I'm trying to add records to a table that includes datetime value using INSERT query.
No matter what date value I'm giving the query, the value saved is 1/1/1900 00:00 .
Also, I'm interested in saving only the short date, without time. I thought changing the type from datetime to smalldatetime would do the job, but it didn't help.
This function will return working hours between given 2 dates. This function assumes that the break is between 9:45 AM and 10 AM and that Lunch is between 12:30 PM and 1 PM. This function also assumes that the working hours are between 7:30 AM and 4 PM. There is a section for public holidays there. We have a table for that you might not so that piece needs to be fixed.
CREATE function [dbo].[fnc_myHinkley_ASSY_CalcWorkingMinutes] (@StartDate datetime, @EndDate datetime)
RETURNS decimal(14,2)
/*
Programmer: Goran Borojevic
Date: 5/14/2014
This function will return working hours between given 2 dates. This function assumes that the break is between 9:45 AM and 10 AM and that Lunch is between 12:30 PM and 1 PM. This function also assumes that the working hours are between 7:30 AM and 4 PM.
*/
AS
BEGIN
--check if one of the dates is null
if @StartDate is null or @EndDate is null
RETURN 0
[code]...
All
I am starting to play with a datetime field in sql server 2005
i wanted to write the date and time to my database in seperate fields but if if format my input to dd-MMM-yy i end up with 02-february- 2008 00:00
and if i try for the time i get 01/01/1900 12.00
i can put them both in the same field, thats not a problem for be but how do i then do an sql query to get backj say all records where the date is between the 01-jan-2008 and 02-feb-2008
Maybe if some one can point me at a tutorial it may assist me
thanks
gibbo
I need to find Monday's DATE (and Tuesday's, and Wednesday's, etc.) of Week number 44 of the year 2005 for my stored procedure. Does anyone know how I can do that?
Jon
Beginning to learn sprocs.
I am having trouble finding a way to work with dates. Below is a very simplified sproc I am trying to get to work. It will later be expanded, but first things first:
CREATE PROCEDURE spCellarOp4
@ReportDate datetime = getdate
AS
SELECT FERMID, fldfermtank, fldfilltime, fldfermprod,
"Sample Test" = CASE
WHEN CONVERT(int, DATEDIFF(dd, fldfilltime, @ReportDate)) = 1 THEN ' it is 1 '
END
FROM vwUnfilteredFermenters
The error message is:
Server: Msg 241, Level 16, State 1, Procedure spCellarOp4, Line 0
Syntax error converting datetime from character string.
Help, anybody? TIA. D. Lewis
I've got a table with some datetime fields in it.One field (call it field 1) is of the form mm/dd/yyyy and the other two(fields 2 and 3) are in the form of hh:mm:ss:xx where xx is hundrethsof a second.I'm getting the difference between field 2 and 3 using (datediff(ms,access_time, release_time )/1000/60.). This seems to work fine.However, in some other cases I'd like to add field 1 to field 2 andthen manipulate the result. This is where it gets weird.If I do it like this: Convert(varchar 20),record_date+access_time,100),it adds field 2 ok but subtracts two days. So for example 3/1/05 +10:30:00 AM = 2/27/05 10:30:00 AM. So it effectively subtracts twoadditional days for no apparent reason. If is userecord_date+2+access, then this returns the correct answer.If I try to use Convert(varchar(20),dateadd(ss,record_date,access_time),100) sql server complains Argument data type datetime isinvalid for argument 2 of the dateadd function.Basically I'd just like to know how to add and subtract fields 1(mm/dd/yyyy format) and 2 (hh:mm:ss:xx format).As a bonus question, is it possible to get an average time for severaldifferent times? For example the average time between 10:30 and 11:00would be 10:45.regards,-David
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm trying to write a function to return all notes with date. Sample data for 1 record=187189 as follows:
iincidentid,iWorkNoteId,iSeqnum, dtEntryDate, workNoteAll
1871893440 1 2006-04-24 note1
1871893545 1 2006-06-22 note2
1871893547 1 2006-06-22 note3
1871893653 1 2006-08-10 note4
1871893653 2 2006-08-10 note5
funtion will return = 2006_08-10 note4 note5 for iincidentid=187189
-----------------------------------------------------
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.getIncidentNotesRev(@iIncidentID int)
RETURNS varchar(8000)
AS
BEGIN
declare @incidentId int
declare @worknoteid int
declare @worknotesaveid int
declare @seqnum int
declare @dtEntryDate smalldatetime
declare @worknoteall varchar(8000)
declare@allnotes varchar(8000)
declare @currentWEDate smalldatetime
declare @beginWEDate smalldatetime
select @allnotes=''
select @currentWEDate=currentweekEndDate from csCurrentweekEndDate --get the current week end date
select @beginWEDate = DATEADD(d, - 28, @currentWEDate)--get the last 4 weeks
declare CursorIncident CURSOR
LOCAL FOR SELECT iIncidentId, iWorkNoteID, iSeqNum, dtEntryDate,worknoteall FROM dbo.rpt_weekly_prospect_status_vw
where iIncidentId=@iIncidentID order by iWorkNoteId
OPEN CursorIncident
FETCH NEXT FROM CursorIncident INTO @incidentId,@worknoteid,@seqnum,@dtEntryDate,@work noteall
--store 1st record of cursor
select @worknotesaveid =@worknoteid
WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS=0)
BEGIN
if @dtEntryDate >=@beginWEDate AND @dtEntryDate <= @currentWEDate
Begin
if @worknotesaveid <> @worknoteid
Begin
Select @allnotes = @allnotes + @dtEntryDate + @worknoteall
End
else
BEgin
select @allnotes = @allnotes + @worknoteall
End
select @worknotesaveid = @worknoteid --save next worknoteId
End
else
Begin
select @allnotes=''
End
FETCH NEXT FROM CursorIncident INTO @incidentId,@worknoteid,@seqnum,@dtEntryDate,@work noteall
END --WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS=0)
CLOSE CursorIncident
DEALLOCATE CursorIncident
return @allnotes
END
----------
Function not working right. I appreciate any help.
Thanks in advance.
I have the following simple SQL which counts the days difference between two date fields:
SELECT
DATEDIFF(dd,central_enquiry.enquiry_time, GETDATE()) as Days_Open
FROM
central_enquiry
---
How do I get it to exclude weekends?
I also have a table nonworkingdays which has a nonworking_date field where users can manually record national holidays and bank holidays etc.
Example date
nonworking_date
01/01/2014
18/04/2014
05/05/2014
How can I include this table in the calculation too?
Here is the query:WHERE DATEPART(month, " + tableName + ".timestamp)>='" + startTextBox.Text + "' AND DATEPART(month, " + tableName + ".timestamp)<='" + endTextBox.Text + "'This is in a program using C# which is why it's in quotes and all that good stuff. The query itself works properly when startTextBox.Text = 8 and endTextBox.Text = 9. Itreturns results for both months 8 and 9. But when I want a result from a single month, say just 9... I put 9 in both text boxes and it ends up returning no results.Logic would tell me that say that both logics should come back TRUE but for some reason it's failing. Any ideas/suggestions? Thanks in advance!
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello,
Can anyone out there tell me if there's a simple way to calculate the number of week days between two dates in TSQL? Need it to calc. average turnaround times, excluding weekends. Can do it v. easily in VB, but gets a little more tricky in TSQL as there's no way to return the number of Sundays and Saturdays between the two dates. Any help much appreciated !
Jon Reade
Sql Server DBA
NEC Technologies (UK) Ltd.
Hello,
Can anyone out there tell me if there's a simple way to calculate the number of week days between two dates in TSQL? Need it to calc. average turnaround times, excluding weekends. Can do it v. easily in VB, but gets a little more tricky in TSQL as there's no way to return the number of Sundays and Saturdays between the two dates. Any help much appreciated !
Jon Reade
Sql Server DBA
NEC Technologies (UK) Ltd.
I am update/inserting records threw a web form in vb.net. I need to insert 'NULL' into my microsoft sql server database. I am not talking about the below line of code where website is the name of my paramater. If i do that it will just place a blank into that field in the database. If i dont enter anything into that textbox I want it to to say NULL in that field. So if I go into the actual table in the SQL Server Management Studio and look at the website field of the recored I just added or updated and did not type anything into the web site textbox it needs to say NULL. I also tried the second line of code but that places a single quote in front and behind NULL. So the field will have the value 'NULL'.
website.value = txtwebsite.text.tostirng
if txtwebsite.text ="" then
website.value ="NULL"
end if
The reason why I need the NULL there is because I bind the website filed to a hyperlink template in a gridview. The actual text of the hyperlink is bound to PAYER which is a name of a insurance payer but the navigateto is bound to the website field. If i do not enter any data into the website field and it stays as NULL, then when my gridview is loaded, payers that dont have a website will not be underlined and user wont have the option to click on them since there is no value for the navigateto. But if i use my form to update/add a payer and leave the website textbox blank in puts a blank into that field in my database and when it loads that new row into the gridview the PAYER is underlined and u can click on it but it will just take u to the web site is unavailable page. So is there anyway to actaull have NULL placed into a filed and not just blank space
I am trying to create a trigger that on update of a single record will set the date on that single record to todays date, ie so i can see when a record was changed. However is there a better way?
Thanks
Brian
hi
I had a view in which I did something like this
isnull(fld,val) as 'alias'
when I assign a value to this in the client (vb 6.0) it works ok in sql2000 but fails in 2005.
When I change the query to fld as 'alias' then it works ok in sql 2005 .
why ?? I still have sql 2000 (8.0) compatability.
Also some queries which are pretty badly written run on sql 2000 but dont run at all in sql 2005 ???
any clues or answers ?? it is some configuration issue ?
Thanks in advance.
I wrote some views in sql2000 and all was well. I upgraded to sql 2005 and non of the order by clauses work when I run the views directly. If I open the view up in desing mode and run them, they work.
Any Ideas?
Thanks,
Rick
Hi
I have a VB project in VS 2005 Express that uses SQL 2005. I use Click Once to deploy the project. The s/w installs and installs the SQL 2005 prerequisit on XP and Vista machines without problem.
Problem: As soon as the apps tries to use SQL 2005 on a Vista machine it says sqlservr.exe has stopped working and has to close. XP machines work like a dream.
Any ideas please? Any help would be welcomed.
Dim sql As String = "CREATE DATABASE " + dataBaseName + " ON (NAME = " + dataBaseName + ", FILENAME = '" _
+ UKHRdataFolder + "" + dataBaseName + ".mdf')"
Dim myCommand As New SqlCommand
Dim myAdapter As New SqlDataAdapter
Dim myData As New System.Data.DataTable
Dim conn As New SqlConnection
conn.ConnectionString = _
"Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=;Integrated Security=True;Connect Timeout=30;User Instance=True"
myCommand.Connection = conn
Try
conn.Open()
Try
myCommand.Connection = conn
myCommand.CommandText = sql
myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()
Catch myerror As SqlException
End Try
Catch myerror As SqlException
Finally
If conn.State <> ConnectionState.Closed Then conn.Close()
End Try
conn.Close()
conn.Dispose()
Hi,
I've been trying to get my merge replication to work with a sql ce 2.0 on
sql server 2005, but it keeps generating shapshot scripts my pocket pc can't
execute.
Example of my table.sch file in my snapshot folder:
drop Table [dbo].[Application]
go
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Application](
[AppID] [nvarchar](20) NOT NULL,
[AddOnInfo] [nvarchar](50) NULL,
[MaxClients] [int] NULL,
[AppName] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[NbrDaysHistory] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Application_NbrDaysHistory]
DEFAULT (10),
[NbrDaysFuture] [int] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Application_NbrDaysFuture]
DEFAULT (10),
[rowguid] [uniqueidentifier] ROWGUIDCOL NOT NULL CONSTRAINT
[DF__Applicati__rowgu__4C364F0E] DEFAULT (newid())
)
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
go
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
go
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Application] ADD CONSTRAINT [Application_PK] PRIMARY KEY
CLUSTERED
(
[AppID]
)
GO
I've selected that I was setting up a merge replication that needs to be
compatible with sql ce. But it doesn't seem to do this...
I've tried to set the compatibility level to 80SP3 manually but it remains
80RTM...
I've tried everything.....
Does anyone have any ideas what could be causing this?
If I remove these lines from the sch file everything works jsut fine:
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
go
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
go
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Application] ADD CONSTRAINT [Application_PK] PRIMARY KEY
CLUSTERED
(
[AppID]
)
GO
Even if I make a publication for sql mobile 2005 it generates the same
script.... It's almost as if SQL 2005 is ignoring my settings...
Thanks,
Desperate Natasja
I have this simple full text search query that works perfectly on my own computer using sql server 2005 express, however, on the production server(shared hosting)when I added the first 50+ rows, the full text search works perfect, but as the number of rows increases, the full text search can only see the first50+ rows, but not the new ones. Is there any quick solution for this or it's just a common mistake for developers for not properly indexed columns?Is there a way to re-indexed all rows without loosing data on the live server? search query: SELECT TOP 50 *FROM li_BookmarksWHERE FREETEXT(Keywords,@Keywords)
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi all,I just asked some people to help me out and phone microsoft with thefollowing information, kindly they refused unless we setup a supportcontract with them first, for pre-sales information. (That really doesnot sound like good business sense to me - anyway here is our problem,if anyone could help thanks)."To tell and ask microsoft:We will be setting up a microsoft sql server 2000 instance running on awindows 2003 server.1) We need to check this can run alongside a microsoft 2003 sql server(either workgroup or standard edition), on the same machine. Are thereany .dll clashes if we do this? If there are can we run SQL Server2000, in a virtual machine running windows 2000 professional. (I have alicenced copy we can use for this).2) If we run one instance of 2000, and one of 2003 of the sql servers,can one use the processor licence model, and one use the CAL licencemodel."Thanks for any help, and any idea why they actually force you to usenews groups for pre-sales information?David
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi all,
I can't get SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition working on my notebook with Windows Vista Business Edition. I installed SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition and then i ran SP2 for SQL Server EE.
But now when i a am trying to connect to any server from SQL SERVER MANAGEMENT STUDIO i can't see any Server in Server Name list. When I click on Browse for more, I don't see any server. I am able to get Network servers.
While installing the SQL SERVER all the features were disabled as it is, then i went to advanced and selected all the options.
Any suggestions are apperiacted in advance.
Regards,
Syed Abbas Naqvi
Sr. Software Developer.
My small business has about 21GIGs of data in our database. This entire week we've been running absolutely slow. Posting transactions have been taking up to 30+ seconds when they're normally instant.
We ran the profiler and found that certain stored procedures were taking an absolutely long time to run. We checked for fragmentation, indexing, etc. Keep in mind our hardware was constantly pegged at 80%+ all the time. We have about 60 users connected to our server at any given time.
After much effort to no avail, we finally resorted to just restarting the software. Some have even suggested powering down and rebooting our hardware, but I halted that. We stopped and restarted the server via the management studio and now everything is just peachy. We're funning super fast and smooth.
My concern is that we're just bandaid-ing the problem and not resolving it; so eventually we're going to be faced with this problem again. Even though restarting the server is quite easy and not too effective on our downtime, personally, I'd like to know what the real issue is. Isn't sql server 2005 a self-tuning software to begin with?
Has anyone experienced this and share some insights on what they did and didn't do to resolve this quirk?
We tested this new feature ("Keep Alive" for orphant connections to automatically close) with no success - neither the standard properties nor slightly changed properties worked.
We tested like this:
SQL Server 2005 - ADO.NET Client
The client established an explicit lock on one row at one database. Afterwards we disconnected the client by pulling out the network-cable. We waited about 35 sec for the sessios to close - but nothing happend; we waited another minute but nothing changed. SQL Server Management Studio and the command line "netstat" told us that the connections are alive ... so what went wrong?
Did we miss something?
Our goal is, that such "orphant connections" get cleaned up and also their inked locks on the database.
BTW we installed the sp1 before all the tests started!
please help -
.agony
I'm not experienced with SQL Server 2005.I've got a live copy of my database running on the web server.I've got another copy running on my desktop that I make changes to.Whats the best way to sync between the two so:1. I don't have to take the application offline2. I don't loose any data from the live database3. But I can implement changes to tables and/or add new tables
View 1 Replies View Relatedhello friends,
i am facing a problem in SQL Server 2005 Express Edition. The database created in the SQL Server 2005 Express is when opened in SQL Server 2000, it changes the data type of all the columns of all the table to text type. can anybody help me?
I am developing an asp.net app using visual web developer. I am using a sql server 2005 db for the back end. I have learned that I have to restart my machine if I want to work with the db in SQL Server 2005 Express after working with it in Visual Web Developer.
I am wondering why this is. I am assuming that the db is locked when it is used with VWD. Is this correct? Am I refering to it's status of "locked" correctly? Should I call this something else?
-thanks to anyone that can help
I have a problem with DTS - ActiveXScripting that it cannot initialize the script engine, I have the backward compatibility stuff installed, even tried a repair but still does not work.
Many thanks for any help you can provide on this problem.
Paul
Error Information below:
Date 17/04/2007 13:07:32
Log Job History (Test ActiveX Script)
Step ID 1
Server GBCONV1A002V03
Job Name Test ActiveX Script
Step Name Step 1: Exec TestActiveX script
Duration 00:00:01
Sql Severity 0
Sql Message ID 0
Operator Emailed
Operator Net sent
Operator Paged
Retries Attempted 0
Message
Executed as user: WW004ConSrvSQLAgentA002. ...TSStep_DTSActiveScriptTask_1 DTSRun OnError: DTSStep_DTSActiveScriptTask_1, Error = -2147220487 (800403F9) Error string: ActiveX Scripting was not able to initialize the script execution engine. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package Help file: sqldts80.hlp Help context: 4500 Error Detail Records: Error: -2147220487 (800403F9); Provider Error: 0 (0) Error string: ActiveX Scripting was not able to initialize the script execution engine. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package Help file: sqldts80.hlp Help context: 4500 DTSRun OnFinish: DTSStep_DTSActiveScriptTask_1 Error: -2147220440 (80040428); Provider Error: 0 (0) Error string: Package failed because Step 'DTSStep_DTSActiveScriptTask_1' failed. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package Help file: ... Process Exit Code 1. The step failed.
Hi all,
i m using VS 2005 and I have to display records with feature of INSERT / DELETE ITEMS But when i connect to Sql Server Database and select * from columns but here when clicking the "Advance" button , i do not get "Advance Sql generation Option " highlighted. Instead , it is turned off. i.e
The Following options are not highlighting
------ Generate Insert, Update, Delete statements
------ use optimistic concurrency
Plz guide me anyone..... is anything wrong with our VS 2005 software installed?
Bilal
I installed SQL Server 2005 Enterprise, then SP1 and then SP2, Maintenance Plan worked. But if I installed SQL Server 2005 Enterprise and then SP2 directly (skipping SP1), the Check Database Integrity in Maintenance Plan was not working. The error message is as follows:
Executed as user: DomainSqlServiceAccount. Microsoft (R) SQL Server Execute Package Utility Version 9.00.3042.00 for 64-bit Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp 1984-2005. All rights reserved. Started: 10:56:21 AM Could not load package "Maintenance PlansTest Plan" because of error 0xC0014062. Description: The LoadFromSQLServer method has encountered OLE DB error code 0x80004005 (Login failed for user ''. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.). The SQL statement that was issued has failed. Source: Started: 10:56:21 AM Finished: 10:56:21 AM Elapsed: 0.047 seconds. The package could not be loaded. The step failed.
Other tasks like Rebuild Index seem to be fine. SP2 is supposed to be inclusive. Does anyone have any ideas on why this is happening.
Thanks
E.G.
I have an SQL code below which removes weekends and non working days when calculating days difference between two dates:
ce.enquiry_time represents when the enquiry was logged
(DATEDIFF(dd, ce.enquiry_time, getdate()) + 1)
-(DATEDIFF(wk, ce.enquiry_time, getdate()) * 2)
-(CASE WHEN DATENAME(dw, ce.enquiry_time) = 'Sunday' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
-(CASE WHEN DATENAME(dw, getdate()) = 'Saturday' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)
-(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM nonworking_day WHERE nonworking_day.nonworking_date >= ce.enquiry_time AND nonworking_day.nonworking_date < dateadd(dd,datediff(dd,0,getdate()),1))
It works but I don't understand how it works it out. I am having issues understanding each coloured piece of code and how it works together.
Hi, I am trying to edit some data from a SQL2000-datasource in ASP.NET 2.0 and have a problem with a column that has bit-data and is used for selection. SQL2005 works fine when declaring <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter DefaultValue="TRUE" Name="APL" Type="boolean" /> </SelectParameters>When running this code with SQL2000, there are no error-msgs, but after editing a record the "APL"-column looses its value of 1 and is set to 0. Looks like an issue with type-conversion, we've hit incompatibilities between SQL200 and 2005 with bit/boolean several times before. So, how is this done correctly with SQL2000? (I've tried setting the Type to "int16" -> err. Also setting Defval="1" gave an err) ThanksMichael
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been using Access 2003 as a front end to a SQL 2k database. Dates are sorted in a descending fashion. I recently upgraded the sql server database to 2005 and dates can no longer be sorted properly. I have set the database compatibility level to sql2000 within the sql2005 database engine but no luck. Any suggetions on how to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
SQL 2005 Dev
How can I do this with Parameters? I can get a single parameter to filter for a single date (or even a combo list of the dates in DB). But I want my parameters to interact so that they specify a range. Is this possible?
I did a backup using SQL Server 2005 Express on 1 machine, and when I tried to restore to SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition (included with VS 2005 Pro), it gives me the following error:
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
The backed-up database has on-disk structure version 611. The server supports version 539 and cannot restore or upgrade this database.RESTORE FILELIST is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 3169)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=08.00.2039&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=3169&LinkId=20476
------------------------------BUTTONS:
OK------------------------------
I looked at the link and it is talking about SQL Server 7 and 2000. I read a few posts about not being able to restore 2005 to 2000, but I have 2005 on both machines. I'm not sure the best way to check, but I know I installed the SQL Server 2005 Developer edition to the new machine recently. Any ideas?
Thanks!