What Is The Memory Footprint Of Enabling Clr In Sql Server 2005?
Aug 14, 2007we wonder about the tradeoffs of t-sql vs clr in sql server 2005 especially from a memory perspective. Is there documentation available on this subject?
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Memory Footprint
Oct 25, 2004Hi Everyone -
Is there a way to have SQL server 2k shrink the memory footprint??
computer starts up ok, small sql footprint,
after a little while - the size SWELLS to 230,384K in memory
usage (according to task manger)
Is there a way to reduce the footprint size??
(without stopping and starting the service)???
thanks
tony
SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Quorum In AlwaysOn And Enabling Memory Optimization?
Nov 26, 2014We are planning to 2014 migration in few days.
ServerA----- ServerA1
ServerB---- ServerB1
In serverA we have 5databases. And making 5databases as availability group. The replica is ServerA1
In server B we have 3 databases. And the making those 3 databases as an availibility group. The secondary replica is ServerB1.
What is the best option to configure the quoram drive in this situation.
Also Server A1 & Server B1 also we use for reporting purposes.
We have some sensitive data. Is it possible to delete the data while reading the data?
How the memory optimization feature work with always on?
Enabling Service Broker In Sql Server 2005
Oct 23, 2006helloi use Visual Web Developer and SQL server 2005 express , how can i enable service borker of my sql server ?thaks for any helpderin
View 1 Replies View RelatedCERTIFICATE PROBLEM WHILE ENABLING SSL ON SQL SERVER 2005
Jun 13, 2007Hi ,
How do we install a certificate for enabling security on MS -SQL Server 2005?
I tried to install through MMC but it says no " certificate authority found " . Any
help will be highly appreciated , Thanks to you all in advance :-)
Best Regards,
Sudhansu Tiwari
Sql Server CE And Db4o Footprint
Oct 30, 2007Hi!
Anybody knows what is the difference in footprint between db4o (www.db4o.com) and sql server CE?
(db4o is an object database for .NET)
Best regards and thx,
gerps
SQL Server 2005 And DTC Enabling On 2k Server
Aug 7, 2006I
am using SQLServer 2005 and .NET when I use the following
statements:
using (TransactionScope
objTransaccion = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required))
...
objTransaccion.Complete();
I
get the following error:
System.Transactions.TransactionManagerCommunicationException:
Network access for Distributed Transaction
Manager (MSDTC) has been disabled.
Please enable DTC for network access in the
security configuration for MSDTC using the Component Services Administrative
tool. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x8004D024)
I
am trying to enable the DTC on Windows 2000 Server but the references seem to
be to Windows 2003 Server. Any
idea on how to do it on 2k Server?
TIA, Brad.-
Enabling Ssl Encryption For SQL 2005
Apr 12, 2008
I have SQL 2005 (v9.0.3042) on Windows Server 2003. The sql server is running under LocalSystem account.
I am trying to enable SSL encryption as described in the article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/316898.
I have logged onto the machine as an administrator when creating a new certificate request in MMC. I have set "Force Encryption" to true on server and restarted the server.
However all my clients (.net code, SQL Server Management Studio) successfully connect to the server without "Encrypt=Yes". I expected to see a ssl error or some kind of error denying connection because the cliend did not request ssl ecnryption.
what am I missing? any help would be greatly appreciated.
thanks
Unattended SQL 2005 Express Install Enabling Ad Hoc Remote Queries
Jul 6, 2006Hi there,
I am trying to create an un-attended SQL 2005 Express install. I have successfully made my own template.ini file to install SQL the way I like but I cannot find a way to make it install with the "Ad hox remote queries" option enabled.
Is there anyway to do this? I can't seem to find any switches in the INI file to allow this.
Thanks
Joseph Beckett
RS Instance Footprint
May 16, 2007Hi!
Does anyone know the footprint of an RS instance? Does it increase proportionally with every instance or is there some shared pool? If I have 10 instances of RS is it really like having a full 10 separate RS running or are they all pooling?
Thanks
Can't Get SQL Server 2005 To Use More Memory
Sep 16, 2007Here'a a break down of what I've done so far.
* Windows 2003 32bit Enterprise with 10gb RAM
* SQL 2005 32bit Enterprise
* boot.ini - have added /3GB /PAE switches
* Confirmed which account SQL Server is running under and added that account to Local Policies/User Rights Assignment/Lock pages in memory
* Enabled AWE in SQL SERVER
* set minimum and maximum server memory to 9gb
* Rebooted.
Task manager says the following:
sqlservr.exe - 95MB usage * I know this is normal when using AWE right?
The actual physical memory used is 3.13GB and never goes higher. So this leads to believe that SQL is utilizing 3GB because of the /3GB switch, but it's not using the rest like it should be. I tried it without the /3GB switch and it only went up to about 2.1GB usage.
I've turned on performance monitor and SQL server target memory says 8.65 GB while the Total Server Memory says 2.45GB.
I've run:
EXEC sp_configure 'show advanced options'
RECONFIGURE
GO
EXEC sp_configure 'awe enabled'
RECONFIGURE
GO
And it confirms that the running value for both is 1
Please help.
Memory In Sql Server 2005
Mar 26, 2007Hi
I would like to know how much of memory is taken by sql server 2005 entprise edition 64 bit during sql server startup in default configuration.....(4GB RAM being used).
i also want to know about montioring the performance of sql server 2005.Should i continue to use performance monitor (perfmon) or is there any new feature in slq server 2005 which provides performance monitoring.
Thanks in advance
Enabling TCP/IP Protocol In SQL Server 6.5
Apr 7, 2004I am using SQL Server 6.5. By default TCP/IP protocol is not enabled (1433 port is not opened by the server). How can I enable this so that I can use a JDBC driver to connect to it.
In SQL Server 2000, the "SQL Server Network Utility" helps us to enable the TCP/IP protocol. But not able to figure our how/where this can be done in 6.5.
Thanks for any help
SQL Server 2005 Memory Management
Dec 11, 2007Hi all,
I needed to load some tables in memory on startup because of performance reasons.
I'm using "select * from <table>", but there are few questions:
1. How to pin already selected data in memory ? (DBCC PINTABLE doesn't work for 2005)
2. How to put index data in memory ? (do you read document(s) for advance memory management - index data caching ?)
3. How to pin index data in memory ? (otherwise sound very bad - table data in fast memory, index data - in slow disks)
Thanks in advance:
Siol En
SQL Server 2005 Std Hogging Way Too Much Memory
Sep 14, 2007Hi:
I'm running Windows Small Business Server 2003 Premium R2. I installed SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition on this PC. I'm using Std Edition instead of the Workgroup Edition that comes with SBS since I like the additional features in the Std Edition.
I'm a kind of a newbie to Windows Server administration and SQL Server administration although I've written lots of SQL queries, stored procedures, etc.
I have 2GB of RAM on this PC. When I looked in Task Manager, I saw that SQL Server was using somewhere over 1GB of RAM. So, I opened up SQL Management Studio, right clicked on the server node, clicked to get to the memory configuration page and saw that SQL Server was set to use all 2GB of RAM on the PC. I changed that to 500MB(500000000, or 476MB) and decided to reboot the server. When the server came back up, I forgot to check SQL Server's new RAM usage. The server ran without interruption for over 24 hours. Now, when I checked SQL Server's memory usage in Task Manager, I can see it's using over 750MB of RAM.
How do I fix this?
I have Exchange Server 2003 running on this PC as well.
Thx.
SQL Server 2005 Memory Management
Dec 11, 2007
Hi all,
I needed to load some tables in memory on startup because of performance reasons.
I'm using "select * from <table>", but there are few questions:
1. How to pin already selected data in memory ? (DBCC PINTABLE doesn't work for 2005)
2. How to put index data in memory ? (do you read document(s) for advance memory management - index data caching ?)
3. How to pin index data in memory ? (otherwise sound very bad - table data in fast memory, index data - in slow disks)
Thanks in advance:
Siol En
SQL Server 2005 DTS/Memory Usage
Sep 18, 2007We have an application that we currently run on SQL Server 2000 that works by creating a DTS package that it then executes.
Due to performance reasons, we have been considering switching to 2005, for a few reasons. Can anyone confirm clarify the following?
1) SQL Server 2000 caps RAM usage at 2GB, whereas SQL Server 2005 is only limited by the OS - RAM usage is a big current issue for us, so if upgrading to 2005 would solve this it would help a lot. Can anyone confirm my understanding of this?
2) Would using the legacy DTS in SQL Server 2005 take advantage of this RAM difference, or is it running on the old 2000 engine and only able to use the 2GB?
Thanks for any help.
Memory Configurations For SQL Server 2005 EE X64 With SQL Server 2000 EE X32 On Windows Server EE X64 Server
Apr 20, 2007My server is a dual AMD x64 2.19 GHz with 8 GB RAM running under Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with service pack 1 installed. We have SQL 2000 32-bit Enterprise installed in the default instance. AWE is enabled using Dynamically configured SQL Server memory with 6215 MB minimum memory and 6656 maximum memory settings.
I have now installed, side-by-side, SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition in a separate named instance. Everything is running fine but I believe SQL Server2005 could run faster and need to ensure I am giving it plenty of resources. I realize AWE is not needed with SQL Server 2005 and I have seen suggestions to grant the SQL Server account the 'lock pages in memory' rights. This box only runs the SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 server databases and I would like to ensure, if possible, that each is splitting the available memory equally, at least until we can retire SQL Server 2000 next year. Any suggestions?
SQL 2005 Server Performance And Maximum Memory Pro
Aug 13, 2007A query was taking 20 seconds and consuming 70% CPU takes only 1 second after setting Maximum Memory property to 2048 MB - why?
Server:
OS Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Server 2003, Enterprise Edition
Version5.2.3790 Service Pack 1 Build 3790
8 GB memory
Two Dual-core AMD Opteron 285 2.6GHz Processors
Server is not configured for AWE
Fiber channel connection to EMC Clarion - two LUNs - one for MDF, one for LDF
SQL 2005
SQL 2005 32 bit Standard Edition - SP1 (version 9.0.2047)
Three instances installed on server - only one instance in use
Binaries and system databases on local mirrored disk
Database file (MDF) on one EMC LUN - dedicated physical drives
Log file (LDF) on one EMC LUN - dedicated physical drives
Query in question:
SELECT TOP 10 Address.Address1, Address.Address2, Address.City, Address.County, Address.State, Address.ZIPCode, Address.Country, Client.Name,
Quote.Deleted, Client.PrimaryContact, Client.DBA, Client.Type, Quote.Status, Quote.LOB, Client.ClientID, Quote.QuoteID, Quote.PolicyNumber,
Quote.EffectiveDate, Quote.ExpirationDate, Quote.Description, Quote.Description2, Quote.DateModified, Quote.DateAccessed, Quote.CurrentPremium,
Quote.TransactionDate, Quote.CreationDate, Quote.Producer FROM ((Client INNER JOIN Address ON Client.ClientID = Address.ClientID) INNER JOIN Quote ON
Client.ClientID = Quote.ClientID) WHERE (Quote.Deleted = 0) AND ((Address.AddressType)='Mailing') ORDER BY Client.Name
Address table - 161,075 rows
Client table - 161,634 rows
Quote table - 59,145 rows
With default maximum memory setting (2,147,483,647 MB) - query runs in 20 seconds and consumes over 70 % of the CPU.
After changing maximum memory setting to 2048 MB, query runs in less than 1 second.
Question is:
What is the best practice for setting the minimum and maximum memory settings for SQL 2005?
What can be monitored to identify the cause of these type of issues - using profiler, PerfMon, other tool?
Thanks
Planning For SQL Server 2005: 64-bit, OS, Processor, Memory
Jul 23, 2005I was browsing Microsoft's SQL Server site, looking forsome details about SQL Server 2005. Didn't find whatI was looking for...I'm thinking about moving an existing SQL Server 2000workload to a new box, using SQL Server 2005, andmaybe the 64-bit version.My questions are:1. What is the current target date for release of SQL Server 2005?Will 64-bit ship when 32-bit ships?2. Will 64-bit SQL Server 2005 require a special versionof Windows Server 2003 (e.g. Windows Server 2003 Enterprise x64)?Will it work with both Intel and AMD processors?3. How many CPUs, and how much memory, will be supported bySQL Server 2005, 32-bit and 64-bit, on each OS that can runSQL Server 2005.I'm looking for a chart here, something like the chart onpage 117 of Kalen Delaney's "Inside SQL Server 2000" book.SQL Server 2005 SQL Server 2005Feature Enterprise 32-bit Enterprise 64-bit------------------- ----------------- -----------------CPUs supportedWin Srvr 2003:Win Srvr 2003 Adv:Win Srvr 2003 Ent x64:Physical memorysupportedWin Srvr 2003:Win Srvr 2003 Adv:Win Srvr 2003 Ent x64:Has Microsoft published this info, and I just can find it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL Server 2005 Hogging Processor And Not Using Memory
Sep 25, 2006Hi,
We have recently tested upgrading our web service from sql 2000 to 2005 sp1. The upgrade went smoothly enough, however we now have the problem of the sqlserver.exe process taking 90-100 % of the processors time, but using only 100 MB of memory.
We have 6GB available and we are running the enterprise editions of Windows 2003 and SQL 2005.
Machine specs,
DL380 G2, 2 X 2.8 Ghz Zeon, 6GB ram, Raid 5, database partition of 140 GB, Log partition of 35 GB.
Db is 25 GB, Log is 12 GB. Largest table has 32 million rows.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Rob
SQL Server 2005 Doesn't Allocate Available Memory
Oct 26, 2007running Sql Server 2005 SP2 on Windows 2003 Server SP1 with 2GB RAM. After start-up, the sqlservr.exe does only take up around 100 MB of RAM, and it stays roughly there even if the DB is used heavily. This leads to very poor performance, even timeouts on simple querys.
In the task manager, I see that of the 2 GB of RAM, more than 1 GB is still available. I don't understand why SQL Server won't take it?
As a test, I configured the min and max amount of RAM SQL Server should used both to 1024 MB and restarted the service - but it is still the same picture. It won't take more than around 100 MB.
The server has just been restarted, but the problem remains.
BTW there is also an instance of SQL 2000 on the same machine. It shows the same behaviour - I even checked the "reserve phyiscal memory" checkbox there, but it stays on a very low number (50 MB) and doesn't adhere to the supposed size.
thanks and best regards,
- Urs
Memory Stress Test In SQL Server 2005
Apr 2, 2007I have a Windows 2003 Server running SQL 2005. The server has 32 GB of memory and I have enabled AWE in SQL. I have also configured the min and max SQL memory as 1 GB and 28 GB, respectively. However, this server currently has very low activity so I'm not sure whether my AWE-related changes worked. SQLSERVR.EXE process takes up about 100 MB of memory. Is there any tool or scripts that I can use to memory stress SQL to confirm that AWE is really in effect ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL Server 2008 :: Enabling TDE On Databases Which Are Used For Log Shipping
Sep 15, 2015I have log shipping enabled on databases(primary and secondary) and works fine. I need to implement TDE on the database. I have experience on implementing TDE on databases which are not used for log-shipping.
What are the steps needed to setup TDE which are involved with log-shipping.
Memory Settings In SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition
Nov 9, 2007Hi,
I'm having trouble finding the optimum memory settings for SQL Server 2005. I have 4 instances running on a macine with 8 dual-core processors and 18GB of RAM. I have tried the following memory settings so far:
No maximum - one instance used about 12GB of RAM so then the others struggled
Maximum of 4GB each (2GB left for Windows) - meant that 3 instances could be using 1GB each and then another at 4GB and needing more whilst 9GB sat unused.
Minimum of 2GB each - one instance would use up 10GB and then never give any back to the other instances.
I also find that setting a maximum then just causes a high amount of paging. What I would like to do is have each instance use a minimum amount, say 1GB, and then have each instance use a maximum of 13GB (3GB for other 3 instances running at a minimum level and 2GB for Windows). This 13GB should then be released and allocated to another instance when necessary, assuming it is no longer all being used. I do not want paging to occur if an instance reaches 13GB.
How do I go about configuring SQL Server to behave like this? Is it possible?
Thanks.
Memory Usage Of SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition
Jan 2, 2007Hi forum readers,
we are working on a release 2.0 mobile solution right now. In our version 1.0 we did not have to worry about memory issues as our application was the only application running on our target devices (e.g. T-Mobile MDA Compact II Pocket PCs, WM2005).
Now we need to share the available memory with others. As our application relies on its SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition database we are wondering about memory usage of that server.
We know that a Pocket PC divides its memory into Storage and Program. If our application uses a 5 MB database and 1.5 MB for DLLs and it's exe-file. These files reside in the storage space when not loaded. When the application starts up it is loaded in the program memory. What happens to the 5 MB database file? Is is loaded into Program memory as well? Are only portions of that file loaded? Or is nothing loaded at all?
Does anyone have a deeper insight into that server an can answer my questions.
Best regards,
Tobias
SQL Server 2012 :: Error While Enabling CDC On Table Level
Oct 12, 2014I am trying to enable CDC feature in SQL Server 2012 Enterprise Edition ( 11.0.2424.0).The command to enable CDC for Database worked fine, but the command for enabling CDC on Table failed.Command used for enabling CDC on table is as follows.
USE DatabaseName
GO
EXEC sys.sp_cdc_enable_table
@source_schema = N'dbo',
@source_name = N'TableName',
@role_name = NULL,
@supports_net_changes = 1
Following is the error message got
Msg 22832, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_cdc_enable_table_internal, Line 623...Could not update the metadata that indicates table [dbo].[TableName] is enabled for Change Data Capture. The failure occurred when executing the command '[sys].[sp_cdc_add_job] @job_type = N'capture''. The error returned was 22836: 'Could not update the metadata for database DatabaseName to indicate that a Change Data Capture job has been added. The failure occurred when executing the command 'sp_add_ jobstep_ internal'. The error returned was 14234: 'The specified '@server' is invalid (valid values are returned by sp_helpserver).'. Use the action and error to determine the cause of the failure and resubmit the request.'. Use the action and error to determine the cause of the failure and resubmit the request.
SQL Server 2005 Workgroup Edition In SBS 2003 R2 Max Memory Question
Feb 11, 2007We have only a small busines and haven't got too much experience with servers and now have a proliant server coming in with SBS 2003 R2 Premium with the 4 GB max memory that SBS 2003 can handle according to the specs.
We weren't planning on using the SQL 2005 worlgroup edition up till now, but now we might. According to the specs of SQL server 2005 workgroup edition however, it has a max RAM of 3GB!
Is this going to be a problem and should we keep using our previous DB, or can we migrate toward SQL server with the 4 GB of RAM?
Performance Issues Total Server Memory Vs Target Server Memory
Aug 2, 2006Hi
I did a load testing and found the following observations:
1. The Memory:Pages/sec was crossing the limit beyond 20.
2. The Target Server Memory was always greater than Total Server Memory
Seeing the above data it seems to be memory pressure. But I found that AvailableMemory was always above 200 MB. Also Buffer Cache HitRatio was close to 99.99. What could be the reason for the above behavior?
SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Any Kind Of Security Risks For Enabling CLR?
Jan 21, 2015SSISDB 2014 - Enabling CLR - Is there are kind of security risks for enabling CLR when creating SSISDB?
View 0 Replies View RelatedEnabling Full Text Search On Existing Sql Server Instance
May 25, 2007Hi
I have an existing instance of sql express 2005 w/advanced services installed. When I installed I did not install full text search. Is there a way I can enable full text search on this existing instance?
Thanks
Setting Memory Values For SQL 2005 Standard (32 Bit) On Windows 2003 Server 64 Bit.
Aug 3, 2007Hi,
I am testing SQL 2005 Standard (32 bit) on a Windows 2003 Server 64 bit with 8GB of RAM? Should I enable the AWP Setting or not and should I change the maximum server memory (currently saying 2GB)?
Thanks!
Tom
SQL Server 2005 Service Broker - Activation Stored Procedure Memory Usuage
Nov 9, 2007We are looking for some guidance with an issue we have picked up with our implementation of Service Broker here on the ABSA Capital project and I am hoping you can help or point us in the direction of someone.
The architecture we have implemented for service broker is to make use of an Activation stored procedure on two queues (1 SP per queue) to process the messages received. What we have found is that the activation stored procedure runs on a background session and its CPU time and memory just grows to the point where it brought one of our UAT servers to a grinding halt.
Is there anyway we can reduce the memory consumption of the activation stored procedure or is this one of those things that still need to be ironed out in Service Broker?