I'm trying to summarize costs assigned to active jobs for a manufacturing business. I need to aggregate work in process (WIP) cost that resides in labor-transaction and part-transaction tables based on transaction types, and transaction dates. Some transactions increase the WIP cost of the job while others decrease WIP. The business needs to see how much $$ is tied up in each job as of a particular date -- the calculation is:
ToDate (cost of materials and labor assigned to job)
- ToInv (cost of materials returned to inventory)
- ToSales (cost of materials sold).
I developed this query incrementally and, so far, the #ToDate, #ToInv, and #ToSales temp tables seem to be populating with the correct data. My thought was to combine these three tables with a UNION and then extract the grand totals and here's where I started getting the following error:
------------------------------------------
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'UNION'.
------------------------------------------
The problem is with the UNIONs going into #myTotal.
I would appreciate any help with this. Also, please let me know if you can suggest a better design for this. Thanks!
--M&S To Date
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS Cost
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN ( <valid trans types> )
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
UNION -- This one works ok.
--L&B To Date
SELECT jh.JobNum,
sum(l.LaborRate*l.LaborHrs) + sum(l.BurdenRate*l.BurdenHrs) AS Cost
FROM LaborDtl l
JOIN JobHead jh ON l.JobNum = jh.JobNum
WHERE jh.JobReleased = 1
AND l.PayrollDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY jh.JobNum
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
SELECT pt.jobnum,
SUM(pt.extcost) AS ToInv
FROM parttran pt
JOIN jobhead jh ON pt.jobnum=jh.jobnum
WHERE trantype IN (<valid trans types>)
AND jh.JobReleased = 1
AND pt.TranDate < '2007-9-30'
GROUP BY pt.jobnum
I have 2 temporary tables from a previous operation, Tab1 and Tab2, with the same dimensions. How do I create a third table Tab3 with the same dimensions containing the the combined rows of the 2 previous tables? TIA!
I am displaying advertisers on a dynamic .net page that users will view via querystrings from a county page, then a city page , as they can pick a zone , then view the advertiser's ad predicated on the zone they pick. I want to have advertisers on a premium plan that can be viewed in all areas of the city, regardless what zone the user picks. Trying the below does not suffice my resultset (the queriedzone is a variable as the request.querystring for the zone ; 'all' is the indicator for an advertiser who should be seen in all zones)
sqlstr = "select company, address, email from advertisers where zone IN ('" + queriedzone + "','all') " ??? thanks in advance ed
In a SQL 2000 SP 1 installation I've a problem with a view.
When I run a select from this view with a where clause the view return me a result set, but if I insert a order by clause the result set is empty. I try to re-organize indexes and update statistics without results.
The server is on a client site so I can't update the SQL 2000 installation immediatly, I try to ask about the installation of the SP 3.
But in the meanwhile I need some information. Anyone see this problem before.
I've run into some trouble with an apparently simple UNION query:
SELECT [Date] AS D, C7, NULL AS L72A, NULL AS P02, PAV FROM [Process Variables Level 1] UNION SELECT [Date] as D, NULL AS C7, L72A, P02, NULL AS PAV FROM [Process Variables Level 2] ORDER BY D
Records in the 2 tables may or may not have the same Date/Time values.
The product of the above UNION query appears to be using dates from the [Process Variables Level 2] table only. I'm getting values returned for field C7 with Date/Time values from table [Process Variables Level 2]??
How can I write a query to return the results for a given survey for all members (including members who have not given responses) given the surveyID.
In the [SurveyQuestionMemberReponse] table I record survey results for any members who have answered the survey. However, if a member has not responsed to the survey they will not have a record in this table.
I want to return a list of members with their response to each question in the survey. If a member has not given a response I would like to indicate they have not responded to the survey and they should still appear in the list.
When I attempt to write a query to UNION the results of a query aimed at gathering all of the results in the [SurveyQuestionMemberReponse] to all of the people in the [Members] table I recieve an error when I include the questionText field in my result set.
The error indicates:
The text data type cannot be selected as DISTINCT because it is not comparable.
Can someone please point me in the right direction. I suspect I am going about this all wrong.
[NOTE] The 'surveyType' in the [Surveys] table indicates which subset of members a given Survey should be available to. For this example let's just assume that every survey should belong to all members.
This may be a dumb question, but I can't seem to get the syntax right. I have two temp tables that have the same columns, I want to do a union on them and store the results in a temp table. Any ideas?
Ie.
select * from #tmpTable1 union select * from #tmpTable2 into #tmpTable3
Right now, a client of mine has a T-SQL statement that does thefollowing:1) Create a temp table.2) Populate temp table with data from one table using an INSERTstatement.3) Populate temp table with data from another table using an INSERTstatement.4) SELECT from temp table.Would it be more efficient to simply SELECT from table1 then UNIONtable 2? The simply wants to see the result set and does not need tore-SELECT from the temp table.
Looking at BOL for temp tables help, I discover that a local temp table (I want to only have life within my stored proc) SHOULD be visible to all (child) stored procs called by the papa stored proc.
However, the following code works just peachy when I use a GLOBAL temp table (i.e., ##MyTempTbl) but fails when I use a local temp table (i.e., #MyTempTable). Through trial and error, and careful weeding efforts, I know that the error I get on the local version is coming from the xp_sendmail call. The error I get is: ODBC error 208 (42S02) Invalid object name '#MyTempTbl'.
Here is the code that works:SET NOCOUNT ON
CREATE TABLE ##MyTempTbl (SeqNo int identity, MyWords varchar(1000)) INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('Put your long message here.') INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('Put your second long message here.') INSERT ##MyTempTbl values ('put your really, really LONG message (yeah, every guy says his message is the longest...whatever!') DECLARE @cmd varchar(256) DECLARE @LargestEventSize int DECLARE @Width int, @Msg varchar(128) SELECT @LargestEventSize = Max(Len(MyWords)) FROM ##MyTempTbl
SET @cmd = 'SELECT Cast(MyWords AS varchar(' + CONVERT(varchar(5), @LargestEventSize) + ')) FROM ##MyTempTbl order by SeqNo' SET @Width = @LargestEventSize + 1 SET @Msg = 'Here is the junk you asked about' + CHAR(13) + '----------------------------' EXECUTE Master.dbo.xp_sendmail 'YoMama@WhoKnows.com', @query = @cmd, @no_header= 'TRUE', @width = @Width, @dbuse = 'MyDB', @subject='none of your darn business', @message= @Msg DROP TABLE ##MyTempTbl
The only thing I change to make it fail is the table name, change it from ##MyTempTbl to #MyTempTbl, and it dashes the email hopes of the stored procedure upon the jagged rocks of electronic despair.
Any insight anyone? Or is BOL just full of...well..."stuff"?
Hi, I have follwing union query. I want to put this all in a temp table.
select Store_Id,batchnumber From Adjustments where updatedDt between '10/30/2007' and '11/20/2007' and Store_id in(8637 ,8641) group by Store_Id, batchnumber Union select DestinationId,b.batchNumber from batch b inner join Carton C on C.Carton_Id = b.General_ID inner join Document d on d.Document_Id = c.Document_Id where b.BatchType = 'Warehouse' and b.TranTable = 'Carton' and (d.DestinationId in (8637 ,8641) ) and c.UpdatedDt Between '10/30/2007' and '11/20/2007' Union select d.DestinationId,b.Batchnumber From batch b inner join Document d on d.Document_Id = b.General_Id where b.BatchType = 'TransferIn' and b.TranTable = 'Document' and (d.DestinationId in (8637,8641) ) and d.UpdatedDt Between'10/30/2007' and '11/20/2007' Union select d.SourceId,b.batchNumber From batch b inner join Document d on d.Document_Id = b.General_Id where b.BatchType = 'TransferOut' and b.TranTable = 'Document' and (d.SourceId in (8637,8641) ) and d.UpdatedDt Between'10/30/2007' and '11/20/2007' order by batchnumber
I'm having trouble creating a temp table out of a select statement that uses multipe union alls.
Here's what I have, I'm trying to get the results of this query into a temp table...
select parent, (select cst_id from co_customer (nolock) where cst_key = Parent) as cst_id, (select cst_name_cp from co_customer (nolock) where cst_key = Parent) as cst_name_cp, (select org_total_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = parent) as Parent_Total_assets, sum(own_assets) as Total_child_own_assets
from ( Select parent, Child, (select org_own_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = child) as Own_assets
from (Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,1) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,1) is not null union all
Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,2) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,2) is not null union all
Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,3) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,3) is not null union all
Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,4) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,4) is not null union all
Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,5) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,5) is not null union all
Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,6) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,6) is not null union all Select Cst_key as Child, dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,7) as Parent from co_customer (nolock) where cst_type = 'Organization' and cst_delete_flag = 0 and dbo.return_org_parent(cst_key,0,7) is not null )as c ) as d
group by parent
having sum(own_assets) <> (select org_total_assets_ext from dbo.co_organization_ext where org_cst_key_ext = parent)
I have an application that I am working on that uses some small temptables. I am considering moving them to Table Variables - Would thisbe a performance enhancement?Some background information: The system I am working on has numeroustables but for this exercise there are only three that really matter.Claim, Transaction and Parties.A Claim can have 0 or more transactions.A Claim can have 1 or more parties.A Transaction can have 1 or more parties.A party can have 1 or more claim.A party can have 1 or more transactions. Parties are really many tomany back to Claim and transaction tables.I have three stored procsinsertClaiminsertTransactioninsertPartiesFrom an xml point of view the data looks like this<claim><parties><info />insertClaim takes 3 sets of paramters - All the claim levelinformation (as individual parameters), All the parties on a claim (asone xml parameter), All the transactions on a claim(As one xmlparameter with Parties as part of the xml)insertClaim calls insertParties and passes in the parties xml -insertParties returns a recordset of the newly inserted records.insertClaim then uses that table to join the claim to the parties. Itthen calls insertTransaction and passes the transaction xml into thatsproc.insertTransaciton then inserts the transactions in the xml, and alsocalls insertParties, passing in the XML snippet
I have 3 Checkbox list panels that query the DB for the items. Panel nº 2 and 3 need to know selection on panel nº 1. Panels have multiple item selection. Multiple users may use this at the same time and I wanted to have a full separation between the application and the DB. The ASP.net application always uses Stored Procedures to access the DB. Whats the best course of action? Using a permanent 'temp' table on the SQL server? Accomplish everything on the client side?
[Web application being built on ASP.net 3.5 (IIS7) connected to SQL Server 2005)
When I run the same query without a specific key it fails. The results only return a single row containing Name, Description and then ALL keywords for every key ID...very odd behavior.
BTW, I need to do this in a single SQL query and not a stored proc or other method.
I am trying to get a consolidated sum of all the columns of the two tables that I am Using the UNION on. I can not get the sum function to work or the group by.
SELECT T2.State,t2.Taxcode, Taxable = Case When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) Else 0 End, 'NonTaxable' = Case When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) Else T1.DistribSum End, T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', (T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total' FROM inv1 t1 inner JOIN oinv t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's' UNION ALL SELECT t2.state,t2.taxcode, Taxable = Case When T1.TaxCode <> 'exempt' and T1.TaxStatus = 'Y' then -(T1.LineTotal - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)) Else 0 End, 'NonTaxable' = Case When T1.TaxCode = 'exempt' or T1.TaxStatus = 'N' then -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal)) Else T1.DistribSum End, -T1.VatSum as 'Total Tax', -(T1.LineTotal + T1.DistribSum - ((T0.DiscPrcnt/100) * T1.LineTotal) + T1.Vatsum) as 'Line Total' FROM RIN1 t1 inner JOIN ORIN t0 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry inner join CRD1 T2 on T0.Cardcode = T2.CardCode WHERE T0.DocDate >='[%1]' AND T0.DocDate <='[%2]' and t2.address = T0.shiptocode and t2.adrestype = 's' order by T2.STATE
Hi, I have three tables named as BroadCastetails,PaymetMaster,MemberMaster. I have two query as mentioned below-- SELECT MemberMaster.FirstName, MemberMaster.LastName, BroadCastDetails.BroadCastName FROM BroadCastDetails INNER JOIN MemberMaster ON 5 = MemberMaster.MemberID AND BroadcastCreationDateTime between '01/01/2007' AND '12/12/2007' SELECT BroadCastDetails.ScheduledStartDateTime, BroadCastDetails.TotalCalls FROM BroadCastDetails UNION SELECT PaymentTransaction.TransactionDate, PaymentTransaction.CallsToCredit FROM PaymentTransaction
I want the result of the above two query in a GridView.How can I do that ? Its urgent...
How can I write a query that will return the following result to show the order details for customerid 1000 for a date range between 01/01/2003 and 01/08/2003
OrderDate Quantity FreeShipping ========= ======== ============ 01/01/2003 5 Y 01/03/2003 0 Y 01/04/2003 9 N 01/08/2003 14 N
Note that even if an order was not placed and the date was a freeshipping date, it is still displayed in the resultset
I have 2 Tables one called Reps and the other called STORES I need to use a UNION statement but my Server is saying that the "UNION" is ERROR The Query Designer does not support the UNION SQL construct.
What command would I use to put these 2 tables together? HELP!
Hi there, I have some identical tables that I want to query for a search Is there anyway I can execute the unions first then a where command on all the tables at once I have tried using go but it doesn't seem to work, so I put the where statemtents at the end of each union for now. Here's my code:
strSQL = "SELECT * FROM england WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM ni WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM wales WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' " &_ "UNION ALL SELECT * FROM scotland WHERE company LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address1 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address2 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address3 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address4 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR address5 LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%' OR postcode LIKE '%" & iKeyword & "%'"
This query works perfectly and orders by just as I need
Code: Select '1st' As [Type], #Uno.ID #Uno.Address, #Uno.shippingInfo FROM #Uno
[Code] ....
However, when I use it in a Union All so I can pull data from 2 diff tables, the order by statement no longer works. How can I order by data in 2 tables?
Code: Select '1st' As [Type], #Uno.ID #Uno.Address, #Uno.shippingInfo FROM #Uno
I try to build some query on hierarchy data and after two days thinking about it i have null result. What I need is union more trees tables by root id to one table.
-- tree -- this query is functional: OK WITH tree (sid, parend_id, level) as ( SELECT sid, parend_id, 0 as level
[Code] ....
But this query work with one root id (100); what can i do when i have more roots id ? -> generate each tree table separated by roots id and then all tables join to one (union).
Hi, This seems like a basic problem but I can't figure out how to resolve it.
I have a query :
SELECT PR.WBS2, SUM(LedgerAR.Amount * - 1) AS Expr5, LB.AmtBud AS budget FROM PR LEFT OUTER JOIN LedgerAR ON PR.WBS1 = LedgerAR.WBS1 AND PR.WBS2 = LedgerAR.WBS2 AND LedgerAR.WBS3 = PR.WBS3 LEFT OUTER JOIN LB ON LB.WBS1 = PR.WBS1 AND LB.WBS2 = PR.WBS2 AND PR.WBS3 = LB.WBS3 WHERE (PR.WBS2 <> '9001') AND (PR.WBS2 <> 'zzz') AND (PR.WBS2 <> '98') AND (PR.WBS3 <> 'zzz') AND (PR.WBS2 <> '') AND (PR.WBS1 = '001-298') GROUP BY PR.WBS2, LB.AmtBud ORDER BY PR.WBS2
I want to sum up the middle column and last column grouping by wbs2. However, when I do SUM(lb.amtbud) the budget column is not summing correctly it is summing the column as if the data appeared like this:
tblOpenSiteDates Site: int OpenDate: smalldate Comment: VarChar
tblCloseSiteDates Site: int CloseDate: smalldate Comments: VarChar newLocationID: int
I am trying to get a view which would display a site with the open and close dates. Null is ok for a close date for those opens that are still open.. not every office has an open date and close date.. it is possible to have just a close date and not an open date (ie unsure of open date but I know its closing)
so the output would be
viewOpenCloseSites Site: int opendate: smalldate closedate: smalldate
I have two tables with data that I need to get and display in a combobox. What I want to do is have the parent table listed in the combobox with all of its children indented. Sorted by parent then by child.
This SQL seems to be more complex than I have done previously
I can get all of the records from both tables easily:
Code: SELECT strName, ID FROM tblParents as pp INNER JOIN tblChildren as cc ON cc.pID = pp.uiGUID UNION (SELECT strName FROM tblChildren as c INNER JOIN tblParents as p ON c.pID = p.ID)
However, this simply returns a list that is not ordered in any fashion. I'd like to have all of the parent's children shown under the parent name (there is only 1 parent per child and multiple children per parent)
I'm trying to get the results from three different tables, where they have some of the same results. I'm only interested in where they match and then trying to order by date (that's in three columns - M, D, Y). I read previous post in 9/07 but the result doesn't seem to order correctly. It does not have any rhyme or reason to the outputed results as it bounces back and forth through Oct, Nov and Dec posting and throughout all three tables. Here's my query below. Any ideas how I can get my ordering correct for all three tables to display all Oct, all Nov and all Dec?
Thanks so much
select date3, date2, date1, who, what from ( select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shows union select date3, date2, date1, who, what from shares union select date3, date2, date1, who, what from soiree ) a order by date3, date2, date1
SELECT plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr, FROM plan2008 GROUP BY plan2008.jahr, plan2008.monat, plan2008.kdkrbez, plan2008.kdgrbez, plan2008.abgrbez, plan2008.artnr
UNION
SELECT fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr FROM fsp_auftrag GROUP BY fsp_auftrag.jahr, fsp_auftrag.monatnr, fsp_auftrag.kundenkreis, fsp_auftrag.kundengruppe, fsp_auftrag.abnehmergruppe, fsp_auftrag.artnr
My problem is that each table contains additional values like art_amount, art_turnover etc... whereby the first table contains plan values while the second table contains actual values.
My goal is to get plan as well as the actual values in one row, how is that possible? If I put the values into each of the selects I get two rows, which is not the wished output.
Is it possible to join the tables after the union took place?
I've some AT_DATE tables (eg: AT_20080401, AT_20080402, ...) in SQLServer DB, and these AT_XX table have same columns. but table count could be variant, so I have to query sysobjects to get all of these tables. like this: select name from sysobject where name like 'AT_%'
Now I try to create a view AT which is the union of all these AT_XX tables, such as:
Code Snippet
Create View AT as select * from AT_20080401 union select * from AT_20080402 union ...
but since I'm not sure how many tables there, it would be impossible to write SQL as above. though I could get this union result via stored-procedure, view couldn't be created on the resultset of a procedure. Create View AT as select * from AT_createView() <-- AT_createView must be a function, not procedure
I've checked msdn, there is Multi-statement table-valued function, but this function type seems to create one temporary table, I don't want to involve much of insert operation because there could be more than 1million records totally in these AT_XX tables.
So is there any way to achived my goal? any reference would be appreciated, thanks !
I am attempting to execute a stored procedure as the sql query for a data transformation from sql into an excel file. The stored procedure I am calling uses temp tables (#tempT1, #tempT2, etc.) to gather results from various calculations. When I try to execute this sp, I get 'Error Source: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Error Description: Invalid Object name "#tempT1"'
Is there a way to make a DTS package call a stored procedure that uses temp tables?