases. Is there any difference?
If yes why?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sulaman Riaz
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2015
SELECThorse1.horse_name AS Child_Horse,
horse2.horse_name AS Sire_Horse,
event.event_name
FROMhorse AS horse1 INNER JOIN horse AS horse2 ON horse1.sire = horse2.horse_id,
entry,
event
WHEREhorse1.horse_id = entry.horse_id
ANDentry.event_id = event.event_id
[Code] ....
I need to list the names of the horses that has entered in the same event as its sire and above is the result that I've got.I'm meant to get only the first two lines of the result since Boxer is father of Flash and Star and they all entered the same event called Dressage. (below is the evidence and refer to the first three rows)
SELECTentry.event_id,
entry.horse_id,
horse.horse_name
FROMentry,
horse
WHEREhorse.horse_id = entry.horse_id
[Code] ....
with my code in the first box, what should I add in order to get the result that I want?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2007
Hi, all experts here,
Thank you very much for your kind attention.
I got a problem with the records returned by inner join query. It is weird as in table a I with records r1, and in table b with records r2 (r1>r2), but the returned record number r3 is greater than r1? That is so strange. As the reasonable records returned should be less than r1?(inner join on attribute a). What probably is the cause of the problem? I am looking forward to hearing from you and thank you very much.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2008
I have a sql statement that joins two tables and I get back a few thousand records when I run it in query tool in management studio.
But when I use SSIS merge join to join the two tables my output is 0 records.
I did sort the key column in both tables by setting 'sortkeyposition' property to 1 in advanced editor for output of both tables.
however the merge join returns nothing to my destination tables. Also I am doing a inner join. The task runs without error but returns nothing as well.. any ideas?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2007
I have 100k + records in table usr_table and I want to select all of them that do not have the same ID as the ID's indicated in table Usr_Type_Data
Select * From usr_table As t1 Join Company_Sales.dbo.Usr_Type_Data As t2 ON t2.user_id = t1.user_id Where CustomerTypeId <> 7
I get 0 returned.
If I change it to:
Select * From usr_table As t1 Join Company_Sales.dbo.Usr_Type_Data As t2 ON t2.user_id = t1.user_id Where CustomerTypeId = 7
I get all records from table Usr_Data_Type returned.
Do I need to specify a special Join type?
Or perhaps change the T-SQL around?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2015
How to return only non matching left join records. Currently I am doing a traffic management database to learn sql.
I am checking for all parishes with no associated drivers. Currently I only have 2 of such.
The regular left join
select parish.name, driver.fname from parish left join driver on driver.parish=parish.name
Returns the all the names of the parishes and the first name of the associated drive, followed by the matches, however the two parishes with no matches have null for the first name.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2008
Hi
I have 2 tables with more then million records in each and I have to perform full outer join.
The problem is that the join clause contains 2 different parameters (int and string) like this:
Select *
From a full outer join b
On a.cli = b.cli OR a.reference = b.reference
Because of the OR in the clause and the million records the query is infinite. If I change to one rule only then it works fine.
How can I join these 2 big tables with 2 rules?
Thanks
Itay
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2007
Hi,
I have a merge (SQL 2005 Standard -> Express) topolgoy which is having problems
The main problem is that the join filters don't seem to work for one area and I am hoping someone can help me with some troubleshooting advice
There are 140+ tables in the topology but the ones causing particular pain are a parent child relationship where the child is actually a bridge/linking table to another table.
Therefore although it is a parent child in the replication filters it is the reverse. i.e. the child has the paramterised filter on it and the parent is one level down joined by it's id. There are other tables joined to this parent table but it stays at three levels deep. The @join_unique_key therefore is set to 0 as is the partition options for the parent /child relationship.
However, when we synchronise we have a problem. The rows get inserted in to the database in RI order but only the child records are replicated down to the subscriber.
The child table with the parameterised filter has 13 articles joined to it in total and one of the other branches of join filters go down as deep as four levels. Most though do not.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to why this might be happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, James
P.S. I should add this problem only occurs when the edits are made at the publisher. If new records are added at the subscriber everything is fine.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
Hi folks. Thanks for the opportunity to get a bit of help here.
I've got two tables. Say, table "foo" and table "bar".
I LEFT JOIN them on a key, say, foo.id and bar.fooid.
For some reason, when I do this join, I get only records from "foo" which have a mate in "bar".
What I really need is all records from "foo", but the columns from bar when there is a match. I don't want to exclude records from "foo" just because they don't have a match from "bar".
Am I just misusing LEFT JOIN?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2004
I have 2 tables GLSUMMARY and GLBUDGET, they are identical.
I am joining them together with a left outer join from the SUMMARY to the BUDGET but when I dont have a matching BUDGET record on the join the SUMMARY gets dropped as well :eek:
Any help will be appreciated!
Here is the query!
SELECT s.conu as CoNu, s.deptnu as DeptNu,
s.fundnu as FundNu, s.acctnu as AcctNu,
Sum(isNull(Amt01,0)) as Amt01,
Sum(isNull(Amt02,0)) as Amt02,
Sum(isNull(Amt03,0)) as Amt03,
Sum(isNull(Amt04,0)) as Amt04,
Sum(isNull(Amt05,0)) as Amt05,
Sum(isNull(Amt06,0)) as Amt06,
Sum(isNull(Amt07,0)) as Amt07,
Sum(isNull(Amt08,0)) as Amt08,
Sum(isNull(Amt09,0)) as Amt09,
Sum(isNull(Amt10,0)) as Amt10,
Sum(isNull(Amt11,0)) as Amt11,
Sum(isNull(Amt12,0)) as Amt12,
Sum(isNull(Amt13,0)) as Amt13,
Sum(isNull(Bud01,0)) as Bud01,
Sum(isNull(Bud02,0)) as Bud02,
Sum(isNull(Bud03,0)) as Bud03,
Sum(isNull(Bud04,0)) as Bud04,
Sum(isNull(Bud05,0)) as Bud05,
Sum(isNull(Bud06,0)) as Bud06,
Sum(isNull(Bud07,0)) as Bud07,
Sum(isNull(Bud08,0)) as Bud08,
Sum(isNull(Bud09,0)) as Bud09,
Sum(isNull(Bud10,0)) as Bud10,
Sum(isNull(Bud11,0)) as Bud11,
Sum(isNull(Bud12,0)) as Bud12,
Sum(isNull(Bud13,0)) as Bud13
FROM shelbydb.shelby.GLSummary S
left OUTER JOIN shelbydb.shelby.GLBudget B
on
(s.begindate = b.begindate)
and (s.acctnu = b.acctnu)
and (s.conu = b.conu)
and (s.deptnu = b.deptnu)
and (s.fundNu = b.fundNu)
WHERE
(s.begindate = '1/1/2004'
and b.begindate = '1/1/2004')
group by
S.conu, S.deptnu, S.fundnu, S.acctnu,
b.conu, b.deptnu, b.fundnu, b.acctnu
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2014
i have Two tables... with both the table having LastUpdated Column. And, in my Select Query i m using both the table with inner join.And i want to show the LastUpdated column which has the maxiumum date value. i.e. ( latest Updated Column value).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2004
Hello All,
We all were new at one point.... any help is appreciated.
Objective:
Combining two 49,000 row tables and remove records where there is only 1 column difference. (keeping the specified column value removing the one with a blank.)
Reason:
I have 2 people going through a list, coding a specific column with a single letter value. They both have different progress on each sheet. Hence I am trying to UNION them and have a result of their combined efforts without duplicates.
My progress/where I'm stuck:
Here is my first query/union:
SELECT * FROM [Eds table]
UNION SELECT * FROM [Vickis table];
As shown above, I have unioned these 2 tables and my results removed th obvious whole record duplicates, but since 1 column is different on these, a union without criteria considers them unique.....
an example of duplicates that I must remove are as follows:
142301 - Product 5000 - 150# - S (Keep)
142031 - Product 5000 - 150# - "" <--- Blank (Remove)
I am trying to run another query on my first query results so I don't mess my first query up. Here it is:
SELECT DISTINCT [Prod #], [Prod Name], [Prod Description], [Product Type]
FROM [Combined Tables]
WHERE [Product Type]<>" ";
Please Help! Thank you in advance.
--------------------
5 minutes away from pulling my last one!
BaldNAskewed
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2014
I have table A (EmployeeNumber, Grouping, Stages)
and
Table B (Grouping, Stages)
Table A could look like the following where the multiple employees could have multiple types and multiple stages.
EmployeeNumber, Type, Stages
100, 1, Stage1
100, 1, Stage2
100, 2, Stage1
100, 2, Stage2
200, 1, Stage1
200, 2, Stage2
Table B is a list of requirements that each employee must have. So every employee must have a type 1 and 2 and the associated stages listed below.
Type, Stage
1, Stage1
1, Stage2
2, Stage1
2, Stage2
2, Stage3
2, Stage4
So I know that each employee should have 2 Type 1's and 4 Type 2's. I hope that makes sense, I'm trying to change my data because ours is very proprietary.
I need to identify employees who do not have all their stages and list the stages they are missing. The final report should only have employees and the associated missing types and stages.
I do a count by employee to see how many types they have to identify the ones that don't have all the types and stages.
My count would look something like this:
EmployeeNumber Type Total
100, 1, 2
100, 2, 2
200, 1, 1
200 1, 2
So I know that employee 100 should have 2 more Type 2's and employee 200 should have 1 more Type 1 and 2 more Type 2's based on the required list.
The problem I'm having is taking that required list and joining to my list of employees with missing data and pulling from it the types and stages that are missing by employee. I thought I could get a list of the employees that are missing information and right join it to the required list where the missing records would be nulls. But, that doesn't work because some employees do have the required information and so I'm not getting any nulls returned.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
Hello
Can any one tell me the difference between Cross Join, inner join and outer join in laymans language
by just taking examples of two tables such as Customers and Customer Addresses
Thank You
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2014
I have table 'stores' that has 3 columns (storeid, article, doc), I have a second table 'allstores' that has 3 columns(storeid(always 'ALL'), article, doc). The stores table's storeid column will have a stores id, then will have multiple articles, and docs. The 'allstores' table will have 'all' in the store for every article and doc combination. This table is like the master lookup table for all possible article and doc combinations. The 'stores' table will have the actual article and doc per storeid.
What I am wanting to pull is all article, doc combinations that exist in the 'allstores' table, but do not exist in the 'stores' table, per storeid. So if the article/doc combination exists in the 'allstores' table and in the 'stores' table for storeid of 50 does not use that combination, but store 51 does, I want the output of storeid 50, and what combination does not exist for that storeid. I will try this example:
'allstores' 'Stores'
storeid doc article storeid doc article
ALL 0010 001 101 0010 001
ALL 0010 002 101 0010 002
ALL 0011 001 102 0011 002
ALL 0011 002
So I want the query to pull the one from 'allstores' that does not exist in 'stores' which in this case would the 3rd record "ALL 0011 001".
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2014
writing the query for the following, I need to collapse the continuity. If the termdate for an ID is one day less than the effdate of the next id (for the same ID) i need to collapse the records. See below example .....how should i write the query which will give me the desired output. i.e., get min(effdate) and max(termdate) if termdate is one day less than the effdate of next record.
ID effdate termdate
556868 1999-01-01 1999-06-30
556868 1999-07-01 1999-10-31
556869 2002-10-01 2004-01-31
556872 1999-02-01 2000-08-31
556872 2000-11-01 2004-01-31
556872 2004-02-01 2004-02-29
output should be ......
ID effdate termdate
556868 1999-01-01 1999-10-31
556869 2002-10-01 2004-01-31
556872 1999-02-01 2000-08-31
556872 2000-11-01 2004-02-29
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2015
I have two xml source and i need only left restricted data.
how can i perform left restricted join?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2015
I was writing a query using both left outer join and inner join. And the query was ....
SELECT
       S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
       Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
      (Production.Products AS P
        INNER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
[code]....
However ,the result that i got was correct.But when i did the same query using the left outer join in both the cases
i.e..
SELECT
       S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
       Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
(Production.Products AS P
LEFT OUTER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
ON C.categoryid = P.categoryid)
ON
S.supplierid = P.supplierid
WHERE
S.country = N'Japan';
The result i got was same,i.e
supplier   country   productid   productname   unitprice   categorynameSupplier QOVFD   Japan   9   Product AOZBW   97.00   Meat/PoultrySupplier QOVFD   Japan  10   Product YHXGE   31.00   SeafoodSupplier QOVFD   Japan  74   Product BKAZJ   10.00   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   13   Product POXFU   6.00   SeafoodSupplier QWUSF   Japan   14   Product PWCJB   23.25   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   15   Product KSZOI   15.50   CondimentsSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULLSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULL
and this time also i got the same result.My question is that is there any specific reason to use inner join when join the third table and not the left outer join.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2014
I have two select statements, in between select statement taking UNION ALL . I need to avoid the error
Warning: The join order has been enforced because a local join hint is used.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Scenario:
OLEDB source 1
SELECT ...
,[MANUAL DCD ID] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM [dbo].[XLSDCI] ORDER BY [MANUAL DCD ID] ASC
OLEDB source 2
SELECT ...
,[Bo Tkt Num] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM ....[dbo].[FFFenics] ORDER BY [Bo Tkt Num] ASC
These two tasks are followed immediately by a MERGE JOIN
All columns in source1 are ticked, all column in source2 are ticked, join key is shown above.
join type is left outer join (source 1 -> source 2)
result of source1 (..dcd column)
...
4-400-8000119
4-400-8000120
4-400-8000121
4-400-8000122 <--row not joining
4-400-8000123
4-400-8000124
...
result of source2 (..tkt num column)
...
4-400-1000118
4-400-1000119
4-400-1000120
4-400-1000121
4-400-1000122 <--row not joining
4-400-1000123
4-400-1000124
4-400-1000125
...
All other rows are joining as expected.
Why is it failing for this one row?
View 1 Replies
View Related