Are Guids good or bad? I've spoken to people who hate them in databases, but the db's I'm using right now all use them, so there must be *some* people out there who like them. I'm interested to know what other people think.
thanks!
I have a two tables each having a uniqueidentifier column person_id
I am trying to a select statement where I want a list of the person_id's in one table that are not in another table.
-- insert into wch_needed those who need checked
insert into #wch_needed (person_id, rendered_by )
select distinct e.person_id, e.rendered_by
from #wch_who o, encounter e
where o.person_id not in (select distinct person_id from #wch_have )
and o.person_id = e.person_id
the where conditional
where o.person_id not in (select distinct person_id from #wch_have )
does not work.
How can I do this?
Does anybody know how to generate a new identity value from within SSIS. Can anybody point me to a good example using a script component?
Thanks you very much!!!!
Sergio
There have been some posts on the difficulties of handling csv with quoted identifers.
I heard there were some custom components that aid in dealing with these as input files.
IYO, what do you consider to be the best way to deal with csv with quoted identifiers as an input to an ETL operation?
Also, if you know of any bloggers making quality (hopefully free) custom components?
Thanks!!
I need to be able to verify that SSMS recognizes ONLY system generated session identifiers.
Where in the configuration of the DBMS can i see evidence of this setting, and / or change it if necessary?
This query is the first time I am using the Unpivot syntax and I am coming across a problem. When I try to unpivot my data, I get the following statement:
"Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
The multi-part identifier "Table3.DocketId" could not be bound."
What is the cause of this issue?
Select
Table3.DocketId,
UP.AssignmentType,
Up.AssignedStaff
From
(
Select distinct
Table2.DocketId,
[Code] ....
I'm posting this in the ClickOnce forums as well...
My application doesn't include the .mdf and .ldf files, rather it creates the database the first time the application is run using a script that is included in the build. I want to create the database in the ClickOnce data directory. The problem I'm having is that SQL Server complains when I execute the CREATE DATABASE command as follows:
CREATE DATABASE [C:Documents and SettingsxxxxxLocal SettingsApps2.0DataPQCK6EXN.5KGAW630RPT.VGOifie..tion_014028c05b1d6ec6_0001.0002_0e86966f19503c89DataiFieldMobile.mdf] ON PRIMARY
( NAME = N'myDatabase', FILENAME = N'C:Documents and SettingsxxxxxxLocal SettingsApps2.0DataPQCK6EXN.5KGAW630RPT.VGOifie..tion_014028c05b1d6ec6_0001.0002_0e86966f19503c89DatamyDatabase.mdf' , SIZE = 3136KB , MAXSIZE = UNLIMITED, FILEGROWTH = 1024KB )
LOG ON
( NAME = N'myDatabase_log', FILENAME = N'C:Documents and SettingsxxxxLocal SettingsApps2.0DataPQCK6EXN.5KGAW630RPT.VGOifie..tion_014028c05b1d6ec6_0001.0002_0e86966f19503c89DatamyDatabase_log.ldf' , SIZE = 1024KB , MAXSIZE = 2048GB , FILEGROWTH = 10%)
END
Here's the error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException "The identifier that starts with 'C:Documents and SettingsxxxxxxLocal SettingsApps2.0DataPQCK6EXN.5KGAW630RPT.VGOifie..tion_014028c05b1d6ec6_0001.00' is too long. Maximum length is 128."
Hello,I am creating a new database and I was advised to use Sequential Guids.I was reading some information and, as far as I understood, I can use NEWSEQUENTIALID. This can be used when I have a uniqueidentifier column as the key of a clustered index to avoid fragmentation during insert. Ok, so I use NEWSEQUENTIALID instead of NEWID.But I will use LINQ most of the time instead of Stored Procedures.So can I specify in my tables scripts to use Sequential Guids when, for example, a record is created? And am I right when using Sequential Guids?Here is a part of my code:-- Blogs ...
create table dbo.Blogs
(
BlogID uniqueidentifier not null
constraint PK_Blog primary key clustered,
Title nvarchar(400) null,
Description nvarchar(2000) null,
CreatedDate datetime null
)
-- Posts ...
create table dbo.Posts
(
PostID uniqueidentifier not null
constraint PK_Post primary key clustered,
BlogID uniqueidentifier not null,
AuthorID uniqueidentifier not null,
Title nchar(1000) null,
Body nvarchar(max) null,
UpdatedDate datetime not null,
IsPublished bit not null,
constraint FK_Posts_Blogs
foreign key(BlogID)
references dbo.Blogs(BlogID)
on delete cascade,
constraint FK_Posts_Users
foreign key(AuthorID)
references dbo.Users(UserID)
on delete cascade Thanks,Miguel
I'm really sorry if this is too OT but it is related to replication...
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe're trying to set a new standard at my office, of using GUIDs as database ID fields - all new tables in all databases will have a GUID as the ID field, using the UniqueIdentifier data type.
The problem that we are running into, is that different applications interpret the UniqueIdentifier data type differently - ADO 2.x interprets it with the opening and closing { } braces. ADO.NET does not include the { and } in the GUID structure, SQL Server Query Analyzer does not include the { } braces, and SQL Server Enterprise Manage does include the { }
so we end up with results like this:
ADO 2.x: {012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd}
ADO.NET: 012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd
Query Analyzer: 012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd
Enterprise Manager: {012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd}
The problem with this is in two parts:
1) VB6 does not have a GUID structure or data type, so we are treating GUIDs as strings... but VB6 doesn't recognize "{012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd}" and "012345678-abcd-ef01-2345-6789abcd" as the same string
2) when sending a URL link through an email, the { } braces break the link - in all email applications that we have tested. This include Groupwise 6, Groupwise 6.5, IPSwitch Web IMail, Outlook 2000, and Outlook Express (IE 6).
We're becoming very frustrated with the problems at hand, and need to know how others have worked around these problems. Please respond with any kind of advice or any real life situations where you have encountered this and found a solution, etc.
Thanks.
Hello,
I've been thinking about using GUIDs as primary keys within my application. One problem I have with this approach is that GUIDs generated with NEWID() are not sequential, and this can have a huge impact on insertion performance due to fragmented indexes. It would seem that NEWSEQUENTIALID() solves this issue, however it doesn't seem very practical to use this on SQL Server Mobile. With SQL Server, you can specify an OUTPUT clause for an INSERT statement, and using this, determine what the last inserted GUID was. There doesn't seem to be such an option in SQL Server Mobile, so how can I get the last generated GUID so that I can attach children records to my parent record? It's been suggested that you could use the MAX() function to get the latest GUID, but there is a problem with this approach - NEWSEQUENTIALID() guarantees that the GUIDs generated will be sequential for the machine generating them, but makes no guarantees about how this will fit in with GUIDs generated by other machines. It is entirely possible that GUIDs generated by a different machine will be larger than the latest one generated on the current machine, so using MAX() to determine the latest value doesn't seem like a valid option to me.
Does anybody have any ideas on tackling this problem? Any thoughts on the suitability of using GUIDs as the primary key for SQL Server Mobile devices in general?
Thanks,
Adrien.
Am I looking at a potential bug here or do I not understand the feature properly? I have an ExecuteSQL task that inserts into a table for logging and includes the System::PackageID as one of the values. It's stored in my table as a uniqueidentifier. When I set the output variable in Parameter Mappings tab of the Execute SQL task to VarChar, all works great. WHen I set it to GUID as the data type in that tab, it outputs a different GUID than the actual System::PackageID variable.
-- Brian
I need gurus input on the pros and cons of Seeded(int) Identity colums vs. UniqueIdentifier(GUIDs) columns for my db design.
As I understand it, merging the data of 2 independent db's both using IDENTITY columns would be very hairy because of the possibility of overlap. GUIDs are much more likely to be unique across different servers.
What I'd like to hear from others are the other pros and cons of the situation. I of course understand the performance hit suffered at the hands of the GUID.
Thanks for your help!
Hi fellows ,
there is a senerio where i want to update GUIDS in columns "pubid" and "artid" generate in sysmergepubliction and sysmergeAricles respectivly in sqlserver 2005 ?
2nd is there any easy way to generate scripts of triggers of all replicated tables in subscriber at one .
hello,
I have several tables that have guids as their primary keys and the tables are related as follows:
Table1 - primary key = ServiceNo (Guid), Filter Key = CampaignNo
Table2 - primary key = CostBasisNo (Guid), Foreign Key = ServiceNo (from Table1)
Table3 - primary key = UserId, Foreign Key = ServiceNo (from table1)
Table4 - primary key = SourceServiceNo (Foreign Key from Table1), MemberServiceNo(Foreign Key from Table1)
what I need to do is copy all records from Table1 where CampaignNo = @CampaignNo and insert them into table1, this I can do easily but I will generate a new ServiceNo for each one and associated a new CampaigNo which is fine.
The problem comes in that I need to also copy the contents of Table2 = Table3 for all ServiceNos that have been copied from Table1 but insert the new Guid that will have been created when copying the rows in Table1
This is further compounded when I need to do the same to Table4 but this time I need to insert the newid's for SourceServiceNo and the related MemberServiceNo which all would have changed.
I haven't the first clue where to start with this task, do I need to use temporary tables, cursors? any help gratefully received, even if it's a pointer to the most efficient approach.
regards
I've been playing around with the new data controls (DetailsView,FormView) and have been having problems when attempting to update a record that has a uniqueidentifier as its primary key.I get the error message:
Object must implement IConvertible. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidCastException: Object must implement IConvertible.I gather this is because there is a bug that has propagated from the beta version.One suggested work around is from http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:GDjA62POtgcJ:scottonwriting.net/sowBlog/archive/11162005.aspx+Implicit+conversion+from+data+type+sql_variant+to+uniqueidentifier+is+not+allowed.+Use+the+CONVERT+function+to+run+this+query.&hl=en
The crux of the problem, it appears, is that the <asp:Parameter> value for the uniqueidentifier field is, by default, set to Type=�Object�. To fix this, simply remove the Type property altogether. That is, change the SqlDataSource parameter setting from something like:
<asp:SqlDataSource ...> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name=�UserId� Type=�Object� /> ... </InsertParameters></asp:SqlDataSource>
to:
<asp:SqlDataSource ...> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name=�UserId� /> ... </InsertParameters></asp:SqlDataSource>
This change worked for me; once the Type was removed the exception ceased and the updates/inserts worked as expected.Unfortunately this only partially worked for me as while it is fine for deletes it won't work for updates.If anyone can help shed any light on this I would greatly appreciate it.CheersMark
This index is not unique
ix_report_history_creative_id
Msg 2601, Level 14, State 1, Procedure DFP_report_load, Line 161
Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.DFP_Reports_History' with unique index 'ix_report_history_creative_id'.
The duplicate key value is (40736326382, 1, 2015-07-03, 67618862, 355324).
Msg 3621, Level 0, State 0, Procedure DFP_report_load, Line 161
The statement has been terminated.
Exception in Task: Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.DFP_Reports_History' with unique index 'ix_report_history_creative_id'. The duplicate key value is (40736326382, 1, 2015-07-03, 67618862, 355324).
The statement has been terminated.
A UNIQUE INDEX must inherently impose a unique constraint and a UNIQUE CONSTRAINT is most likely implemented via a UNIQUE INDEX. So what is the difference? When you create in Enterprise Manager you must select one or the other.
View 8 Replies View RelatedHelloWhat should I use for better perfomance sinceunique constraint always use index ?ThanksKamil
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhat's the difference in the effect of the followings:
CREATE UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED INDEX
and
ALTER TABLE dbo.titles ADD CONSTRAINT
titleind UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED
I found there're two settings in Indexs/Keys dialog box of the management studio, Is Unique, and Type. The DDL statements above are generated by setting Is Unique to yes plus Type to Index, and just Type to Unique Key, respectively. What's the difference between them?
Hi everyone,
I need urgent help to resolve this issue...
As far as the performance goes which one is better..
Unique Index(col1, col2) OR Unique constraint(col1, col2) ?
Unique constraint automatically adds a unique index
and unique index takes care of uniqueness then whats the use of unique constraint ?
Which one do one use ?
thanks
sonali
BOL says a unique constraint is preferred over a unique index. It also states that a unique constraint creates a unique index. What then is the difference between the two, and why is a constraint preferred over the index?
View 2 Replies View Related
hi team,
.Can i create umique constraint with out unique index.when i am creating a unique constraint sql creates a unique index (default) can i have only unique constraint ?
I am having a problem trying to figure out the best way to get the results I need. I have a table of part numbers that is joined with a table of notes. The table of notes is specific to the part number and user. A row in the notes table is only created if the user has entered notes on that part number. I need to create a search that grabs all matches on a keyword and returns the records. The problem is that it currently returns a row from the parts table with no notes and a separate row with the notes included if they had created an entry. It seems like this should be easy but it eludes me today.
Here is the code
Code Snippet
create procedure SearchPartKeyword
(
@Keyword varchar(250) = null,
@Universal_Id varchar(10) = null
)
as
select p.PartNumber, p.Description, p.ServiceOrderable, n.MyNotes, p.LargestAssembly, p.DMM,
p.Legacy, p.Folder, p.Printer
from Parts p inner join notes n on p.PartNumber = n.Identifier
where n.Universal_ID = @Universal_ID and p.Description like @Keyword
union
select p.PartNumber, p.Description, p.ServiceOrderable, '' as MyNotes, p.LargestAssembly,
p.DMM, p.Legacy, p.Folder, p.Printer
from Parts p
where p.Description like @Keyword
and the results:
PartNo Description SO Notes LA DMM Legacy Folder Printer
de90008 MAIN BOARD 1 DGF1 114688 0 0 0
de90008 MAIN BOARD 1 I love this part Really I do DGF1 114688 0 0 0
This could return multiple part numbers and If they have entered notes I want the row with the notes
Thank You
Dominic Mancl
What 's difference between Unique key and unique index in SQL server 2005?
View 9 Replies View RelatedHere is the table I created:
create table Test (
[recId] [int] identity(1, 1) not null,
[code] [varchar](50) not null,
[prime] [bit] not null constraint [DF_Test_prime] default (cast(0 as bit)),
constraint [PK_Test] primary key clustered
(
[recId]
) with fillfactor = 90 on [primary]
) on [primary]
go
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('AVA', cast(1 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('BUS', cast(1 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('BUS', cast(0 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('BUS', cast(0 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('CAR', cast(1 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('CAR', cast(0 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('RLW', cast(1 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('RLW', cast(0 as bit))
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('RLW', cast(0 as bit))
select *
from Test
I need to create a constraint on this table that will not allow me to have two rows that are prime for the same code. So the following insert statement should fail:
-- This should fail
insert into Test (code, prime) values ('RLW', cast(1 as bit))
Thanks for you help!
Regards,
Anand
In my site, when a user registers, I need to create rows in additional tables besides aspnet_Users. So, I need to be able to pass the generated userId guid to subsequent SqlCommands. I'm having a terrible time with this. What's the correct way to set up a SqlParameter so that it will accept a guid? I keep getting this error: "Conversion failed when converting from a character string to uniqueidentifier."
I've tried creating the parameter both with and without a SqlDbType.
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue(paramName, guid);
and
SqlParameter p = new SqlParameter(paramName);p.SqlDbType = SqlDbType.Guid;cmd.Parameters.Add(p);
and I get the same error either way.
Driving me nuts! Any help appreciated.
hello
i am just starting to learn sql and know the basics, but now im looking for a good book to learn some more. A book that covers stored procedure would be very useful. If possible a book with q and a would be very good because i feel this tests if u understand what was just explaned. but if there is a good book without this it is ok. All sugestions welcome
NubNub
hii am using vs2005 for development of web application for reporting with sqlexpress05 as back end .later when project is ready for deployment i have to deploy the project on remote hosting server where i have limited access and sqlserver2000 database to use.i want to ask is there are any limitation or problem of sqlexpress while deploying it on remote sqlservre 2000.and should i have to to continue with sqlexpress as back end.is there any problems for using dynamic database connections(by using smart tags) other than programaticaly connecting database to asp.net ie by writing code.i am new in developmentplease guide me, please guide
View 2 Replies View Relatedhello all..i have make a searching, but is not good. my code like that:Public Class getall Public Function getitem(ByVal id As String) As DataSet Dim con As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection("Data Source=BOYsqlexpress;Initial Catalog=GAMES;User ID=ha;Password=a") Dim ds As New DataSet() Dim adapter As New SqlDataAdapter("select * from [item] where name like '%" & id & "%'", con) Try con.Open() adapter.Fill(ds, "user") Return ds Catch ex As Exception Console.Write(ex.Message) Finally con.Close() con = Nothing End Try ' Next Return ds End Functionand class my item in database is containning dragon ball 3, counter strikeif i insert dragon, it can display dragon ball 3.but if i insert dragon 3, it not display dragon ball 3.it should display dragon ball 3 .how should i change my code?thx...
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi, gurus!
Of course, you know that this:
... WHERE (COLUMNNAME = @PARAMETER)
works perfectly, but the opposite - when I need to pass
a column name as a parameter - the SQL Server 2000 cursing me...
I was designing some stored procedures and here is what I need:
... WHERE (@COLUMNNAME = 1)
^^^ I need to use a different column names here, so I decided to use
a parameter, but it does not even budge. Of course, I can use workaround:
IF @COLUMNNAME = 'External' THEN
BEGIN
SELECT ... WHERE (External = 1)
END
But, I SO! do not want to do it 9 times - I have 9 column names
to check...
Maybe, there is another way to do it?..
Thanks,
Cheers!
I'm having some trouble working out how to query some data. Rather than explain up front, here's some examples of what I want to achieve:
*******************************************************
I've got a structure which looks vaguely like this:
[ANCESTORS]
Grandparent
Parent
Child
If limit by grandparents, then I only get the lineage for that particular grandparent. I.e.:
SELECT *
FROM [ANCESTORS]
( some sort of joins here )
Where Grandparent.Name = 'Cybill'
This would return all of the children of 'Cybill' and their children. Now, if I use the following query:
SELECT *
FROM [ANCESTORS]
( some sort of joins here )
Where Child.Name = 'Jean'
This would return Jean's parents + the parents of Jean's parents (Jean's grandparents).
Likewise, if I enter:
SELECT *
FROM [ANCESTORS]
( some sort of joins here )
Where Parent.Name = 'Ron'
Then I would get Ron's parents and also his children.
*******************************************************
So, as you can see, at first it appears that I'm after a LEFT JOIN - meaning that the grandparents don't need to have child records to be returned, but, then it turns out that I need INNER JOINS - to limit grandparents when I choose children.
Can anybody see my dilemma here?
Mark-up ASP.net posts here
MarkItUp.com
Hi All
I am planning to do MCDBA, whether it'd good for DBA's, is't worth of doing or not, Please send me your comments.
Thanks
Regards
Ram