Using Transactions With Multiple SQL Statements
Oct 31, 2006
I am writing a fairly complex data automation procedure that basically uses about 5 stored procedures and some additional sql from C# to populate a database.
i would like to utilize transactions in C# and sql to help me if something goes wrong.
My question is, do i have to maintain the same connection in order to have one transaction for all my Commands.
right now i do things like
connection.Open();
Command.ExecuteNonQuery();
connection.Close();
connection.Open();
Command2.ExecuteNonQuery();
connection.Close();
i think i have to keep the same connection open for the duration of all my commands in order to utilize transactions, is this correct?
thanks,
mcm
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 11, 2006
Hello everyone
I need to have a transaction with a select statement like so
trans = cn.beginTransaction
Insert into order table an order record
select unique order Id from order table
insert record 1 into orderdetails using the orderid
insert record 2 into orderdetails using the orderid
commit trans
I am of course experiencing record locking after my first insert. I cannot select records from the order table even though I need the inserted OrderId in order to insert into the orderitemst table.
I have tried switching the isolation level to readuncomitted on my transaction but sp_who2 still shows a block even with the readUncomitted Isolation level.
A foreign key on the orderitems table prevents me from inserting orderitems without a parent order id to prevent orphans. Is this a common transactional issue?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2007
I have some problems getting my SSIS package to run in a transaction, I wonder if anyone can assist.
What I want to do is run one package, which consists of a
- 1) create staging table SQL statement
- 2) read (all) from Access MDB to staging
- 3) copy (only new) from staging table to real table
- 4) drop the staging table
I changed the package to "require" a transactions, and left all containers in it to "supported" (default, I think). I left all the transaction type to default "serializeable".
The package does not work, since the table I created on step one is not "seen" when step 2 wants to insert into it. If I set the package transaction back to "supported" (default) the package works, but an error on step 2 or 3 will not rollback changes and not remove the staging tables...
So, my question really is: How do I make step 1 results visible to step 2 in the same transaction? Or do I need to take a completly different approach for this?
Stupid question I think, but I seem to not be able to find the right way to handle this situation...
Thanks for reading!
Ralf
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2007
I have a simple question: Can I have two or more stored procedures that begin transactions but the last stored procedure will commit all transactions if there was no error?
In other words, I have a stored procedure that performs some legacy stuff. I do not want to rewrite that logice, execpt I am putting it into a Stored Procedure since it currently is embedded SQL.
To support newer functionality, I am writing data to additional new tables. However, I do not want the *new* things to occur if there is an error. This is easy enough, I dont call the Stored Procedure for the new functionality if there was an error. However, if there was not an error and the newer stored procedure is called AND there is an error in the new stored procedure, I want to ROLLBACK the changes from the proceeding stored procedures.
To my understanding, I can name transactions but that is only to indicate in the logs what transactions have failed.
I thought about not using transactions for any of the individual stored procedures and calling them from a main stored procedure. The main stored procedure will have a BEGIN TRY and an END TRY (I am using SQL Server 2005) and at the top (right after the try) I will have a BEGIN TRANSACTION. In the BEGIN CATCH I will have a ROLLBACK and at the end I will have a COMMIT. If any of the stored procedures fail at any point it will cause the catch to occur thus rolling back all of my transactions. This would be the easiest way but I still need to deal with the question of, "What happens if any single stored procedure is called?" I guess I could have try and catches in each individual stored procedure for that.
I just want to make sure I am not overlooking something simple. I think I have the right idea by doing it this way I mentioned above. Because this is critical billing processing I just want to have some reassurance that this would work.
Thank
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2013
I have a stored proc that is executed from within another stored proc, both of these procs run transactions in them that update data.
Now if either of these 2 SPs fail i want to be able to roll back the transactions that have occured so that the data doesn't change.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2006
I have a package with two sequence containers, each containing two SQL tasks and a data flow task, executed in that order. I want to encapsulate the data flow task in a transaction but not the SQL tasks. I have the TransactionOption property set to 'required' on the data flow tasks and 'supported' on the SQL tasks and the sequence containers. When I run the package I get a distributed transaction error on the first SQL task of the second sequence container:
"[Execute SQL Task] Error: Executing the query "TRUNCATE TABLE DistTransTbl2" failed with the following error: "Distributed transaction completed. Either enlist this session in a new transaction or the NULL transaction.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly."
The only way I can get the package to succeed is to set the TransactionOption = 'required' on the sequence containers and 'supported' on all subordinate tasks. This is not what I want, however. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Eric
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
am trying to generate the same batch id for the records that I am trying to insert..
for example,
I have 3 records
1001
1002
1004
and I want to insert with the same batch id starts with 1
batchid id
1 1001
1 1002
1 1003
and next tiem i insert with new records
1005
1008
1009
and i insert with an incremented batch id which is 2
batch id id
2 1005
2 1008
2 1009
how can i generate the same batch id for each transaction?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2008
I am using ODBC to connect to SQL Server. The documentation says that ODBC transactions are managed on the connection level and cannot span connections.
Does this mean that two instances of my code using transactions (each with its own process and a single connection) in the same machine accessing the same database will not play nice together (violate transaction rules)?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2015
I want the below sql code to force a error if it falls on a saturday or sunday, and there are no rows in the OrderTrans table for the previous day (TransDate) but not sure how to do multiple if statements.
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[OrderTrans](
[OrderId] [int] NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,I'm having a problem running a distributed transaction between twolinked servers that both have multiple instances of SQL Serverinstalled on them. This is the error message that I receive:"The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in thespecified transaction coordinator. ]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB'ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]."The query follows the format:"BEGIN DISTRIBUTED TRANUPDATE [LINKEDSERVER1INSTANCE_NAME].DB.OWNER.TABLENAMESET fieldname = alias2.fieldnameFROM tablename alias2JOIN [LINKEDSERVER1INSTANCE_NAME].DB.OWNER.TABLENAME alias1on alias2.urn=alias1,urn"[color=blue]>From what I can gather from various sources the SQL Server must be[/color]named the same as the computer which it is installed on. However, if Ihave two instances of SQL Server, they cannot both be named the same asthe computer. Does anyone know of a way around this or whether I'mbarking up the wrong tree completely?Many thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2007
I have a quick question.
I need to execute some stored procedures in certain steps... all performing some inserts/updates
What i need is, a mechanism, by which i can roll back to the previous state if i encounter an exception (either in the app or SP)
so, if the my first two SP execute fine, perform their functionality like insert/update, and the third one fails...
how can i roll back to the initial state in ASP.NET.
would appreciate any info.
or redirection to the the location where i can look up some info on that.
AJ
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
Is there a way to execute multiple SQL statements within SQL Server? I'm triyng to write a sql statement that will delete from three tables. I need at least two sql statements to delete from these three tables. Can this be done?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2008
how can take codes below and put them into one store procedure to supplie a gridview. also i will like to define the row name on the left like i did to the column on the top using the 'AS'
Code1....
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'January' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS January, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'February' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS February,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'March' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS March, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'April' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS April,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'May' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS May, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'June' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS June,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'July' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS July, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'August' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS August,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'September' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS September, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'October' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS October,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'November' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS November, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'December' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS December,
SUM(CASE WHEN site_descr = 'SITE1' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS AllTotal
FROM dbo.V_results
WHERE (site_descr = 'SITE1')
Code2.....
SELECT
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'January' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS January, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'February' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS February,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'March' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS March, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'April' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS April,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'May' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS May, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'June' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS June,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'July' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS July, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'August' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS August,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'September' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS September, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'October' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS October,
SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'November' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS November, SUM(CASE WHEN Month = 'December' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS December,
SUM(CASE WHEN site_descr = 'SITE2' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS AllTotal
FROM dbo.V_results
WHERE (site_descr = 'SITE2')
thanks in advance
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2005
I am just wondering if it is possible using SQL Server 2000 to have multiple SQL Statements executed with one sqlComm.ExecuteNonQuery(); call?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2005
Hi guys and gals,
I am trying to create a select statement that will return an INT that I will later have to use in another select statement. I have the following code, however, I keep getting an error that says:
'Error116: Only one expression can be specified in the select list when the subquery is not introduced with EXISTS.'
My Code is below:
//Start of sql
CREATE PROCEDURE ADMIN_GetSingleUsers( @userID int) AS
DECLARE @userSQL intSET @userSQL = (SELECT User_ID, TITLE.TITLE AS TITLE, Cast(Users.Active as varchar(50)) as Active, Cast(Users.Approved as varchar(50)) as Approved, Users.Unit_ID As usersUnitID, * From TITLE, Users WHERE User_ID = @userID AND TITLE.TITLE_ID = Users.Title_ID )
Select Unit_ID, Parent_ID, Unit_Name from UNITS WHERE Unit_ID = @userSQL
//End of sql
Can you point to what I am doing wrong? Thanks in advance!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2008
This query brings back 2 rows for each record, one for each case statement. How can I change this to bring in the contsupp.notes for both types of data? Or could it be fixed in the joins?
select
contact1.accountno,
contact1.key5 as "Ch#",
contact2.uexpsort as "Sort",
contact1.company as "Church",
contact1.contact as "Editor",
contact1.phone1 as "Phone",
contact2.uemerg as "Emergency",
contact1.Address1 as "Address",
contact1.city as "City",
contact1.state as "State",
contact1.zip as "Zip",
contact2.ubulletnqt as "Qty",
contact2.ubullcolor as "BullColor",
contact2.ubarcode as "Barcode",
contact2.udelivery as "Delivery",
contact2.uoutputdev as "OutputDev",
contact2.utimedeliv as "Time",
contact2.ucolor as "DelivColor",
contact2.ucollated as "Collated",
contact2.ustapled as "Stapled",
case when contsupp.contsupref = 'Delivery Notes' then contsupp.notes end as "Deliverynotes",
case when contsupp.contsupref = 'Cover Change Slip' then contsupp.notes end as "CoverChangeSlip"
from
Contact1 inner join contact2 on Contact1.Accountno = Contact2.Accountno
inner join contsupp on Contact1.Accountno=Contsupp.Accountno
where
contact1.key5 not like '' and contsupp.contsupref='Delivery Notes' or contsupp.contsupref ='Cover Change Slip' order by contact1.key5
Thanks for your help
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2006
HI Gurus
I have written one CTE (common table expression) and trying to use same CTE with three seperate UPDATE statements which gives me error saying "Invalid Object name" (it works fine when I try to use with 1 update statement (any one from three update statements)
Isnt it possible that I can use 1 CTE with mutiple update statements?
waiting for your reply....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2007
Does anyone know how to execute more than one MDX statement in a single report? For example, If you wanted to create a session set, run some mdx with the set included, then drop the session set. In Management studio the mdx works perfectly if you separate the individual mdx statements with GO. I tried using semicolons as mdx statement terminators and this didn't work either.
Reporting Services does something between when the report begins it's execution and the time the MDX is submitted to AS. And running a trace to see exactly what is passed in doesn't work either - the only message displayed is the same error message as what is passed back to RS. (I ran a trace with all events selected).
Anyone have any ideas?
Thank you in advance,
John
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2007
I'm hoping someone out there has a creative solution for my scenario. I have the report code below. I want to create a parameter that allows the user to select which where statement to use in the report. Then I want to use the corresponding where description below ( ex: @WHEREDESC1 ) in my header which will describe (in laymen's terms) which parameter was chosen and what is being reported on.
Has anyone achieved this or have an idea how it may be done?
DECLARE @WHEREDESC1 VARCHAR(50), @WHEREDESC2 VARCHAR(50), @WHEREDESC3 VARCHAR(50),
@WHEREDESC4 VARCHAR(50), @WHEREDESC5 VARCHAR(50)
SET @WHEREDESC1 = 'SRM Admitting and Principal Diagnosis do not match'
SET @WHEREDESC2 = 'SRM and AMPFM Admit dates do not match'
SET @WHEREDESC3 = 'SRM and AMPFM Discharge dates do not match'
SET @WHEREDESC4 = 'SRM and AMPFM Visit Type Codes do not match'
SET @WHEREDESC5 = 'SRM and AMPFM DRG codes do not match'
SELECT LEFT(srm.EPISODES.ADMISSION_DATE, 11) AS SRM_Admit_DT, ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.AdmitDate AS AMPFM_Admit_DT,
LEFT(srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_DATE, 11) AS SRM_Disch_DT, ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.DischDate AS AMPFM_Disch_DT,
srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_TYPE AS SRM_Visit_Type, ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.VisitTypeCode AS AMPFM_Visit_Type,
srm.EPISODES.CHARGES AS SRM_Charges, ampfm.rpt_VisitFinancial.TotCharges AS AMPFM_Charges,
ampfm.rpt_VisitFinancial.VisitChargesActive AS AMPFM_Active_Charges, ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.PatientFullName,
srm.CDMAB_DRG_INFO.DRG_NUMBER AS SRM_Drg, ampfm.rpt_InsuranceDrg.InsDrg AS AMPFM_Drg,
ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.Complaint AS AMPFM_Admit_Dx, srm.cdmab_base_info.ADM_DX_CODE, srm.cdmab_base_info.ADM_DX_DESC,
srm.cdmab_base_info.PRIN_DX_CODE, srm.cdmab_base_info.PRIN_DX_DESC, srm.EPISODES.ACCOUNT_NUMBER,
srm.EPISODES.MEDREC_NO
FROM srm.EPISODES INNER JOIN
ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit ON srm.EPISODES.ACCOUNT_NUMBER = ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.AccountNumber INNER JOIN
ampfm.rpt_VisitFinancial ON ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.IntOOS = ampfm.rpt_VisitFinancial.IntOOS INNER JOIN
ampfm.rpt_InsuranceDrg ON ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.IntOOS = ampfm.rpt_InsuranceDrg.IntOOS AND
ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.VisitTypeCode = ampfm.rpt_InsuranceDrg.VisitTypeCode INNER JOIN
srm.CDMAB_DRG_INFO ON srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_KEY = srm.CDMAB_DRG_INFO.EPISODE_KEY INNER JOIN
srm.cdmab_base_info ON srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_KEY = srm.cdmab_base_info.EPISODE_KEY
--WHERE srm.cdmab_base_info.ADM_DX_CODE <> srm.cdmab_base_info.PRIN_DX_CODE
--WHERE srm.EPISODES.ADMISSION_DATE <> ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.AdmitDate
--WHERE srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_DATE <> ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.DischDate
--WHERE srm.EPISODES.EPISODE_TYPE <> ampfm.rpt_AdtVisit.VisitTypeCode
--WHERE srm.CDMAB_DRG_INFO.DRG_NUMBER <> ampfm.rpt_InsuranceDrg.InsDrg
Order By srm.EPISODES.ACCOUNT_NUMBER
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2006
I am not even sure if this is possible but I want to be able to excute several statements (or SPs) at once from inside a SPs (or any other method).
What I am doing is a I am taking data from a single column, multiple rows and making it into one row (i.e. data1 + data2 + data3....) But I am doing this to a total of 2.1 million individual rows and the result will be about 204k rows.... what I have written is basically a nested loop and it works fine but very slow... slow as in it has been running for 24 hours now and it is about 60% done... I need this to finish in under 36 hours preferably...
If I could handle more than one set of data at once (there will be no duplicates) I could speed up the process by how ever many I feel like working with...
So is there a way to execute a statement (sp or function) and go to the next statement without waiting for the first to finish??
Thanks Big Time... I hope this is possible.
OH.... SQL 2000 SP4 on Windows 2003.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2007
Hi,
I am using distributed transactions where in I start a TransactionScope in BLL and receive data from service broker queue in DAL, perform various actions in BLL and DAL and if everything is ok call TransactionScope.Commit().
I have a problem where in if i run multiple instances of the same app ( each app creates one thread ), the threads pop out the same message and I get a deadlock upon commit.
My dequeue SP is as follows:
CREATE PROC [dbo].[queue_dequeue]
@entryId int OUTPUT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @conversationHandle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
DECLARE @messageTypeName SYSNAME;
DECLARE @conversationGroupId UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
GET CONVERSATION GROUP @conversationGroupId FROM ProcessingQueue;
if (@conversationGroupId is not null)
BEGIN
RECEIVE TOP(1) @entryId = CONVERT(INT, [message_body]), @conversationHandle = [conversation_handle], @messageTypeName = [message_type_name] FROM ProcessingQueue WHERE conversation_group_id=@conversationGroupId
END
if @messageTypeName in
(
'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/EndDialog',
'http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQL/ServiceBroker/Error'
)
begin
end conversation @conversationHandle;
end
END
Can anyone explain to me why the threads are able to pop the same message ? I thought service broker made sure this cannot happen?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2015
We have control table which will be useful whether we need to start the job or not. If we are starting the Job we will make it to 1.
Below is the Table Structure.
Table Name IN_USE_FG
CUST_D 0
PROD_D 0
GEO_D 0
DATE_D 0
Now we have different packages for 4 tables data loading. These 4 packages will start at a time. Before going to load the data we have to make the Flag to 1 and after that we have to load it. Because of this we have written Update statement to update the Value to 1 in respective Package.
Now we are getting dead lock because we are using same table at a same time. Because we are updating different records.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2007
I was wondering if it's possible to have a stored procedure that has two select statements which you can combine as a single result set. For instance:select name, age, titlefrom tableaselect name, age, titlefrom tablebCould you combine these queries into a single result set?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2004
I am almost sure I can update variables columns in one select/case type
statement, but having problems working out the syntax.
I have a table with transactions - with tran types as the key.
in this example, types = A,B,C ,D.
in this first example I am updating the sum of QTY to value t_A based on
tran types =A.
can I perform sub query/case to update with the same where clause
but for types B,C and D?? I also have to insert for specific lot numbers each sum values.
Create table #t_reconcile(
t_lot_number int not null,
t_A float,
t_B float,
t_C float,
t_D float)
insert #t_reconcile
select t.lot_number, sum(t.qty)
from i , t
where i._id = t.event_id
i.transaction_type = 'A'
group by t.lot_number
order by t.lot_number
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2005
Hi,I am wondering if anyone has any examples of how to run multiple sql statements from a file using .net? I want to automatically install any stored procedures or scripts from a single file on the server when my web application runs for the first time. Thanks for your help in advance!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2008
I'm working on a query which involves changing the case of a field from mixed case to all lower case. The field exists in multiple tables, so to do this I have multiple update statements. Is there a way to make this more efficient?
See below for example:
update InvestBroker
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
update InvestFill
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
update InvestBrokerAccount
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
update InvestFIXBroker
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
update InvestUploadBrokerFilter
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
update InvestSettleInstructions
set BrokerID = lower(BrokerID)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2004
Hi all;
How do I enclose multiple filters in a variable, for instance how would I put the following filter into a variable and also is it actually possible or do I have to do something else before performing this type of operation:
tel1 like '072%' or tel1 like '+27 72%' or tel1 like '072-%'
or tel1 like '+2772%' or tel1 like '72%'
and len(tel1) > 7
or tel2 like '072%' or tel2 like '+27 72%' or tel2 like '072-%'
or tel2 like '+2772%' or tel2 like '72%'
and len(tel2) > 7
or tel3 like '072%' or tel3 like '+27 72%' or tel3 like '072-%'
or tel3 like '+2772%' or tel3 like '72%'
and len(tel3) > 7
or tel4 like '072%' or tel4 like '+27 72%' or tel4 like '072-%'
or tel4 like '+2772%' or tel4 like '72%'
and len(tel4) > 7
or tel5 like '072%' or tel5 like '+27 72%' or tel5 like '072-%'
or tel5 like '+2772%' or tel5 like '72%'
and len(tel5) > 7
or tel_other like '072%' or tel_other like '+27 72%' or tel_other like '072-%'
or tel_other like '+2772%' or tel_other like '72%'
and len(tel_other) > 7
the problem is that it's got a couple of apostrophes which when declaring variables pulls it out of that mode, I have looked on the internet but can't seem to find anything
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2014
I know I should know the answer to this, but I just can't quite get the syntax down
Code:
Select case when zipCode = '10185' Then 'Deliver'
Else when zipCode = '2309' And paid = 'Yes' Then 'Deliver'
Else When zipCode = '1291' And paid = 'Yes' Then 'Deliver'
Else When zipCode = '88221' And paid = 'No' Then 'Hold'
Else when zipCode = '34123' Then 'Deliver'
End
From postalDeliveryDatabase
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
I believe we can you multiple statements in stored procedures?
Suppose I have a stored procedure and I pass parameters to this SP.
What I am aiming for is to pass some values to the stored procedure, use a select statement to retrieve some values, then have two update statements as below. Updating the same table but with opposite values, both passed as a parameter and retrived, as given below:
CREATE sp_temp_proc
@order_id int,
@order_position int,
@temp_order_id OUTPUT
@temp_order_position OUTPUT,
SELECT order_id AS temp_order_id
FROM <TABLE> WHERE order_position < @order_position
@temp_order_id = temp_order_id
UPDATE <TABLE> SET order_position = @order_position WHERE order_id =
@temp_order_id
UPDATE <TABLE> SET order_position = @temp_order_position WHERE order_id = @order_id
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2007
Hi,
I'm wondering if SqlCommand.CommandText could be set with multiple statements when CommandType=Text. anyone knows it?
I'm sure storedprocedure is the right way to go. I'm curious if this is one thing that only sp can do.
Thx
Tao
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi!I got 2 stored procedure, proc1 executes proc2,proc2 does some updates and inserts on different tables ...proc1:ALTER PROCEDUREASexecute proc2SELECT * FROM tblFoo______________________my problem is, that when executing proc1, I receive the message:"THE SP executed successfully, but did not return records!"But I need the resultset from "SELECT * FROM tblFoo" that is executedat the end of proc1.I'm not sure, but I think that I solved a similira problem with "setnocount on", I put it into both SP, but it's still the same ... noresultset ...How can I display "SELECT * FROM tblFoo" within a SP, where SQLstatements are executed before?!Thank you!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2015
I am using multiple IIF statements in ssas, it does not produce any output, does not shows any error, simply it processing..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2007
Hello,
I am curious as to whether I can insert more than one IIF statement into a table's visibility expression without nesting one inside the other.
I am rather loath to do so because of the risks that subsequent developers unfamiliar with both the situation and the logic could alter one IIF and not realize that if chokes off the other.
It had been my hope to apply the IIFs such that they would act independent of one another in a sort-of 'OR' statement whereby if one resulted in the table's hidden property being 'True' then it would not matter if the other's was true or false, etc.
Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
