Why Is DTS Faster Than A Query To Load A Remote Table?
Apr 23, 2007Hello
DTS is notoriously faster than making the following statement:
insert into synonym_MyRemoteTable
select * from myLocalTable
Why is it so?
Thanks a lot.
ADVERTISEMENT
How To Make You Reports Load Faster ?
Sep 3, 2007Any ideas how to make reports faster when returning lots fo rows?
I know you would need to work on your sql query etc..
Or maybe cache it.
But i'm thinking of having a kind of middle tier thing that sits between your sql database and the reports itself.
Any ideas would be appreciated
I Need A Faster Query
Jun 20, 2007Hi y'all,
I've recently run a profiler on my code and following query took 7 seconds:
SELECT TOP 10 UI, COUNT(UI) AS Expr1 FROM table WHERE (UI <> 'custom_welcome') GROUP BY UI ORDER BY COUNT(UI) DESC
Is it possible to rewrite this so my code gets faster? It's also possible that it's due to the size of the table?
Thanks in advance! I'll let you know how long your query takes :)
Faster SQL Query
Mar 31, 2004Hi!
I M basically an application developer & use simple sql queries in my programmings. I do not have much idea abt tuning/auditing part & thatswhy i m unable to answer them properly in my interviews. Can anybody give me some tips?????
Question 1:
In a stored procedure, One SELECT stmt is there & depending upon the @rowcount, it updates around 14000 records which is also written inside this stored procedure. Instead of writing this way, there is some other way which is faster than this. Can anybody tell me the correct way???
Question 2:Can anybody give me few examples like this?????? I need them desparetly.
Thanx. Bye.
How To Tell If One Query Is Faster Than Another
Jul 26, 2006I have rewritten a stored procedure that consists of a single select that selects from a view. Essentially I combined the select in the view and the select in the sp into one select. I am now trying to determine if the new version is faster.
The estimated execution plan gives a ratio of 96% : 4% in favour of the new version when I run them together from a query window but when I try to time them I can't get a satisfactory result.
If I run each query once and display the difference between start and end time, they display 0. If I run each one 100, 200, etc times I get different results each time.
Is there anything I can do?
Faster Query Results
Oct 17, 2007Can anyone give me the basics of speeding up reports that use queries or views or nested views?
Current reports are now taking over 2 minutes to show.We have thousands and sometimes even millions of records to report against.Queries have 4 and 5 table joins etc.
We are using ASP.NET 2.0 in Visual Studio 2005 and Crystal Reports.
Thanks
Help Make Query Run Better (faster)
Mar 20, 2007I need help makeing the following query run more efficently.
Code:
SELECT t1.ID,t1.firstName,t1.lastName,t1.address,t1.city,t1.state, t1.zip,t1.locationAddress,t1.locationCity,t1.locationState,t1.locationZip
FROM Landlord_tbl t1
left outer join Mail_tbl t2
ON t2.potentialSitesID = t1.potentialSitesID
WHERE t2.mailed_out_date is null and NOT(t1.firstName+t1.lastName) is Null
GROUP BY t1.ID,t1.firstName,t1.lastName,t1.address,t1.city,t1.state, t1.zip,t1.locationAddress,t1.locationCity,t1.locationState,t1.locationZip
ORDER BY t1.firstName, t1.lastName, t1.city, t1.state
Query Run Time (which Should Be Faster?)
Feb 28, 2008Hi, when I execute the sql in DBTestArchive and then DBTest query analyzer , I found that the run time is shorter in DBTest. Can I make assumption that the query run time is shorter in DBTest if I select data from it and insert into another database? Thanks.
INSERT INTO DBTestArchive.dbo.tblVendorMasterArchive
SELECT * FROM DBTest.dbo.tblVendorMaster
Better (faster) Way Of Handling Query
Mar 26, 2008
I have a query which will display the employee name who is handling maximum number of project.
the query is
Code Snippet
select EmployeeDetails.Empid,
EmployeeDetails.FirstName + ' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName as EmpName,
count(*) as Number_Of_Projects
from EmployeeDetails left outer join LUP_EmpProject
on EmployeeDetails.Empid= LUP_EmpProject.Empid
group by EmployeeDetails.Empid,EmployeeDetails.FirstName,EmployeeDetails.LastName
HAVING count(*)=(SELECT TOP 1 COUNT(EmpID)
FROM LUP_EmpProject GROUP BY EmpID ORDER BY 1 DESC)
where EmployeeDetails table contain empname and empid. LUP_EmpProject table contain empid and project id.
Can anybody help me in writing a better query than the above given?
Please help!!!!!!!!!!
Drop PK And Query Runs Faster. Why?
Aug 23, 2000I have a query which joins multiple tables. This query has suddenly begun to take up to 2 minutes to run (vs. 5-10 seconds previously).
No major change in number of records in the tables (currently about 220,000). When I remove the PK from one of the tables which then forces a tablescan, the query returns to running in 5-10 seconds. If I add the PK back, performance is back to 2 minutes.
Any suggestions short and/or long term?
Thanks for any help.
Any Clue To Make This Query Run Faster
Oct 3, 2006Any help would be really appreciated....
My stored procedure...
CREATE PROCEDURE business3rd7
@Fromdate DATETIME,
@ToDate DATETIME
AS
select distinct CONVERT(VARCHAR(10),Receipts.Companynumber1)+CONVE RT(VARCHAR(10),Receipts.Companynumber2) as co ,
Receipts.Premium1+Receipts.Premium2 as Premium,
"CAN"=case when Receipts.transactiontype='CAN'
then (receipts.premium1+receipts.premium2)
else 0
end,
"NET"=Receipts.Premium1+Receipts.Premium2-case when Receipts.transactiontype='CAN'
then (receipts.premium1+receipts.premium2)
else 0
end,
"#NEW"=case when Receipts.transactiontype='NEW' then count(Receipts.policynumber) else
0 end,
-------
"$NEW"=
case when Receipts.transactiontype='NEW' then (Receipts.Premium1+Receipts.premium2)
else 0 end,
"#REN"=case when Receipts.transactiontype='REN' then count(Receipts.policynumber) else
0 end,
"$RENEW"=
case when Receipts.transactiontype='REN' then (Receipts.Premium1+Receipts.premium2)
else 0 end,
"#AP"=case when Receipts.transactiontype='AP' then count(Receipts.policynumber) else 0
end,
"$AP"=
case when Receipts.transactiontype='AP' then (Receipts.Premium1+Receipts.premium2) else
0 end,
"#SENT"=case when policy.Renewalofferdate between @Fromdate AND @ToDate then
count(policy.policynumber) end,
"%"=case when case when Receipts.transactiontype='REN' then count(Receipts.policynumber)else 0
end =0 then 0
when case when policy.Renewalofferdate between @Fromdate AND @ToDate then
count(policy.policynumber) else 0 end=0 then 0
else
case when Receipts.transactiontype='REN' then count(Receipts.policynumber)else 0
end /case when policy.Renewalofferdate between @Fromdate AND @ToDate then
count(policy.policynumber) else 0 end end,
"Current Year"= case when policy.Renewalofferdate between @Fromdate AND @ToDate then
count(clubamount) end,
"Previous Year"=case when policy.Renewalofferdate between DateAdd(year, -1, @Fromdate)
AND DateAdd(year, -1, @ToDate) then count(clubamount) end,
"#AA"=count(receipts.clubamount),
"$AA"=sum(receipts.clubamount)
FROM Receipts,Policy
where Receipts.Agencyid=Policy.Agentid
group by
Receipts.CompanyNumber1,Receipts.CompanyNumber2,
Receipts.Premium1,Receipts.Premium2,
Receipts.TransactionType,policy.Renewalofferdate,
Receipts.Agencyid
GO
Query plan...
----------------------Query Plan
|--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([Expr1008] ASC, [Expr1009] ASC, [Expr1010] ASC, [Expr1011] ASC, [Expr1012] ASC, [Expr1013] ASC, [Expr1014] ASC, [Expr1015] ASC, [Expr1016] ASC, [Expr1017] ASC, [Expr1018] ASC, [Expr1019] ASC, [Expr1020] ASC, [Expr1021] ASC, [Ex
|--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1008]=Convert([Receipts].[CompanyNumber1])+Convert([Receipts].[CompanyNumber2]), [Expr1009]=[Receipts].[Premium1]+[Receipts].[Premium2], [Expr1010]=If ([Receipts].[TransactionType]='CAN') then ([Receipts].[Premium1]+[R
|--Compute Scalar(DEFINE:([Expr1004]=Convert([Expr1076]), [Expr1005]=Convert([Expr1077]), [Expr1006]=Convert([Expr1078]), [Expr1007]=If ([Expr1078]=0) then NULL else [Expr1079]))
|--Stream Aggregate(GROUP BY:([Receipts].[CompanyNumber1], [Receipts].[CompanyNumber2], [Receipts].[Premium1], [Receipts].[Premium2], [Receipts].[TransactionType], [Policy].[RenewalOfferDate], [Receipts].[AgencyID]) DEFINE:([Expr1076]=COUN
|--Sort(ORDER BY:([Receipts].[CompanyNumber1] ASC, [Receipts].[CompanyNumber2] ASC, [Receipts].[Premium1] ASC, [Receipts].[Premium2] ASC, [Receipts].[TransactionType] ASC, [Policy].[RenewalOfferDate] ASC, [Receipts].[AgencyID] ASC))
|--Hash Match(Inner Join, HASH:([Policy].[AgentID])=([Receipts].[AgencyID]), RESIDUAL:([Policy].[AgentID]=[Receipts].[AgencyID]))
|--Table Scan(OBJECT:([gasInquiry].[dbo].[Policy]))
|--Table Scan(OBJECT:([gasInquiry].[dbo].[Receipts]))
The two tables has number of records as 13349 and 97032.It taking more than 30 mins...
Any way to make it faster...
Temp Table Faster?
Dec 23, 2005If you were doing paging of results on a web page and were interestedin grabbing say records 10-20 of a result set. But also wanted to knowthe total # of records in the result set (so you could know the total #of pages in the set).Would it be better to query the DB table 2X. Once for Count(*). Andagain for the records for the current page?Or better to create a temp table, select the records into it, and thenget count(*) and the page results from the temp table?I saw an example in a book that made a temp table to do this and to meit seemed like it would be slower. I don't get the reason for a temptable. Anyone have any ideas?
View 5 Replies View RelatedT-SQL (SS2K8) :: Create UDF To Query A Table On A (random) Remote Server
Jan 30, 2015I'm trying to write a function that will retrieve the last backup date/time of a particular database on a remote server (i.e. by querying msdb.dbo.backupset). Unfortunately, you can't use sp_executesql in a function, so I can't figure out a way to pass the server name to the query and still be able to return the datetime value back to the calling TSQL code (so that rules out using EXEC().
View 3 Replies View RelatedAdHoc Query Faster Than Stored Proc?
Aug 28, 2004Yesterday i face a strange SQL Server 2000 behaviour :-(
I had a query that was wrapped inside a stored procedure, as usual.
Suddenly, the stored procedure execution time raised from 9 secs to 80.
So to understand where the problem was i cut and pasted the sp body's into a new query analyzer window an then executed it again. Speed back to 9 secs.
Tried stored procedure again, and speed again set to 80 secs.
Tried to recompile sp. Nothing. Tried to restart SQL Server. Nothing. Tried to DROP & RE-CREATE sp. Done! Speed again at 9 secs.
My collegue asked me "why?", but i had no words. :confused: Do you have any explanation?
Faster Query - Select By One Or Multiple Fields
Feb 1, 2008Let's say I have a table of users.
Let's imagine there's two fields:
username (PK),
password
Now I need to authenticate a user against this table. What is the recommended approach? Is it better / faster to
(1) SELECT * FROM [User]
WHERE username = 'whatever' AND password='whatever'
or
(2) SELECT * FROM [User]
WHERE username = 'whatever'
and then in my code check that the record returned matched the password?
Why Does A Query Runs Considerably Faster Than Stored Procedure?
Dec 29, 2003I have an stored procedure that takes 23 seconds to execute. However, the same query is executed in 4 seconds.
All the tests where made using the Query Analizer.
What could be wrong?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Faster Way To Import/append Data To Table...
Dec 13, 1999Hello,
I was wondering if there was a different approach I should take in appending data to a table...
My destination table has about 94+ million records in it, and I have been taking two approaches to getting new files into this table:
1) I do a data pump task in a DTS to import the file to a trans (temp) table, which is truncated every time, and then do an INSERT INTO statement from the temp table to my destination table.
The import to the trans table only takes a few minutes (about 1 - 2 million records per file, but have short record lenghts,) but when I do the INSERT INTO statement, it takes upwards of 6 hrs to append.
2) I have tried doing a bulk insert task, going directly to the destination table (which defeats the purpose of my trans table to check out the data prior, but I feel the data is clean at this point.)
I am running the bulk insert right now, and it's been running for over 3 hours...so I'm going to assume this will take just as long as the INSERT INTO statement does like I did before.
My destination table does not have any indexes in it at all, and I don't need to do any transformations to the data when bringing it into SQL since the data is clean. Also, I have a default value constraint on one of my fields on the destination table.
Plus there are other ppl and applications hitting the server which could impact the overall processing, but nothing out of the ordinary is going on the server today. I know there are only so many ways to get a file into a table...but maybe someone knows a different way I should try this.
Thanks for anyone's suggestions!
Kael.
Deleteing Millions Records From A Table-faster Way?
Jun 21, 2007hi!
i am using sql 2005 k with sp1.
I want to delete 30-40 million rows from a transactional table. Whats the fastest way to delete these rows. just to delete 300,000 rows it takes 30 min. also i don't want to truncate the table.
any help would be appreciated
Thanks
How Do I Make 30 Sec Running Query (select C1 Sum(x) From T1 Where C1 &&> 1000 Group By C1) Run Faster?
Aug 10, 2007It seems when I run the query with the set staticts IO on then statistic reports back with the 'work table', and the query takes 30+ sec. if the worktable is ommited(whatever the reason?) the query take less 1 sec.
Here is my take, I believe work table is created in tempdb...and if not then whole query is using the cached page, am I right?
if I am right then the theory is, if I increase the (via sp_configure) server min memory setting and min query memory, the query ought use the cached page and return in less 1 sec. (specially there is absolutely no one but me on the server), so far I can't make it go faster...what setting am I missing to make it run faster?
Another question is if the query can not avoid but use the tempdb, is it going to always be 30 sec+ time? why is tempdb involvement make it go so much slower?
Thanks in for you help in advance
13GB MySQL Table...Processing Queries Faster...
May 23, 2007I have a 13 GB MYSQL table with the following definition:
Code:
CREATE TABLE `WikiParagraphs` (
`ID` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
`Paragraph` text NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`ID`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=73035281 ;
I query it like this:
Code:
select Paragraph from WikiParagraphs where ID in (1,2,3,4)
the 1,2,3,4 bit comes from the Sphinx FullText engine that gives me the IDs I need that match my query within about 500 milliseconds.
But retrieving the data itself takes approximately 3-6 seconds.
Obviously, I'd like to speed this query up.
Any ideas?
G-Man
Same Statement Executes 10 Times Faster As Raw Sql In Query Analyzer Then In A Stored Proc
Aug 15, 2007
Hi,
I apologize for the long post but I am trying to give as much information as I can about the steps I've taken to troubleshoot this.
We have a stored procedure that builds a sql statement and executes it using the Execute command. When I execute the stored procedure through query analyzer it takes close to 5 seconds to execute. When I print out the exact same statement and execute it directly in query analyzer as "raw sql", it takes 0.5 seconds - meaning it takes 10 times longer for the code to execute in the stored proc. I altered the stored proc to execute the printed sql instead of building but it still takes the full 5 seconds and there were no changes in the execution plan. This makes me confident that the issue is not caused by the dynamic sql. I've used with recompile to make sure that the stored procedure caches the most recent execution plan. When I compare the execution plans, the stored proc uses a nested loop whereas the raw sql statement uses a hash join. Seeing that, I added the hash hint to the stored proc and doing so brought down the execution time down from 5 secs to 2 secs but still the raw sql statement uses a clustered index whereas the stored proc uses a non-clustered index and that makes the statement 4 times slower. This proves how efficient clustered indexes are over non-clustered ones, but it doesn't help me since, as far as I know, I can't force SQL Server to use the clustered index.
Does anyone know why sql server is generating such an inefficient execution plan for the stored proc compared to the execution plan that it generates when executing the raw sql statement? The only thing I can think of is that some stats are not updated and that somehow throws off the stored proc. But then again, shouldn't it affect the raw sql statement?
Thank you,
Michael Tzoanos
Remote Access Server Configuration Option And Remote Query Timeout?
Jun 2, 2015- When I disable "allow remote connections to this server" from server properties>connection page, I can still remotely connect to the server from SSMS...so what is the impact of enable/disabling it?
- what is the impact of changing the remote query timeout (on the same page) from default value?
Select * From Table Is Processed Much Faster Than Select MyField From Table ¿?¿?
Oct 1, 2007
I have a query that has the following structure
Select *
From Table
Where Condition And ... (some 'Exists' conditions)
When I run the query using field names the query gets much slower, and I cannot understand Why!
Select MyField
From Table
Where Condition And ... (some 'Exists' conditions)
I'm talking about three times slower using the Select MyField sintax.
Any ideas???
Query Executes Faster In Grid Mode Than In Text Mode!!
Mar 9, 2000Hello,everyone!!
There is a query which when executed in the grid mode(ctrl+d) takes approx 0.02 seconds(about 21,000
rows) But when I execute in the text mode, it takes about 0.40 seconds!!
Why is this difference?
Also, when the records from this table are read from a VB application, they are equally slow (as in the text mode!)
Why is it so slow on the text mode & relatively faster in the grid mode?
Has anyone got any idea on ‘Firehose’ style cursor ?(which may speed up access of data in the VB application)
Rgds,
Adie
Transact SQL :: Retrieve Currently Created Date From Master Table To Load Into Parent And Child Table
May 12, 2015In Master tabel i have these date datas
2015-05-10
2015-05-11
2015-05-12
SO when i try to load from  Master table to parent and child table i am using using expresssion likeÂ
select B.ID,A.* FROM FLATFILE_INVENTORY AS A JOIN DMS_INVENTORY AS B ONÂ
A.ACDealerID=B.DMSDEALERID AND A.StockNumber=B.STOCKNUMBER ANDÂ
A.InventoryDate=B.INVENTORYDATE AND A.VehicleVIN=B.VEHICLEVIN
WHERE convert(date,A.[FtpDate]) = convert(date,GETDATE()) Â and convert(date,B.Ftpdate) = convert(date,getdate()) ;
If i use this Expression i am getting the current system date data's only  from Master table to parent and child tables.
My Problem is If i do this in my local sserver using the above Expression if i loaded today date and if need to load yesterday date i can change my system date to yesterday date and i can run this Expression.so that yeserday date data alone will get loaded from Master to parent and  child tables.
If i run this expression to remote server  i cannot change the system date in server.
while using this Expression for current date its loads perfectly but when i try to load yesterday data it takes current date date only not the yesterday date data.
What is the Expression on which ever  date i am trying load in  the master table  same date need to loaded in Parent and child table without changing the system Date.
Integration Services :: Load Incremental Data Into Fact Table When Source Table Not Have Timestamp And Unique Key
Sep 24, 2015I have a transaction table having about 40 crore rows in source. It don't have timestamp and unique key columns. It have only Bill_month and Bill_Year columns. Actually for loading this table into staging I have added a new datetime column by adding default bill_date as 01. Then
* First we delete last 3 month data from staging tables.
* Get last 3 months data from source table.
* Load that 3 months data from source to staging table.Â
We do this because we only get update for last three months data. Now I have to include this transaction table as Fact table in DW. What will be the best practice for loading the fact table by picking data form staging table. Also we have to look up with dimensions for Foreign Keys.Â
* Should I implement the same method of deleting last 3 months records and loading them again.Â
Difference Between Remote Login Timeout And Remote Query Timeout?
Mar 28, 2008I just want to find out what the difference between a remote login and a remote query is. I'd have thought that a remote query inherently requires a remote login.
View 6 Replies View RelatedSQL Query Load Times
Feb 10, 2006I have an VB.NET web app which performs a fairly complicated SQL query. It seems in the morning, the 1st time the page is loaded (and query executed) it takes up to 10-15 seconds to complete loading. Sometimes it even times out. However anytime after that, the page loads up (even from another computer) in about 4-5 seconds. Can someone explain the reason for this and how I might fix the load times in the morning?
Thanks
Data Load Query
Sep 21, 2005Hi,I'm extracting data from a mainframe application with a view to loadingit into a MS SQL database. I'm trying to determine the most efficientway to format the mainframe extract file to make loading into thedatabase easier.The problem I have is that the existing record structure includes anarray that can vary between 1 to 50. If I include this array in asingle record the table I use to import the data would need 50 columnsthough not all these would be populated. There is a field in the recordto identify how many occurances of the array there are.Current Record Structure :Account NumberAccount NameOther Account DetailsTotalNumberOfArrayFieldsPopulatedArray :Value1Value2Value3....up to Value50 (if required)i.e.12344,Mr Agent,$29.95,2,BX123,BX12412345,Mr Jones,$14.95,3,XX123,XX124,XX12512345,Mr Jones,$14.00,1,XY12312345,Mr Jones,$15.95,2,XZ124,XZ12512346,Mr Smith,$19.95,3,AX123,AX124,AX12512346,Mr Smith,$19.00,1,BY12312347,Mr Acant,$99.95,7,CX123,CX124,CX125,CX126,CX127,CX128 ,CX129There may be up to 3 records created for each Account Number withdifferent values in the array fields.Am I better to break this file into two files .. one with the corecustomer information and a second file with a row for each array valuewhich has a link to the customer information file.OrIs there a way to efficiently process the original file once it isloaded into the staging tables in the database ?i.e.File 1 - Core Customer Information====================================Current Record Structure :Record NumberAccount NumberAccount NameOther Account DetailsTotalNumberOfArrayFieldsPopulatedFile 2 - Array Information====================================Record NumberArray :Value1Value2Value3....up to Value50 (if required)File 1========================12344,Mr Agent,$29.95,212345,Mr Jones,$14.95,312345,Mr Jones,$14.00,112345,Mr Jones,$15.95,212346,Mr Smith,$19.95,312346,Mr Smith,$19.00,112347,Mr Acant,$99.95,7File 2========================12344,BX12312344,BX12412345,XX12312345,XX12412345,XX12512345,XY12312345,XZ12412345,XZ12512346,AX12312346,AX12412346,AX12512346,BY12312347,CX12312347,CX12412347,CX12512347,CX12612347,CX12712347,CX12812347,CX129At times the individual array values will be used for look ups thoughessentially the Customer Information record will be the primary lookupdata.I'm leaning toward changing my COBOL code and creating the 2nd outputunless someone can suggest a simple way to process the information onceloaded into the table.Any help that could be suggested would be greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies View RelatedQuery Load Balancing
Apr 10, 2006Hi,
We have a massive database that users run complex queries on. The queries are never the same so caching cannot be used too much effect. When many queries are run at one time by the various users the system slows down.
What we are trying to achieve is maybe have a primary SQL Server 2005 machine and multiple (4-5) SQL Server 2005 secondary machines. The primary machine would get the query and would decide based on loads as to which secondary machine would fulfill the query.
We are not worried about failover and clustering and all that fun stuff. Our primary concern is to achieve the quickest execution of the query. We were wondering if SQL Server 2005 has any feature that enables query load balancing of some kind.
Thanks
Table Load
Mar 14, 2006After working on this with no luck for a couple of days I am sick of pounding my head against a wall! I need help!! I am trying to load 3 flat files into one table and I am not sure how to do it using SSIS. I just need some guidence as to where to go. I can load 1 flat file into the table but 3 is the issue and combining the data so it is loaded in sequential rows. I have had it load, but it has been in three pieces one after the other. I am just not sure where to go and I really need some help! Thank you for any assistance or advice!
View 5 Replies View RelatedSQL 2012 :: Incremental Load Of CDC Using Query
Jun 6, 2014I required query for Incremental Load of CDC using Query
View 1 Replies View RelatedCTE Query - Long Load Time
Dec 5, 2014I have a CTE query that is used to fill in nulls on a history table. The With statement executes just fine. sub 2 seconds on 974 records, however the main query is what's turning the whole query into a turtle. I know that it's the looping that it's doing there that is causing the slow down, but I'm just not sure how to fix it. I've tried inserting it into a temp table, refactored the code a hundred times, but nothing seems to be working.
Code is below and the execution plan is attached.
Server Version: 12.0.2342.0
Enterprise: 64bit
;WITH BuildTable
AS ( SELECT [GEGTH].[ID]
, [GEGTH].[Changed By]
, CAST( [dbo].[GetWeekStarting] ([GEGTH].[Changed Date] , 2 ) AS DATE) AS WeekOf
, [GEGT].[Title]
[code]....