Tempdb Performance Issue
Jan 22, 2008
My Sql 2005 SP1 has performance trouble this afternoon. I
noticed a lot PageLatch_up and PageLatch_sh waiting with 2:1:1. I think the
problem may be caused by the tempdb. There are more than 1000 temp tables. The number
of user connections is abnormally high. “SELECT
*
FROM tempdb.dbo.sysobjects� cannot be finished due to blocking.
I restarted the server to fix
the problem temporaryly.
Any clue to fix the problem? Does it help to replace temp
table with table variable in stored procedures? “Drop temp table� are called in
procedures, why the temp tables are still in the tempdb?
Thanks for your help.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 7, 2001
We think we're having performance problems, and among the areas of investigations is the tempdb database. Since it resets itself after SQL is restarted, is there a way to find out how big it has grown in the past ? Does leaving it at the default size cause a performace hit ?? Right now it's 8.75 MB, with 7.38 MB available, which sounds pretty harmless.
Any thoughts ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2007
Hi,
We are thinking about buying new harddrives to improve sql server performance. Currently TEMPDB is running on a dedicated RAID 0 with 3 harddrives of 136 GB, 10.000 RPM. When running a large bulk insert within a SSIS package to 15 destination tables we notice high numbers in the Avg. and current Read Queue length (above 3000) of the drive where TEMPB is on. No other programs or swap file is using this RAID 0 drive. Can anyone tell me if it is worth buying 4 harddrives of 15.000 RPM each 33 GB big replacing the current 3 drives? How much impact will it have on the Avg. and Current Read queue length and will it improve the time sql server needs to bulk insert data?
Thanks.
Marc
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2001
SQL Server 6.5
I am running a Query in my Production Server. It is hardly taking 15 Mins. The same Query is taking more than 3 Hours in my test server. I can see the only difference between these two servers is Tempdb Size. Will tempdb size matters the performance of a Query. Can anyone reply me?
Thanks in Advance
Krishnakumar
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2004
Has anyone seen the SQL Server error:
"tempdb is skipped. You cannot run a query that requires tempdb"?
We're running a .Net web application with a SQL Server 2000 backend, and we get the error intermittently. Restarting the SQL Server service seems to fix it, as it causes tempdb to be rebuilt, but this isn't a long term solution. Any direction or hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
- Mike
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2004
1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection
above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server witha particular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return100 rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query insingle user mode. So I tested the query on the Development server bytaking a backup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the devserver. I ran the same query and found that it ran in less than asecond.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue isrelated to some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc.Or could it be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQLServer configuations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating systemrelated issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2005
TempDB is one of the databases equipped with MSSQL Server by default.What is the purpose of it?Why do we use this temp database?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2002
Hi,
THis is sql server 6.5 question.
I have tempdb data device size default 2 MB, which has completely filled up. I am trying to expand data device to it.
I created new device tempdb_data_ext (250 MB) and tried to expand tempdb data device. But everytime I do it, it ends up adding space to tempdb log device. How can I expand tempdb data device?
It's extremely urgent.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2001
Hi,
How can I control the growth of tempdb in SQl server.It's growing like anything.
CAn I create some alerts or jobs and what those alerts/job are supposed to do?
All help appreciated.
Jai
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2001
Hello!
This is error message I discovered in NT even viewer:
c:MSSQL7DATATEMPDB.MDF: Operating system error 112(There is not enough space on the disk.) encountered.
In SQL Server error log the errors are:
Error: 1101, Severity: 17, State: 10
Could not allocate new page for database 'TEMPDB'. There are no more pages available in filegroup DEFAULT. Space can be created by dropping objects, adding additional files, or allowing file growth..
Currently tempdb rezides on C drive and it's almost out of space.
What should I do?
Detach tempdb and then move to different drive?
What's the procedure?
Thanks
Lena
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2000
TEMPDB in one of our production servers does not clear up so every three to four weeks I have to restart NT. Nothing like this happens on any of the other three servers. Does anybody know where I should look at to correct the problem. I sure would appreciate it.
Thanks
Shashu
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2001
I have never done this before and thought I would ask. Is it possible to detach the tempdb database, move it to another drive or partition, and then re-attach it? What would be the downside or side-affects to doing such a thing?
Thanks. JT
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2001
We want to shrink the size of our TEMPDB , Does anyone know how to without blowing it away and re creating it.
Also, our tempdb expands to occupy all available space on the server, the space is not released until the server is restarted.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2000
Hi why I cannot backup the tempdb. Is this a normal or there is something that I am doing wrong.
Ali
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2000
Hi
I get a message:
Error : 933, Severity: 22, State: 1
Logical page 258 of the log encountered while retrieving highest timestamp in database 'tempdb' is not the last page of the log and we are not currently recovering that database.
I use sqlserver -T4022 to start my SQL Server since it will not start with out it. When I start sqlserver without the option, it tells me that
Error : 615, Severity: 21, State: 1
Unable to find database table id = 2, name = 'tempdb'.
I just want my SQL Server back. Please help!
Thanks
Betty Lee
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2000
I need to move tempdb to another drive,also increase the size.Largest database is 15GB.Can anyone suggest the size and also the exact commands to move.Do I need to backup the databases before I do this task?If SP1 is not installed,will it be o.k for me for this tempdb problem.If we have a larger tempdb like 4GB,will it effect anything?...Urgent!!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2000
The tempdb has grown to over 2 GB on our DB. There are no user tables or SP in it. Is there a way to clean up and are there any consequences to this?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2000
I read an article on this site by Michael Hotek re "Basic SQL Server 6.5 Configuration Options". In the paragraph about TempDB he says that you should always avoid using Temp tables in stored procs. I use this feature a lot when trying to do "not in" type queries (I filter out a portion of a larger table and then use the "not in" on the temp table rather than the entire table.)
Is there a better way to run a Not in query. I have the table well indexed (i think) but it seems to do a full table scan if I use the entire table.
Any ideas???
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2003
Our Tempdb.mdf file is 11 gigs. I have tried several things to shrink this but with no luck. Does anybody have a suggestion on how I can free up that space. I have tried to re-start Sql but that didn't do anything. I thought that there was a bug, if the files got above 4 gig that sql wouldn't clear them, but I could be wrong
I thought I could detach it, and attach a new file, but makes me nervous without knowing if that’s correct.
Thanks for the help
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 1999
Hi,
I moved my tempdb (2MB) to RAM and restarted the server. It did restart but when I tried to connect thru ISQL, it gave me an ERROR -
A connection could not be established to <server-name> - DB-Library. Unable to Connect.
What could be the possible reason.
To move tempdb to RAM, do i just have to change the values of the MEMORY and TEMPDB IN RAM parms and restart or do I have to do anything else.
Please help.
Thanks
Nishant
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 1999
Hi
When should I put tempdb in RAM and when should I not ?
Thanks in advance
Vijay
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 1999
I am trying to configure a 6.5 server to set the tempdb to run off disk. I reset the tempdb in ram = 0 in the configuration, and restarted the service, but it left it as running in ram, with 0 configured. I then rebooted the server, and it still left the tempdb in ram. Any ideas?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2006
Hi All,
I am trying to get some information about tempdb database. I've tried BOL but I couldn't find a whole lot of info. I am trying to find out what size should tempdb be to not to cause problems. Also, I am trying to shrink tempdb by using shrink database option in EM, but it only shrinks the tempdb transaction log not the datafile, and I don't know why it is happening.
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 1998
We are using Peoplesoft HRMS version 7.0 on NT Server 4.0 and SQL Server 6.5, service packs on both up-to-date.
The server is a HP LX Pro with 4 200 MHz 1MB cache processors with 2,560 MB of RAM and 18 9GB drives configured with different combinations of RAID 1, 1+0, and 5.
The database is 2.3GB in actual size with the specific size of 6GB for data and 2GB for log on separate RAIDs.
We would like to use tempdb in RAM to boost the speed of complex queries that use the tempdb for intermediate working tables.
We would like to know of any experience of running tempdb in RAM, issues to overcome, of how to setup.
There are articles and books not recommending using tempdb in RAM. Comments anyone?
Note: Have looked in SQL Server DBA Survival Guide, and SQL Server Unleashed, along with the normal MS Documentation, technet, online books, and knowledge base searches.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 1998
System: Pentium II - Dual 450. 13 GIG RAID. 128 MB RAM.
Everything I've ever heard or seen says not to put tempDB in RAM, citing reasons of negligible benefit or even worse performance as it steals memory from SQL's cache memory.
My issue is I need to take anywhere from 500 to 3000 records (games played) in a batch every five minutes from a table, ordered by game id. There's no guarantee of sequential order to how the records are inserted, so I need to do an ORDER BY in my query. I also do a stored procedure for ranking that requires an ORDER BY.
The performance difference between the two is staggering. 1000 records with a 200 mb tempdb database (not in RAM) takes about 300 seconds. With a 16 MB tempdb database IN ram, it takes just under 127 seconds. Only problem? I'm constantly getting, after a few batches have run, "out of space in syslogs for tempdb ram messages. "
Is there a way to net such performance from tempdb without putting it in RAM, and if not, is there a way to explicity clear out tempdb. Thanks for any help.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2001
Hello All~
I have a problem with Tempdb database on SQL 6.5 server.....when i create a temporary table,
i block other users in other databases. Actually i run a stored procedure which creates a temporary table and then the procedure insets some values of a table from my test database. When the spored procedure is executed, users in other databases also get blocked and no new user will be allowd to log on to the server. When i check as to what the other users are executing, i find that they are also creting or droping a temp table.
So i will have to either kill my SP or let it finish and continue blocking other users.
As of now, i am not able to find a reason for that and i try to run the Stored procedure in offpeak hrs.
I have not played around much with Temp tables in SQL 6.5. Pl do suggest me as to what to do....
Some details you would be interested on :
Server - SQL Server 6.5
Front End - Great Plains
Size of Tempdb - Data Space Available( It says shared with data)
database_name database_size unallocated space
------------------------------ ------------------ ------------------
tempdb 1502.00 MB -6301.82 MB
reserved data index_size unused
------------------ ------------------ ------------------ ------------------
7991108 KB 7996222 KB 72 KB -5186 KB
Hope this information helps.
Thanks in Advance...
Siv
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2001
I have a dumb ?
When I go in to expand the tempdb to at least 25mb req. for the migration
It is actually expanding the Log size & the Db available size still says 1.76mb.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanx for your time
Rick C
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2001
Hi, our tempdb log keeps filling up and suggests we back it up. Can we double the size of the log file if we are using simple recovery?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2004
Hi
Being new to SQL server I would like some information regarding the tempdb database.
I user SQL Server 2000.
At present I appear to be backing up my tempdb but it has been failing since way back. It gives me this error when trying to bakup the database:
Executed as user: NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM. Backup and restore operations are not allowed on database tempdb. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3147) BACKUP DATABASE is terminating abnormally. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 3013). The step failed.
Can someone give me a basic grounding as to what the tempdb is used for and should I back it up or not?
Thanks in advance
Neil.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2004
Hello,
My db tempdb is very big (55 Go), how can i reduce it or erase it and why it's so big ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2008
Hi All
if temdb grows and use all the disk space and then after log backup or other clean up process its size got reduced but it is still holding the space it was grown upto. In this case what would be ideal to do restart server/services or is it possible to reduce the space alocated to tempdb through properties.
any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related