Hi,
I am traing to execute this select
SELECT count(*) CM_CERT_VARIANCE_DET_APINV_RELATE
using SQL SERVER ODBC, however, I received this message:
"Identifer too long"
Is there any table length name limitation?
I think, there is, because works well on SQL environment.
I mean, should this table have less then 18 characters? Can I work around this limitation?
cheers,
Alessandro
Hi SQL Server Team,
In order to add a data source by using ODBC Administrator, programmatically i am using SQLConfigDataSource. Thus calling SQLConfigDataSource with the fOption set to either ODBC_ADD_DSN for creating a new DSN.
Following is the stattement specified in the source code. where type_of_driver = "Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)"; and parameters contains the data source source credentials information such as DSN, UID, PSW, FIL, Description, DataDirectory,DEFAULTDIR and DBQ all separated by " ".
rc = SQLConfigDataSource(NULL, ODBC_ADD_DSN, type_of_driver, parameters);
after execution of below mentioned command an error is encountered i.e -1 is returned if the DataDirectory path exceeds certain nested directories link. for eg. the file path specified below.
C:My DocumentsClients CurrentAHW Netcare BenefitsDeliverables1-5 Results Chain - system LevelAlberta NetcareBenefits Logic System Level V01.rcm
Creating a datasource with the file name i.e Benefits Logic System Level V01 every time.
rc = :: SQLConnect(hDbc, (unsigned char *)szSource, SQL_NTS, (unsigned char *)szUserName, SQL_NTS, (unsigned char *)szPassword, SQL_NTS);
Also following error message was encountered during execution of SQLConnect command.
/*szErrorMsg = 0x0012e834 "[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver]General error Not enough information to connect to this DSN with SQLConnect. Use SQLDriverConnect."*/
Thus followed the instruction smentioned in the error message an dtried using SQL DriverConnect() in the following manner.
rc = :: SQLDriverConnect(hDbc, NULL,(SQLCHAR *)"DSN=RCM",SQL_NTS,outstr, sizeof(outstr),
&outstrlen,SQL_DRIVER_NOPROMPT);
Still an error is encountered but this time it returns a RETCODE of 100 whrease earlier it had returned -1.
Inform the procedure to be followed using SQLConnect when DataDirectory path is too long.
An early reply will be appreciated.
Cheers & Regards,
Saresh
HiThere is an application that runs on sql server.The application selects/updates some few tables frequentlyOnce there is even a select on this table .It blocks other userssometimes for very long.Is there anything that can be done to reduce this?The table has 18000 rows and does not seem to have an indexI thought indexing might help but 18000 rows without an index isno reason for 30 minutes of lock time.I will appreciate your help as usualVince
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have written a stored procedure to list out all tables in whichrows or the table itself is locked. The only information I amnot able to get is the time when the lock occurred. The way Iwant is that if I run the procedure it should show all lockson a table which are at least 5 or x seconds old. This way I canavoid momentary locks on a table which go away after few seconds.Which table and column of master database has that information?Thanks.--email id is bogus
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello Folks,
I'm looking for the group's collective wisdom on the following issue, I'm sure many have been confronted with it.
I'm designing a db for a website that will utilize SQL Server 7. I have few tables that I think will grow very large row wise and that will be written to an read from frequently. I sense that I might be able to get better perfomance out of the system if I split many of these large tables up (row wise) into many smaller tables.
For example, The website that I'm working on has a "MailingAddresses" db table that contains the mailing addresses for the sites users (subscribers and other misc users - 1 record per user, anticipating 70,000+ users). Each user can update their record, and there will be frequent queries to the tables to get addresses for both internal admin use and for display on public webpages.
The website has five distinct sections that are in some sense like five distinct websites. Each user belongs to only one of these sections and they won't migrate between sections. Therefore I'm considering breaking up the one large "MailingAddresses" tables into five smaller tables, one for each section, i.e., "MAddressesSectionA", ..., "MAddressesSectionE".
These tables will have the same fields and constraints. Also of course there would be the same number of reads and writes in total with the five smaller tables as compared to that for the one big table. Also the combined size of the info in the five smaller tables would be the same as that for the one large table.
Though it's going to more of a pain to manage five tables versus one, I have a hunch it might be easier for the dbms to handle reads and writes with five smaller tables than with one large table...
...Of course this is true when queries are mainly respective to users from just one or two of the sections (as might be the case) - the big table then has the overhead of the address records for users in the other sections. BUT is there any benefit with the five smaller tables route when they are all frequently accessed??? Sure each select query has fewer records to go through, but with all five tables in play the dbms has to deal on average with the same amount of info as in the one big table.
What do you folks think, to divide or not to divide the big table(s) up row wise into smaller tables?
I guess the issue is summed up in this question: In general, can a dbms better handle in memory, and more quickly write to and query access - one BIG table with a+b+...+n records, or N smaller tables with a, b,...,n records respectively?
Thanks for the collective wisdom, - Jerry
I have a long query which I have set off and would like to stop, andrename one of the tables used.My query is due to my lack of understanding of the underlyingstructure of MSSQL-Server...So say and update updates TABLE_A and I stop it, whilst thistransaction is rolling back I attempt to rename TABLE_A to TABLE_A_OLDand rename a different table to become TABLE_A. I am assuming thatthe rollback actions will use the object reference of TABLE_A_OLD andcontinue to rollback the effects on the correct table and not corrupt'new' TABLE_A... or will it not allow me to rename TABLE_A until therollback is complete?Thanks for any help!Steve
View 1 Replies View Related
Hi everyone,
I've got an excel file that I want to import into a database table.
The longest text in a cell is 385 characters.
I've made the fields in the table nvarchar(1024).
I created a data flow task for the import.
When I run this task, I get the following error:
[Excel Source [1]] Error: There was an error with output column "Line Text" (52) on output "Excel Source Output" (9). The column status returned was: "Text was truncated or one or more characters had no match in the target code page.".
[Excel Source [1]] Error: The "output column "Line Text" (52)" failed because truncation occurred, and the truncation row disposition on "output column "Line Text" (52)" specifies failure on truncation. A truncation error occurred on the specified object of the specified component.
is it possible that there is a restriction on the length of the text ?
regards,
Filip
Dear Participants,
We are using merge replication for multi locational database but we are facing one problem in only one table which is not included in replication-
Table name is xxxxmast has only 39 row static information, but it used by every users for all task as select only information from this table like-
Select fin_year into mem_variable from xxxxmast where co_name = :global_variable
go
Code validation from here only.
Right validation from here only.
Report retrival validation from here only.
It means its usage for select from every user frequentely for so many times but we have to only fetch information from this table.
It was working prior fine but rightnow get problem for while-
Today Dated 08-March this table not accessible fro three times in eight hours-
1st time for 10 minute.
2nd time 10 minutes
3rd time 52 minutes.
Users want to login but at the login time years and other validation from this table, so users awaited for above mention time.
We had have do following by yesterday-
Drop table xxxxmast.
Create table xxxxmast.
Insert required data.
This is realy trouble for our application.
Any help realy great for us.
Thanks
R.Mall
We have a web-based third-party application that has both background processes and user activity requests running in the same database (SQL Server 2005 SP2). The problem is that a background process will start a long-running transaction and hold an exclusive lock on a few rows in a given table (a small table, <100 rows). The web clients need to scan this same table, but when their "select *" statements get to those locked row(s), the web client queries stall waiting for that exclusive lock to be released. This effectively brings the entire web front end to a halt because all clients must hit this table for each user action. I realize that this is the classic lock condition that multiversioning databases like Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server Compact Edition, and other databases do not suffer because they don't use shared read locks like SQL Server. But since we're on SQL Server for this app, what is the way to get around this problem? Modifying the clients to use WITH (NOLOCK) is not an option... there will be major consistency issues unless the clients run in Read Committed or higher. Any ideas? We could tweak this app if needed. Does SQL Server 2008 introduce multiversioning or at least some mechanism to get around this problem? I did not see it mentioned on the Microsoft site, but maybe I missed it. Thanks in advance.
Austin
Hi,
The scenario is the data comes from various sources and its staged into staging database. From this staging database it goes into data warehouse database. Everyday this staging database is truncated and repopulated from various sources.
I've a dimension table called DimCustomers which consists of around 300,000 rows and has lots of different types of SCD columns. It takes around 4-5 hours to load data from staging to this dimension table. Currently I'm using a For Loop container which uses a store proc to extract 15000 rows each time and populate my dimension tables. First couple of loops it goes off quickly but as and when the number reaches half of the count it slows down and hence it takes around 4-5 hours to load data.
What would be the best approach to populate this kind of dimension table.
Thanks
i need to full-text index a table so that i can easily search the text fields of that table.. the table has about 21,000 rows, and i was wondering how long it might take to full-text index it?
thanks
We have a proc that adds some fields to a few tables of ours and normally there are no issues. For one of our client databases this process is taking anywhere from 5-10 minutes to add the fields. This causes an issue where the app will timeout waiting. After plugging around and looking at the proc and trying different items i found it to only be for this one database and ONLY when there is data in the table. If i truncate the table and run the same procedure everything is fine. Tables all have same index on 4 columns and the columns being added are not indexed because of the stupid hoops we have to jump thru to pre-pivot data for our reporting package.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have several reports that are looking for a code within a certain set of codes or ranges. The specific list of codes to be including is determined by the end user. Currently my "IN" statement can be a hundred lines, listing several ranges, lists of specific codes, etc. I am constantly getting asked what codes does it include, is this code included, etc. Sometimes they'll give me a printed 10 page list of codes and want me to compare to what I have included in the report. Not ideal in the slightest.
What I'd like to do is have a table or a file of some kind somewhere where the end user can view the codes contained, add new ones, and delete ones they no longer want. Then I'd like to be able to just reference that file in my IN statement. Leaving the responsibility of listing the correct codes on them.
is it possible to link a table with odbc into sql server?
it would be nice to link an MS Access table into sql server where i could use stored procedures to access the MS Access table.
I have created a System DSN using the SQL Server ODBC driver and configured it to point to my server and database.
When I access the newly created DSN, it should show the tables listing. However, I get the following screen:
See it here
Why am I getting this instead of the tables listing and how do I fix it?
Thank you!
Hi all,
I'm trying to copy a table from an odbc db to an sqlserver2005 db. SSIS will not do this for me and says I must write a script. I'm not experienced enough in sqlserver to do this and was unable to find a example of this by searching the web. Does anyone know of any websites with an explanation of how to do this?
thanks for any help.
I have access97 front end , with linked tables to sql server 2005. when i change a table ID column (type int) to primary key so it is updatable, then try open the table i get odbc error with no msg, if i alter table again to remove primary key option table opens fine but is not updateable. any ideas would be a great help
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi.I have the problem that some records in a ms sqlserver table is unableto update from Access.I get the error message odbc-time out error in linked table......I tried to copy this table to another database, where none but me wasaktive.And then it worked quit ok when I try to save the record.I am thinking about if there is some trigger och restraint that Idon't know about, but I don't know how to se all of this in thedatabase.I have changed the odbc-timeout settings in Access but that doesn'tseed to make any differenceSo what's the problem?Does anyone have an idea?/regards BigOlle
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using SSIS 2014 with the below .net framework version and installed in Windows server 2012 R2 . I have installed my client's odbc drivers (both 32 bit and 64 bit) in my production server and created ODBC system DSNs for 32 bit and 64 bit.
When i open SSIS 2014 and tried to create the odbc connection but i can able to see only the 32 bit system DSN connection ,i can't able to see my 64 bit odbc system dsn connection.
Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 Shell (Integrated)
Version 11.0.50727.1 RTMREL
Microsoft .NET Framework
Version 4.5.51650
SQL Server Integration Services
Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services Designer
Version 12.0.1524.0
And i installed my client odbc drivers(32,64 bit) and created ODBC system DSNs in my local system and when i open ssis 2014 and i can able to see both the ODBC system DSNS(32,64) connections from SSIS ODBC connection.
I am using below version of .net framework in my local system which was installed in windows 7 and i have SSIS 2012 also installed in my system and i can able to see both ODBC connections using 2012 as well in my local system.
Microsoft Visual Studio 2012 Shell (Integrated)
Version 11.0.50727.1 RTMREL
Microsoft .NET Framework
Version 4.5.50938
SQL Server Integration Services
Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services Designer
Version 12.0.1524.0
why i can not see the ODBC 64 bit system DSN connection from SSIS in my production server ?
Hi,
I am using VB.NET 2005 and set up an ODBC connection via ODBC.ODBCConnection to a MDB database. Therefor, I use the "Microsoft Access ODBC Driver (*.mdb)".
When I set up a ODBCCommand like "ALTER DATABASE..." or "CREATE TABLE..." and issue it with the com.ExecuteNonQuery() command, I get an error from ODBC driver, that a SQL statement has to begin with SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE.
How can I use DDL statements via ODBC?
I would appreciate if you could help me to use ODBC for that - no OLE, no ADO.
Thanks for help!
Regards,
Stefan D.
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out
How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out
How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
I apologize if this is not the correct forum for this posting. Looking at the descriptions, it appeared to be the best choice.
I am running Windows XP Pro SP2. I have installed the SQL Native Client for
XP. However, when I try to add a new data source through ODBC Connection
Manager, SQL Native Client is not listed as an option. I have followed this procedure on three other systems with no problems. What would be causing the
SQL Native Client to not show up in the list of available ODBC data sources?
I have converted a access database to sql server 2000 for some reason i keep getting this error base table not found.
I know the sql database is there and i also know the table is there. I'm not sure why i keep getting this error..
thanks
FYI: I'm using SQL2005 on a windows 2003 server.
So, I've written an Instead of Trigger to update a foreign key field based on information in another field of the same record.
To add some error handling to the process I updated the Trigger to insert any records that don't have legitimate foreign keys into a second table.
This process works great when I test it by just adding a record using the table view in the SQL Management Studio or through a query run in the query browser.
However, when a record is added via an ODBC connection I get foreign key constraint errors and records are not added to the second table. If the foreign key is legit the record is added and the part of trigger that updates that keyed field executes just fine.
Is anyone aware of this issue? Is there a way around it?
I found the following MSKB article but I'm not sure if it applies to my situation:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304096
Here's my current code, if that track the problem in anyway:
Code:
ALTER TRIGGER UpdateTicketID
ON Email
Instead of INSERT
AS
IF ((Select charindex('{', [subject]) FROM Inserted) = 0)
BEGIN
INSERT INTO
BadEmail ([Subject], Sender, Body, EntryID, LastModificationTime, AttachmentLInk, SendTo, Cc, ContactID)
Select
[Subject], Sender, Body, EntryID, LastModificationTime, AttachmentLink, SendTo, Cc, ContactID
From
Inserted
END
ELSE IF ((Select substring([subject], charindex('{', [subject])+1, (charindex('}', [subject]) - charindex('{', [subject]))-1) From Inserted) NOT In (Select TicketID From Ticket))
BEGIN
INSERT INTO
BadEmail ([Subject], Sender, Body, EntryID, LastModificationTime, AttachmentLInk, SendTo, Cc, ContactID)
Select
[Subject], Sender, Body, EntryID, LastModificationTime, AttachmentLink, SendTo, Cc, ContactID
From
Inserted
END
ELSE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO
Email ([Subject], Sender, Body, ticketID, EntryID, LastModificationTime, AttachmentLink, SendTo, Cc, ContactID)
Select
[Subject]
, Sender
, Body
, substring([subject], charindex('{', [subject])+1, (charindex('}', [subject]) - charindex('{', [subject]))-1)
, EntryID
, LastModificationTime
, AttachmentLink
, SendTo
, Cc
, ContactID
From
Inserted
END
GO
Thank very much for any help.
-Will
I would like to INSERT an array of integer into a table in MSSQL Server, then count the number of rows in the table with c++ using ODBC. Here you find my code to do this task:
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include<tchar.h>
#include <sql.h>
#include <sqlext.h>
#include<sqltypes.h>
[Code] ....
In my code, I would like to Insert the array and then count the number of rows:
SQLTCHAR Statement[] = _T("INSERT INTO information1(Wert1,Wert2) VALUES(?,?) select count(*) as a from information1 ") ;
Problem : My expectation is, that first 9 rows are inserted into table then comes 9 as result to user (if the table is empty) but this code returns me 1 if first the table is empty. If the table is not empty, it returns 1+number of existing rows in the table. If I take a look inside the table, the 9 rows are successfully inserted in it. Only the number of rows in the table is wrong.
Hint : If I monitor the database using SQL Profiler. It looks like this:
Why this statement doesn't work correctly?
Hi all,I am having trouble getting linked Oracle 9 server in MS SQL Server2005 Express to work properly. My machine is running Windows XP.The Microsoft and Oracle OLE DB Providers have problems dealing withOracle's Numeric Data Type, so I decided to use Microsoft's OLE DB forODBC Provider and an Oracle ODBC source. When using the Microsoft ODBCfor Oracle Driver in my ODBC source I have inconsistent behavior.Sometimes my queries are processed properly, then other times I get thefollowing errorOLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "ODBCBEAST" returnedmessage "[Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttrfailed".OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "ODBCBEAST" returnedmessage "[Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's SQLSetConnectAttrfailed".OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "ODBCBEAST" returnedmessage "[Microsoft][ODBC driver for Oracle][Oracle]".Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Line 1Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "MSDASQL"for linked server "ODBCBEAST".I have no idea why sometimes I can connect to the linked server with noproblems andwhy other times it performs like this. I'm not changing anything aboutthe system I can think of. When I use an Oracle client (PL/SQL) I haveabsolutely no problems connecting. TNSPING returns that the connectionis good.This is unacceptable so I decided to try my luck with the Oracle 10gODBC driver. However when I use this and perform an openquery selectagainst the linked server I get back only 11 rows, when I know that thedatabase has over 100 rows (in fact when using the Microsoft ODBCdriver and it works that's what I get). I figured maybe the buffersetting needed to be raised in the ODBC configuration so I took it from64000 to 600000 (a magnitude of 10) but I still get back only 11 rows.I'm at my wit's end.Any suggestions on resolving one or the other problem would be muchappreciated.Thanks much
View 2 Replies View RelatedI created very simple table with 3 columns and one is varchar(max) datatype
When i insert records thru VC++ ADO code i am getting this error
Exception Description Multiple-step OLE DB operation generated errors. Check e
ach OLE DB status value, if available. No work was done. and Error Number:: -2147217887
ODBC Driver: SQL Native Client
SQL server 2005
Table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[RAVI_TEMP](
[ID] [int] NULL,
[Name] [varchar](max) NULL,
[CITY] [varchar](50) NULL
)
VC++ code
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <string>
#include <strstream>
#include <iomanip>
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
try
{
HRESULT hr = CoInitialize(NULL);
_RecordsetPtr pExtRst = NULL;
_bstr_t bstrtDSN, bstrtSQL;
bstrtDSN = L"DSN=espinfo;UID=opsuser;PWD=opsuser;";
bstrtSQL = L"SELECT * FROM RAVI_TEMP";
_variant_t vartValueID,vartValueNAME,vartValueCITY;
_bstr_t bstrtValueID,bstrtValueNAME,bstrtValueCITY;
pExtRst.CreateInstance(__uuidof(Recordset));
hr = pExtRst->Open(bstrtSQL, bstrtDSN, adOpenDynamic, adLockOptimistic, adCmdText);
hr = pExtRst->AddNew();
bstrtValueID = L"1";
vartValueID = bstrtValueID.copy();
bstrtValueNAME = L"RAVIBABUBANDARU";
vartValueNAME = bstrtValueNAME.copy();
bstrtValueCITY = L"Santa Clara";
vartValueCITY = bstrtValueCITY.copy();
pExtRst->GetFields()->GetItem(L"ID")->Value = vartValueID;
pExtRst->GetFields()->GetItem(L"NAME")->Value = vartValueNAME;
pExtRst->GetFields()->GetItem(L"CITY")->Value = vartValueCITY;
pExtRst->Update();
pExtRst->Close();
}
catch(_com_error e)
{
printf("Exception Description %s and Error Number:: %d",(LPTSTR)e.Description(),e.Error());
return e.Error();
}
return 0;
CoUninitialize();
}
if i use regular SQL ODBC driver, no error but its truncating the data
Adv Thanks for your help
Hi,
Please help share with me if you know the version compatibility matrix of Ms SQL Server, ODBC driver (sqlsrv32.dll), Driver Manager (odbc32.dll) and ODBC API spec. For instance, how can I know Ms SQL Server 2000 can work with which version of sqlsrv32.dll, a particular version of sqlsrv32.dll can work with which version of odbc32.dll and a certain version of sqlsrv32.dll/odbc32.dll conforms to which version of ODBC API spec (e.g. 3.5).
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
vtluu.
When trying to link to an SQL table in Access 2003, the software appears to be malfunctioning.
The sequence of events is File - Get External Data - Link Tables - Files of Type: ODBC Databases().
The Problem: On two of my computers, the select data source window does not pop up, preventing me from linking to any ODBC data source.
Observations: This function has worked normally in the recent past and works on other computers running Access 2003. One difference between the computers working and non-working computers is Norton Antivirus 2006 (recent upgrade).
Has anyone experienced anything like this? What's going on?
Hi Everyone,
I have set up a link from ACCESS to a SQL 7.0 database using ODBC (File DSN saved on a shared DRIVE). The link works well only from the workstation where the link was created. But How can I create a link so a group of users can view the linked table in ACCESS without type a password? Any suggestion is appreciated.
Lunjun
Hi Everybody,
On localhost this application works fine but when I put on remote server. I am getting following errors. For both localhost and server, I am using same remote sql 2000. I will appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Arif
Server Error in '/' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR [42000] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Line 1: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: Microsoft.Data.Odbc.OdbcException: ERROR [42000] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Line 1: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[OdbcException: ERROR [42000] [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Line 1: Incorrect syntax near ')'.]
Microsoft.Data.Odbc.OdbcConnection.HandleError(IntPtr hHandle, SQL_HANDLE hType, RETCODE retcode) +27
Microsoft.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteReaderObject(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) +838
Microsoft.Data.Odbc.OdbcCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() +80
Calgary.venues.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in c:inetpubwwwrootCalgarySitevenuesvenues.aspx.vb:32
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +67
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +35
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +731
My SQL statement:
SQL Server seems to think my SQL Statement is too long........ I'm not sure why.
"INSERT INTO tblChangeControls (Initiator,BPM,AddRemMod,ChangeType,SpecificChange,ChangeDescription,TechnicalDescriptionOfChange,DateInitiated) select 'Benjamin Short' ,'6' ,'2' ,'Printer' ,'40' ,'' ,'';"
Error message:
The identifier that starts with 'INSERT INTO tblChangeControls (Initiator,BPM,AddRemMod,ChangeType,SpecificChange,ChangeDescription,TechnicalDescriptionOfChange,' is too long. Maximum length is 128.